@article{MTMT:30712539, title = {Challenges and Answers of Urban Development Focusing GreenInfrastructure in European Metropolises}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/30712539}, author = {Filepné Kovács, Krisztina and Gonzalez de linares, Paloma and Iváncsics, Vera and Máté, Klaudia and Jombach, Sándor and Valánszki, István}, doi = {10.7275/5fwb-n385}, journal-iso = {FÁBOS CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS}, journal = {PROCEEDINGS OF THE FÁBOS CONFERENCE ON LANDSCAPE AND GREENWAY PLANNING}, volume = {6}, unique-id = {30712539}, issn = {2642-338X}, year = {2019}, eissn = {2326-9936}, pages = {Article 40.-11}, orcid-numbers = {Filepné Kovács, Krisztina/0000-0002-5471-5955; Iváncsics, Vera/0000-0002-8829-4060; Valánszki, István/0000-0002-0779-6537} } @article{MTMT:31393119, title = {Green Governance in Metropolitan Regions}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31393119}, author = {Gonzalez de linares, Paloma and Iváncsics, Vera and Filepné Kovács, Krisztina and Máté, Klaudia and Valánszki, István}, journal-iso = {CORVINUS REG STUD}, journal = {CORVINUS REGIONAL STUDIES}, volume = {3}, unique-id = {31393119}, issn = {2061-8646}, abstract = {Metropolitan regions have different governance policies, strategies and tools for preserving and developing green spaces. The aim of this study is to analyse and compare the ‘green governance system’ of 5 metropolitan regions and draw the consequences for Budapest. We have chosen metropolitan regions with similar administration: Montreal, Vienna, London, Munich and Budapest. London and Vienna have a strong greenbelt regulation which was also the original aim in the introduction of the Spatial Plan of Budapest Agglomeration. In Montreal the districts are planned at human scale under the concept of ‘Eco-neighborhoods’. In the frames of a comparison analysis we explore the most important conflicts and highlight the most successful strategies in controlling urban sprawl and green infrastructure development of metropolitan regions and draw the consequences for Budapest. We also analyse the level in participative democracy.}, keywords = {urban sprawl; green infrastructure; governance; participative democracy}, year = {2018}, pages = {79-100}, orcid-numbers = {Iváncsics, Vera/0000-0002-8829-4060} } @article{MTMT:31393111, title = {A Cross-border Review of Green Infrastructure Planning Methods and Differences}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31393111}, author = {Iváncsics, Vera and Filepné Kovács, Krisztina and Máté, Klaudia and Valánszki, István and Gonzalez de linares, Paloma and Kollányi, László}, journal-iso = {CORVINUS REG STUD}, journal = {CORVINUS REGIONAL STUDIES}, volume = {3}, unique-id = {31393111}, issn = {2061-8646}, abstract = {The research presents the different practices of green infrastructure (GI) development between countries and groups of countries. The concept of GI, published in the United States in 1996 (Benedict, M. A. – McMahon, E. T. 2006), was adopted all over the world. However, the practical transposition of a complex concept at a theoretical level differs in many countries, with unique aspects focusing on the country’s culture. After studying the concept of GI, the study analyses the practice of European countries based on given criteria and then characterises their practice. According to our results the integration of GI into legal system is not a common solution, rather uses the member states manuals or strategies for implementation. The objectives have been formulated according to existing nature conservation system. The existing mapping systems followed the MAES Atlas. The implementation of GI is strongly connected to social initiatives; however, very few states facilitate effectively the bottom-up implementation and financial schemes. Thanks to this research, the currently developed GI implementation in Hungary can be integrated into international trends.