TY - JOUR AU - Filepné Kovács, Krisztina AU - Gonzalez de linares, Paloma AU - Iváncsics, Vera AU - Máté, Klaudia AU - Jombach, Sándor AU - Valánszki, István TI - Challenges and Answers of Urban Development Focusing GreenInfrastructure in European Metropolises JF - PROCEEDINGS OF THE FÁBOS CONFERENCE ON LANDSCAPE AND GREENWAY PLANNING J2 - FÁBOS CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS VL - 6 PY - 2019 IS - 1 SP - Article 40. EP - 11 PG - 11 SN - 2642-338X DO - 10.7275/5fwb-n385 UR - https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/30712539 ID - 30712539 LA - English DB - MTMT ER - TY - JOUR AU - Gonzalez de linares, Paloma AU - Iváncsics, Vera AU - Filepné Kovács, Krisztina AU - Máté, Klaudia AU - Valánszki, István TI - Green Governance in Metropolitan Regions JF - CORVINUS REGIONAL STUDIES J2 - CORVINUS REG STUD VL - 3 PY - 2018 IS - 1-2 SP - 79 EP - 100 PG - 22 SN - 2061-8646 UR - https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31393119 ID - 31393119 N1 - Thematic Issue: New Planning Challenges for Cities & Landscapes. Edited by Salamin, Géza – Jeney, László AB - Metropolitan regions have different governance policies, strategies and tools for preserving and developing green spaces. The aim of this study is to analyse and compare the ‘green governance system’ of 5 metropolitan regions and draw the consequences for Budapest. We have chosen metropolitan regions with similar administration: Montreal, Vienna, London, Munich and Budapest. London and Vienna have a strong greenbelt regulation which was also the original aim in the introduction of the Spatial Plan of Budapest Agglomeration. In Montreal the districts are planned at human scale under the concept of ‘Eco-neighborhoods’. In the frames of a comparison analysis we explore the most important conflicts and highlight the most successful strategies in controlling urban sprawl and green infrastructure development of metropolitan regions and draw the consequences for Budapest. We also analyse the level in participative democracy. LA - English DB - MTMT ER - TY - JOUR AU - Iváncsics, Vera AU - Filepné Kovács, Krisztina AU - Máté, Klaudia AU - Valánszki, István AU - Gonzalez de linares, Paloma AU - Kollányi, László TI - A Cross-border Review of Green Infrastructure Planning Methods and Differences JF - CORVINUS REGIONAL STUDIES J2 - CORVINUS REG STUD VL - 3 PY - 2018 IS - 1-2 SP - 65 EP - 78 PG - 14 SN - 2061-8646 UR - https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31393111 ID - 31393111 N1 - Thematic Issue: New Planning Challenges for Cities & Landscapes. Edited by Salamin, Géza – Jeney, László AB - The research presents the different practices of green infrastructure (GI) development between countries and groups of countries. The concept of GI, published in the United States in 1996 (Benedict, M. A. – McMahon, E. T. 2006), was adopted all over the world. However, the practical transposition of a complex concept at a theoretical level differs in many countries, with unique aspects focusing on the country’s culture. After studying the concept of GI, the study analyses the practice of European countries based on given criteria and then characterises their practice. According to our results the integration of GI into legal system is not a common solution, rather uses the member states manuals or strategies for implementation. The objectives have been formulated according to existing nature conservation system. The existing mapping systems followed the MAES Atlas. The implementation of GI is strongly connected to social initiatives; however, very few states facilitate effectively the bottom-up implementation and financial schemes. Thanks to this research, the currently developed GI implementation in Hungary can be integrated into international trends. LA - English DB - MTMT ER - TY - JOUR AU - Filepné Kovács, Krisztina AU - Gonzalez de linares, Paloma AU - Iváncsics, Vera AU - Kukulska, Anita AU - Wilkosz-Mamcarczyk, Magdalena AU - Cegielska, Katarzyna AU - Szylar, Marta AU - Noszczyk, Tomasz AU - Valánszki, István TI - What Can We Learn from Western European Landscape Policies? Comparitive Analysis of European Landscape Policies Focusing on Poland and Hungary JF - CORVINUS REGIONAL STUDIES J2 - CORVINUS REG STUD VL - 3 PY - 2018 IS - 1-2 SP - 47 EP - 64 PG - 18 SN - 2061-8646 UR - https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31393074 ID - 31393074 