https://m2.mtmt.hu/ hun 2026-08-25 22:42 JournalArticle 37321248 VALIDATED true 0 false 2026-07-14T07:37:31.577+0000 2026-07-14T07:36:00.661+0000 2026-06-04T07:48:20.660+0000 true 10104190 Murai Fruzsina /api/admin/10104190 Admin Murai Fruzsina (ESK admin) true 2026-06-19T09:53:16.951+0000 2026-06-19T09:53:16.951+0000 2026-06-19T09:53:37.047+0000 true 10028864 Horváth Klára /api/admin/10028864 Admin Horváth Klára (ELTE PPK admin 5) true 10028864 true false true 24 24 /api/publicationtype/24 PublicationType Folyóiratcikk 1 true 24 JournalArticle true 1134514 Survey paper true 24 24 /api/publicationtype/24 PublicationType Folyóiratcikk 1 true 24 JournalArticle /api/subtype/1134514 Összefoglaló cikk SubType Összefoglaló cikk (Folyóiratcikk) 102 true 1134514 true 1 /api/category/1 Category Tudományos true 1 Petróczi, Andrea true true /api/journal/10059606 REVIEWED SPORTS 2075-4663 2075-4663 true false 10059606 false 10059606 true 2075-4663 2075-4663 Journal FOREIGN 14 6 229 229 40 2026 Interpreting doping prevalence estimates generated through indirect estimation models (IEMs) remains challenging for sport policy and governance due to the wide variation in reported rates and methodological complexity. In this study, we combined a critical appraisal of the methodological and epistemic developments of IEM applications to doping prevalence with a bibliometric analysis of publication trends, citation patterns, and collaboration networks, using a convergent parallel mixed-methods design. Across 52 records published between 2002 and 2026, this study maps the scientific landscape of IEM-based doping prevalence research. Findings show that IEM-based prevalence research is methodologically sophisticated yet institutionally dispersed and largely Eurocentric, reflecting a field still consolidating its standards and disciplinary identity. Over time, the focus has shifted from reporting prevalence rates to methodological critique and re-analysis of existing datasets. Reported prevalence estimates, ranging from 0 to 57.1%, are highly sensitive to modelling assumptions about athlete behaviour in complex survey environments. While this trend strengthens rigour, it also complicates evidence synthesis for policy actors and risks undermining trust in IEM-based estimates if poorly communicated. Anti-doping organisations and researchers should treat IEM-derived prevalence as bounded indicators rather than definitive rates and integrate prevalence evidence with contextual data for transparent policy and public communication. true 2026 true true true false true false GOLD 2026-07-14 true https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14060229 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q1 false false false false 2026-06-18T09:53:36.765+0000 Egészség- és Sporttudományi Kar (SZE); Felnőttképzés-kutatási és Tudásmenedzsment Intézet (ELTE / PPK); Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Könyvtár és Informác... 3 37 3 9 0 true Language 10002 /api/language/10002 Angol Angol English true 2 true PersonAuthorship 139367313 /api/authorship/139367313 Petróczi, Andrea [Petróczi, Andrea (Sporttudomány), szerző] Egészség- és Sporttudományi Kar (SZE) 1 0.11111111 true false false Author 10084575 /api/author/10084575 Petróczi Andrea (Sporttudomány) Petróczi Andrea true true Petróczi Andrea true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PersonAuthorship 139367314 /api/authorship/139367314 Sagoe, Dominic 2 0.11111111 false false false Sagoe Dominic true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PersonAuthorship 139367315 /api/authorship/139367315 Kiss, Anna [Kiss, Anna (dietetika, táplál...), szerző] Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Könyvtár és Informác... 3 0.11111111 false false false Author 10050895 /api/author/10050895 Kiss Anna (dietetika, táplálkozástudomány) Kiss Anna true 10050895 true Kiss Anna true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PersonAuthorship 139367316 /api/authorship/139367316 Soós, Sándor [Soós, Sándor (Tudományelemzés), szerző] Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Könyvtár és Informác...; Felnőttképzés-kutatási és Tudásmenedzsment Intézet (ELTE / PPK) 4 0.111 false false false Author 10048365 /api/author/10048365 Soós Sándor (Tudományelemzés) Soós Sándor true 10048365 true Soós Sándor true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PersonAuthorship 139367317 /api/authorship/139367317 Chegeni, Razieh 5 0.11111111 false false false Chegeni Razieh true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PersonAuthorship 139367318 /api/authorship/139367318 Veltmaat, Annalena 6 0.11111111 false false false Veltmaat Annalena true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PersonAuthorship 139367319 /api/authorship/139367319 Cruyff, Maarten 7 0.11111111 false false false Cruyff Maarten true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PersonAuthorship 139367320 /api/authorship/139367320 van der Heijden, Peter 8 0.11111111 false false false van der Heijden Peter true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PersonAuthorship 139367321 /api/authorship/139367321 de Hon, Olivier 9 0.11111111 false true false de Hon Olivier true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PublicationIdentifier 32466433 /api/publicationidentifier/32466433 DOI: 10.3390/sports14060229 PlainSource 6 /api/publicationsource/6 DOI PublicationSourceType 10001 /api/publicationsourcetype/10001 DOI true true true DOI DOI https://doi.org/@@@ true true 6 true GOLD true IDENTICAL 10.3390/sports14060229 https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14060229 false true PublicationIdentifier 32493213 /api/publicationidentifier/32493213 REAL: 239867 SwordSource 36 /api/publicationsource/36 REAL PublicationSourceType 10007 /api/publicationsourcetype/10007 Repozitórium true true