@article{MTMT:33832487,
	title = {Evaluation Framework for Social Impact on the E-Co-Housing Project in Budapest},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/33832487},
	author = {Babos, Annamária and Csizmady, Adrienne and Szántóné Orbán, Annamária and Szabó, Julianna},
	doi = {10.3311/PPso.17956},
	journal-iso = {PERIOD POLYTECH SOC MANAG SCI},
	journal = {PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA SOCIAL AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES},
	volume = {32},
	unique-id = {33832487},
	issn = {1416-3837},
	abstract = {In Europe, today's affordable housing and co-housing projects represent complex products, complementing the physical intervention with economic and social techniques. This means that purely environmental and economical evaluation is not sufficient for these projects. While environmental and economical evaluation methodologies are widespread and advanced in the construction sector, methodologies to evaluate the social impacts of housing projects are rarely used and therefore underdeveloped.This study elaborates a framework to evaluate and monitor the social impacts of a complex social housing and co-housing project. The method adopted implements the Social Life Cycle Assessment, integrating a Post Occupancy Evaluation as the main tool for collecting and analysing data. The presented assessment framework is elaborated for the E-Co-Housing Model, a new experimental model so far as the development of affordable housing in Budapest is concerned. However, it delivers a starting point for more complex sustainability analysis of residential buildings in general.The guideline for the Evaluation Framework is the methodology of the Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products, clarifying and improving some of its usual elements. The study of the E-Co-Housing Model shows that housing products, especially affordable and co-housing projects significantly differ from other products. The differences are their main stakeholder groups, their life cycle stages and in their impact ways too. Therefore, housing products need a special S-LCA methodology to assess in a balanced way the complex aspects of its environmental, economic, and social sustainability.},
	year = {2024},
	eissn = {1587-3803},
	pages = {47-57},
	orcid-numbers = {Babos, Annamária/0009-0004-7194-6538; Csizmady, Adrienne/0000-0002-8282-8623}
}

@article{MTMT:35440630,
	title = {Innovative housing models to support shared use of space: the case study of Sonnwendviertel Ost in Vienna},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/35440630},
	author = {Babos, Annamária and Szántóné Orbán, Annamária and Benkő, Melinda},
	doi = {10.1186/s40410-024-00242-8},
	journal-iso = {CITY TERRIT ARCHITECT},
	journal = {CITY TERRITORY AND ARCHITECTURE},
	volume = {11},
	unique-id = {35440630},
	issn = {2195-2701},
	abstract = {Amidst the persistent urban expansion in European cities, the need for high-quality housing for growing populations remains a challenge. Integrating newly developed housing areas into the urban fabric and fostering a distinct local identity pose additional challenges. Despite extensive research in this realm, there exists a gap in the examination of the extent of shared space utilization in new housing developments. This study fills that gap by analyzing the quantity, quality, and diversity of space utilization in new housing projects, focusing on the development processes and maintenance methods. The research, conducted through site and case study analyses of Sonnwendviertel Ost development area in Vienna, underscores that the shared utilization of spaces is closely tied to distinct housing models with varied levels of financing and involvement of diverse actors. Consequently, it provides insights into the housing models and their configurations that best facilitate the development of shared use of spaces in housing construction. This, in turn, is perceived as instrumental in cultivating a more robust neighborhood identity and enhancing the livability of communities, thereby contributing to sustainable urban development. © The Author(s) 2024.},
	year = {2024},
	orcid-numbers = {Babos, Annamária/0009-0004-7194-6538; Benkő, Melinda/0000-0001-5438-6840}
}

@article{MTMT:34689691,
	title = {Öt kelet-közép-európai főváros központrendszerének összevetése fejlesztési terveik alapján},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/34689691},
	author = {Losonczy, Anna and Szántóné Orbán, Annamária and Benkő, Melinda},
	doi = {10.32643/fk.147.3.5},
	journal-iso = {FÖLDRAJZI KÖZLEMÉNYEK},
	journal = {FÖLDRAJZI KÖZLEMÉNYEK},
	volume = {147},
	unique-id = {34689691},
	issn = {0015-5411},
	year = {2023},
	pages = {298-314},
	orcid-numbers = {Benkő, Melinda/0000-0001-5438-6840}
}