N1 - Thematic Issue: New Planning Challenges for Cities & Landscapes. Edited by Salamin, Géza – Jeney, László AB - With the contribution of our international team we compared the main elements of landscape policy of France, Germany, Poland and Hungary. Germany and France, all have a strong landscape policy but of different types, tools and institutional systems. In our analysis we compare these systems with the landscape policy tools of East-Central European countries. The French state offers several possible tools for local authorities for landscape protection and development. Germany has an exceptional hierarchic and detailed system for landscape plans integrated into the spatial planning system. In Poland and Hungary as former socialist countries landscape and spatial policy had to be changed, adjusted to market demands. In all countries landscape assets are important part of our heritage and the countries have chosen different methods to protect them. We compare the tools, the mechanism and draw consequences for the Hungarian and Polish landscape planning practice. LA - English DB - MTMT ER - TY - CHAP AU - Iváncsics, Vera AU - Filepné Kovács, Krisztina AU - Máté, Klaudia AU - Valánszki, István AU - Gonzalez de linares, Paloma AU - Kollányi, László ED - Salamin, Géza ED - Jeney, László ED - Péti, Márton TI - A cross-border review of green infrastructure planning methods and differences T2 - Spaces Crossing Borders PB - Geo Institute, Corvinus University of Budapest CY - Budapest SN - 9789635037018 PY - 2018 SP - 70 EP - 70 PG - 1 UR - https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/30850538 ID - 30850538 AB - The research presents the different practices of green infrastructure (GI) development between countries, groups of countries. The concept of GI, published in the United States in 1996 (Benedict, M. A. – McMahon, E. T. 2006), was adapted by the whole world. However, the practical transposition of a complex concept at a theoretical level differs in many countries, with unique aspects focusing on the country’s culture. After studying the concept of GI, the study analyses the practice of neighbouring, European and more distant countries based on given criteria and then typizes their practice. Our research questions are: What is the institutional system of GI planning? What is the main objective of GI planning (ecosystem services, GI elements, urban–rural relations, multifunctionality, etc.)? What are the main tools for GI development? What typical means of realisation and financing schemes can be identified? Along with this, geographic location and landscape pattern, and land use regulation traditions can influence the formed characters. As the results shows there is a great difference between the end user of the planning strategies and documents: titled to civil user, to professional management body or both. Thanks to this research, the currently developed GI implementation in Hungary can be integrated into international trends, providing further points for policy-makers. LA - English DB - MTMT ER - TY - CHAP AU - Filepné Kovács, Krisztina AU - Gonzalez de linares, Paloma AU - Iváncsics, Vera AU - Anita, Kukulska AU - Magdalena, Wilkosz-Mamcarczyk AU - Katarzyna, Cegielska AU - Marta, Szylar AU - Tomasz, Noszczyk AU - Valánszki, István ED - Salamin, Géza ED - Jeney, László ED - Péti, Márton TI - What can we learn from Western European landscape policies?. Comparison analysis of European landscape policies focusing on Poland and Hungary TS - Comparison analysis of European landscape policies focusing on Poland and Hungary T2 - Spaces Crossing Borders PB - Geo Institute, Corvinus University of Budapest CY - Budapest SN - 9789635037018 PY - 2018 SP - 67 EP - 67 PG - 1 UR - https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/30850459 ID - 30850459 AB - With the contribution of our international team we compared the main elements of landscape policy of France, Germany, Poland and Hungary. Germany and France, all have a strong landscape policy but of different types, tools and institutional systems. In our analysis we compare these systems with the landscape policy tools of East-Central European countries. The French state offers several possible tools for local authorities for landscape protection and development. Germany has an exceptional hierarchic and detailed system for landscape plans integrated into the spatial planning