Initial Experience Using Digital Variance Angiography in Context of Prostatic Artery Embolization in Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography.

Alizadeh, Leona S ✉; Gyánó, Marcell [Gyánó, Marcell (radiológia), szerző] Városmajori Szív- és Érgyógyászati Klinika (SE / AOK / K); Kinepict Health Korlátolt Felelősségű Társaság; Góg, István [Góg, István (Érsebészet), szerző] Érsebészeti és Endovaszkuláris Tanszék (SE / AOK / K); Kinepict Health Korlátolt Felelősségű Társaság; Szigeti, Krisztián [Szigeti, Krisztián (Biofizika), szerző] Biofizikai és Sugárbiológiai Intézet (SE / AOK / I); Kinepict Health Korlátolt Felelősségű Társaság; Osváth, Szabolcs [Osváth, Szabolcs (Biofizika), szerző] Biofizikai és Sugárbiológiai Intézet (SE / AOK / I); Kinepict Health Korlátolt Felelősségű Társaság; Kiss, János P [Kiss, János (Neurofarmakológia), szerző] Kinepict Health Korlátolt Felelősségű Társaság; Yel, Ibrahim; Koch, Vitali; Grünewald, Leon D; Vogl, Thomas J; Booz, Christian

Angol nyelvű Szakcikk (Folyóiratcikk) Tudományos
Megjelent: ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY 1076-6332 1878-4046 30 (4) pp. 689-697 2023
  • SJR Scopus - Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging: Q1
Azonosítók
Támogatások:
  • (NVKP-16-1-2016-0017 National Heart Program) Támogató: NKFIH
  • (2020-1.1.5-GYORSÍTÓSÁV-2021-00018)
  • (BIOImaging Excellence Programme at Semmelweis University)
Szakterületek:
  • Radiológia, sugárgyógyászat és orvosi képalkotás
In previous clinical studies digital variance angiography (DVA) provided higher contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and better image quality in lower extremity angiography than digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Our aim was to investigate whether DVA has similar quality reserve in prostatic artery embolization (PAE). The secondary aim was to explore the potential advantages of the color-coded DVA (ccDVA) technology in PAE.This retrospective study evaluated 108 angiographic acquisitions from 30 patients (mean ± SD age 68.0 ± 8.9, range 41-87) undergoing PAE between May and October 2020. DSA and DVA images were generated from the same unsubtracted acquisition, and their CNR was calculated. Visual evaluation of DVA and DSA image quality was performed by four experienced interventional radiologists in a randomized, blinded manner. The diagnostic value of DSA and ccDVA images was also evaluated using clinically relevant criteria (visibility of small [< 2.5 mm] and large arteries [> 2.5 mm], feeding arteries and tissue blush) in a paired comparison. Data were analysed by the Wilcoxon signed rank test or the binomial test, the interrater agreement was determined by the Kendall W or Fleiss Kappa analysis.DVA provided 4.11 times higher median CNR than DSA (IQR: 1.72). The visual score of DVA images (4.40 ± 0.05) was significantly higher than that of DSA (3.39 ± 0.07, p < 0.001). The Kendall W analysis showed moderate but significant agreement (WDVA = 0.38, WDSA = 0.53). The preference of ccDVA images was significantly higher in all criteria (63-89%) with an interrater agreement of 58-79%. The Fleiss Kappa range was 0.02-0.18, significant in all criteria except large vessels.Our data show that DVA provides higher CNR and better image quality in PAE. This quality reserve might be used for dose management (reduction of radiation dose and contrast agent volume), and ccDVA technology has also a high potential to assist PAE interventions in the future.
Hivatkozás stílusok: IEEEACMAPAChicagoHarvardCSLMásolásNyomtatás
2025-03-30 05:30