@article{MTMT:35432925,
	title = {Academic freedom: Global variations in norm conceptualization, diffusion and contestation – an introduction},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/35432925},
	author = {Kovács, Kriszta and Spannagel, Janika},
	doi = {10.1017/S2045381724000133},
	journal-iso = {GLOB CONSTITUTIONALISM},
	journal = {GLOBAL CONSTITUTIONALISM: HUMAN RIGHTS DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW},
	volume = {2024},
	unique-id = {35432925},
	issn = {2045-3817},
	abstract = {This Introduction provides an overview of the topics covered in this special issue on ‘Academic freedom: Global variations in norm conceptualization, diffusion and contestation’, which explores what academic freedom means, how this may vary on a global level, how the norm spread around the world and what current contestations look like. The Introduction defines some terms essential to this debate, such as the freedom of science, academic freedom, freedom of scientific research and the right to science, and offers an analytical framework for the various contributions of the special issue. This includes, in particular, a distinction between illiberal and liberal science scripts and their relationship with academic freedom, as well as between different forms of contestations and limitations of academic freedom. Authors from varying disciplinary and regional backgrounds address different aspects of this theme in their respective contributions, of which the introduction gives a brief summary.},
	keywords = {LIMITATIONS; academic freedom; Freedom of science; contestations; science script},
	year = {2024},
	eissn = {2045-3825},
	pages = {1-13},
	orcid-numbers = {Kovács, Kriszta/0000-0002-6085-4126; Spannagel, Janika/0000-0001-7085-3840}
}

@article{MTMT:35432935,
	title = {Academic freedom in Europe: Limitations and judicial remedies},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/35432935},
	author = {Kovács, Kriszta},
	doi = {10.1017/S2045381724000091},
	journal-iso = {GLOB CONSTITUTIONALISM},
	journal = {GLOBAL CONSTITUTIONALISM: HUMAN RIGHTS DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW},
	volume = {2024},
	unique-id = {35432935},
	issn = {2045-3817},
	abstract = {Europe has recently struggled with democratic backsliding and autocratization. This autocratization has accompanied a decline in academic freedom in many backsliding countries, as reported by the Academic Freedom Index. Can the standards set by the European supranational courts effectively safeguard academic freedom? This article provides answers to this question. It argues that despite differences in their approaches, the theoretical conceptions of scholarship held by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) share an essential feature: both have moved towards embracing the ‘liberal science script’ by protecting academic freedom. The main difference between the two courts’ approaches is the subject of protection. The ECtHR focuses on the individual rights of academics: It protects free speech in the academic context by establishing a high standard for holding academics liable for publicly expressing their views inside and outside of academia. The ECJ has applied the concept of institutional autonomy, thereby setting a high standard for safeguarding the freedom of academic institutions. This standard can be applied with regard to the demands placed by policy-makers on academia regarding its role in democracy, including gender equality requirements for EU research funding.},
	keywords = {European Convention on Human Rights; academic freedom; free speech; EU charter of fundamental rights},
	year = {2024},
	eissn = {2045-3825},
	pages = {1-21},
	orcid-numbers = {Kovács, Kriszta/0000-0002-6085-4126}
}

@article{MTMT:34037108,
	title = {Eurowhiteness in Science: Privilege Escalation and Intentional Sludge},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34037108},
	author = {Ziegler, Dezső Tamás and Unger, Anna},
	doi = {10.1111/socf.12927},
	journal-iso = {SOCIOL FORUM},
	journal = {SOCIOLOGICAL FORUM},
	volume = {38},
	unique-id = {34037108},
	issn = {0884-8971},
	year = {2023},
	eissn = {1573-7861},
	pages = {830-851},
	orcid-numbers = {Ziegler, Dezső Tamás/0000-0002-5750-1573; Unger, Anna/0000-0003-3520-0566}
}

@book{MTMT:32737597,
	title = {Hungary in State of Exception: Authoritarian Neoliberalism from the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy to the COVID-19 Crisis},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/32737597},
	isbn = {9781793652270},
	author = {Antal, Attila},
	publisher = {Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; Rowman and Littlefield Publishing Group Inc},
	unique-id = {32737597},
	year = {2022},
	orcid-numbers = {Antal, Attila/0000-0001-6835-7493}
}