@article{MTMT:32722600,
	title = {Understanding Centrality Theories. Socio-spatial Characteristics and Interrelations of City Centers},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/32722600},
	author = {Losonczy, Anna and Szántóné Orbán, Annamária},
	doi = {10.1556/096.2021.00048},
	journal-iso = {ÉPÍTÉS-ÉPÍTÉSZETTUDOMÁNY},
	journal = {ÉPÍTÉS-ÉPÍTÉSZETTUDOMÁNY},
	volume = {50},
	unique-id = {32722600},
	issn = {0013-9661},
	year = {2022},
	eissn = {1588-2764},
	pages = {27-43}
}

@article{MTMT:32899925,
	title = {Contemporary Decentralized Development of a Centrally Planned Metropolis: The Case of Budapest},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/32899925},
	author = {Losonczy, Anna and Szántóné Orbán, Annamária and Benkő, Melinda},
	doi = {10.17645/up.v7i3.5426},
	journal-iso = {URBAN PLANNING},
	journal = {URBAN PLANNING},
	volume = {7},
	unique-id = {32899925},
	issn = {2183-7635},
	abstract = {This study examines the changes undergone by urban centers within Greater Budapest’s extension area, which was annexed to the capital of Hungary in 1950, and which is, with minor modifications, equivalent to the outer zone today. The article compares the development methods of two different political systems: state socialism (i.e., the communist regime) between 1950 and 1990, and post‐socialist capitalism after 1990. Over a longer period, the urban development of Budapest has made a long but circular journey from decentralized to a decentralized–disjointed socio‐spatial development system, passing through a centrally‐planned communist era between 1945 and 1990. Nevertheless, closer examination of this process reveals that several paradigm shifts took place in the design methodology, which was strongly influenced by socio‐economic changes. These shifts, layered upon the inherited structure, as well as the neglect or preference of different systems, caused great differences in the development histories of centers on the outskirts. Therefore, we have set up a development typology for the centers on the outskirts by summarizing the planning history at the city level. Based on how well the center was able to incorporate itself into the larger metropolis since 1950, we have distinguished the following development models: the metropolized, the transcript, the rehabilitated, and the urban village model. This typology is extended to include new urban centers that formed during state socialism (between 1950 and 1990) and post‐socialist capitalism (since 1990).},
	year = {2022},
	eissn = {2183-7635},
	pages = {144-158},
	orcid-numbers = {Benkő, Melinda/0000-0001-5438-6840}
}

@article{MTMT:31994631,
	title = {Fejlődő kertváros. A helyi központrendszer változásai Budapest XVI. kerületében},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31994631},
	author = {Losonczy, Anna and Benkő, Melinda and Szántóné Orbán, Annamária},
	journal-iso = {UTÓIRAT},
	journal = {UTÓIRAT: A RÉGI-ÚJ MAGYAR ÉPÍTŐMŰVÉSZET MELLÉKLETE},
	volume = {21},
	unique-id = {31994631},
	issn = {1789-9680},
	year = {2021},
	pages = {57-61},
	orcid-numbers = {Benkő, Melinda/0000-0001-5438-6840}
}

@{MTMT:33792070,
	title = {Families and family values in society and culture: country report of Hungary.},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/33792070},
	author = {Medgyesi, Márton and Szántóné Orbán, Annamária},
	booktitle = {Families and Family Values in Society and Culture},
	unique-id = {33792070},
	year = {2021},
	pages = {187-208}
}

@article{MTMT:31636859,
	title = {Lessons Learned From 11 Countries on Programs Promoting Intergenerational Solidarity},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31636859},
	author = {Zlotnick, Cheryl and Groenou, Marjolein Broese and Szántóné Orbán, Annamária and Corrigan, Trudy and Coimbra, Susana and Kirtava, Zviad and Holdsworth, Clare and Comas‐d'Argemir, Dolors and Aliprant, Laura and Gadet, Carole and Pavia, George},
	doi = {10.1111/fare.12482},
	journal-iso = {FAM RELAT},
	journal = {FAMILY RELATIONS},
	volume = {70},
	unique-id = {31636859},
	issn = {0197-6664},
	abstract = {Objective: The goal of this project was to develop a systematic framework through which interventions promoting intergenerational solidarity in 11 countries could be assessed. Background: Although intergenerational solidarity—the exchange of material, social, and emotional support and care between family generations—benefits both the country's economic well-being (macro-level) and the individual's physical, mental, and social well-being (micro-level), decreasing intergenerational solidarity is evident in many industrialized countries. Interventions promoting intergenerational solidarity are increasingly being developed, but few are described in the literature. Moreover, no unifying framework describing them exists. Method: Representatives from 11 countries convened to identify interventions promoting intergenerational solidarity. After several meetings, a unifying framework was created. Representatives selected a convenience sample of programs and abstracted information based on the framework. Results: The outcome of social well-being was virtually ubiquitous in most programs. Countries appeared to take a broad view of intergenerational solidarity, focusing on interactions among generations, rather than interactions within families. Discussion and Implications: The framework enabled the systematic abstraction and assessment of programs. Most programs had no standard method of evaluating their outcomes. Longitudinal evaluations would be optimal if we want to identify the best practices in intergenerational solidarity programs.},
	year = {2021},
	eissn = {1741-3729},
	pages = {670-681},
	orcid-numbers = {Zlotnick, Cheryl/0000-0002-3327-2155}
}