true REAL REAL https://real.mtak.hu/@@@ true true 36 true GREEN true 239867 https://real.mtak.hu/239867 false true PublicationIdentifier 32630506 /api/publicationidentifier/32630506 WoS: 001803361200001 PlainSource 1 /api/publicationsource/1 WoS PublicationSourceType 10003 /api/publicationsourcetype/10003 Indexelő adatbázis false true true WoS WoS https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/@@@ true true 1 true IDENTICAL 001803361200001 https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/001803361200001 true true PublicationIdentifier 32636963 /api/publicationidentifier/32636963 Scopus: 105043153982 PlainSource 3 /api/publicationsource/3 Scopus PublicationSourceType 10003 /api/publicationsourcetype/10003 Indexelő adatbázis false true true Scopus Scopus http://www.scopus.com/record/display.url?origin=inward&eid=2-s2.0-@@@ true true 3 true IDENTICAL 105043153982 http://www.scopus.com/record/display.url?origin=inward&eid=2-s2.0-105043153982 true true PublicationIdentifier 32466434 /api/publicationidentifier/32466434 Egyéb URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/14/6/229 PlainSource 40 /api/publicationsource/40 Egyéb URL PublicationSourceType 10006 /api/publicationsourcetype/10006 Link true true true Egyéb URL Other URL @@@ true true 40 true https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/14/6/229 https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/14/6/229 false true SjrRating 11709285 /api/sjrrating/11709285 sjr:Q1 (2026) Scopus - Orthopedics and Sports Medicine SPORTS 2075-4663 2075-4663 81 0.24 journal RatingType 10002 /api/ratingtype/10002 sjr sjr true true ClassificationExternal 2732 /api/classificationexternal/2732 Scopus - Orthopedics and Sports Medicine true 2732 true Q1 FROM_LAST_YEAR true true Reference 75787043 /api/reference/75787043 1. Boardley 2025: Latent motivation profiles and doping in sport and exercise: An integrative approach based on achievement goal and self-determination theories., Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sport, 35, p. e70138, DOI: 10.1111/sms.70138 1 10.1111/sms.70138 false true Reference 75787044 /api/reference/75787044 2. Garcy 2025: Theorizing the use of performance enhancing substances and methods in sport as four different types of deviant behavior., Deviant Behav., 45, p. 818, DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2023.2266548 2 10.1080/01639625.2023.2266548 false true Reference 75787045 /api/reference/75787045 3. Lauritzen 2023: Intelligence-based doping control planning improves testing effectiveness: Perspectives from a national anti-doping organisation., Drug Test. Anal., 15, p. 506, DOI: 10.1002/dta.3435 3 10.1002/dta.3435 false true Reference 75787046 /api/reference/75787046 4. Hoppen, B., and Sukys, S. (2024). Perceived coach-created empowering and disempowering climate effects on athletes’ intentions to use doping: The mediational role of self-regulatory efficacy and attitudes towards doping. Sports, 12., DOI: 10.3390/sports12040100 4 10.3390/sports12040100 false true Reference 75787047 /api/reference/75787047 5. Manges, T., Seidel, K., Walter, N., Schüler, T., and Elbe, A.M. (2022). Answering the call for values-based anti-doping education—An evidence-informed intervention for elite adolescent athletes in Germany and Austria. Front. Sport Act. Living, 4., DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2022.859153 5 10.3389/fspor.2022.859153 false true Reference 75787048 /api/reference/75787048 6. Gleaves 2021: Doping prevalence in competitive sport: Evidence synthesis with “best practice” recommendations and reporting guidelines from the WADA Working Group on Doping Prevalence., Sports Med., 51, p. 1909, DOI: 10.1007/s40279-021-01477-y 6 10.1007/s40279-021-01477-y false true Reference 75787049 /api/reference/75787049 7. Tourangeau 2007: Sensitive questions in surveys., Psychol. Bull., 133, p. 859, DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859 7 10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859 false true Reference 75787050 /api/reference/75787050 8. Krumpal 2013: Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review., Qual. Quant., 47, p. 2025, DOI: 10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9 8 10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9 false true Reference 75787051 /api/reference/75787051 9. Dahl 2026: Why Is workplace sexual harassment underreported? The value of outside options amid the threat of retaliation., Am. Econ. Rev., 116, p. 897, DOI: 10.1257/aer.20221703 9 10.1257/aer.20221703 false true Reference 75787052 /api/reference/75787052 10. McKenzie 2023: Under-reporting of sport-related concussions by adolescent athletes: A systematic review., Int. Rev. Sport Exerc. Psychol., 16, p. 66, DOI: 10.1080/1750984X.2020.1824243 10 10.1080/1750984X.2020.1824243 false true Reference 75787053 /api/reference/75787053 11. Fritz 2024: How to best measure academic dishonesty in students: A systematic review of self-report assessment methods and psychometric quality., Eur. J. Psychol. Assess., 40, p. 498, DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000861 11 10.1027/1015-5759/a000861 false true Reference 75787054 /api/reference/75787054 12. Folk 2022: Agreement between youth self-report and biospecimen-confirmed substance use: A systematic review., Subst. Use Misuse, 57, p. 531, DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2021.2019783 12 10.1080/10826084.2021.2019783 false true Reference 75787055 /api/reference/75787055 13. Fortuna 2023: Inconclusive (or “Elusive”): Concordance Between Substance Use Self-report and Toxicology for Diverse Youth Populations., J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry, 62, p. 721, DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2023.04.007 13 10.1016/j.jaac.2023.04.007 false true Reference 75787056 /api/reference/75787056 14. Zaal, E., Ongena, Y., van der Velden, N., Loughnan, D., and Hoeks, J. (2026). Unraveling honest responding: A systematic review on the effectiveness of social desirability bias reduction methods in survey research. Qual. Quant., 1–33., DOI: 10.1007/s11135-026-02664-7 14 10.1007/s11135-026-02664-7 false true Reference 75787057 /api/reference/75787057 15. Weerasinghe 2025: Designing against desirability: A systematic review of alternative response techniques in self-reported social science data., J. Org. Behav. Res., 10, p. 130, DOI: 10.51847/Y7q16s5TNh 15 10.51847/Y7q16s5TNh false true Reference 75787058 /api/reference/75787058 16. Lockett, I., Blank, C., Patterson, L., Westmattelmann, D., Lux, D., and Petróczi, A. (2026). From violation to stigma: A literature review of athletes’ lived experiences following anti-doping sanctions. Front. Sports Act. Living, 8., DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2026.1651135 16 10.3389/fspor.2026.1651135 false true Reference 75787059 /api/reference/75787059 17. Lockett 2026: Mapping doping-related criminal legislation together: An informed stakeholder consultation., Perform. Enhanc. Health, 14, p. 100413, DOI: 10.1016/j.peh.2026.100413 17 10.1016/j.peh.2026.100413 false true Reference 75787060 /api/reference/75787060 18. Grimes 2026: Talking dirty: Anti-doping’s stigmatizing rhetoric and its impact on the unintentional doper., Perform. Enhanc. Health, 14, p. 100412, DOI: 10.1016/j.peh.2025.100412 18 10.1016/j.peh.2025.100412 false true Reference 75787061 /api/reference/75787061 19. Arnab, R. (2025). Randomized Response Techniques: Early Developments. Indirect Methods of Data Collection and Analysis from Surveys, Springer. Indian Statistical Institute Series., DOI: 10.1007/978-981-97-6005-3 19 10.1007/978-981-97-6005-3 false true Reference 75787062 /api/reference/75787062 20. Le, T.N., Lee, S.M., Tran, P.L., and Li, C.S. (2023). Randomized response techniques: A systematic review from the pioneering work of Warner (1965) to the present. Mathematics, 11., DOI: 10.3390/math11071718 20 10.3390/math11071718 false true Reference 75787063 /api/reference/75787063 21. Hox 2005: Meta-analysis of randomized response research: Thirty-five years of validation., Sociol. Methods Res., 33, p. 319, DOI: 10.1177/0049124104268664 21 10.1177/0049124104268664 false true Reference 75787064 /api/reference/75787064 22. Boruch 1971: Assuring confidentiality of responses in social research: A note on strategies., Am. Sociol., 6, p. 308 22 false true Reference 75787065 /api/reference/75787065 23. Kuk 1990: Asking sensitive questions indirectly., Biometrika, 77, p. 436, DOI: 10.1093/biomet/77.2.436 23 10.1093/biomet/77.2.436 false true Reference 75787066 /api/reference/75787066 24. Greenberg 1969: The unrelated question randomized response model: Theoretical framework., J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 64, p. 520, DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1969.10500991 24 10.1080/01621459.1969.10500991 false true Reference 75787067 /api/reference/75787067 25. Horvitz 1967: The unrelated question randomized response model., Soc. Stat. Sect. Proc. Am. Stat. Assoc., 64, p. 65 25 false true Reference 75787068 /api/reference/75787068 26. Yu 2008: Two new models for survey sampling with sensitive characteristic: Design and analysis., Metrika, 67, p. 251, DOI: 10.1007/s00184-007-0131-x 26 10.1007/s00184-007-0131-x false true Reference 75787069 /api/reference/75787069 27. Nepusz 2011: New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: A pilot study on mephedrone., Subst. Abuse Treat. Prev. Policy, 6, p. 20, DOI: 10.1186/1747-597X-6-20 27 10.1186/1747-597X-6-20 false true Reference 75787070 /api/reference/75787070 28. Nepusz 2014: Estimating the prevalence of socially sensitive behaviors: Attributing guilty and innocent noncompliance with the single sample count method., Psychol. Methods, 19, p. 334, DOI: 10.1037/a0034961 28 10.1037/a0034961 false true Reference 75787071 /api/reference/75787071 29. Boeije 2002: Honest by chance: A qualitative interview study to clarify respondents’ (non-) compliance with computer-assisted randomized response., Bull. Sociol. Methodol., 75, p. 24, DOI: 10.1177/075910630207500104 29 10.1177/075910630207500104 false true Reference 75787072 /api/reference/75787072 30. Boeije 2007: Evaluating compliance with a computer assisted randomized response technique: A qualitative study into the origins of lying and cheating., Comput. Hum. Behav., 23, p. 591, DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.11.001 30 10.1016/j.chb.2004.11.001 false true Reference 75787073 /api/reference/75787073 31. Landsheer 1999: Trust and understanding, two psychological aspects of randomized response., Qual. Quant., 33, p. 1, DOI: 10.1023/A:1004361819974 31 10.1023/A:1004361819974 false true Reference 75787074 /api/reference/75787074 32. Jerke 2019: Too sophisticated even for highly educated survey respondents? A qualitative assessment of indirect question formats for sensitive questions., Surv. Res. Methods, 13, p. 319 32 false true Reference 75787075 /api/reference/75787075 33. Pielke 2018: Assessing doping prevalence is possible. So what are we waiting for?., Sports Med., 48, p. 207, DOI: 10.1007/s40279-017-0792-1 33 10.1007/s40279-017-0792-1 false true Reference 75787076 /api/reference/75787076 34. Ulrich 2023: Assessing the prevalence of doping among elite athletes: An analysis of results generated by the Single Sample Count method versus the Unrelated Question Method., Sports Med. Open, 9, p. 112, DOI: 10.1186/s40798-023-00658-5 34 10.1186/s40798-023-00658-5 false true Reference 75787077 /api/reference/75787077 35. Ibbett 2023: Topic sensitivity still affects honest responding, even when specialized questioning techniques are used., Conserv. Sci. Pract., 5, p. e12927, DOI: 