ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 12 pp. 117-127. , 11 p. (2015)
Közlemény:2778044 Egyeztetett Forrás Idéző Folyóiratcikk (Szakcikk ) Nyilvános idézők összesen: 71 Független: 59 Függő: 12 Idézett közlemények száma: 8
Folyóiratcikk/Szakcikk (Folyóiratcikk)/Tudományos[2778044] [Érvényesített]
Független idéző: 59, Függő idéző: 12, Nem vizsgált idéző: 0, Összes idéző: 71
  1. * Kelemen E et al. Preliminary guidelines for integrated assessment and valuation of ecosystem services in specific policy contexts. (2015)
  3. Pecháček O et al. Economic comparison of management strategies in the forests with the different intensity protection [Ekonomická komparace strategií hospodaření v lesích s různou intenzitou ochrany]. (2016) ZPRAVY LESNICKEHO VYZKUMU 0322-9688 1805-9872 61 4 279-289
  4. Stępniewska M. Ecosystem Service Mapping and Assessment as a Support for Policy and Decision Making. (2016) CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER 1863-0650 1863-0669 44 10 1414-1422
  5. Braat Leon. Ecosystem Services. (2016) Megjelent: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science
  6. Malkamäiki Arttu et al. Impacts of land use and land use changes on the resilience of beekeeping in Uruguay. (2016) FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS 1389-9341 70 113-123
  7. * Mihók Barbara et al. Ki mondja meg, mi a fontos? – Részvétel és természetvédelem. (2016) TERMÉSZETVÉDELMI KÖZLEMÉNYEK 1216-4585 22 131-154
  8. Malatinszky A. Stakeholder perceptions of climate extremes' effects on management of protected grasslands in a central European area. (2016) WEATHER, CLIMATE, AND SOCIETY 1948-8327 1948-8335 8 3 209-217
  9. Reilly K H et al. Stakeholders’ frames and ecosystem service use in the context of a debate over rebuilding or removing a dam in New Brunswick, Canada. (2016) ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY 1708-3087 22 1
  10. * Kovács Eszter et al. Towards understanding and resolving the conflict related to the Eastern Imperial Eagle (Aquila heliaca) conservation with participatory management planning. (2016) LAND USE POLICY 0264-8377 1873-5754 54 158-168
  11. Capdevilla D. Water flows to multiple stakeholdes: A ecosystem service-based approach to conflicts in the Ten River basin. (2016)
  12. Lai S et al. Anthropization processes and protection of the environment: An assessment of land cover changes in Sardinia, Italy. (2017) SUSTAINABILITY 2071-1050 9 12
  13. Pártl A et al. A spatial analysis of integrated risk: vulnerability of ecosystem services provisioning to different hazards in the Czech Republic. (2017) NATURAL HAZARDS 0921-030X 1573-0840 89 3 1185-1204
  14. * Mihók B et al. Biodiversity on the waves of history: conservation in a changing social and institutional environment in Hungary, a post-soviet EU member state. (2017) BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 0006-3207 211 67-75
  15. Gaglio Mattias et al. Changes in land use and ecosystem services in tropical forest areas: a case study in Andes mountains of Ecuador. (2017) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIODIVERSITY SCIENCE ECOSYSTEMS SERVICES AND MANAGEMENT 2151-3732 2151-3740 13 1 264-279
  16. Vergílio Mart et al. Ecosystem functions at the island scale: a contribution to the design of ecological structure. (2017) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIODIVERSITY SCIENCE ECOSYSTEMS SERVICES AND MANAGEMENT 2151-3732 2151-3740 13 1 355-379
  17. Ignazio Cannas et al. Ecosystem Services and the Natura 2000 Network: A Study Concerning a Green Infrastructure Based on Ecological Corridors in the Metropolitan City of Cagliari. (2017) LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE 0302-9743 1611-3349 10409 379-400
  18. Mannetti Lelani. Evaluating land use conflicts at the borders of Etosha National Park, Namibia: A social-ecological approach. (2017)
  19. Zang Z et al. Evaluation of ecological well-being and eco-economic efficiency in the Chinese mainland: From the perspective of justice and efficiency. (2017) SHENGTAI XUEBAO / ACTA ECOLOGICA SINICA 1000-0933 1872-2032 37 7 2403-2414
  20. * Balázs Bálint et al. Féltermészetes agrártájak ökoszisztéma-szolgáltatásai a gazdálkodók szemszögéből. (2017) TERMÉSZETVÉDELMI KÖZLEMÉNYEK 1216-4585 23 144-167
  21. Lai Sabrina et al. Land cover changes and environmental protection: A study based on transition matrices concerning Sardinia (Italy). (2017) LAND USE POLICY 0264-8377 1873-5754 67 126-150
  22. Lopes Rita. Puzzling Out Ecosystem Services Values: A Participatory Framework to Support Decision- Making. (2017)
  23. Lai Sabrina et al. The Influence of Natura 2000 Sites on Land-Taking Processes at the Regional Level: An Empirical Analysis Concerning Sardinia (Italy). (2017) SUSTAINABILITY 2071-1050 9 2
