@inbook{MTMT:34547665,
	title = {Mit érdemes tudnunk szerzőként az open accessről?},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34547665},
	author = {Tóth, János},
	booktitle = {Tudománystratégia},
	unique-id = {34547665},
	year = {2023},
	pages = {117-130},
	orcid-numbers = {Tóth, János/0000-0001-5633-5991}
}

@inbook{MTMT:34547651,
	title = {Milyen folyóiratban érdemes publikálni?. A kézirattal megcélzott folyóiratok köre és jellemzői},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34547651},
	author = {Tóth, János},
	booktitle = {Tudománystratégia},
	unique-id = {34547651},
	year = {2023},
	pages = {83-100},
	orcid-numbers = {Tóth, János/0000-0001-5633-5991}
}

@article{MTMT:34094060,
	title = {Beyond views, productivity, and citations: measuring geopolitical differences of scientific impact in communication research},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34094060},
	author = {Tóth, János and Háló, Gergő and Goyanes, Manuel},
	doi = {10.1007/s11192-023-04801-7},
	journal-iso = {SCIENTOMETRICS},
	journal = {SCIENTOMETRICS},
	volume = {2023},
	unique-id = {34094060},
	issn = {0138-9130},
	abstract = {Scientometric analyses applying critical sociological frameworks have previously shown that high-prestige research output—with regards to both quantity and impact—is typically clustered in a few core countries and world regions, indicating uneven power relations and systematic biases within global academia. Although citation count is a common formula in these analyses, only a handful of studies investigated altmetrics (impact measures beyond citation-based metrics) in communication science. In this paper, we explore geopolitical biases of impact amongst the most productive scholars in the field of communication from 11 countries and 3 world regions. Drawing on SCOPUS data, we test three formulas that measure scholarly performance (citations per document; views per document; and citations per view) to investigate how geographical location affects the impact of scholars. Our results indicate a strong US-dominance with regard to citation-based impact, emphasizing a further need for de-Westernization within the field. Moreover, the analysis of altmetric formulas revealed that research published by Eastern European and Spanish scholars, although accessed similarly or even more often than American or Western European publications, is less cited than those. Country-level comparisons are also discussed.},
	year = {2023},
	eissn = {1588-2861},
	pages = {1-25},
	orcid-numbers = {Tóth, János/0000-0001-5633-5991; Háló, Gergő/0000-0002-7656-4043; Goyanes, Manuel/0000-0001-8329-0610}
}

@article{MTMT:31906157,
	title = {Prestige and Independence-Controlled Publication Performance of Researchers at 14 Hungarian Research Institutions between 2014 and 2018 : A Data Paper},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31906157},
	author = {Tóth, János and Demeter, Márton},
	doi = {10.17646/KOME.75672.61},
	journal-iso = {KOME},
	journal = {KOME: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PURE COMMUNICATION INQUIRY},
	volume = {9},
	unique-id = {31906157},
	issn = {2063-7330},
	year = {2021},
	pages = {41-63},
	orcid-numbers = {Tóth, János/0000-0001-5633-5991; Demeter, Márton/0000-0002-9888-9682}
}

@article{MTMT:31306723,
	title = {Negative and Engaged: Sentiments towards the 2016 Migrant Quota Referendum in Hungarian Online Media},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31306723},
	author = {Tóth, János},
	doi = {10.1177/0888325420915954},
	journal-iso = {EAST EUR POLIT SOC},
	journal = {EAST EUROPEAN POLITICS AND SOCIETIES},
	volume = {35},
	unique-id = {31306723},
	issn = {0888-3254},
	year = {2021},
	eissn = {1533-8371},
	pages = {493-518},
	orcid-numbers = {Tóth, János/0000-0001-5633-5991}
}

@book{MTMT:31668776,
	title = {NÉPSZAVAZÁSOK REPREZENTÁCIÓI: A 2016-OS MAGYARORSZÁGI KVÓTANÉPSZAVAZÁS ÉS NEMZETKÖZI MÉDIAKÖRNYEZETE},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31668776},
	isbn = {9789634981220},
	author = {Tóth, János},
	publisher = {NKE Közigazgatási Továbbképzési Intézet},
	unique-id = {31668776},
	year = {2020},
	orcid-numbers = {Tóth, János/0000-0001-5633-5991}
}