@article{MTMT:31330639,
	title = {Sharing-Based Co-Housing Categorization. A Structural Overview of the Terms and Characteristics Used in Urban Co-Housing},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31330639},
	author = {Babos, Annamária and Szabó, Julianna and Szántóné Orbán, Annamária and Benkő, Melinda},
	doi = {10.1556/096.2020.009},
	journal-iso = {ÉPÍTÉS-ÉPÍTÉSZETTUDOMÁNY},
	journal = {ÉPÍTÉS-ÉPÍTÉSZETTUDOMÁNY},
	volume = {48},
	unique-id = {31330639},
	issn = {0013-9661},
	abstract = {The European urban areas are growing fast, with many contemporary housing forms. Among these, co-housing forms related to sharing have become a key issue for urban housing development. These housing forms are analysed (their physical and social characteristics or effects) in more and more publications, without a common terminology of this interdisciplinary research field. In our study, based on the overview of existing definitions, characteristics we introduce a comprehensive sharing based categorization that could be valuable for terms and projects, as well. With the note, that the social dimension of sharing methods would not exist without the physical ones, because in co-housing the shared space is the basic criteria. In this paper, we focus on three groups of the social fields of sharing related to housing: the shared creation, the shared tenure, and the shared activities. We conclude the structural approach of our overview unravels new perspectives for the classification of housing forms. Based on our categorization and methodology, we recommend the development of a sharing based scalable classification that measures projects consistent and comparable.
		
		A városias, beépített területek aránya Európa szerte folyamatosan növekszik, ennek következtében kortárs városi lakhatási formák is teret nyernek. A megosztáshoz kötődő, úgynevezett co-housing formák a kortárs városi lakófejlesztések jelentős részét képzik. Éppen ezért egyre több elemzés és publikáció születik a témában (például a fizikai és társadalmi jellemzőikről vagy azok hatásairól), azonban a lakhatás kutatási területén nincs egyetértés a kifejezések és definíciók használatában. A következő tanulmányban egy, a lakhatási formákat megosztás alapján rendszerező kategorizáció kerül bemutatásra, melynek elméleti és gyakorlati haszna is lehet. A kategorizáció a meglévő kifejezésekre, definíciókra és jellemzőkre egyaránt épít. A co-housing lakhatás alapvető feltétele a – változó méretű és minőségű – megosztott tér, így a társadalmi dimenziók minden esetben kötődnek egy fajta tériséghez is. A lakhatási formákban jelenlévő társadalmi és fizikai dimenziók együttes vizsgálata nem képezi jelen kutatás tárgyát, a társadalmi típusúakra koncentrál: a megosztott létrehozásra, tulajdonlásra és a tevékenységekre. Megállapítható, hogy a kutatás során alkalmazott rendszerezett áttekintés új irányvonalakra mutatott rá a lakhatási formák osztályozásának területén. A tanulmányban tárgyalt megosztás-alapú kategorizálásra és módszertanra alapozva egy, a megosztásra épülő és skálázható osztályozás kidolgozása javasolt, melyben a projektek mérése és összehasonlítása egységes módon történhet.},
	year = {2020},
	eissn = {1588-2764},
	pages = {331-355},
	orcid-numbers = {Babos, Annamária/0009-0004-7194-6538; Benkő, Melinda/0000-0001-5438-6840}
}

@misc{MTMT:31805794,
	title = {The impact of contemporary cohousing model on urban quality of life: Case studies from Vienna, Berlin, Zürich, and Budapest},
	url = {https://m2.mtmt.hu/api/publication/31805794},
	author = {Babos, Annamária and Benkő, Melinda and Szántóné Orbán, Annamária},
	unique-id = {31805794},
	year = {2020},
	orcid-numbers = {Benkő, Melinda/0000-0001-5438-6840}
}