  24. Cord AF et al. Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: Main concepts, methods and the road ahead. (2017) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 28 264-272
  25. * Kalóczkai Á. Az ökoszisztéma szolgáltatások szerepe a természet értékének mérésében és a tájhasználati konfliktusok kezelésében. (2018)
  26. Martín-López B et al. Chapter 2: Nature’s contributions to people and quality of life.. (2018) Megjelent: The IPBES regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Europe and Central Asia pp. 57-185
  27. Pinke Zsolt et al. Developing an integrated land use planning system on reclaimed wetlands of the Hungarian Plain using economic valuation of ecosystem services. (2018) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 30 B 299-308
  28. Wells G J et al. Ecosystem service analysis in marginal agricultural lands: A case study in Belize. (2018) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 32 Part A 70-77
  29. Dang Dongliang et al. Ecosystem Services and Their Relationships in the Grain-for-Green Programme—A Case Study of Duolun County in Inner Mongolia, China. (2018) SUSTAINABILITY 2071-1050 10 11 p. 4036
  30. Palomo-Campesino S et al. Exploring Current and Future Situation of Mediterranean Silvopastoral Systems: Case Study in Southern Spain. (2018) RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT 1550-7424 71 5 578-591
  31. Chung Min Gon et al. Global relationships between biodiversity and nature-based tourism in protected areas. (2018) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 34 11-23
  32. Cannas I et al. Green Infrastructure and Ecological Corridors: A Regional Study Concerning Sardinia. (2018) SUSTAINABILITY 2071-1050 10 4
  33. Jax K. et al. Handling a messy world: Lessons learned when trying to make the ecosystem services concept operational. (2018) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 29 415-427
  35. Artmann M et al. How smart growth and green infrastructure can mutually support each other — A conceptual framework for compact and green cities. (2018) ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS 1470-160X 1872-7034 96 10-22
  36. Heli Saarikoski et al. Institutional challenges in putting ecosystem service knowledge in practice. (2018) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 29 Part C 579-598
  37. Cannas I et al. Integrating Green Infrastructure and Ecological Corridors: A Study Concerning the Metropolitan Area of Cagliari (Italy). (2018) Megjelent: Smart Planning: Sustainability and Mobility in the Age of Change. Green Energy and Technology pp. 127-145
  38. Xu X et al. Lake-wetland ecosystem services modeling and valuation: Progress, gaps and future directions.. (2018) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 33 A 19-28
  39. * Marjainé Szerényi Zsuzsanna et al. Merre tart a környezetértékelés? A teljes gazdasági értéktől az ökoszisztéma-szolgáltatásokig. (2018) Megjelent: Környezet – Gazdaság – Társadalom pp. 135-150
  40. Santos - et al. Report on Social Mapping and Assessment Methods for Ecosystem Services. (2018)
  41. Nel Lyndre et al. Selection Of Indicators For Assessment Of Soil-Related Agricultural Ecosystem Services And Sustainable Management. (2018) Megjelent: 25th International Poster Day and Institute of Hydrology Open day: Transport of Water, Chemicals and Energy in the Soil-Plant-A... p. 103
  42. * Dick Jan et al. Stakeholders’ perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept: Results from 27 case studies. (2018) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 29 Part C 552-565
  43. Kerekes Sándor et al. Sustainability, environmental economics, welfare. (2018) ISBN:9789635037070; 9789635037117
  44. Braun V et al. Trajectories of Protected Area Creation in the Austrian Alps: two case studies. (2018) Megjelent: 6th Symposium for Research in Protected Areas, Conference Volume pp. 83-84
  45. Marina García-Llorente et al. What can conservation strategies learn from the ecosystem services approach? Insights from ecosystem assessments in two Spanish protected areas. (2018) BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION 0960-3115 1572-9710 27 7 1575-1597
  46. * Turkelboom Francis et al. When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning. (2018) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 29 Part C 566-578
  47. Oláh Judit et al. Achieving Sustainable E-Commerce in Environmental, Social and Economic Dimensions by Taking Possible Trade-Offs. (2019) SUSTAINABILITY 2071-1050 11 1
  48. Rincón-Ruiz Alexander et al. Applying integrated valuation of ecosystem services in Latin America: Insights from 21 case studies. (2019) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 36 p. 100901