10.1111/csp2.12927 35 10.1111/csp2.12927 false true Reference 75787078 /api/reference/75787078 36. Atsusaka 2023: A bias-corrected estimator for the crosswise model with inattentive respondents., Pol. Anal., 31, p. 134, DOI: 10.1017/pan.2021.43 36 10.1017/pan.2021.43 false true Reference 75787079 /api/reference/75787079 37. Meisters 2023: More than random responding: Empirical evidence for the validity of the (Extended) Crosswise Model., Behav. Res., 55, p. 716, DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-01819-2 37 10.3758/s13428-022-01819-2 false true Reference 75787080 /api/reference/75787080 38. John 2018: When and why randomized response techniques (fail to) elicit the truth., Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 148, p. 101, DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.07.004 38 10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.07.004 false true Reference 75787081 /api/reference/75787081 39. Barlas 2009: Do randomized-response designs eliminate response biases? An empirical study of non-compliance behavior., J. Appl. Econom., 24, p. 377, DOI: 10.1002/jae.1052 39 10.1002/jae.1052 false true Reference 75787082 /api/reference/75787082 40. Walzenbach 2023: Puzzling answers to crosswise questions: Examining overall prevalence rates, response order effects, and learning effects., Surv. Res. Methods, 17, p. 1 40 false true Reference 75787083 /api/reference/75787083 41. Clark 1998: Honest answers to embarrassing questions: Detecting cheating in the randomized response model., Psychol. Methods, 3, p. 160, DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.2.160 41 10.1037/1082-989X.3.2.160 false true Reference 75787084 /api/reference/75787084 42. Ostapczuk 2011: Improving self-report measures of medication non-adherence using a cheating detection extension of the randomised-response-technique., Stat. Methods Med. Res., 20, p. 489, DOI: 10.1177/0962280210372843 42 10.1177/0962280210372843 false true Reference 75787085 /api/reference/75787085 43. Meisters 2024: A new approach to detecting cheating in sensitive surveys: The cheating detection triangular model., Sociol. Methods Res., 53, p. 328, DOI: 10.1177/00491241211055764 43 10.1177/00491241211055764 false true Reference 75787086 /api/reference/75787086 44. Reiber 2023: Cheater detection using the unrelated question model., Sociol. Methods Res., 52, p. 389, DOI: 10.1177/0049124120914919 44 10.1177/0049124120914919 false true Reference 75787087 /api/reference/75787087 45. Liu 2013: A variant of the parallel model for sample surveys with sensitive characteristics., Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 67, p. 115, DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2013.05.003 45 10.1016/j.csda.2013.05.003 false true Reference 75787088 /api/reference/75787088 46. Tian 2014: A new non-randomized response model: The parallel model., Stat. Neerl., 68, p. 293, DOI: 10.1111/stan.12034 46 10.1111/stan.12034 false true Reference 75787089 /api/reference/75787089 47. Heck 2018: Detecting nonadherence without loss in efficiency: A simple extension of the crosswise model., Behav. Res. Methods, 50, p. 1895, DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0957-8 47 10.3758/s13428-017-0957-8 false true Reference 75787090 /api/reference/75787090 48. Lukusa 2026: Adjusting self-protective and non-response behaviours in sensitive prevalence estimation by a two-stage multilevel Randomised Response Technique., Int. Stat. Rev., 94, p. 202, DOI: 10.1111/insr.12597 48 10.1111/insr.12597 false true Reference 75787091 /api/reference/75787091 49. Shah 2020: Combining answers to direct and indirect questions: An implementation of Kuk’s randomized response model., Commun. Stat. Theory Methods, 49, p. 3933, DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2019.1593458 49 10.1080/03610926.2019.1593458 false true Reference 75787092 /api/reference/75787092 50. Sagoe, D., Cruyff, M., Chegeni, R., Veltmaat, A., Kiss, A., Soós, S., De Hon, O., Van der Heijden, P., and Petróczi, A. (2024). Exploring doping prevalence in sport from indirect estimation models: A systematic review and meta-bibliometric analysis. Sport. Med. Open., DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4104397/v1 50 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4104397/v1 false true Reference 75787093 /api/reference/75787093 51. 2012: Sample survey on sensitive topics: Investigating respondents’ understanding and trust in alternative versions of the randomized response technique., J. Res. Pract., 8, p. M1 51 false true Reference 75787094 /api/reference/75787094 52. (2026, April 24). IAAF Accused of Suppressing Athletes’ Doping Study, BBC. Available online: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/athletics/33948924. 52 false true Reference 75787095 /api/reference/75787095 53. Willison, E. (2025). One in Five Commonwealth Games Athletes Admitted to Doping, The Telegraph. Available online: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/athletics/2025/10/16/one-in-five-2022-commonwealth-games-athletes-admit-doping/. 53 false true Reference 75787096 /api/reference/75787096 54. (2026, April 24). Anonymous Survey Exposes British Doping by Daniel Soriano. Inside The Games. Available online: https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/anonymous-survey-exposes-british-doping. 54 false true Reference 75787097 /api/reference/75787097 55. (2026, April 24). The True Extent of Doping Across Elite Sport, as Admitted by Athletes Themselves by Nick Harris. Sporting Intelligence Investigations. Available online: https://sportingintelligence832.substack.com/p/revealed-the-true-extent-of-doping. 55 false true Reference 75787098 /api/reference/75787098 56. Creswell, J.W., and Clark, V.L.P. (2017). