@article{MTMT:34782505, title = {Edge history modulates the depth of edge influence: Evidence from ground beetles with different feeding traits}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34782505}, author = {Magura, Tibor and Lövei, Gábor}, doi = {10.1016/j.foreco.2024.121874}, journal-iso = {FOREST ECOL MANAG}, journal = {FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT}, volume = {561}, unique-id = {34782505}, issn = {0378-1127}, year = {2024}, eissn = {1872-7042} } @article{MTMT:34599254, title = {The Use and Prospects of Nonlethal Methods in Entomology}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34599254}, author = {Lövei, Gábor and Ferrante, Marco}, doi = {10.1146/annurev-ento-120220-024402}, journal-iso = {ANNU REV ENTOMOL}, journal = {ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY}, volume = {69}, unique-id = {34599254}, issn = {0066-4170}, abstract = {Arthropods are declining globally, and entomologists ought to be in the forefront of protecting them. However, entomological study methods are typically lethal, and we argue that this makes the ethical status of the profession precarious. Lethal methods are used in most studies, even those that aim to support arthropod conservation. Additionally, almost all collecting methods result in bycatch, and a first step toward less destructive research practices is to minimize bycatch and/or ensure its proper storage and use. In this review, we describe the available suite of nonlethal methods with the aim of promoting their use. We classify nonlethal methods into (a) reuse of already collected material, (b) methods that are damaging but not lethal, (c) methods that modify behavior, and (d) true nonlethal methods. Artificial intelligence and miniaturization will help to extend the nonlethal methodological toolkit, but the need for further method development and testing remains.}, keywords = {MONITORING; ETHICS; sampling; Insect decline; arthropod conservation}, year = {2024}, eissn = {1545-4487}, pages = {183-198} } @article{MTMT:34518824, title = {Ecological filtering shapes the impacts of agricultural deforestation on biodiversity}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34518824}, author = {Hua, F. and Wang, W. and Nakagawa, S. and Liu, S. and Miao, X. and Yu, L. and Du, Z. and Abrahamczyk, S. and Arias-Sosa, L.A. and Buda, K. and Budka, M. and Carrière, S.M. and Chandler, R.B. and Chiatante, G. and Chiawo, D.O. and Cresswell, W. and Echeverri, A. and Goodale, E. and Huang, G. and Hulme, M.F. and Hutto, R.L. and Imboma, T.S. and Jarrett, C. and Jiang, Z. and Kati, V.I. and King, D.I. and Kmecl, P. and Li, N. and Lövei, Gábor and Macchi, L. and MacGregor-Fors, I. and Martin, E.A. and Mira, A. and Morelli, F. and Ortega-Álvarez, R. and Quan, R.-C. and Salgueiro, P.A. and Santos, S.M. and Shahabuddin, G. and Socolar, J.B. and Soh, M.C.K. and Sreekar, R. and Srinivasan, U. and Wilcove, D.S. and Yamaura, Y. and Zhou, L. and Elsen, P.R.}, doi = {10.1038/s41559-023-02280-w}, journal-iso = {NAT ECOL EVOL}, journal = {NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION}, volume = {8}, unique-id = {34518824}, issn = {2397-334X}, year = {2024}, eissn = {2397-334X}, pages = {251-266} } @article{MTMT:34500477, title = {Urbanization reduces gut bacterial microbiome diversity in a specialist ground beetle, Carabus convexus}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34500477}, author = {Magura, Tibor and Mizser, Szabolcs and Horváth, Roland and Tóth, Mária and Likó, István and Lövei, Gábor}, doi = {10.1111/mec.17265}, journal-iso = {MOL ECOL}, journal = {MOLECULAR ECOLOGY}, volume = {33}, unique-id = {34500477}, issn = {0962-1083}, year = {2024}, eissn = {1365-294X}, orcid-numbers = {Mizser, Szabolcs/0000-0001-8366-6243; Horváth, Roland/0000-0002-3717-3605} } @inbook{MTMT:34449645, title = {Modern Examples of Extinctions}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34449645}, author = {Lövei, Gábor}, booktitle = {Encyclopedia of Biodiversity}, doi = {10.1016/B978-0-12-822562-2.00244-9}, unique-id = {34449645}, year = {2024}, pages = {128-139} } @article{MTMT:33661319, title = {Spatiotemporal distancing of crops reduces pest pressure while maintaining conservation biocontrol in oilseed rape}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/33661319}, author = {Sulg, Silva and Kovács, Gabriella and Willow, Jonathan and Kaasik, Riina and Smagghe, Guy and Lövei, Gábor and Veromann, Eve}, doi = {10.1002/ps.7391}, journal-iso = {PEST MANAG SCI}, journal = {PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE}, unique-id = {33661319}, issn = {1526-498X}, abstract = {BACKGROUND: Agricultural landscapes provide resources for arthropod pests as well as their natural enemies. To develop integrated pest management (IPM) practices, it is important to understand how spatiotemporal location influences crop colonization and damage severity. We performed a 3-year (2016–2018) field experiment in winter oilseed rape (OSR, Brassica napus) fields in Estonia, where half of the fields were within 500 m of the location of the previous year's winter