  49. Alfréd Szilágyi et al. Decomposition rates and soil organic matter content of conventional, organic and permaculture farms on the Szentendre Island, Hungary: an explorative case study. (2019) Megjelent: 26th International Poster Day pp. 222-231
  50. Szilágyi A et al. Earthworm and nematode populations in conventional, organic and permaculture farms on Szentendre Island, Hungary: An explorative case study. (2019) Megjelent: 26th International Poster Day pp. 213-221
  51. Szilágyi A et al. Earthworm and nematode populations in conventional, organic and permaculture farms on the Szentendre Island, Hungary: an explorative case study. (2019) Megjelent: 26th International Poster Day pp. 14-14
  52. Rincón-Ruiz Alexander et al. Ecosystem services as an inclusive social metaphor for the analysis and management of environmental conflicts in Colombia. (2019) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 37 p. 100924
  53. * Ábrám Ö. et al. Ecosystem Services of Lake Kolon. (2019) Megjelent: 26th International Poster Day pp. 13-19
  54. Bernués Alberto et al. Exploring social preferences for ecosystem services of multifunctional agriculture across policy scenarios. (2019) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 39 p. 101002
  55. Lopes Rita et al. How to articulate the multiple value dimensions of ecosystem services? Insights from implementing the PArticulatES framework in a coastal social-ecological system in Portugal. (2019) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 38 p. 100955
  56. Ruiz-Frau Ana et al. In the blind-spot of governance – Stakeholder perceptions on seagrasses to guide the management of an important ecosystem services provider. (2019) SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 0048-9697 1879-1026 688 1081-1091
  57. Leone Federica et al. Local Development and Protection of Nature in Coastal Zones: A Planning Study for the Sulcis Area (Sardinia, Italy). (2019) SUSTAINABILITY 2071-1050 11 18 p. 5095
  58. Marjainé Szerényi. Mit nyújthat a Barcsi Ó-Dráva holtág az emberek számára?: Az ökoszisztéma-szolgáltatások felmérése és az élőhely helyreállításának várható hatásai. (2019) Megjelent: A Barcsi Ó-Dráva holtág élőhelyei és élővilága pp. 203-221
  59. Kiss Márton. Ökoszisztéma-szolgáltatások modell-alapú értékelése. (2019)
  60. Rodríguez-Rodríguez D et al. Perceptions, attitudes and values of two key stakeholders on the oldest and newest Spanish national parks. (2019) ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY 1387-585X 1573-2975 21 2 1053-1073
  61. Lhoest Simon et al. Perceptions of ecosystem services provided by tropical forests to local populations in Cameroon. (2019) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 38 p. 100956
  63. Stosch Kathleen C. et al. Quantifying stakeholder understanding of an ecosystem service trade-off. (2019) SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 0048-9697 1879-1026 651 2524-2534
  64. Cuni-Sanchez Aida et al. Social Perceptions of Forest Ecosystem Services in the Democratic Republic of Congo. (2019) HUMAN ECOLOGY (NEW YORK) 0300-7839 1572-9915 47 839-853
  65. Juhász Erika et al. Természetvédők és kutatók ismeretei az eurázsiai hód kapcsán a Kárpát-medencében I.: elterjedés, életnyomok, az együttélés lehetőségei, az elhullás okai. (2019) TERMÉSZETVÉDELMI KÖZLEMÉNYEK 1216-4585 25 59-79
  66. Cuni-Sanchez Aida et al. The importance of livelihood strategy and ethnicity in forest ecosystem services’ perceptions by local communities in north-western Cameroon. (2019) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 40 p. 101000
  67. Seppelt Ralf et al. Trade-Offs and Synergies Between Biodiversity Conservation and Productivity in the Context of Increasing Demands on Landscapes. (2019) Megjelent: Atlas of Ecosystem Services pp. 251-256
  68. Negev Maya et al. Using the ecosystem services framework for defining diverse human-nature relationships in a multi-ethnic biosphere reserve. (2019) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 39 p. 100989
  69. * Vári Á. et al. Berries, greens, and medicinal herbs - Mapping and assessing wild plants as an ecosystem service in Transylvania (Romania). (2020) JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY AND ETHNOMEDICINE 1746-4269 16 1
  70. Zeng Jie et al. Do Protected Areas Improve Ecosystem Services? A Case Study of Hoh Xil Nature Reserve in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. (2020) REMOTE SENSING 2072-4292 12 3 p. 471
  71. * Rodríguez-Morales Beatriz et al. Perception of ecosystem services and disservices on a peri-urban communal forest: Are landowners’ and visitors’ perspectives dissimilar?. (2020) ECOSYSTEM SERVICES 2212-0416 43 p. 101089
2020-07-06 12:07