@article{MTMT:34789251, title = {The PICOTS-ComTeC Framework for Defining Digital Health Interventions: An ISPOR Special Interest Group Report}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34789251}, author = {Zrubka, Zsombor and Champion, Annette and Holtorf, Anke-Peggy and Di Bidino, Rossella and Earla, Jagadeswara Rao and Boltyenkov, Artem T. and Tabata-Kelly, Masami and Asche, Carl and Burrell, Anita}, doi = {10.1016/j.jval.2024.01.009}, journal-iso = {VALUE HEALTH}, journal = {VALUE IN HEALTH}, volume = {27}, unique-id = {34789251}, issn = {1098-3015}, year = {2024}, eissn = {1524-4733}, pages = {383-396}, orcid-numbers = {Zrubka, Zsombor/0000-0002-1992-6087} } @article{MTMT:34789105, title = {The effect of virtual reality in dentistry: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34789105}, author = {Motahari Nezhad, Hossein and Aslan, Sadeghdaghighi and Amir-Hossein, Ashourioun}, doi = {10.21203/rs.3.pex-2592/v1}, journal-iso = {PROTOCOL EXCHANGE}, journal = {PROTOCOL EXCHANGE}, unique-id = {34789105}, issn = {2043-0116}, year = {2024}, pages = {1-8} } @article{MTMT:34789042, title = {The effect of telehealth on pain management: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34789042}, author = {Motahari Nezhad, Hossein and Aslan, Sadeghdaghighi and Hosna, Salmani}, doi = {10.21203/rs.3.pex-2593/v1}, journal-iso = {PROTOCOL EXCHANGE}, journal = {PROTOCOL EXCHANGE}, unique-id = {34789042}, issn = {2043-0116}, year = {2024}, pages = {1-8} } @article{MTMT:34786459, title = {Outcomes of smart glasses: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34786459}, author = {Motahari Nezhad, Hossein and Aslan, Sadeghdaghighi and Hosna, Salmani}, journal-iso = {PROTOCOL EXCHANGE}, journal = {PROTOCOL EXCHANGE}, unique-id = {34786459}, issn = {2043-0116}, year = {2024} } @article{MTMT:34767385, title = {Robot-assisted surgery and artificial intelligence-based tumour diagnostics: social preferences with a representative cross-sectional survey}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34767385}, author = {Hölgyesi, Áron and Zrubka, Zsombor and Gulácsi, László and Baji, Petra and Haidegger, Tamás and Kozlovszky, Miklós and Weszl, Miklós and Kovács, Levente and Péntek, Márta}, doi = {10.1186/s12911-024-02470-x}, journal-iso = {BMC MED INFORM DECIS}, journal = {BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING}, volume = {24}, unique-id = {34767385}, issn = {1472-6947}, year = {2024}, eissn = {1472-6947}, orcid-numbers = {Hölgyesi, Áron/0000-0001-8131-2839; Zrubka, Zsombor/0000-0002-1992-6087; Haidegger, Tamás/0000-0003-1402-1139; Weszl, Miklós/0000-0001-8000-4367; Kovács, Levente/0000-0002-3188-0800} } @article{MTMT:34765050, title = {Readability and credibility evaluation of most-visited health websites based on eBizMBA and Alexa global ranking}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34765050}, author = {Rahmatizadeh, Shahabedin and Valizadeh-Haghi, Saeideh and Nasibi-Sis, Hamed and Motahari Nezhad, Hossein}, doi = {10.30699/fhi.v13i0.567}, journal-iso = {Front Health Inform}, journal = {Frontiers in Health Informatics}, volume = {13}, unique-id = {34765050}, abstract = {Introduction: Online health information is one of the most important and widely used sources of information. Currently, a significant number of individuals use the internet for health-related information to learn about health, disease, health promotion, and threats to their health.Material and Methods: This research examined the top 15 health websites based on their popularity in eBizMBA and Alexa rank from January to February 2022. A total of 30 health websites (15 from each category) were evaluated in terms of credibility by the use of Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) and health on the net foundation (HON) code. Also, the readability of the mentioned websites was evaluated by the use of four readability tools.Results: Most of the websites ranked by both Alexa and eBizMBA met the “Authority” and” Complementarity" criteria. When it comes to the readability of the 30 most visited health websites according to eBizMBA and Alexa analytics in the world, the analysis demonstrated that the readability of highly-ranked health websites was higher than the recommended level.Conclusion: Some of the websites had deficiencies according to the HONcode and JAMA criteria, and the average readability of the websites did not meet the gold standard. Despite the increasing use of the internet for medical information, these resources' poor quality and readability remain a barrier to informed decision-making of patients.}, year = {2024}, eissn = {2676-7104}, pages = {191-199}, orcid-numbers = {Rahmatizadeh, Shahabedin/0000-0003-2429-1642; Valizadeh-Haghi, Saeideh/0000-0002-4326-5215; Nasibi-Sis, Hamed/0000-0003-3340-2738} } @article{MTMT:34749444, title = {The Impact of Parental Electronic Health Literacy on Disease Management and Outcomes in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Cross-Sectional Clinical Study}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34749444}, author = {Hölgyesi, Áron and Luczay, Andrea and Tóth-Heyn, Péter and Muzslay, Eszter and Világos, Eszter and Szabó, Attila and Baji, Petra and Kovács, Levente and Gulácsi, László and Zrubka, Zsombor and Péntek, Márta}, doi = {10.2196/54807}, journal-iso = {JMIR Pediatr Parent}, journal = {JMIR PEDIATRICS AND PARENTING}, volume = {7}, unique-id = {34749444}, year = {2024}, eissn = {2561-6722}, orcid-numbers = {Hölgyesi, Áron/0000-0001-8131-2839; Luczay, Andrea/0000-0002-3877-1471; Tóth-Heyn, Péter/0000-0002-7521-5044; Muzslay, Eszter/0009-0006-5309-3820; Szabó, Attila/0000-0001-7321-9861; Baji, Petra/0000-0003-2899-8557; Kovács, Levente/0000-0002-3188-0800; Zrubka, Zsombor/0000-0002-1992-6087} } @article{MTMT:34745750, title = {Psychometric properties of General Oral Health Assessment Index across ages. COSMIN Systematic Review.