@article{MTMT:34779292,
	title = {‘We're still here’: Misrecognition and the quest for dual identification of Roma people},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34779292},
	author = {Kende, Anna and Sam Nariman, Hadi and Ayanian, Arin H. and Halabi, Slieman and Ivan, Claudiu and Karić, Tijana and Mihić, Vladimir and Nyúl, Boglárka and Pántya, József and da Silva, Caroline and Hopkins, Nick},
	doi = {10.1002/casp.2793},
	journal-iso = {J COMMUNITY APPL SOC PSYCHOL},
	journal = {JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY & APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY},
	volume = {34},
	unique-id = {34779292},
	issn = {1052-9284},
	abstract = {Misrecognition describes everyday practices that deny the autonomy of minority members to define who they are and instead impose identities that may diverge from their own sense of self. Being misrecognized is particularly relevant for the historically marginalized Roma people, whose national belonging is repeatedly questioned despite centuries of co‐existence and citizenship. Our aim was to understand whether the experience of misrecognition, along with discrimination, would predict identification patterns that represent an obstacle to dual identification among Roma people in three East‐Central European countries: Hungary, Romania and Serbia. We collected data among Roma participants online and face‐to‐face with convenience sampling ( N  = 1,325). Latent class analysis revealed three similar classes based on national and ethnic identification scores in all subsamples: (1) disidentification, (2) Roma identification and (3) dual identification. Logistic regression analysis showed that misrecognition and discrimination predicted stronger Roma identity than dual identification in Hungary and Serbia. However, misrecognition predicted stronger dual identification in Romania, possibly as a reaffirmation strategy in response to misrecognition. Our results show that misrecognition can add to our understanding of minority group members' identification with the superordinate category of the nation as well as subgroup ethnic minority identity, and this connection could be key for advancing Roma inclusion.},
	year = {2024},
	eissn = {1099-1298},
	pages = {1-16},
	orcid-numbers = {Kende, Anna/0000-0001-5148-0145; Nyúl, Boglárka/0000-0001-6620-9630; Pántya, József/0000-0003-2359-9661}
}

@article{MTMT:34743480,
	title = {When the shoe does not fit: The role of perspective‐taking orientation in a perspective‐taking prejudice reduction intervention},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34743480},
	author = {Szekeres, Hanna and Lantos, Nóra Anna and Faragó, Laura and Nyúl, Boglárka and Kende, Anna},
	doi = {10.1002/casp.2785},
	journal-iso = {J COMMUNITY APPL SOC PSYCHOL},
	journal = {JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY & APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY},
	volume = {34},
	unique-id = {34743480},
	issn = {1052-9284},
	abstract = {We tested how individuals' dispositional perspective‐taking impacts the effectiveness of an intergroup perspective‐taking intervention aimed to reduce anti‐Gypsyism in Hungary. For the intervention, we adapted a role‐playing book with a Roma adolescent protagonist (called the ‘Gypsy Maze’). We predicted that the intervention would be more effective in reducing prejudice for stronger perspective‐takers, compared to weaker, for whom it may even be counterproductive, potentially triggering victim blaming. We conducted a pilot field study among high school students and two experiments among university students ( N  = 982). In Study 1, we found that dispositional perspective‐taking qualified the effect of the intervention. While strong perspective‐takers endorsed less prejudice following the intervention versus control conditions, weak perspective‐takers endorsed more. In Study 2, we aimed to replicate Study 1 and test underlying explanations, however, the intervention was ineffective in reducing prejudice among both weak and strong perspective‐takers. These results draw attention to the limits of perspective‐taking interventions and highlight the importance of both societal‐contextual boundaries and personalizing intergroup interventions. Please refer to the Supplementary Material section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement .},
	year = {2024},
	eissn = {1099-1298},
	pages = {1-23},
	orcid-numbers = {Szekeres, Hanna/0000-0002-1038-1682; Lantos, Nóra Anna/0000-0003-2056-1027; Faragó, Laura/0000-0003-1243-7296; Nyúl, Boglárka/0000-0001-6620-9630; Kende, Anna/0000-0001-5148-0145}
}

