ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 12 pp. 117-127. , 11 p. (2015)
Közlemény:2778044 Érvényesített Forrás Idéző Folyóiratcikk (Szakcikk ) Nyilvános idézők összesen: 55 Független: 46 Függő: 9 Idézett közlemények száma: 8
Folyóiratcikk/Szakcikk (Folyóiratcikk)/Tudományos[2778044] [Érvényesített]
Független idéző: 46, Függő idéző: 9, Nem vizsgált idéző: 0, Összes idéző: 55
  1. * Kelemen E et al. Preliminary guidelines for integrated assessment and valuation of ecosystem services in specific policy contexts. (2015)
  3. Pecháček O et al. Economic comparison of management strategies in the forests with the different intensity protection [Ekonomická komparace strategií hospodaření v lesích s různou intenzitou ochrany]. (2016) ZPRAVY LESNICKEHO VYZKUMU 0322-9688 1805-9872 61 4 279-289
  4. Stępniewska M. Ecosystem Service Mapping and Assessment as a Support for Policy and Decision Making. (2016) CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER 1863-0650 1863-0669 44 10 1414-1422
  5. Braat Leon. Ecosystem Services. (2016) Megjelent: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science
  6. Malkamäiki Arttu. Impacts of land use and land use changes on the resilience of beekeeping in Uruguay. (2016) FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS 1389-9341 70 113-123
  7. * Mihók Barbara et al. Ki mondja meg, mi a fontos? – Részvétel és természetvédelem. (2016) TERMÉSZETVÉDELMI KÖZLEMÉNYEK 1216-4585 22 131-154
  8. Malatinszky Ákos. Stakeholder Perceptions of Climate Extremes’ Effects on Management of Protected Grasslands in a Central European Area. (2016) WEATHER, CLIMATE, AND SOCIETY 1948-8327 1948-8335 8 3 209-217
  9. Reilly K et al. Stakeholders’ frames and ecosystem service use in the context of a debate over rebuilding or removing a dam in New Brunswick, Canada. (2016) ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY 1708-3087 22 1
  10. * Kovács Eszter et al. Towards understanding and resolving the conflict related to the Eastern Imperial Eagle (Aquila heliaca) conservation with participatory management planning. (2016) LAND USE POLICY 0264-8377 1873-5754 54 158-168
  11. Capdevilla D. Water flows to multiple stakeholdes: A ecosystem service-based approach to conflicts in the Ten River basin. (2016)
  12. Marina García-Llorente et al. What can conservation strategies learn from the ecosystem services approach? Insights from ecosystem assessments in two Spanish protected areas. (2016) BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION 0960-3115 1572-9710 2016 1-23
  13. Lai S et al. Anthropization processes and protection of the environment: An assessment of land cover changes in Sardinia, Italy. (2017) SUSTAINABILITY 2071-1050 9 12
  14. Pártl A. A spatial analysis of integrated risk: vulnerability of ecosystem services provisioning to different hazards in the Czech Republic. (2017) NATURAL HAZARDS 0921-030X 1573-0840 2017 1-20
  15. * Mihók B et al. Biodiversity on the waves of history: conservation in a changing social and institutional environment in Hungary, a post-soviet EU member state. (2017) BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 0006-3207 211 67-75
  16. Gaglio Mattias. Changes in land use and ecosystem services in tropical forest areas: a case study in Andes mountains of Ecuador. (2017) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIODIVERSITY SCIENCE ECOSYSTEMS SERVICES AND MANAGEMENT 2151-3732 2151-3740 13 1 264-279
  17. Pinke Zsolt et al. Developing an integrated land use planning system on reclaimed wetlands of the Hungarian Plain using economic valuation of ecosystem services. (2017) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 2017
  18. Vergílio Mart. Ecosystem functions at the island scale: a contribution to the design of ecological structure. (2017) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIODIVERSITY SCIENCE ECOSYSTEMS SERVICES AND MANAGEMENT 2151-3732 2151-3740 13 1 355-379
  19. Ignazio Cannas et al. Ecosystem Services and the Natura 2000 Network: A Study Concerning a Green Infrastructure Based on Ecological Corridors in the Metropolitan City of Cagliari. (2017) LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE 0302-9743 1611-3349 10409 379-400
  20. Mannetti Lelani. Evaluating land use conflicts at the borders of Etosha National Park, Namibia: A social-ecological approach. (2017)
  21. Zang Z. Evaluation of ecological well-being and eco-economic efficiency in the Chinese mainland: From the perspective of justice and efficiency. (2017) SHENGTAI XUEBAO / ACTA ECOLOGICA SINICA 1000-0933 1872-2032 37 7 2403-2414
  22. * Balázs Bálint et al. Féltermészetes agrártájak ökoszisztéma-szolgáltatásai a gazdálkodók szemszögéből. (2017) TERMÉSZETVÉDELMI KÖZLEMÉNYEK 1216-4585 23 144-167
  23. Jax K et al. Handling a messy world: Lessons learned when trying to make the ecosystem services concept operational. (2017) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 29 415-427
  24. Artmann M et al. How smart growth and green infrastructure can mutually support each other — A conceptual framework for compact and green cities. (2017) ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS 1470-160X 1872-7034 2017
  25. Lai Sabrina. Land cover changes and environmental protection: A study based on transition matrices concerning Sardinia (Italy). (2017) LAND USE POLICY 0264-8377 1873-5754 67 126-150