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, Sage. 56 false true Reference 75787099 /api/reference/75787099 57. Page 2021: The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews., Br. Med. J., 372, p. n71, DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71 57 10.1136/bmj.n71 false true Reference 75787100 /api/reference/75787100 58. Abdulrazzaq 2023: The Psychosomatic Reflection of AAS (Androgenic Anabolic Steroid) Usage between Bodybuilders in Baghdad Gyms., J. ReAtt. Ther. Dev. Divers., 6, p. 224 58 false true Reference 75787101 /api/reference/75787101 59. Backhouse, S., Whitaker, L., McKenna, J., Beggs, C., Watkins, S., Nunn, R., and Petroczi, A. (2026, March 17). Schoolboy Supplement Use Behaviours and Doping Vulnerability. Available online: https://eprints.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/id/eprint/7554/1/SchoolboySupplementUseBehavioursAndDopingVulnerabilityPV-BACKHOUSE.pdf. 59 false true Reference 75787102 /api/reference/75787102 60. Balk, L., and Dopheide, M. (2021). Dopinggebruik in de Nederlandse Topsport [Doping Use in Dutch Elite Sport], Mulier Institute. Available online: https://www.mulierinstituut.nl/publicaties/25952/doping-in-dutch-elite-sports/. 60 false true Reference 75787103 /api/reference/75787103 61. Balk 2023: Doping prevalence and attitudes towards doping in Dutch elite sports., Sci. J. Sport. Perform., 2, p. 132, DOI: 10.55860/BCUQ4622 61 10.55860/BCUQ4622 false true Reference 75787104 /api/reference/75787104 62. Boardley 2019: Perceptions of coach doping confrontation efficacy and athlete susceptibility to intentional and inadvertent doping., Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports, 29, p. 1647, DOI: 10.1111/sms.13489 62 10.1111/sms.13489 false true Reference 75787105 /api/reference/75787105 63. Breuer, C., and Hallmann, K. (2026, February 06). Dysfunktionen des Spitzensports: Doping, Match-Fixing und Gesundheitsgefährdungen aus Sicht von Bevölkerung und Athleten, Available online: https://fis.dshs-koeln.de/en/publications/dysfunktionen-des-spitzensports-doping-match-fixing-und-gesundhei. 63 false true Reference 75787106 /api/reference/75787106 64. Christiansen 2023: Recreational athletes’ use of performance-enhancing substances: Results from the first European Randomized Response Technique Survey., Sports Med.—Open, 9, p. 1, DOI: 10.1186/s40798-022-00548-2 64 10.1186/s40798-022-00548-2 false true Reference 75787107 /api/reference/75787107 65. Cruyff 2024: The one-sayers model for the Extended Crosswise design., J. R. Stat. Soc. A, 187, p. 882, DOI: 10.1093/jrsssa/qnae009 65 10.1093/jrsssa/qnae009 false true Reference 75787108 /api/reference/75787108 66. Dietz, P., Ulrich, R., Dalaker, R., Striegel, H., Franke, A.G., Lieb, K., and Simon, P. (2013). Associations between physical and cognitive doping—A cross-sectional study in 2997 triathletes. PLoS ONE, 8., DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078702 66 10.1371/journal.pone.0078702 false true Reference 75787109 /api/reference/75787109 67. Dietz 2016: Analgesics use in competitive triathletes: Its relationship to doping and on predicting its usage., J. Sports Sci., 34, p. 1965, DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1149214 67 10.1080/02640414.2016.1149214 false true Reference 75787110 /api/reference/75787110 68. Duiven, E., and De Hon, O. (2015). De Nederlandse Topsporter en het Anti-Dopingbeleid 2014–2015 [The Dutch Elite Athlete and Anti-Doping Policy 2014–2015], Anti-Doping Authority Netherlands. Available online: https://www.dopingautoriteit.nl/media/files/2015/The_Dutch_elite_athlete_and_the_anti-doping_policy_2014-2015_international_summary_DEF.pdf. 68 false true Reference 75787111 /api/reference/75787111 69. Elbe 2018: Doping prevalence among Danish elite athletes., Perform. Enhanc. Health, 6, p. 28, DOI: 10.1016/j.peh.2018.01.001 69 10.1016/j.peh.2018.01.001 false true Reference 75787112 /api/reference/75787112 70. Fincoeur 2017: Omgaan met sociale wenselijkheid: Inschatting van de dopingprevalentie aan de hand van de Randomized Response Technique., Panopticon J. Crim. Law Criminol. Crim. Justice, 38, p. 376 70 false true Reference 75787113 /api/reference/75787113 71. Franke 2017: The use of pharmacologic cognitive enhancers in competitive chess., Epidemiology, 28, p. e57, DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000737 71 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000737 false true Reference 75787114 /api/reference/75787114 72. Frenger, M., Pitsch, W., and Emrich, E. (2016). Sport-induced substance use—An empirical study to the extent within a German Sports Association. PLoS ONE, 11., DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165103 72 10.1371/journal.pone.0165103 false true Reference 75787115 /api/reference/75787115 73. Heller, S., Ulrich, R., Simon, P., and Dietz, P. (2020). Refined analysis of a cross-sectional doping survey among recreational triathletes: Support for the nutritional supplement gateway hypothesis. Front. Psychol., 11., DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561013 73 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561013 false true Reference 75787116 /api/reference/75787116 74. Heyes, A.R. (2022). Psychosocial Factors Facilitating Use of Performance and Cognitive Enhancing Drugs in Sport and Education. [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Birmingham]. Available online: https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/12515/. 