@{MTMT:31205698, title = {New EU-Level Scenarios on the Future of Ecosystem Services}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31205698}, author = {Priess, Joerg A. and Hauck, Jennifer and Haines-Young, Roy and Alkemade, Rob and Mandryk, Maryia and Veerkamp, Clara J. and Bela, Györgyi and Berry, Pam and Dunford, Rob and Harrison, Paula and Keune, Hans and Kok, Marcel and Kopperoinen, Leena and Lazarova, Tanya and Maes, Joachim and Pataki, György and Preda, Elena and Schleyer, Christian and Vadineanu, Angheluta and Zulian, Grazia}, booktitle = {Atlas of Ecosystem Services}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-96229-0_22}, unique-id = {31205698}, year = {2019}, pages = {135-140} } @article{MTMT:31102624, title = {Combining policy analyses, exploratory scenarios, and integrated modelling to assess land use policy options}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31102624}, author = {Hauck, Jennifer and Schleyer, Christian and Priess, Joerg A. and Veerkamp, Clara J. and Dunford, Rob and Alkemade, Rob and Berry, Pam and Primmer, Eeva and Kok, Marcel and Young, Juliette and Haines-Young, Roy and Dick, Jan and Harrison, Paula A. and Bela, Györgyi and Vadineanu, Angheluta and Goerg, Christoph}, doi = {10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.009}, journal-iso = {ENVIRON SCI POLICY}, journal = {ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY}, volume = {94}, unique-id = {31102624}, issn = {1462-9011}, abstract = {Scenario-based approaches provide decision makers with accessible storylines of potential future changes. The parameterisation of such storylines as input variables for integrated assessment models allows using models as a test bed for assessing the effects of alternative land use policy options in different scenarios. However, the potential of this kind of policy-screening analysis can be further improved by assessing the institutional compatibility of the policy options under review. The aim of this paper is to explore the added value of combining institutions-oriented policy analyses with scenario-modelling approaches for improved assessments of EU land use policy options. We describe an expert-based, stepwise process to combine four scenario storylines and two integrated assessment model approaches (CLIMSAVE & IMAGE-GLOBIO) with a procedure for institutional compatibility assessment.Among the subsidies we assessed were those for technology-driven intensification of agricultural production, which would contribute to decreasing demand for cropland across a range of scenarios. In regionalised policy designs, they also contribute to ecological effectiveness, and higher costs of governing. Subsidies to promote biomass production can have negative effects on ecosystems including land conversion, conversion of grassland into cropland as well as conversion of natural forests into managed forests. These effects can to some extent be mitigated by careful policy design which considers the institutional context and features cross-sectoral coordination. An integrated Ecosystem Services Framework policy could accommodate regionalised policy designs and cross-sectoral coordination, however, it can operate only under specific circumstances and needs particular efforts. Rural development approaches are another alternative which feature expansion of cropland by means of a large-scale, bottom-up transformation based on voluntary changes in behaviour, flexibility, participation, and local and regional collaboration. Apart from a vast number of interdisciplinary lessons learned, we also gained insights from the science-policy interface. A weak EU appeared as a plausible scenario from a scientific perspective, given the current political environment. However, it appreaded to be unacceptable at EU level policy making. We decided to maintain scientific independence and looked at policy options also in the context of a weak EU yielding environmentally beneficial opportunities for regional decision making at the expense of relevance of our scenarios to EU level policy makers.