@article{MTMT:34568073,
	title = {Antecedents and consequences of perceived misrecognition and perceived discrimination in ethnic minorities},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34568073},
	author = {Özdemir, Fatih and Doosje, Bertjan and Feddes, Allard R. and van Bergen, Naomi R. and Ayanian, Arin H. and Halabi, Slieman and Guevara, Yaatsil and Kende, Anna and Karić, Tijana and da Silva, Caroline and de Jong, Judith C. and Pántya, József and Zick, Andreas and Reicher, Stephen D. and Hopkins, Nick},
	doi = {10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.101938},
	journal-iso = {INT J INTERCULT REL},
	journal = {INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERCULTURAL RELATIONS},
	volume = {99},
	unique-id = {34568073},
	issn = {0147-1767},
	year = {2024},
	eissn = {1873-7552},
	pages = {101938-101952},
	orcid-numbers = {Kende, Anna/0000-0001-5148-0145; Pántya, József/0000-0003-2359-9661}
}

@article{MTMT:34492133,
	title = {Blindfolding political trust: the palliative effect of trust-based ignorance of political performance problems},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34492133},
	author = {Hadarics, Márton},
	doi = {10.1080/00224545.2023.2298886},
	journal-iso = {J SOC PSYCHOL},
	journal = {JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY},
	unique-id = {34492133},
	issn = {0022-4545},
	abstract = {In this study, we gather empirical evidence supporting the assumption that political trust is related to the ignorance of political performance problems, which ignorance, in turn, has a palliative function as it protects subjective well-being. We hypothesized that political trust has a stronger positive effect on the evaluation of political performance (and indirectly on subjective well-being) if actual performance is more questionable. These hypotheses were tested by multilevel structural equation modeling. Our multilevel moderated mediation models supporting this hypothesis were based on the 2018 European Social Survey dataset (N = 49,519) extended with county-level indices indicating actual performance in healthcare, education, and economy. The results also imply that the bigger the actual problem is, the stronger ignorance is driven by political trust.},
	year = {2024},
	eissn = {1940-1183},
	pages = {1-14},
	orcid-numbers = {Hadarics, Márton/0000-0001-8203-448X}
}

@article{MTMT:34352186,
	title = {Negative contexts as catalyzers: Belief in a just world enhances political trust via perceived procedural justice, and contextual procedural injustice boosts it},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34352186},
	author = {Hadarics, Márton},
	doi = {10.1002/ejsp.3011},
	journal-iso = {EUR J SOC PSYCHOL},
	journal = {EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY},
	volume = {54},
	unique-id = {34352186},
	issn = {0046-2772},
	abstract = {In our multinational study, we tested the hypothesis that belief in a just world (BJW) enhances political trust by strengthening perceptions of political procedural justice. Based on data from the ninth round of the European Social Survey and various country‐ranking indices, we found a positive relationship between BJW and political trust, with perceived procedural justice serving as an important mediator in this relationship. More importantly, our multilevel analysis indicated that the actual quality of procedural justice moderates this relationship in a way that BJW enhances perceived procedural justice and political trust indirectly to a greater extent in countries with more severe problems with political procedural justice. The results show that a negative context serves as a catalyzer for motivated perceptions, as BJW pushes perceptions in the direction of justice even more strongly in an unjust context, which, in turn, contributes to gratuitous political trust.},
	year = {2024},
	eissn = {1099-0992},
	pages = {282-297},
	orcid-numbers = {Hadarics, Márton/0000-0001-8203-448X}
}

@article{MTMT:33969786,
	title = {Myths and Reality About Confronting Anti-Gay Prejudice: Who Confronts and Why (Not)?},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/33969786},
	author = {Szekeres, Hanna and Cabarkapa, Dana},
	doi = {10.1080/00918369.2022.2161085},
	journal-iso = {J HOMOSEXUAL},
	journal = {JOURNAL OF HOMOSEXUALITY},
	volume = {71},
	unique-id = {33969786},
	issn = {0091-8369},
	abstract = {There are lay theories about who would confront heterosexist prejudice, with people often citing women, educated, and liberals as being more likely to speak up. However, prior work is inconclusive about such predictors of confrontation. We tested which individual-level characteristics predict bystander confrontation, and what motivates or prevents straight individuals from confronting-focusing on socio-political ideology and gender. We conducted our study among Eastern-Southeastern Europeans (N = 132), and we employed a behavioral paradigm, where participants believed they witnessed and had an opportunity to confront anti-gay discrimination. We found 24% confrontation rate, which was not predicted by age, socioeconomic status, education level, or heterosexism. Moreover, we found that women or liberals were as likely to confront as men or conservatives were, respectively, however, their motivations and obstacles differed. Opposed to our prediction, men were not discouraged from confronting because of fear of being misidentified as gay, while as predicted, women were discouraged due to concerns about their assertiveness and efficacy. We also found that as predicted, liberals were encouraged to confront for equality/intergroup-oriented reasons, and conservatives were encouraged by individual/merit-oriented reasons. We suggest that intervention programs relying on personalized messages can be utilized to motivate confronting heterosexist prejudice along ideological lines.},
	keywords = {gender; political ideology; sexual prejudice; Bystanders; Prejudice confrontation; heterosexism},
	year = {2024},
	eissn = {1540-3602},
	pages = {1139-1162},
	orcid-numbers = {Szekeres, Hanna/0000-0002-1038-1682}
}