system. Research questions: How the landscape policy is integrated into the spatial planning system? What are the tools and institutional system of landscape policy? What are the means of public participation? How the European Landscape Convention influenced the landscape policy? In Poland and Hungary as former socialist countries landscape and spatial policy had to be changed, adjusted to market demands. In all countries landscape assets are important part of our heritage and the countries have chosen different methods to protect them. We compare the tools, the mechanism and draw consequences for the Hungarian and Polish landscape planning practice. LA - English DB - MTMT ER - TY - CHAP AU - Gonzalez de linares, Paloma AU - Filepné Kovács, Krisztina AU - Iváncsics, Vera AU - Valánszki, István AU - Máté, Klaudia ED - Salamin, Géza ED - Jeney, László ED - Péti, Márton TI - Green governance in Metropolis areas T2 - Spaces Crossing Borders PB - Geo Institute, Corvinus University of Budapest CY - Budapest SN - 9789635037018 PY - 2018 SP - 40 EP - 40 PG - 1 UR - https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/30850447 ID - 30850447 AB - Metropolis regions have different governance policies, strategies and tools for preserving and developing green spaces. Budapest has just elaborated its Green Infrastructure Plan and the Land Use Framework Plan of Budapest agglomeration Zone is under revision. It is high time and really worth to analyse and compare the ‘green governance system’ of other metropolis regions and draw the consequences for Budapest. We have chosen 5 metropolis regions with similar administration: Montreal, Marseille, Vienna, London, Budapest. London and Vienna have a strong greenbelt regulation which was also the original aim at the introduction of the Spatial Plan of Budapest Agglomeration. In Montreal the districts are planned at human scale under the concept of ‘Eco-neighborhoods’ . We question what are the motivations and tools of green space protection and development? How does the governance system of the agglomeration area influence environmental policies? How do green policies help in controlling urban sprawl? How are the agglomeration planning tools integrated into the general spatial planning system of the state? Is the planning process mainly regional and global or local and community based? In the frames of a comparison analysis we explore the most important conflicts and highlight the most successful strategies in controlling urban sprawl and green infrastructure development of metropolis regions and draw the consequences for Budapest. LA - English DB - MTMT ER - TY - JOUR AU - Filepné Kovács, Krisztina AU - Jombach, Sándor AU - Balha, Gabriella AU - Gonzalez de linares, Paloma AU - Iváncsics, Vera AU - Valánszki, István AU - Máté, Klaudia TI - "Zöld Kontroll" a városi szétterülés elleni küzdelemben európai nagyvárosok példáján. "Green Controll" in fighting urban sprawl in European metropolises TS - "Green Controll" in fighting urban sprawl in European metropolises JF - 4D TÁJÉPÍTÉSZETI ÉS KERTMŰVÉSZETI FOLYÓIRAT / JOURNAL OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE AND GARDEN ART J2 - 4D TÁJÉP KERTMŰV PY - 2018 IS - 50 SP - 46 EP - 67 PG - 22 SN - 1787-6613 UR - https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/30712596 ID - 30712596 LA - Hungarian DB - MTMT ER - TY - CHAP AU - Gonzalez de linares, Paloma AU - Filepné Kovács, Krisztina ED - Tóth, Csilla TI - Agrár-erdészet, mint zöldfelületek megújításának és összekapcsolásának az eszköze T2 - Őshonos- és Tájfajták - Ökotermékek - Egészséges táplálkozás - Vidékfejlesztés PB - Nyíregyházi Egyetem, Műszaki és Agrártudományi Intézet CY - Nyíregyháza SN - 9786155545900 PY - 2018 SP - 469 EP - 476 PG - 8 UR - https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/30712587 ID - 30712587 LA - Hungarian DB - MTMT ER - TY - JOUR AU - Gonzalez de linares, Paloma TI - Comparing urban food systems between temperate regions and tropical regions introducing urban agroforestry in temperate climates through the case of Budapest JF - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DESIGN & NATURE AND ECODYNAMICS J2 - INT J DESIGN NATURE ECODYNAMICS VL - 13 PY - 2018 IS - 4 SP - 395 EP - 406 PG - 12 SN - 1755-7437 DO - 10.2495/DNE-V13-N4-395-406 UR - https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/30710845 ID - 30710845 LA - English DB - MTMT ER -