}, keywords = {policy; European Union; green infrastructure; strategy}, year = {2018}, pages = {65-78}, orcid-numbers = {Iváncsics, Vera/0000-0002-8829-4060} } @article{MTMT:31393074, title = {What Can We Learn from Western European Landscape Policies? Comparitive Analysis of European Landscape Policies Focusing on Poland and Hungary}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31393074}, author = {Filepné Kovács, Krisztina and Gonzalez de linares, Paloma and Iváncsics, Vera and Kukulska, Anita and Wilkosz-Mamcarczyk, Magdalena and Cegielska, Katarzyna and Szylar, Marta and Noszczyk, Tomasz and Valánszki, István}, journal-iso = {CORVINUS REG STUD}, journal = {CORVINUS REGIONAL STUDIES}, volume = {3}, unique-id = {31393074}, issn = {2061-8646}, abstract = {With the contribution of our international team we compared the main elements of landscape policy of France, Germany, Poland and Hungary. Germany and France, all have a strong landscape policy but of different types, tools and institutional systems. In our analysis we compare these systems with the landscape policy tools of East-Central European countries. The French state offers several possible tools for local authorities for landscape protection and development. Germany has an exceptional hierarchic and detailed system for landscape plans integrated into the spatial planning system. In Poland and Hungary as former socialist countries landscape and spatial policy had to be changed, adjusted to market demands. In all countries landscape assets are important part of our heritage and the countries have chosen different methods to protect them. We compare the tools, the mechanism and draw consequences for the Hungarian and Polish landscape planning practice.}, keywords = {Hungary; Poland; landscape policy; planning; protection}, year = {2018}, pages = {47-64}, orcid-numbers = {Iváncsics, Vera/0000-0002-8829-4060} } @{MTMT:30850538, title = {A cross-border review of green infrastructure planning methods and differences}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/30850538}, author = {Iváncsics, Vera and Filepné Kovács, Krisztina and Máté, Klaudia and Valánszki, István and Gonzalez de linares, Paloma and Kollányi, László}, booktitle = {Spaces Crossing Borders}, unique-id = {30850538}, abstract = {The research presents the different practices of green infrastructure (GI) development between countries, groups of countries. The concept of GI, published in the United States in 1996 (Benedict, M. A. – McMahon, E. T. 2006), was adapted by the whole world. However, the practical transposition of a complex concept at a theoretical level differs in many countries, with unique aspects focusing on the country’s culture. After studying the concept of GI, the study analyses the practice of neighbouring, European and more distant countries based on given criteria and then typizes their practice. Our research questions are: What is the institutional system of GI planning? What is the main objective of GI planning (ecosystem services, GI elements, urban–rural relations, multifunctionality, etc.)? What are the main tools for GI development? What typical means of realisation and financing schemes can be identified? Along with this, geographic location and landscape pattern, and land use regulation traditions can influence the formed characters. As the results shows there is a great difference between the end user of the planning strategies and documents: titled to civil user, to professional management body or both. Thanks to this research, the currently developed GI implementation in Hungary can be integrated into international trends, providing further points for policy-makers.}, year = {2018}, pages = {70-70}, orcid-numbers = {Iváncsics, Vera/0000-0002-8829-4060} } @{MTMT:30850459, title = {What can we learn from Western European landscape policies?. Comparison analysis of European landscape policies focusing on Poland and Hungary}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/30850459}, author = {Filepné Kovács, Krisztina and Gonzalez de linares, Paloma and Iváncsics, Vera and Anita, Kukulska and Magdalena, Wilkosz-Mamcarczyk and Katarzyna, Cegielska and Marta, Szylar and Tomasz, Noszczyk and Valánszki, István}, booktitle = {Spaces Crossing Borders}, unique-id = {30850459}, abstract = {With the contribution of our international team we compared the main elements of landscape policy of France, Germany, Poland and Hungary. Germany and France, all have a strong landscape policy but of different types, tools and institutional systems. In our analysis we compare these systems with the landscape policy tools of East-Central European countries. The French state offers several possible tools for local authorities for landscape protection and development. Germany has an exceptional hierarchic and detailed system for landscape plans integrated into the spatial planning system. Research questions: How the landscape policy is integrated into the spatial planning system? What are the tools and institutional system of landscape policy? What are the means of public participation? How the European Landscape Convention influenced the landscape policy? In Poland and Hungary as former socialist countries landscape and spatial policy had to be changed, adjusted to market demands. In all countries landscape assets are important part of our heritage and the countries have chosen different methods to protect them. We compare the tools, the mechanism and draw consequences for the Hungarian and Polish landscape planning practice.