@CONFERENCE{MTMT:34668662,
	title = {Long-Lasting Effects of a Prosocial Counter-Misinformation Intervention in an Informational Autocracy},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34668662},
	author = {Orosz, Gábor and Faragó, Laura and Krekó, Péter and Benedek, Paskuj},
	booktitle = {ICPS 2023 Poster Brochure},
	unique-id = {34668662},
	year = {2023},
	pages = {160},
	orcid-numbers = {Orosz, Gábor/0000-0001-5883-6861; Faragó, Laura/0000-0003-1243-7296; Krekó, Péter/0000-0002-4751-4717}
}

@article{MTMT:34437024,
	title = {Gondolkodni ér! – avagy a kogníció hatása az álhírek felismerésére},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34437024},
	author = {Győry, Réka and Faragó, Laura},
	journal-iso = {IMPULZUS (SZEGED)},
	journal = {IMPULZUS – SZEGEDI PSZICHOLÓGIAI TANULMÁNYOK},
	volume = {10},
	unique-id = {34437024},
	year = {2023},
	eissn = {2064-9258},
	orcid-numbers = {Faragó, Laura/0000-0003-1243-7296}
}

@article{MTMT:34247064,
	title = {"Personally, I feel sorry, but professionally, I don't have a choice." Understanding the drivers of anti-Roma discrimination on the rental housing market},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34247064},
	author = {Váradi, Luca and Szilasi, Blanka and Kende, Anna and Braverman, Jeremy and Simonovits, Gabor and Simonovits, Bori},
	doi = {10.3389/fsoc.2023.1223205},
	journal-iso = {FRONT SOCIOL},
	journal = {FRONTIERS IN SOCIOLOGY},
	volume = {8},
	unique-id = {34247064},
	abstract = {The aim of our study is to assess the drivers of discriminatory behaviors of real-estate agents and private landlords toward prospective Roma tenants, relying on qualitative data from Hungary. Though there is a broad literature on the forms and frequency of discrimination, we know much less about the question of why people discriminate. Previous research suggests that discrimination on the basis of ethnicity is widespread in Hungary. To understand the drivers of discrimination, we analyzed: (a) the sources and justifications of discrimination of Roma people on the rental housing market among real-estate agents and private landlords, the actors making decisions about tenants (b) mapped the social embeddedness of discrimination, and (c) assessed the resilience of discriminatory intentions by analyzing the reactions to a 3-min advocacy video showing discrimination of Roma people on the rental housing market. We conducted and analyzed five online group discussions with 18 real estate agents and landlords advertising properties for rent in different regions of the country. Our qualitative study revealed that discrimination of Roma people is understood to be a widespread and socially acceptable practice driven by the need to avoid risks attributed to Roma tenants based on widely held stereotypes about them. We identified certain specificities in the justification and argumentation strategies of real-estate agents in comparison to private landlords. By providing counter-information presenting the perspective of Roma tenants, negative views could be challenged on the emotional level and also by shifting the group dynamics, strengthening the viewpoint of those without prejudice. We discuss our findings with regards to the possibilities of interventions against discrimination in societies in which neither social norms nor state institutions expect the equal treatment of the members of ethnic minority groups.},
	keywords = {Hungary; Focus group; Ethnic discrimination; rental housing market; Roma people; anti-Gypsyism; social intervention},
	year = {2023},
	eissn = {2297-7775},
	pages = {1-19},
	orcid-numbers = {Kende, Anna/0000-0001-5148-0145; Simonovits, Bori/0000-0002-5727-5043}
}

@inbook{MTMT:34212425,
	title = {Anti-Gypsyism as a Historically Lasting Form of Prejudice in Politically Unstable Societies},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34212425},
	author = {Kende, Anna and Lášticová, Barbara},
	booktitle = {The Psychology of Politically Unstable Societies},
	doi = {10.4324/9781003282181-13},
	unique-id = {34212425},
	year = {2023},
	pages = {153-168},
	orcid-numbers = {Kende, Anna/0000-0001-5148-0145}
}