}, keywords = {policy analysis; Scenario analysis; Integrated assessment model; IMAGE-GLOBIO; CLIMSAVE IAP}, year = {2019}, eissn = {1873-6416}, pages = {202-210}, orcid-numbers = {Hauck, Jennifer/0000-0002-1614-9657; Schleyer, Christian/0000-0002-9604-1653; Young, Juliette/0000-0002-8522-0883} } @article{MTMT:30918204, title = {A biológiai sokféleség és az ökoszisztémaszolgáltatások helyzete Európában és Közép-Ázsiában: az IPBES regionális értékelő tanulmánya}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/30918204}, author = {Lengyel, Szabolcs and Bela, Györgyi and Zlinszky, András and Molnár, Zsolt and Báldi, András}, doi = {10.20332/tvk-jnatconserv.2019.25.112}, journal-iso = {TERMÉSZETVÉD KÖZLEM}, journal = {TERMÉSZETVÉDELMI KÖZLEMÉNYEK}, volume = {25}, unique-id = {30918204}, issn = {1216-4585}, year = {2019}, eissn = {2786-3506}, pages = {112-130}, orcid-numbers = {Lengyel, Szabolcs/0000-0002-7049-0100; Zlinszky, András/0000-0002-9717-0043; Báldi, András/0000-0001-6063-3721} } @article{MTMT:3283347, title = {Stakeholders’ perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept: Results from 27 case studies}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/3283347}, author = {Dick, Jan and Turkelboom, Francis and Woods, Helen and Iniesta-Arandia, Irene and Primmer, Eeva and Saarela, Sanna-Riikka and Bezák, Peter and Mederly, Peter and Leone, Michael and Verheyden, Wim and Kelemen, Eszter and Hauck, Jennifer and Andrews, Chris and Antunes, Paula and Aszalós, Réka and Baró, Francesc and Barton, David N and Berry, Pam and Bugter, Rob and Carvalho, Laurence and Czúcz, Bálint and Dunford, Rob and Garcia, Blanco Gemma and Geamănă, Nicoleta and Giucă, Relu and Grizzetti, Bruna and Izakovičová, Zita and Kertész, Miklós and Kopperoinen, Leena and Langemeyer, Johannes and Montenegro, Lapola David and Liquete, Camino and Luque, Sandra and Martínez, Pastur Guillermo and Martin-Lopez, Berta and Mukhopadhyay, Raktima and Niemela, Jari and Odee, David and Peri, Pablo Luis and Pinho, Patricia and Patrício-Roberto, Gleiciani Bürger and Preda, Elena and Priess, Joerg and Röckmann, Christine and Santos, Rui and Silaghi, Diana and Smith, Ron and Vădineanu, Angheluţă and van der Wal, Jan Tjalling and Arany, Ildikó and Badea, Ovidiu and Bela, Györgyi and Boros, Emil and Bucur, Magdalena and Blumentrath, Stefan and Calvache, Marta and Carmen, Esther and Clemente, Pedro and Fernandes, João and Ferraz, Diogo and Fongar, Claudia and García-Llorente, Marina and Gómez-Baggethun, Erik and Gundersen, Vegard and Haavardsholm, Oscar and Kalóczkai, Ágnes and Khalalwe, Thalma and Kiss, Gabriella and Köhler, Berit and Lazányi, Orsolya and Lelleiné Kovács, Eszter and Lichungu, Rael and Lindhjem, Henrik and Magare, Charles and Mustajoki, Jyri and Ndege, Charles and Nowell, Megan and Nuss, Girona Sergi and Ochieng, John and Often, Anders and Palomo, Ignacio and Pataki, György and Reinvang, Rasmus and Rusch, Graciela and Saarikoski, Heli and Smith, Alison and Soy, Massoni Emma and Stange, Erik and Vågnes, Traaholt Nora and Vári, Ágnes and Verweij, Peter and Vikström, Suvi and Yli-Pelkonen, Vesa and Zulian, Grazia}, doi = {10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.015}, journal-iso = {ECOSYST SERV}, journal = {ECOSYSTEM SERVICES}, volume = {29}, unique-id = {3283347}, issn = {2212-0416}, keywords = {evaluation; Ecosystem services operationalisation; Place-based implementation; Stakeholder perceptions}, year = {2018}, eissn = {2212-0416}, pages = {552-565}, orcid-numbers = {Kiss, Gabriella/0000-0002-5817-9037; Vári, Ágnes/0000-0001-5285-847X} } @article{MTMT:3268997, title = {New EU-scale environmental scenarios until 2050 – Scenario process and initial scenario applications}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/3268997}, author = {Priess, JA and Hauck, J and Haines-Young, R and Alkemade, R and Mandryk, M and Veerkamp, C and Bela, Györgyi and Dunford, R and Berry, P and Harrison, P and Dick, J and Keune, H and Kok, M and Kopperoinen, L and Lazarova, T and Maes, J and Pataki, György and Preda, E and Schleyer, C and Görg, C and Vadineanu, A and Zulian, G}, doi = {10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.006}, journal-iso = {ECOSYST SERV}, journal = {ECOSYSTEM SERVICES}, volume = {29}, unique-id = {3268997}, issn = {2212-0416}, year = {2018}, eissn = {2212-0416}, pages = {542-551} } @article{MTMT:3150107, title = {Different arguments, same conclusions: how is action against invasive alien species justified in the context of European policy?