OSR field and half were outside this zone. We investigated how distance from the previous year's OSR crop influences the infestation and parasitism rates of two of its most important pests: the pollen beetle (Brassicogethes aeneus) and the cabbage seed weevil (Ceutorhynchus obstrictus). RESULTS: When the distance from the previous year's OSR crop was >500 m, we recorded significantly reduced pest pressure by both B. aeneus and C. obstrictus in the study fields. Biocontrol of both pests, provided by parasitic wasps, was high in each study year and commonly not affected by distance. Mean parasitism rates of B. aeneus were >31%, occasionally reaching >70%; for C. obstrictus, mean parasitism was >46%, reaching up to 79%, thereby providing effective biocontrol for both pest species. CONCLUSION: Spatiotemporal separation of OSR fields can reduce pest pressure without resulting in reduced parasitism of OSR pests. This supports a spatiotemporal field separation concept as an effective and sustainable technique for IPM in OSR. © 2023 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.}, keywords = {integrated pest management; biological control; Agricultural land management; pollen beetle; cabbage seed weevil}, year = {2024}, eissn = {1526-4998}, orcid-numbers = {Sulg, Silva/0000-0002-4060-9596; Kovács, Gabriella/0000-0003-3731-8613; Willow, Jonathan/0000-0003-2377-4917; Kaasik, Riina/0000-0002-8090-2199; Smagghe, Guy/0000-0001-8334-3313; Veromann, Eve/0000-0002-0977-5270} } @CONFERENCE{MTMT:34734810, title = {In praise of rarity}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34734810}, author = {Lövei, Gábor}, booktitle = {Book of Abstracts - 4th International Conference on Community Ecology}, unique-id = {34734810}, year = {2023}, pages = {1} } @article{MTMT:34547575, title = {Analysing the distribution of strictly protected areas toward the EU2030 target}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34547575}, author = {Cazzolla Gatti, Roberto and Zannini, Piero and Piovesan, Gianluca and Alessi, Nicola and Basset, Alberto and Beierkuhnlein, Carl and Di Musciano, Michele and Field, Richard and Halley, John M. and Hoffmann, Samuel and Iaria, Jacopo and Kallimanis, Athanasios and Lövei, Gábor and Morera, Albert and Provenzale, Antonello and Rocchini, Duccio and Vetaas, Ole R. and Chiarucci, Alessandro}, doi = {10.1007/s10531-023-02644-5}, journal-iso = {BIODIVERS CONSERV}, journal = {BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION}, volume = {32}, unique-id = {34547575}, issn = {0960-3115}, abstract = {Protecting global biodiversity is one of the most urgent tasks for the coming decades. Area-based conservation is a pillar for preserving ecosystems and species. Strictly protected areas specifically preserve biodiversity and ecosystem processes. The “EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030” targets strict protection for 10% of land area. Here we performed the first analysis of strictly protected areas (as IUCN type Ia, Ib, and II) across Europe, by investigating their area coverage at the level of biogeographical regions, countries and elevation gradients. We show that, with few exceptions, the amount of strictly protected area is very limited and the spatial distribution of such protected areas is biased towards higher elevation sites, as in the case of other protected areas. Then, we suggest that potential areas should be identified to expand strictly protected areas with low economic and social costs including, for instance, areas with high biodiversity value, low population, and low productive land use. Finally, we propose that a coordinated effort and a strategic plan to achieve continental-scale conservation are fundamental, and at least half of this land under strict conservation (i.e. 5%) should be under the protection categories Ia and Ib.}, year = {2023}, eissn = {1572-9710}, pages = {3157-3174} } @article{MTMT:34432012, title = {Correction to: Analysing the distribution of strictly protected areas toward the EU2030 target}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34432012}, author = {Cazzolla Gatti, Roberto and Zannini, Piero and Piovesan, Gianluca and Alessi, Nicola and Basset, Alberto and Beierkuhnlein, Carl and Di Musciano, Michele and Field, Richard and Halley, John M. and Hoffmann, Samuel and Iaria, Jacopo and Kallimanis, Athanasios and Lövei, Gábor and Morera, Albert and Provenzale, Antonello and Rocchini, Duccio and Vetaas, Ole R. and Chiarucci, Alessandro}, doi = {10.1007/s10531-023-02683-y}, journal-iso = {BIODIVERS CONSERV}, journal = {BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION}, volume = {32}, unique-id = {34432012}, issn = {0960-3115}, year = {2023}, eissn = {1572-9710}, pages = {3175-3177} } @CONFERENCE{MTMT:34413638, title = {Urbanization reduces gut bacterial microbiome diversity in a habitat specialist ground beetle}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34413638}, author = {Magura, Tibor and Lövei, Gábor}, booktitle = {Book of Abstracts - XII European Congress of Entomology}, unique-id = {34413638}, year = {2023}, pages = {463-464} }