74 false true Reference 75787117 /api/reference/75787117 75. Hilkens 2021: Social media, body image and resistance training: Creating the perfect ‘Me’ with dietary supplements, anabolic steroids and SARM’s., Sports Med. Open, 7, p. 81, DOI: 10.1186/s40798-021-00371-1 75 10.1186/s40798-021-00371-1 false true Reference 75787118 /api/reference/75787118 76. James 2013: A potential inflating effect in estimation models: Cautionary evidence from comparing performance enhancing drug and herbal hormonal supplement use estimates., Psychol. Sport Exerc., 14, p. 84, DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.08.003 76 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.08.003 false true Reference 75787119 /api/reference/75787119 77. Nakhaee 2013: Prevalence of use of anabolic steroids by bodybuilders using three methods in a city of Iran., Addict. Health, 5, p. 77 77 false true Reference 75787120 /api/reference/75787120 78. Nilaweera 2020: 369 Knowledge, attitude and usage of doping drugs among national level athletes in Sri Lanka., Br. J. Sports Med., 54, p. A150 78 false true Reference 75787121 /api/reference/75787121 79. Petróczi, A., Cruyff, M., De Hon, O., Sagoe, D., and Saugy, M.O. (2022). Hidden figures: Revisiting doping prevalence estimates reported for two major international sport events in Ulrich et al. (2018) in the context of further empirical evidence and the extant literature. Front. Sports Act. Living, 4., DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2022.1017329 79 10.3389/fspor.2022.1017329 false true Reference 75787122 /api/reference/75787122 80. Fincoeur, B., Gleaves, J., and Ohl, F. (2018). Assessing and explaining the doping prevalence in cycling. Doping in Cycling: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Routledge., DOI: 10.4324/9781351103879 80 10.4324/9781351103879 false true Reference 75787123 /api/reference/75787123 81. Pitsch, W. (2022). Doping in recreational sport as a risk management strategy. J. Risk Financ. Manag., 15., DOI: 10.3390/jrfm15120574 81 10.3390/jrfm15120574 false true Reference 75787124 /api/reference/75787124 82. Pitsch 2026: Dope stereotypes: When perception runs south and prevalence points north., Perform. Enhanc. Health, 14, p. 100398, DOI: 10.1016/j.peh.2025.100398 82 10.1016/j.peh.2025.100398 false true Reference 75787125 /api/reference/75787125 83. Pitsch 2012: The frequency of doping in elite sport: Results of a replication study., Int. Rev. Sociol. Sport., 47, p. 559, DOI: 10.1177/1012690211413969 83 10.1177/1012690211413969 false true Reference 75787126 /api/reference/75787126 84. Pitsch 2005: Zur Häufigkeit des Dopings im Leistungssport: Ergebnisse eines www-surveys [On the frequency of doping in high-performance sport: Results of a www survey]., Leipz. Sportwiss. Beiträge, 46, p. 63 84 false true Reference 75787127 /api/reference/75787127 85. Pitsch 2007: Doping in elite sports in Germany: Results of a www survey., Eur. J. Sport. Soc., 4, p. 89, DOI: 10.1080/16138171.2007.11687797 85 10.1080/16138171.2007.11687797 false true Reference 75787128 /api/reference/75787128 86. Pitsch, W., Maats, P., and Emrich, E. (2009). Zur Häufigkeit des Dopings im Deutschen Spitzensport [On the Frequency of Doping in German Elite Sport], Magazin Forschung. 86 false true Reference 75787129 /api/reference/75787129 87. Emrich, E., and Pitsch, W. (2009). Zur Häufigkeit des Dopings im deutschen Spitzensport–eine Replikationsstudie [On the frequency of doping in German elite sport–a replication study]. Sport und Doping: Zur Analyse einer Antagonistischen Symbiose, Peter Lang. 87 false true Reference 75787130 /api/reference/75787130 88. Emrich, E., and Pitsch, W. (2009). On the frequency of doping in top German sport—A replication study. Sport and Doping for the Analysis of an Antagonistic Symbiosis, Peter Lang. 88 false true Reference 75787131 /api/reference/75787131 89. Kempf, H., Nagel, S., and Dietl, H. (2013). Doping im Breiten- und Freizeitsport. Zur Überprüfung von Hypothesen mittels RRT-gewonnener Daten. Im Schatten der Sportwirtschaft, Hofmann. 89 false true Reference 75787132 /api/reference/75787132 90. Strauß, B. (2002). Wie verbreitet ist Doping im Leistungssport? Eine www Umfrage mit Hilfe der Randomized-Response-Technik [How widespread is doping in competitive sports? A www survey using the randomized response technique]. Expertise im Sport, BPS. 90 false true Reference 75787133 /api/reference/75787133 91. Reiber 2022: Improving the efficiency of surveys with randomized response models: A sequential approach based on curtailed sampling., Psychol. Methods, 27, p. 198, DOI: 10.1037/met0000353 91 10.1037/met0000353 false true Reference 75787134 /api/reference/75787134 92. Robach 2024: Prevalence of drug use in ultra-endurance athletes., Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., 56, p. 828, DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003374 92 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003374 false true Reference 75787135 /api/reference/75787135 93. Sayed, K.H., Cruyff, M.J., Van der Heijden, P.G., and Petróczi, A. (2022). Refinement of the extended crosswise model with a number sequence randomizer: Evidence from three different studies in the UK. PLoS ONE, 17., DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279741 93 10.1371/journal.pone.0279741 false true Reference 75787136 /api/reference/75787136 94. Sayed 2024: The analysis of randomized response “ever” and “last year” questions: A non-saturated Multinomial model., Behav. Res. Methods, 56, p. 1335, DOI: 10.3758/s13428-023-02096-3 94 10.3758/s13428-023-02096-3 false true Reference 75787137 /api/reference/75787137 95. Sayed 2024: Modeling evasive response bias in Randomized Response: Cheater detection versus self-protective no-saying., Psychometrika, 89, p. 1261, DOI: 10.1007/s11336-024-10000-x 95 10.1007/s11336-024-10000-x false true Reference 75787138 /api/reference/75787138 96. Sayed, K.H., Cruyff, M.J., Petróczi, A., and Van der Heijden, P.G. (2026). The Extended Crosswise Model adjusted for random answering. J. Surv. Stat. Methodol., smag004., DOI: 10.1093/jssam/smag004 96 10.1093/jssam/smag004 false true Reference 75787139 /api/reference/75787139 97. Schröter, H., Studzinski, B., Dietz, P., Ulrich, R., Striegel, H., and Simon, P. (2016). A Comparison