}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34745750}, author = {Oszlánszky, Judit and Gulácsi, László and Péntek, Márta and Hermann, Péter and Zrubka, Zsombor}, doi = {10.1016/j.jval.2024.02.022}, journal-iso = {VALUE HEALTH}, journal = {VALUE IN HEALTH}, unique-id = {34745750}, issn = {1098-3015}, abstract = {To systematically review the psychometric properties of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) across age groups using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) methodology.Data: English peer-reviewed articles reporting studies of the development, translation, or validation of GOHAI.PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE from Jan 1990 until 31. December 2023. Methodological evaluation: based on COSMIN-methodology. The results are presented overall and for four age-groups (≥60 years, all ages, <60 years, ≤45 years). Structural validity was summarized qualitatively. Internal consistency and reliability were synthesized via random-effects meta-analysis of T-transformed Cronbach α values, and Fisher's Z transformed correlation coefficients. Construct validity and responsiveness were assessed using effect sizes.497 records were identified, 72 underwent full-text assessment, resulting in 60 included reports. Structural validity was inconsistent across all age groups and overall. Internal consistency was sufficient with overall α=0.81, and high evidence quality. Test-retest reliability was consistently sufficient across age groups with overall r=0.84. For construct validity 361 hypotheses were assessed (37.4% for convergent-, 62.6% for known-groups validity). The percentage of confirmed hypotheses in ≥ 60-years, all ages, <60-years and ≤ 45-years were 75.5%, 66.7%, 78.9%, and 88.9%, respectively. Responsiveness was not assessed in the <60-years and ≤45-years age groups, leading to indeterminate overall rating with very low evidence quality.This review affirms that GOHAI has sufficient psychometric properties as an OHRQoL instrument in various age groups, but its responsiveness is scarcely researched and its utility for individual-level follow-up is limited. The measurement properties of OHRQoL tools must be scrutinized in the changing demands of personalized and value-based dental care. (PROSPERO registration:CRD42022384132).}, keywords = {Quality of Life; systematic review; Oral Health; Psychometric; COSMIN}, year = {2024}, eissn = {1524-4733}, orcid-numbers = {Hermann, Péter/0000-0002-9148-0139; Zrubka, Zsombor/0000-0002-1992-6087} } @article{MTMT:34564532, title = {Ranking resilience: assessing the impact of scientific performance and the expansion of the Times Higher Education Word University Rankings on the position of Czech, Hungarian, Polish, and Slovak universities}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34564532}, author = {Tóth, Barbara and Motahari Nezhad, Hossein and Horseman, Nicki and Berek, László and Kovács, Levente and Hölgyesi, Áron and Péntek, Márta and Mirjalili, Seyedali and Gulácsi, László and Zrubka, Zsombor}, doi = {10.1007/s11192-023-04920-1}, journal-iso = {SCIENTOMETRICS}, journal = {SCIENTOMETRICS}, volume = {129}, unique-id = {34564532}, issn = {0138-9130}, abstract = {University rankings are gaining importance worldwide. While the top-ranked universities are the subject of numerous academic publications, very little literature is available on universities in the lower two-thirds of the ranking list. In this study, we analysed the sensitivity of year to year changes in position in the Times Higher Education World University Rankings (THE) of universities from the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia using hypothetical scenarios of potential changes in their research outputs. A regression model was developed that quantifies the effect of the inclusion of institutions that are new to ranking as well as dropouts on the ranking list. We also developed a method to allow customized sensitivity analysis of the subsequent year's rank from an institution's projected research output, given its current rank and research output, assuming that other ranking indicators remain unchanged over 1–2 years. It should be noted that most universities in the region have ranked below 800, and while research output has been increasing, it was observed that ranks worsened for most universities from these four countries. The Field-Weighted Citation Impact and the total volume of publications had the highest effect on rankings, while the proportion of Scimago Q1 publications did not have a consistent effect on the projected next year's ranks. In most universities, the growth in research performance indicators were below the level that would be required to offset the rank changes due to the inclusion of new entrants in ranking. The findings of this research suggest that universities have to consider complex strategies to improve their ranking focusing on other activities than research such as reputation, internationalization, or industry income. With due caution, our results might be generalized to most of the universities below 800 in the THE. The rank prediction tool presented in this article is available online at https://hecon.uni-obuda.hu/en/rank-calculator/ .}, year = {2024}, eissn = {1588-2861}, pages = {1739-1770}, orcid-numbers = {Horseman, Nicki/0009-0003-8091-9366; Berek, László/0000-0002-4126-1528; Kovács, Levente/0000-0002-3188-0800; Hölgyesi, Áron/0000-0001-8131-2839; Zrubka, Zsombor/0000-0002-1992-6087} } @{MTMT:34531915, title = {Economic and Societal Benefits of Advanced Digital Technologies in Medicine}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34531915}, author = {Zrubka, Zsombor}, booktitle = {IEEE 22nd World Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics : SAMI 2024 : Proceedings}, unique-id = {34531915}, year = {2024}, pages = {13-14}, orcid-numbers = {Zrubka, Zsombor/0000-0002-1992-6087} }