TY  - CHAP
AU  - Okpala, Peterchris
ED  - Kayyali, Mustafa
TI  - The Future of Global University Rankings
T2  - Global University Ranking Systems
PB  - IGI Global Scientific Publishing
CY  - Hershey, Pennsylvania
SN  - 9798337310749
PY  - 2025
SP  - 251
EP  - 280
PG  - 30
DO  - 10.4018/979-8-3373-1072-5.ch010
UR  - https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/36391053
ID  - 36391053
AB  - Pursuing world-class university status reflects the increasingly global landscape in which higher education institutions (HEIs) operate. To be considered “world-class” implies being the best among the best worldwide and one way through which this status is currently accorded or determined is through the global university ranking (GUR), of which there are different models. Emerging in the early 2000s, various GURs have gained significant influence not only on HEI administrators, students, leaders, and faculty but also on governments and policymakers. As the GURs evolved, they have become associated with the increasing internationalization and marketization of higher education and a growing global market for HEIs. References to GURs have also become strongly present in university strategic plans, marketing materials, and national policy reforms. Volumes of studies have been conducted on the merits, strengths and weaknesses, as well as the impacts of GURs worldwide. This subject matter is comprehensively explored in this chapter.
LA  - English
DB  - MTMT
ER  - 

TY  - THES
AU  - Kappa, Viktor Ström
TI  - Engineering lmpact: Analyzing the Scientific and Technological Outcomes of Collaborative Research between Universities and Firms
PY  - 2024
UR  - https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34720703
ID  - 34720703
LA  - English
DB  - MTMT
ER  - 

TY  - THES
AU  - MARINA, LIMA FIGUEIRÊDO
TI  - DIAGNÓSTICO E CERTIFICAÇÃO DE SUSTENTABILIDADE DO CAMPUS I DA UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DA PARAÍBA POR MÉTRICAS GLOBAIS.
PY  - 2024
UR  - https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/35414793
ID  - 35414793
LA  - Portuguese
DB  - MTMT
ER  - 

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Subbarayalu, Arun Vijay
ED  - Kayyali, Mustafa
TI  - Understanding World University Ranking
T2  - Navigating Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Global Higher Education
PB  - IGI Global
CY  - Hershey, Pennsylvania
SN  - 9798369369173
T3  - Advances in higher education and professional development book series, ISSN 2327-6983
PY  - 2024
SP  - 581
EP  - 604
PG  - 24
DO  - 10.4018/979-8-3693-6915-9.ch025
UR  - https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/35747803
ID  - 35747803
AB  - World university rankings are critical for prospective students, faculty members, and policymakers evaluating HEIs based on various ranking indicators. The author adopted a mixed-methods study design where a narrative review was carried out to describe three ranking methodologies (i.e., THE, QS, and ARWU), including HEIs' challenges in the ranking process. The identified challenges include limited research funding, scarcity of top-tier faculty, balancing quantity & quality of research publications, publishing in high-impact journals, building international research networks, enhancing academic and employer reputations, maintaining optimal student-faculty ratios, and acquiring necessary data for rankings. In addition, an autoethnographic approach was adopted to identify strategies to improve universities' ranking performance, with a focus on enhancing research outputs, expanding international research networks, improving teaching and learning environments, strengthening reputation and addressing operational challenges centered around managing ranking data.
LA  - English
DB  - MTMT
ER  - 

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Teixeira, Tatiane
AU  - Picinin, Claudia Tania
TI  - University Rankings: Proposal for a Future Research Agenda through a Systematic Literature Review
JF  - SUSTAINABILITY
J2  - SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
VL  - 16
PY  - 2024
IS  - 7
SP  - 3043
SN  - 2071-1050
DO  - 10.3390/su16073043
UR  - https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34777564
ID  - 34777564
AB  - The purpose of this study is to develop a proposal for a future research agenda on university rankings, based on a systematic review of the existing literature, ith emphasis on the following criteria: objectives, countries, types, variables, methodologies, and future lines of research. The analysis of university rankings revealed a need to review evaluation methodologies and reflect on their consequences for educational policies and the strategic management of higher education institutions. The PRISMA method was used to map the literature available on the Scopus database. The findings were systematized to promote a broad understanding by the reader: (i) drawing up a table that condenses the results of this review; (ii) categorizing the objectives identified in the articles; (iii) surveying the number of studies by country; (iv) categorizing the methodologies employed; (v) developing a figure of the categories of variables associated with rankings; and (vi) compiling a table that brings together the recommendations for future research suggested by scholars in the field. As a result, this research not only goes into great detail on issues related to university rankings, but also establishes a path for future research, constituting a robust foundation for educational managers, policymakers, and academics interested in the subject.
LA  - English
DB  - MTMT
ER  -