@inbook{MTMT:1814454,
	title = {Nőttek-e az előítéletek Magyarországon?},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/1814454},
	author = {Enyedi, Zsolt and Fábián, Zoltán and Sik, Endre},
	booktitle = {Társadalmi Riport 2004},
	unique-id = {1814454},
	year = {2004},
	pages = {375-399},
	orcid-numbers = {Sik, Endre/0000-0003-4166-1852}
}

@article{MTMT:1492394,
	title = {Construction of the Roma Identity in Eastern and Central Europe. Perception and Self-identification},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/1492394},
	author = {Csepeli, György and Simon, Dávid},
	doi = {10.1080/1369183032000170204},
	journal-iso = {J ETHN MIGR STUD},
	journal = {JOURNAL OF ETHNIC AND MIGRATION STUDIES},
	volume = {30},
	unique-id = {1492394},
	issn = {1369-183X},
	abstract = {Roma people are the most numerous and most disadvantaged of all ethnic minority groups living in contemporary Central and Eastern Europe. The use of the category of Roma varies a great deal in Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria. While the stereotypes, attitudes and prejudices concerning the Roma minority suggest the presence of a highly homogenised and unified group, the actual population meant by the category of Roma varies according to the nature of the encounter. Moreover, not only do members of the non‐Roma majority fail to agree who is Roma and who is not Roma, but there is no match between the results of the outgroup and ingroup categorisation. This mismatch is especially striking in Hungary. Explanatory models presented in this paper show differences in the structure of sociological determinants of categorisation between the three countries studied. As far as the nature of outgroup categorisation is concerned, the study showed that, compared to the general level of prejudice of the population, the anti‐Gypsy prejudice is significantly less intense among the non‐Roma interviewers in the survey, whose task was to categorise the respondents, but interviewers cannot be considered to have no anti‐Gypsy bias altogether.},
	keywords = {DISCRIMINATION; Poverty; Prejudice; STEREOTYPES; Roma; Categorisation},
	year = {2004},
	eissn = {1469-9451},
	pages = {129-150},
	orcid-numbers = {Csepeli, György/0000-0002-9331-058X; Simon, Dávid/0000-0001-9531-9716}
}

@article{MTMT:2242595,
	title = {Authoritarianism vs cultural pressure. Anti-Gypsy Prejudice in Hungary},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/2242595},
	author = {Bojan, Todosijevic and Enyedi, Zsolt},
	doi = {10.2753/RPO1061-0405400531},
	journal-iso = {J RUSS EAST EUR PSYCH},
	journal = {JOURNAL OF RUSSIAN AND EAST EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGY},
	volume = {40},
	unique-id = {2242595},
	issn = {1061-0405},
	abstract = {This article addresses the issue of personality vs. cultural norms with regard to two related problems: the relationship between authoritarianism and prejudice, and the empirical foundation of the concept of ethnocentrism. The analysis is based on a survey of anti-Gypsy attitudes in two Hungarian cities, Salgótarján and Sopron. A random sample of 400 adolescents was surveyed, including one parent of each adolescent (total N = 800). The two locations differ in aggregate level of anti-Gypsy prejudice, that is, the anti-Gypsy cultural norm, which allows the use of a quasi-experimental design. The results support the empirical foundation of the concept of ethnocentrism, although it was possible to detect the effect of cultural pressure on the connection between anti-Gypsy prejudice and general ethnocentrism. Concerning the effect of cultural pressure on the relationship between authoritarianism and anti-Gypsy prejudice, the results support the cultural pressure model in the youth samples, but contradict this model in the parent samples. Multivariate causal modeling of the youth anti-Gypsy prejudice shows that in both cities authoritarianism and parents'prejudice are significant direct predictors. However, the role of authoritarianism is considerably weaker under condition of higher normative pressure.},
	year = {2002},
	eissn = {1558-0415},
	pages = {31-54}
}