TY  - JOUR
AU  - Braun, Dorian
AU  - Chappuis, Vivianne
AU  - Fonseca, Manrique
AU  - Raabe, Clemens
AU  - Suter, Valerie G. A.
AU  - Couso-Queiruga, Emilio
TI  - Reproducibility and Reliability of Intraoral Scanners for Evaluating Peri-Implant Tissues and Implant-Supported Prostheses: A Cross-Sectional Study
JF  - JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY
J2  - J ESTHET RESTOR DENT
VL  - 37
PY  - 2025
IS  - 6
SP  - 1273
EP  - 1283
PG  - 11
SN  - 1496-4155
DO  - 10.1111/jerd.13408
UR  - https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/35965380
ID  - 35965380
N1  - Export Date: 31 March 2025
LA  - English
DB  - MTMT
ER  - 

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Gonzalez-Chavez, Jose Alfredo
AU  - Soto-Barreras, Uriel
AU  - Perez-Aguirre, Brenda
AU  - Nevarez-Rascon, Martina
AU  - Villegas-Mercado, Carlos Esteban
AU  - Dominguez-Perez, Ruben Abraham
TI  - Reliability of Dental Shade Selection Methods: Agreement Among Spectrophotometer, Intraoral Scanner, and Cross-Polarization Photography
JF  - JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY
J2  - J ESTHET RESTOR DENT
VL  - 37
PY  - 2025
IS  - 7
SP  - 1784
EP  - 1790
PG  - 7
SN  - 1496-4155
DO  - 10.1111/jerd.13458
UR  - https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/36014489
ID  - 36014489
LA  - English
DB  - MTMT
ER  - 

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Hein, Sascha
AU  - Nold, Julian
AU  - Masannek, Matthias
AU  - Westland, Stephen
AU  - Spies, Benedikt C.
AU  - Wrbas, Karl Thomas
TI  - Comparative evaluation of intraoral scanners and a spectrophotometer for percent correct shade identification in clinical dentistry
JF  - CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
J2  - CLIN ORAL INVEST
VL  - 29
PY  - 2025
IS  - 1
PG  - 8
SN  - 1432-6981
DO  - 10.1007/s00784-024-06124-0
UR  - https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/35666665
ID  - 35666665
N1  - Funding Agency and Grant Number: PD Dr. med
            Funding text: We thank the participants of this study for their efforts and patience. We would also like to thank PD Dr. med. dent. Sebastian B. M. Patzelt, M.Sc. for kindly providing the Carestream CS3700 intra oral scanner used in this study.
AB  - Objectives The study aimed to assess the percent correct shade identification of four intraoral scanners (IOS) and a spectrophotometer, focusing on how reliably each device selects the correct tooth shade compared to a visual observer's selection. The research question addresses how much clinicians can trust the device-selected shade without visual verification. Materials and methods Sixteen participants with natural, unrestored teeth were included. The teeth evaluated were tooth 21 (left maxillary central incisor), tooth 23 (left maxillary canine), and tooth 26 (first left maxillary molar). Tooth color was measured using four IOS devices and the Vita Easyshade V in three regions: incisal, middle, and cervical. The nearest 3D Master shade selected by each device was compared to the visual observer's selection. The percent exact match, acceptable match (> 1.2, <= 2.7 triangle E-ab), and mismatch type A (< 2.7, <= 5.4 triangle E-ab) were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using a chi-square test with a 95% confidence level. Results The overall clinical pass rate was highest for Carestream (78.2%), followed by Easyshade (63.5%), Primescan (51.2%), Trios (39.5%), and Medit (31.3%). Carestream also recorded the highest rate of mismatch type A (47.7%). Significant differences between devices were observed for all categories (p < 0.05). Conclusions Carestream demonstrated the highest overall clinical pass rate, while Medit exhibited the lowest. The study highlights the variability between devices in shade matching performance. Clinical relevance This study highlights the importance of considering device performance when relying on IOS or spectrophotometers for shade selection without visual assessment, as the reliability can vary significantly across devices.
LA  - English
DB  - MTMT
ER  -