@article{MTMT:35434643, title = {Húsz év után: alkalmazkodás és konfliktusok a magyar jogrendszer európaizációs átalakulásában}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/35434643}, author = {Varju, Márton and Várnay, Ernő and Vincze, Attila}, doi = {10.51783/ajt.2024.2.02}, journal-iso = {ÁLLAM JOGTUDOMÁNY}, journal = {ÁLLAM- ÉS JOGTUDOMÁNY}, volume = {65}, unique-id = {35434643}, issn = {0002-564X}, abstract = {A magyar jogrendszer az 1990-es évek óta áll az európai uniós jog hatása alatt, és alkalmazkodik közvetlen és közvetett módokon annak elvárásaihoz. Húsz évvel Magyarország európai uniós csatlakozása után ismét érdemes mérleget vonni a magyar jogrendszer európaizációs változásairól. Empirikus jogi módszerekre épülő, a jogrendszer makro- és mikroszintű változásait egyaránt lefedő elemzésünkben azt vizsgáltuk, hogy a magyar jogrendszert mennyiben jellemzi az európai uniós jogi kötelezettségek átvétele és az azoknak való megfelelés a jogi európaizáció folyamatában. A megfelelés mellett a jogrendszer európai uniós konfliktusait is vizsgáltuk. Különösen arra a kérdésre kerestünk választ, hogy a konfliktusok – súlyukból és jellegükből eredően – utalhatnak-e a magyar jogrendszer az uniós joggal fennálló viszonyának alapvető megváltozására.}, year = {2024}, pages = {7-31}, orcid-numbers = {Varju, Márton/0000-0003-3027-0493} } @misc{MTMT:35198468, title = {Preparing for constitutional dialogue with the CJEU or sharpening the Hungarian sword against EU law?}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/35198468}, author = {Chronowski, Nóra and Várnay, Ernő}, unique-id = {35198468}, year = {2024}, orcid-numbers = {Chronowski, Nóra/0000-0003-0519-0707} } @{MTMT:34876640, title = {Az Európai Uuniós tagság hatása a magyar jogalkotásra}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34876640}, author = {Varju, Márton and Várnay, Ernő}, booktitle = {20 év az Európai Unióban}, unique-id = {34876640}, year = {2024}, pages = {152-174}, orcid-numbers = {Varju, Márton/0000-0003-3027-0493} } @article{MTMT:34799308, title = {Annulment Actions and the V4. Taking Legislative Conflicts Before the CJEU}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34799308}, author = {Varju, Márton and Czina, Veronika and Cseres, K and Várnay, Ernő}, doi = {10.17645/pag.7473}, journal-iso = {POLITICS GOVERNANCE}, journal = {POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE}, volume = {12}, unique-id = {34799308}, issn = {2183-2463}, abstract = {The EU member states have been using the action for annulment to challenge the legality of EU measures while pursuing a range of non-legal and essentially political motivations. This also holds for the V4 member states, which have also resorted to annulment actions to judicialize their legislative conflicts within the EU before the CJEU. Among the V4, Poland has been the most frequent litigant, using this institutional tool increasingly actively during the last 10 years. Poland’s behavior appears to confirm expectations of differentiation among this group of member states. It also coincides with a period of political change marked by deep legislative conflicts within the EU. The V4 annulment challenges against EU legislative measures usually made a genuine effort to achieve the legal objective of annulling the challenged legal act. However, there is evidence that they also pursued certain political motivations or a combination of them. These could include the securing of gains in domestic politics, avoiding the local costs of an EU policy misfit and/or promoting a preferred policy position, and/or influencing EU competence arrangements. In a few cases, the litigant member state aimed to avoid concrete material disadvantages. Securing a legal interpretation from the CJEU that would influence the behavior of other EU actors or clarify the law affecting the position of the applicant member state also motivated some of the V4 legal challenges.}, year = {2024}, eissn = {2183-2463}, orcid-numbers = {Varju, Márton/0000-0003-3027-0493} } @inbook{MTMT:34414479, title = {Az uniós jog kikényszerítése}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34414479}, author = {Várnay, Ernő}, booktitle = {Internetes Jogtudományi Enciklopédia}, unique-id = {34414479}, year = {2023}, pages = {1-15} } @book{MTMT:34285548, title = {Magyarázat az Európai Unió jogáról}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34285548}, isbn = {9789635942299}, author = {Várnay, Ernő and Papp, Mónika}, publisher = {Wolters Kluwer Kft.}, unique-id = {34285548}, year = {2023}, orcid-numbers = {Papp, Mónika/0000-0003-1010-7939} } @article{MTMT:34123491, title = {Orbán Endre: Alkotmányos identitás az Európai Unióban (Budapest: TK JTI 2020) 224.}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34123491}, author = {Várnay, Ernő}, doi = {10.51783/ajt.2023.1.08}, journal-iso = {ÁLLAM JOGTUDOMÁNY}, journal = {ÁLLAM- ÉS JOGTUDOMÁNY}, volume = {64}, unique-id = {34123491}, issn = {0002-564X}, year = {2023}, pages = {97-105} } @misc{MTMT:33726821, title = {Internetes Jogtudományi Enciklopédia}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/33726821}, editor = {Varju, Márton and Horváthy, Balázs and Várnay, Ernő}, unique-id = {33726821}, year = {2022}, orcid-numbers = {Varju, Márton/0000-0003-3027-0493; Horváthy, Balázs/0000-0001-6809-0223} } @article{MTMT:33530912, title = {The Hungarian sword of constitutional identity}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/33530912}, author = {Várnay, Ernő}, doi = {10.1556/2052.2022.00380}, journal-iso = {HUN J LEGAL STUD}, journal = {HUNGARIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES}, volume = {63}, unique-id = {33530912}, issn = {2498-5473}, year = {2022}, eissn = {2560-1067}, pages = {79-106} } @article{MTMT:33336358, title = {After the Judgment:The Implementation of Preliminary Rulings in the Hungarian Judicial System 2004-2019 and Beyond}, url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/33336358}, author = {Varju, Márton and Várnay, Ernő}, journal-iso = {COMMON MKT LAW REV}, journal = {COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW}, volume = {59}, unique-id = {33336358}, issn = {0165-0750}, year = {2022}, eissn = {1875-8320}, pages = {1743-1770}, orcid-numbers = {Varju, Márton/0000-0003-3027-0493} }