}, year = {2018}, pages = {67-67}, orcid-numbers = {Iváncsics, Vera/0000-0002-8829-4060} } @{MTMT:30850447, title = {Green governance in Metropolis areas}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/30850447}, author = {Gonzalez de linares, Paloma and Filepné Kovács, Krisztina and Iváncsics, Vera and Valánszki, István and Máté, Klaudia}, booktitle = {Spaces Crossing Borders}, unique-id = {30850447}, abstract = {Metropolis regions have different governance policies, strategies and tools for preserving and developing green spaces. Budapest has just elaborated its Green Infrastructure Plan and the Land Use Framework Plan of Budapest agglomeration Zone is under revision. It is high time and really worth to analyse and compare the ‘green governance system’ of other metropolis regions and draw the consequences for Budapest. We have chosen 5 metropolis regions with similar administration: Montreal, Marseille, Vienna, London, Budapest. London and Vienna have a strong greenbelt regulation which was also the original aim at the introduction of the Spatial Plan of Budapest Agglomeration. In Montreal the districts are planned at human scale under the concept of ‘Eco-neighborhoods’ . We question what are the motivations and tools of green space protection and development? How does the governance system of the agglomeration area influence environmental policies? How do green policies help in controlling urban sprawl? How are the agglomeration planning tools integrated into the general spatial planning system of the state? Is the planning process mainly regional and global or local and community based? In the frames of a comparison analysis we explore the most important conflicts and highlight the most successful strategies in controlling urban sprawl and green infrastructure development of metropolis regions and draw the consequences for Budapest.}, year = {2018}, pages = {40-40}, orcid-numbers = {Iváncsics, Vera/0000-0002-8829-4060} } @article{MTMT:30712596, title = {"Zöld Kontroll" a városi szétterülés elleni küzdelemben európai nagyvárosok példáján. "Green Controll" in fighting urban sprawl in European metropolises}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/30712596}, author = {Filepné Kovács, Krisztina and Jombach, Sándor and Balha, Gabriella and Gonzalez de linares, Paloma and Iváncsics, Vera and Valánszki, István and Máté, Klaudia}, journal-iso = {4D TÁJÉP KERTMŰV}, journal = {4D TÁJÉPÍTÉSZETI ÉS KERTMŰVÉSZETI FOLYÓIRAT / JOURNAL OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE AND GARDEN ART}, unique-id = {30712596}, issn = {1787-6613}, year = {2018}, pages = {46-67}, orcid-numbers = {Filepné Kovács, Krisztina/0000-0002-5471-5955; Iváncsics, Vera/0000-0002-8829-4060; Valánszki, István/0000-0002-0779-6537} } @inproceedings{MTMT:30712587, title = {Agrár-erdészet, mint zöldfelületek megújításának és összekapcsolásának az eszköze}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/30712587}, author = {Gonzalez de linares, Paloma and Filepné Kovács, Krisztina}, booktitle = {Őshonos- és Tájfajták - Ökotermékek - Egészséges táplálkozás - Vidékfejlesztés}, unique-id = {30712587}, year = {2018}, pages = {469-476} } @article{MTMT:30710845, title = {Comparing urban food systems between temperate regions and tropical regions introducing urban agroforestry in temperate climates through the case of Budapest}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/30710845}, author = {Gonzalez de linares, Paloma}, doi = {10.2495/DNE-V13-N4-395-406}, journal-iso = {INT J DESIGN NATURE ECODYNAMICS}, journal = {INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DESIGN & NATURE AND ECODYNAMICS}, volume = {13}, unique-id = {30710845}, issn = {1755-7437}, year = {2018}, eissn = {1755-7445}, pages = {395-406} }