@article{MTMT:34754210,
	title = {Apologetikus alkotmánytörténet újratöltve? Megjegyzések A magyar történeti alkotmány: korszakok és kihívások című kötethez},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34754210},
	author = {Szente, Zoltán},
	doi = {10.51783/ajt.2023.4.06},
	journal-iso = {ÁLLAM JOGTUDOMÁNY},
	journal = {ÁLLAM- ÉS JOGTUDOMÁNY},
	volume = {64},
	unique-id = {34754210},
	issn = {0002-564X},
	year = {2023},
	pages = {89-100},
	orcid-numbers = {Szente, Zoltán/0009-0001-6844-0091}
}

@{MTMT:34135433,
	title = {From guarding the constitution to serving politics – the decline of the Hungarian Constitutional Court},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34135433},
	author = {Szente, Zoltán},
	booktitle = {Constitutionality of Law without a Constitutional Court A View from Europe},
	unique-id = {34135433},
	year = {2023},
	pages = {99-120},
	orcid-numbers = {Szente, Zoltán/0009-0001-6844-0091}
}

@article{MTMT:34121908,
	title = {Polner Ödön ismeretlen előadása az 1848. évi áprilisi törvényekről},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34121908},
	author = {Schweitzer, Gábor and Szente, Zoltán},
	doi = {10.15170/Dike.2023.07.01.10},
	journal-iso = {DÍKÉ},
	journal = {DÍKÉ: A MÁRKUS DEZSŐ ÖSSZEHASONLÍTÓ JOGTÖRTÉNETI KUTATÓCSOPORT FOLYÓIRATA},
	volume = {7},
	unique-id = {34121908},
	abstract = {Professor Ödön Polner (1865-1961) was one of the outstanding scholars of Hungarian public law. His legacy includes the manuscript of a lecture he gave in 1948, in which he reviewed the basic laws adopted in the first phase of the Hungarian Revolution of 1848. Within the framework of the historical constitution, these laws laid the foundations of nationalism and bourgeois constitutionalism in Hungary in the middle of the 19th century.  Below, after a short description of Polner’s professional career and some introductory remarks, we publish the text of the lecture given in 1948.},
	year = {2023},
	eissn = {2631-1232},
	pages = {117-134},
	orcid-numbers = {Szente, Zoltán/0009-0001-6844-0091}
}

@{MTMT:33790862,
	title = {The impact of populism on constitutional interpretation in the EU Member States},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/33790862},
	author = {Szente, Zoltán and Gárdos-Orosz, Fruzsina},
	booktitle = {Judicial Activism in an Age of Populism},
	unique-id = {33790862},
	year = {2023},
	pages = {3-21},
	orcid-numbers = {Szente, Zoltán/0009-0001-6844-0091}
}

@article{MTMT:33782845,
	title = {The myth of populist constitutionalism in Hungary and Poland: Populist or authoritarian constitutionalism?},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/33782845},
	author = {Szente, Zoltán},
	doi = {10.1093/icon/moad014},
	journal-iso = {INT J CONSTITUT LAW},
	journal = {INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW},
	volume = {21},
	unique-id = {33782845},
	issn = {1474-2640},
	abstract = {The article seeks to answer the question whether the analytical framework of “populist constitutionalism” adequately describes and explains the constitutional changes that the Hungarian and Polish populist governments have implemented, respectively, since 2010 and 2015. After presenting the similarities and differences between the Hungarian and Polish constitutional developments, the article discusses the conceptual attempts of populist constitutionalism, identifying the primary and secondary characteristics that the literature attributes to this phenomenon. The main point of the article is that these criteria only partially characterize the recent constitutional changes in these two countries, and that the features that do really prevail are more indicative of an unmarked authoritarian transition than of a new, specific version of constitutionalism. It describes the different reasons for the misapplication of constitutional populism to these two countries. Finally, it explains how counterproductive the misconception of populist constitutionalism is for understanding the recent constitutional development in Hungary and Poland.},
	year = {2023},
	eissn = {1474-2659},
	pages = {127-155},
	orcid-numbers = {Szente, Zoltán/0009-0001-6844-0091}
}

@article{MTMT:33501830,
	title = {Constitutional identity as a normative constitutional concept},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/33501830},
	author = {Szente, Zoltán},
	doi = {10.1556/2052.2022.00390},
	journal-iso = {HUN J LEGAL STUD},
	journal = {HUNGARIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES},
	volume = {63},
	unique-id = {33501830},
	issn = {2498-5473},
	year = {2022},
	eissn = {2560-1067},
	pages = {3-20},
	orcid-numbers = {Szente, Zoltán/0009-0001-6844-0091}
}

@book{MTMT:33500792,
	title = {Constitutional Law in Hungary. Third Edition},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/33500792},
	isbn = {9789403546810},
	author = {Szente, Zoltán},
	publisher = {Wolters Kluwer},
	unique-id = {33500792},
	year = {2022},
	orcid-numbers = {Szente, Zoltán/0009-0001-6844-0091}
}

@{MTMT:33451025,
	title = {How Not to Use History in Constitutional Interpretation. The Aborted Resurrection of the Historical Constitution in Hungary},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/33451025},
	author = {Szente, Zoltán},
	booktitle = {Comparative Constitutional History},
	unique-id = {33451025},
	year = {2022},
	pages = {311-331},
	orcid-numbers = {Szente, Zoltán/0009-0001-6844-0091}
}

@inbook{MTMT:33087899,
	title = {Immunity of Legislative Body Members},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/33087899},
	author = {Szente, Zoltán},
	booktitle = {Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law [MPECCoL]},
	unique-id = {33087899},
	year = {2022},
	pages = {1-14},
	orcid-numbers = {Szente, Zoltán/0000-0002-5293-1670}
}

@inbook{MTMT:33087897,
	title = {Legislative Body Debate},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/33087897},
	author = {Szente, Zoltán},
	booktitle = {Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law [MPECCoL]},
	unique-id = {33087897},
	year = {2022},
	pages = {1-18},
	orcid-numbers = {Szente, Zoltán/0000-0002-5293-1670}
}