@article{MTMT:32774936,
	title = {A hibrid rezsim fogságában. Rendszertipológia, választások és a demokratizáció esélyei},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/32774936},
	author = {Unger, Anna},
	journal-iso = {FUNDAMENTUM},
	journal = {FUNDAMENTUM},
	volume = {26},
	unique-id = {32774936},
	issn = {1417-2844},
	year = {2022},
	pages = {23-35},
	orcid-numbers = {Unger, Anna/0000-0003-3520-0566}
}

@article{MTMT:31634864,
	title = {The Anti-Enlightenment Tradition as a Source of Cynicism in the European Union},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31634864},
	author = {Ziegler, Dezső Tamás},
	doi = {10.1007/s41111-020-00168-9},
	journal-iso = {CHIN POLITICAL SCI R},
	journal = {CHINESE POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW},
	volume = {7},
	unique-id = {31634864},
	issn = {2365-4252},
	year = {2022},
	eissn = {2365-4244},
	pages = {574-594},
	orcid-numbers = {Ziegler, Dezső Tamás/0000-0002-5750-1573}
}

@inbook{MTMT:31635233,
	title = {Using EU Citizenship to Protect Academic Freedom. An Alternative Method},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31635233},
	author = {Ziegler, Dezső Tamás},
	booktitle = {Research Handbook on European Union Citizenship Law and Policy},
	unique-id = {31635233},
	year = {2022},
	pages = {184-200},
	orcid-numbers = {Ziegler, Dezső Tamás/0000-0002-5750-1573}
}

@article{MTMT:32241213,
	title = {Academic freedom: A test and a tool for illiberalism, neoliberalism and liberal democracy},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/32241213},
	author = {Pap, András László},
	journal-iso = {BROWN J WORLD AFF},
	journal = {BROWN JOURNAL OF WORLD AFFAIRS},
	volume = {27},
	unique-id = {32241213},
	issn = {1080-0786},
	year = {2021},
	pages = {105-126},
	orcid-numbers = {Pap, András László/0000-0003-4546-6632}
}

@article{MTMT:31634860,
	title = {The Anti-Enlightenment Tradition as a Common Framework of Fascism and the Contemporary Far-Right},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31634860},
	author = {Ziegler, Dezső Tamás},
	journal-iso = {FASCISM},
	journal = {FASCISM: JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE FASCIST STUDIES},
	volume = {10},
	unique-id = {31634860},
	issn = {2211-6249},
	abstract = {The relationship between far-right political streams and fascism is a recurring topic in scientific literature. However, we find a low number of academic publications which try to create a framework for their similarities. This article uses Zeev Sternhell’s theory of fascism as a tool to measure different interpretations of fascism and the far right. According to its basic statement, there exists an anti-Enlightenment tradition in the Western world, which could serve as a substratum of these streams. This proves two points. Firstly, that there are several political groups which share a very similar political vision, even if their levels of aggression and radicalism are different. This is the reason why many neo-fascist, post-fascist, ‘populist’ and conservative parties have interchangeable rhetorical clichés and ideological patterns. Second, it shows that Western countries could successfully fight the rise of upcoming anti-democratic forces through strengthening the values of the Enlightenment-tradition.},
	year = {2021},
	eissn = {2211-6257},
	pages = {16-51},
	orcid-numbers = {Ziegler, Dezső Tamás/0000-0002-5750-1573}
}

@article{MTMT:32000457,
	title = {Anti-Enlightenment In International Business And Trade Law: A U.S.−E.U. Comparison},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/32000457},
	author = {Ziegler, Dezső Tamás},
	journal-iso = {J Int Business Law},
	journal = {Journal of International Business and Law},
	volume = {19},
	unique-id = {32000457},
	year = {2020},
	eissn = {2151-7649},
	pages = {162-207},
	orcid-numbers = {Ziegler, Dezső Tamás/0000-0002-5750-1573}
}