}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/3150107}, author = {Heink, U and van Herzele, A and Bela, Györgyi and Kalóczkai, Ágnes and Jax, K}, doi = {10.1007/s10531-016-1170-2}, journal-iso = {BIODIVERS CONSERV}, journal = {BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION}, volume = {27}, unique-id = {3150107}, issn = {0960-3115}, abstract = {The prevention and management of invasive alien species (IAS) has become a high priority in European environmental policy. At the same time, ways of evaluating IAS continue to be a topic of lively debate. In particular, it is far from clear how directly policy makers’ value judgements are linked to the European (EU) policy against IAS. We examine the arguments used to support value judgements of both alien species and invasive alien species as well as the relation between these value judgements and the policy against IAS being developed at European level. Our study is based on 17 semi-structured interviews with experts from EU policy making and from the EU member states Austria, Belgium, Germany and Hungary. We found that our interviewees conceived of IAS in very different ways, expressed a variety of visions of biodiversity and ecosystem services, and adhered to widely different values expressed in their perceptions of IAS and the impacts of IAS. However, only some of these conceptualizations and value judgements are actually addressed in the rationale given in the preamble to the European IAS Regulation. Although value judgements about IAS differed, there was considerable agreement regarding the kind of action to be taken against them. © 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht}, keywords = {ecosystem services; Environmental policy; Perception of nature; EU regulation; Biodiversity evaluation; Analysis of arguments}, year = {2018}, eissn = {1572-9710}, pages = {1659-1677} } @CONFERENCE{MTMT:3321286, title = {Successes and failures of participatory planning - Evaluation of participatory planning processes in nature conservation}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/3321286}, author = {Kiss, Gabriella and Tormáné Kovács, Eszter and Kelemen, Eszter and Fabók, Veronika and Kalóczkai, Ágnes and Mihók, Barbara and Pataki, György and Balázs, Bálint and Bela, Györgyi and Megyesi, Gergely Boldizsár and Margóczi, Katalin and Roboz, Ágnes}, booktitle = {(Un)Making Europe: Capitalism, Solidarities, Subjectivities}, unique-id = {3321286}, year = {2017}, pages = {360-361}, orcid-numbers = {Kiss, Gabriella/0000-0002-5817-9037; Tormáné Kovács, Eszter/0000-0001-8509-6432; Megyesi, Gergely Boldizsár/0000-0001-7511-8298} } @article{MTMT:3315762, title = {Caught Between Personal and Collective Values. Biodiversity conservation in European decision-making}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/3315762}, author = {Primmer, E and Termansen, M and Bredin, Y and Blicharska, M and García-Llorente, M and Berry, P and Jääskeläinen, T and Bela, Györgyi and Fabók, Veronika and Geamana, N and Harrison, P A and Haslett, J R and Lavinia, Cosor G and Andersen, A H K}, doi = {10.1002/eet.1763}, journal-iso = {ENVIRON POLICY GOV}, journal = {ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE}, volume = {27}, unique-id = {3315762}, issn = {1756-932X}, year = {2017}, eissn = {1756-9338}, pages = {588-604} } @article{MTMT:3290793, title = {Féltermészetes agrártájak ökoszisztéma-szolgáltatásai a gazdálkodók szemszögéből}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/3290793}, author = {Balázs, Bálint and Kelemen, Eszter and Pataki, György and Bela, Györgyi}, doi = {10.20332/tvk-jnatconserv.2017.23.144}, journal-iso = {TERMÉSZETVÉD KÖZLEM}, journal = {TERMÉSZETVÉDELMI KÖZLEMÉNYEK}, volume = {23}, unique-id = {3290793}, issn = {1216-4585}, year = {2017}, eissn = {2786-3506}, pages = {144-167}, orcid-numbers = {Balázs, Bálint/0000-0001-6937-499X} } @article{MTMT:3268326, title = {Evaluation of participatory planning: Lessons from Hungarian Natura 2000 management planning processes}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/3268326}, author = {Tormáné Kovács, Eszter and Kelemen, Eszter and Kiss, Gabriella and Kalóczkai, Ágnes and Fabók, Veronika and Mihók, Barbara and Megyesi, Gergely Boldizsár and Pataki, György and Bodorkós, Barbara and Balázs, Bálint and Bela, Györgyi and Margóczi, Katalin and Roboz, Ágnes and Molnár, Dániel}, doi = {10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.028}, journal-iso = {J ENVIRON MANAGE}, journal = {JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT}, volume = {204}, unique-id = {3268326}, issn = {0301-4797}, year = {2017}, eissn = {1095-8630}, pages = {540-550}, orcid-numbers = {Tormáné Kovács, Eszter/0000-0001-8509-6432; Kiss, Gabriella/0000-0002-5817-9037; Megyesi, Gergely Boldizsár/0000-0001-7511-8298; Balázs, Bálint/0000-0001-6937-499X} }