  26. Rodríguez-Rodríguez D et al. Perceptions, attitudes and values of two key stakeholders on the oldest and newest Spanish national parks. (2017) ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY 1387-585X 1573-2975 2017
  27. Lopes Rita. Puzzling Out Ecosystem Services Values: A Participatory Framework to Support Decision- Making. (2017)
  28. Lai Sabrina et al. The Influence of Natura 2000 Sites on Land-Taking Processes at the Regional Level: An Empirical Analysis Concerning Sardinia (Italy). (2017) SUSTAINABILITY 2071-1050 9 2
  29. Cord AF et al. Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: Main concepts, methods and the road ahead. (2017) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 2017
  30. * Kalóczkai Á. Az ökoszisztéma szolgáltatások szerepe a természet értékének mérésében és a tájhasználati konfliktusok kezelésében. (2018)
  31. Martín-López B et al. Chapter 2: Nature’s contributions to people and quality of life.. (2018) Megjelent: The IPBES regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Europe and Central Asia pp. 57-185
  32. Wells G et al. Ecosystem service analysis in marginal agricultural lands: A case study in Belize. (2018) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 32 Part A 70-77
  33. Dang Dongliang et al. Ecosystem Services and Their Relationships in the Grain-for-Green Programme—A Case Study of Duolun County in Inner Mongolia, China. (2018) SUSTAINABILITY 2071-1050 10 11 p. 4036
  34. Palomo-Campesino S et al. Exploring Current and Future Situation of Mediterranean Silvopastoral Systems: Case Study in Southern Spain. (2018) RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT 1550-7424 2018
  35. Chung Min et al. Global relationships between biodiversity and nature-based tourism in protected areas. (2018) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 34 11-23
  36. Cannas I et al. Green Infrastructure and Ecological Corridors: A Regional Study Concerning Sardinia. (2018) SUSTAINABILITY 2071-1050 10 4
  38. Heli Saarikoski et al. Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice. (2018) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 29 Part C 579-598
  39. Cannas I. Integrating Green Infrastructure and Ecological Corridors: A Study Concerning the Metropolitan Area of Cagliari (Italy). (2018) Megjelent: Smart Planning: Sustainability and Mobility in the Age of Change. Green Energy and Technology pp. 127-145
  40. Xu X et al. Lake-wetland ecosystem services modeling and valuation: Progress, gaps and future directions.. (2018) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 33 A 19-28
  41. * Marjainé Szerényi et al. Merre tart a környezetértékelés? A teljes gazdasági értéktől az ökoszisztéma-szolgáltatásokig. (2018) Megjelent: Környezet – Gazdaság – Társadalom pp. 135-150
  42. Santos - et al. Report on Social Mapping and Assessment Methods for Ecosystem Services. (2018)
  43. * Dick Jan et al. Stakeholders’ perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept: Results from 27 case studies. (2018) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 29 Part C 552-565
  44. Kerekes Sándor et al. Sustainability, environmental economics, welfare. (2018) ISBN:9789635037070
  45. Braun V et al. Trajectories of Protected Area Creation in the Austrian Alps: two case studies. (2018) Megjelent: 6th Symposium for Research in Protected Areas, Conference Volume pp. 83-84
  46. * Turkelboom Francis et al. When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning. (2018) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 29 Part C 566-578
  47. Oláh Judit et al. Achieving Sustainable E-Commerce in Environmental, Social and Economic Dimensions by Taking Possible Trade-Offs. (2019) SUSTAINABILITY 2071-1050 11 1 p. 89
  48. Rincón-Ruiz Alexander et al. Applying integrated valuation of ecosystem services in Latin America: Insights from 21 case studies. (2019) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 36 p. 100901
  49. Rincón-Ruiz Alexander et al. Ecosystem services as an inclusive social metaphor for the analysis and management of environmental conflicts in Colombia. (2019) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 37 p. 100924
  50. Lopes Rita et al. How to articulate the multiple value dimensions of ecosystem services? Insights from implementing the PArticulatES framework in a coastal social-ecological system in Portugal. (2019) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 38 p. 100955
  51. Ruiz-Frau Ana et al. In the blind-spot of governance – Stakeholder perceptions on seagrasses to guide the management of an important ecosystem services provider. (2019) SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 0048-9697 1879-1026 688 1081-1091
  52. Kiss Márton. Ökoszisztéma-szolgáltatások modell-alapú értékelése. (2019)
  53. Lhoest Simon et al. Perceptions of ecosystem services provided by tropical forests to local populations in Cameroon. (2019) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 38 p. 100956
  54. Stosch Kathleen et al. Quantifying stakeholder understanding of an ecosystem service trade-off. (2019) SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 0048-9697 1879-1026 651 2524-2534
  55. Seppelt Ralf et al. Trade-Offs and Synergies Between Biodiversity Conservation and Productivity in the Context of Increasing Demands on Landscapes. (2019) Megjelent: Atlas of Ecosystem Services pp. 251-256
2019-09-19 12:48