@article{MTMT:31634855,
	title = {EU disintegration as cultural insurrection of the anti-Enlightenment tradition},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31634855},
	author = {Ziegler, Dezső Tamás},
	doi = {10.1080/14782804.2020.1784109},
	journal-iso = {J CONTEMP EUR STUD},
	journal = {JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY EUROPEAN STUDIES},
	volume = {28},
	unique-id = {31634855},
	issn = {1478-2804},
	abstract = {This article highlights certain aspects of EU member state culture on the disintegration of the Union from a constructivist perspective. It ascertains that the present disintegration is a result of a long-time existing Europe-wide anti-Enlightenment tradition described by Zeev Sternhell. Its patterns were always part of EU law as well as domestic policy-making; only its strength and relevance were different. As a result, EU policies existed like materials in a dynamic equilibrium: Antagonistic processes like integration and disintegration were melding in EU cooperation, at the same time, in the same system. Without proper circumstances, however, the system can contain more and more patterns which reverse cooperation and cause tensions. On the other hand, the anti-Enlightenment tradition does not necessarily negate the cooperation, but has the potential to change domestic governance and, through this, the principles on which European nations build their cooperation.},
	year = {2020},
	eissn = {1478-2790},
	pages = {434-448},
	orcid-numbers = {Ziegler, Dezső Tamás/0000-0002-5750-1573}
}

@book{MTMT:30854967,
	title = {The Rise of Hungarian Populism. State Autocracy and the Orbán Regime},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/30854967},
	author = {Antal, Attila},
	publisher = {Emerald Publishing Ltd.},
	unique-id = {30854967},
	abstract = {Under the tenure of Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, the political system in Hungary has moved significantly in an autocratic direction, yet there is a lack of research explaining the historical context, political landscape and drive behind this shift.
		This book offers a deep historical and theoretical investigation into how this authoritarian, populist regime has evolved. Backlash from globalization in the 21st century, dissatisfaction with the European Union and international fiscal institutions have created a situation in which Orban’s regime is able to thrive. New kinds of autocracy cannot be properly understood without a thorough analysis of Eastern Europe’s development in the 20th century and the neoliberal agenda before and after the regime changes. There is a major oversight in the contemporary literature regarding the historical and theoretical origins of right-wing authoritarian populism in Hungary.  
		This book explores the main factors behind the Orbán regime including the country’s authoritarian populist past, the charismatic charm of populist leaders, and cooperation between neoliberal and state autocracy. By providing a thoroughly researched historical narrative and offering an alternative critique of right-wing populism, this text will prove invaluable for researchers seeking to understand Eastern European history and politics, as well as populism, authoritarianism and neoliberalism more broadly.
		
		https://books.emeraldinsight.com/page/detail/The-Rise-of-Hungarian-Populism/?K=9781838677541},
	year = {2019},
	orcid-numbers = {Antal, Attila/0000-0001-6835-7493}
}

@article{MTMT:30659753,
	title = {Attitude Changes towards Immigrants in the Turbulent Years of the 'Migrant Crisis' and Anti-Immigrant Campaign in Hungary},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/30659753},
	author = {Barna, Ildikó and Koltai, Júlia Anna},
	doi = {10.17356/ieejsp.v5i1.501},
	journal-iso = {INTERSECTIONS (HU)},
	journal = {INTERSECTIONS: EAST EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIETY AND POLITICS},
	volume = {5},
	unique-id = {30659753},
	year = {2019},
	eissn = {2416-089X},
	pages = {48-70},
	orcid-numbers = {Barna, Ildikó/0000-0002-7710-8402; Koltai, Júlia Anna/0000-0002-8676-7303}
}

@misc{MTMT:31137618,
	title = {It’s Not Just About CEU:Understanding the Systemic Limitationof Academic Freedom in Hungary},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31137618},
	author = {Ziegler, Dezső Tamás},
	unique-id = {31137618},
	year = {2019},
	orcid-numbers = {Ziegler, Dezső Tamás/0000-0002-5750-1573}
}

@article{MTMT:30617164,
	title = {A választás mint rendszerkarakterisztikus intézmény},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/30617164},
	author = {Unger, Anna},
	journal-iso = {FUNDAMENTUM},
	journal = {FUNDAMENTUM},
	volume = {22},
	unique-id = {30617164},
	issn = {1417-2844},
	year = {2018},
	pages = {5-16},
	orcid-numbers = {Unger, Anna/0000-0003-3520-0566}
}