@article{MTMT:31328297,
	title = {Values, strengths and futures of museums, libraries and community centres as seen by experts in the field: First round results of a Delphi study},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31328297},
	author = {Tóth, János},
	doi = {10.46284/mkd.2020.8.2.4},
	journal-iso = {MUSEOL CULT HERIT},
	journal = {MUZEOLOGIA A KULTURNE DEDICSTVO-MUSEOLOGY AND CULTURAL HERITAGE},
	volume = {8},
	unique-id = {31328297},
	issn = {1339-2204},
	abstract = {In the process of building local communities with shared cultural values, museums, libraries and
		community centres are key agents in civil society. When these institutions project specific notions and
		ideal types of identity and citizenship, they have the potential to produce changes in people’s behaviour.
		It is only natural that political bodies are interested in these processes. On 16 September 2016, the
		Ministry of Human Capacities of the Hungarian Government launched an EU-funded project with the
		primary aim of strengthening social cohesion within the region. As a part of this project, we surveyed
		59 professionals working in Hungarian museums, libraries and community centres, using the Delphi
		method, to gain insights about their capacities, needs, and visions. This article presents the results of
		the first round of analysis. Respondents’ answers were analysed using NVivo qualitative data analysis
		software, which resulted in a thematic map showing the main problems professionals in these sectors are
		struggling with, and highlighting the kinds of visions they had for their institutions’ future. The study
		clearly shows that the cultural sector is plagued by financial problems, and that there is a strong need
		for reform when it comes to the professional training of workers in these fields. Regarding the future,
		visions are centred around cultural institutions increasingly becoming community spaces, thinktanks, and
		ideas workshops that consciously guide community formation.},
	year = {2020},
	eissn = {2453-9759},
	pages = {55-75},
	orcid-numbers = {Tóth, János/0000-0001-5633-5991}
}

@article{MTMT:31276533,
	title = {Reasons to decline an invitation to peer review during the Coronavirus(COVID-19) outbreak. Are there implications for journal policy?},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31276533},
	author = {Tóth, János},
	doi = {10.17646/KOME.75672.47},
	journal-iso = {KOME},
	journal = {KOME: AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PURE COMMUNICATION INQUIRY},
	volume = {8},
	unique-id = {31276533},
	issn = {2063-7330},
	year = {2020},
	pages = {1-6},
	orcid-numbers = {Tóth, János/0000-0001-5633-5991}
}

@article{MTMT:30764430,
	title = {Blind Myself: Simple Steps for Editors and Software Providers to Take Against Affiliation Bias},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/30764430},
	author = {Tóth, János},
	doi = {10.1007/s11948-019-00128-w},
	journal-iso = {SCI ENG ETHICS},
	journal = {SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS},
	volume = {26},
	unique-id = {30764430},
	issn = {1353-3452},
	abstract = {This letter contains suggestions for editors and software providers to help avoid affiliation bias in the initial and concluding stages of the peer review process. Submission management systems have a responsibility to ensure protection against affiliation bias. This can be achieved by automatically withholding the author’s identity and affiliation information from all editors, including the Editor-in-Chief, until a decision about publication has been made. Journals relying on email-based submissions are in a more difficult situation. Not having external support in confirming the submitting author’s identity, this dilemma can be resolved through the implementation of strict instructions and guidelines concerning manuscript submission and handling. In this case the “human factor” cannot be fully eliminated, while automated processes can only be changed intentionally and with a certain delay. Therefore, with the suggested steps, submission management systems could become a strong guard against unconscious bias while also making conscious bias more difficult to impact the peer review process.},
	year = {2020},
	eissn = {1471-5546},
	pages = {1875-1877},
	orcid-numbers = {Tóth, János/0000-0001-5633-5991}
}

@article{MTMT:31014085,
	title = {To save your country, flag your teacher: Anonymous reporting of liberal indoctrination as academic witch-hunt in Orbán's Hungary},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31014085},
	author = {Tóth, János},
	doi = {10.1386/macp_00009_7},
	journal-iso = {INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL POL OF MEDIA AND CULTURAL},
	journal = {INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDIA AND CULTURAL POLITICS},
	volume = {15},
	unique-id = {31014085},
	issn = {1740-8296},
	abstract = {At the end of 2018, a pro-government media outlet in Hungary started
		encouraging university students to report if they encounter liberal political
		activism in the classroom. Given the measures that the Hungarian
		government took against universities and liberal academic freedoms
		only a month before – like stop financing gender studies programmes
		and forcing Central European University (CEU) to relocate most of
		their future activities to Vienna – there is a widely supported belief in
		Hungarian academia that this is a part of a larger government campaign
		against academic freedom and the ethos of higher education in general.
		This commentary points out that to be able to distinguish said reports
		from made-out propaganda stories, it is necessary to leave their sources
		of information identifiable.},
	year = {2019},
	eissn = {2040-0918},
	pages = {391-399},
	orcid-numbers = {Tóth, János/0000-0001-5633-5991}
}