of the cheater detection and the unrelated question models: A randomized response survey on physical and cognitive doping in recreational triathletes. PLoS ONE, 11., DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155765 97 10.1371/journal.pone.0155765 false true Reference 75787140 /api/reference/75787140 98. Schu 2026: Cheating and doping in chess—A survey among 1,924 German club players using the Randomized Response Technique., Perform. Enhanc. Health, 13, p. 100344, DOI: 10.1016/j.peh.2025.100344 98 10.1016/j.peh.2025.100344 false true Reference 75787141 /api/reference/75787141 99. Seifarth, S., Dietz, P., Disch, A.C., Engelhardt, M., and Zwingenberger, S. (2019). The prevalence of legal performance-enhancing substance use and potential cognitive and or physical doping in German recreational triathletes, assessed via the Randomised Response Technique. Sports, 7., DOI: 10.3390/sports7120241 99 10.3390/sports7120241 false true Reference 75787142 /api/reference/75787142 100. Simon 2006: Doping in fitness sports: Estimated number of unreported cases and individual probability of doping., Addiction, 101, p. 1640, DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01568.x 100 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01568.x false true Reference 75787143 /api/reference/75787143 101. Stamm 2011: Supplemente, Medikamente und Doping im Freizeitsport., Schweiz. Z. Sportmed. Sport., 59, p. 122 101 false true Reference 75787144 /api/reference/75787144 102. Vieweg, K. (2012). Doping im Breiten- und Freizeitsport. Akzente des Sportrechts, Duncker & Humblot. [1st ed.]., DOI: 10.3790/978-3-428-53870-6 102 10.3790/978-3-428-53870-6 false true Reference 75787145 /api/reference/75787145 103. Striegel 2010: Randomized response estimates for doping and illicit drug use in elite athletes., Drug Alcohol Depend., 106, p. 230, DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.07.026 103 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.07.026 false true Reference 75787146 /api/reference/75787146 104. Stubbe 2014: Prevalence of use of performance enhancing drugs by fitness centre members., Drug Test. Anal., 6, p. 434, DOI: 10.1002/dta.1525 104 10.1002/dta.1525 false true Reference 75787147 /api/reference/75787147 105. Ulrich 2018: Doping in two elite athletics competitions assessed by randomized-response surveys., Sports Med., 48, p. 211, DOI: 10.1007/s40279-017-0765-4 105 10.1007/s40279-017-0765-4 false true Reference 75787148 /api/reference/75787148 106. Ding 2014: Content-based citation analysis: The next generation of citation analysis., J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 65, p. 1820, DOI: 10.1002/asi.23256 106 10.1002/asi.23256 false true Reference 75787149 /api/reference/75787149 107. Peroni 2012: FaBiO and CiTO ontologies for describing bibliographic resources and citations., J. Web Semant., 17, p. 33, DOI: 10.1016/j.websem.2012.08.001 107 10.1016/j.websem.2012.08.001 false true Reference 75787150 /api/reference/75787150 108. Iqbal 2021: A decade of in-text citation analysis based on natural language processing and machine learning techniques: An overview of empirical studies., Scientometrics, 126, p. 6551, DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-04055-1 108 10.1007/s11192-021-04055-1 false true Reference 75787151 /api/reference/75787151 109. Anderson 2020: Citation context analysis as a method for conducting rigorous and impactful literature reviews., Org. Res. Methods, 26, p. 77, DOI: 10.1177/1094428120969905 109 10.1177/1094428120969905 false true Reference 75787152 /api/reference/75787152 110. Csardi 2006: The igraph software package for complex network research., Int. J. Complex. Syst., 1695, p. 1 110 false true Reference 75787153 /api/reference/75787153 111. Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.L., Lambiotte, R., and Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp., P10008., DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008 111 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008 false true Reference 75787154 /api/reference/75787154 112. Palmateer 2010: Evidence for the effectiveness of sterile injecting equipment provision in preventing hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus transmission among injecting drug users: A review of reviews., Addiction, 105, p. 844, DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02888.x 112 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02888.x false true Reference 75787155 /api/reference/75787155 113. Kiss, A., Lakner, Z., Soós, S., and Petróczi, A. (2022). Women’s footprint in anti-doping sciences: A bibliometric approach to research impact. Front. Sports Act. Living, 4., DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2022.866648 113 10.3389/fspor.2022.866648 false true Reference 75787156 /api/reference/75787156 114. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities, University of Chicago Press. 114 false true Reference 75787157 /api/reference/75787157 115. De Solla Price, D.J. (1963). Little Science, Big Science, Columbia University Press., DOI: 10.7312/pric91844 115 10.7312/pric91844 false true Reference 75787158 /api/reference/75787158 116. Granovetter 1973: The strength of weak ties., Am. J. Sociol., 78, p. 1360, DOI: 10.1086/225469 116 10.1086/225469 false true Reference 75787159 /api/reference/75787159 117. Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Harvard University Press., DOI: 10.4159/9780674029095 117 10.4159/9780674029095 false true Reference 75787160 /api/reference/75787160 118. Burt 2004: Structural holes and good ideas., Am. J. Sociol., 110, p. 349, DOI: 10.1086/421787 118 10.1086/421787 false true Reference 75787161 /api/reference/75787161 119. Kretschmer 1994: Coauthorship networks of invisible colleges and institutionalized communities., Scientometrics, 30, p. 363, DOI: 10.1007/BF02017234 119 10.1007/BF02017234 false true Reference 75787162 /api/reference/75787162 120. Nayak, T.K. (2026, January 17). A Review of Rigorous Randomized Response Methods for Protecting Respondent’s Privacy and Data Confidentiality, Available online: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2020/adrm/RRS2020-06.pdf. 120 false true Reference 75787163 /api/reference/75787163 121. (2026, April 19). Spotlight: WADA’s Work on Prevalence of Doping: Understanding the Effectiveness of Anti-Doping Programs. Available online: https://www.wada-ama.org/en/news/wadas-work-prevalence-doping-understanding-effectiveness-anti-doping-programs. 121 false true Reference 75787164 /api/reference/75787164 122. Sagoe, D., Cruyff, M., Spendiff, O., Chegeni, R., De Hon, O., Saugy, M., Van der Heijden, P.G., and Petróczi, A. (2021). Functionality of the Crosswise Model for assessing sensitive or transgressive behavior: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Psychol., 12., DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655592 122 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655592 false true Reference 75787165 /api/reference/75787165 123. Matsumoto, D., and van de Vijver, F.J.R. (2011). Survey response styles across cultures. Cross-Cultural Research Methods in Psychology, Cambridge University Press. 123 false true Reference 75787166 /api/reference/75787166 124. Krumpal 2012: Asking sensitive questions: The impact of forgiving wording and question context on social desirability bias., Qual. Quant., 46, p. 1601, DOI: 10.1007/s11135-011-9469-2 124 10.1007/s11135-011-9469-2 false true Reference 75787167 /api/reference/75787167 125. Mavletova 2013: Sensitive topics in PC web and mobile web surveys: Is there a difference?., Surv. Res. Methods, 7, p. 191 125 false true Reference 75787168 /api/reference/75787168 126. Chen, Y.-R., Mannix, E.A., Neale, M.A., and Wageman, R. (2006). Question comprehension and response: Implications of individualism and collectivism. National Culture and Groups, Emerald., DOI: 10.1016/S1534-0856(2006)9 126 10.1016/S1534-0856(2006)9 false true Reference 75787169 /api/reference/75787169 127. Niu 2012: Trust discrimination tendency of trust circles in the positive and negative information-sharing/disclosing domains and cultural differences between Canada and China., J. Soc. Evol. Cultur. Psychol., 6, p. 233, DOI: 10.1037/h0099211 127 10.1037/h0099211 false true Reference 75787170 /api/reference/75787170 128. Saunders, M.N.K., Skinner, D., Diets, G., Gillespie, N., and Lewicki, R.J. (2010). Trust differences across national-societal cultures: Much to do, or much ado about nothing. Organizational Trust: A Cultural Perspective, Cambridge University Press. 128 false true Reference 75787171 /api/reference/75787171 129. Uskul 2013: How successful you have been in life depends on the response scale used: The role of cultural mindsets in pragmatic inferences drawn from question format., Soc. Cognit., 31, p. 222, DOI: 10.1521/soco.2013.31.2.222 129 10.1521/soco.2013.31.2.222 false true Reference 75787172 /api/reference/75787172 130. Kurman 2002: Measured cross-cultural differences in self-enhancement and the sensitivity of the self-enhancement measure to the modesty response., Cross-Cultur. Res., 36, p. 73, DOI: 10.1177/1069397102036001004 130 10.1177/1069397102036001004 false true Reference 75787173 /api/reference/75787173 131. Uskul 2022: Preferred responses when honour is at stake: The role of cultural background, presence of others, and causality orientation., Asian J. Soc. Psychol., 25, p. 336, DOI: 10.1111/ajsp.12496 131 10.1111/ajsp.12496 false true Reference 75787174 /api/reference/75787174 132. Nauright 2025: Beyond scapegoats: Doping and the myth of the level playing field., Perform. Enhanc. Health, 13, p. 100376, DOI: 10.1016/j.peh.2025.100376 132 10.1016/j.peh.2025.100376 false true Reference 75787175 /api/reference/75787175 133. Ulrich 2026: Clarification regarding doping rates in the article by Nauright, Ratcliff & Zipp (2025)., Perform. Enhanc. Health, 14, p. 100415, DOI: 10.1016/j.peh.2026.100415 133 10.1016/j.peh.2026.100415 false true Reference 75787176 /api/reference/75787176 134. Nauright 2026: Corrigendum to “Beyond scapegoats: Doping and the myth of the level playing field”., Perform. Enhanc. Health, 14, p. 100414, DOI: 10.1016/j.peh.2026.100414 134 10.1016/j.peh.2026.100414 false true Reference 75787177 /api/reference/75787177 135. Backhouse 2026: Bridging research and practice in the psychology of doping in sport: Reflections and future directions., Psychol. Sport. Exerc., 83, p. 103033, DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.103033 135 10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.103033 false true Reference 75787178 /api/reference/75787178 136. Höglinger, M., and Jann, B. (2018). More is not always better: An experimental individual-level validation of the randomized response technique and the crosswise model. PLoS ONE, 13., DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201770 136 10.1371/journal.pone.0201770 false true Reference 75787179 /api/reference/75787179 137. Chaudhuri, A., and Pal, S. (2022). Randomized Response and Indirect Survey Techniques. A Comprehensive Textbook on Sample Surveys, Springer. Indian Statistical Institute Series., DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-1418-8 137 10.1007/978-981-19-1418-8 false true Reference 75787180 /api/reference/75787180 138. Bartels 2022: The implicit association test in introductory psychology textbooks: Blind spot for controversy., Psychol. Learn. Teach., 21, p. 113, DOI: 10.1177/14757257211055200 138 10.1177/14757257211055200 false true Reference 75787181 /api/reference/75787181 139. Schimmack 2021: The Implicit Association Test: A method in search of a construct., Perspect. Psychol. Sci., 16, p. 396, DOI: 10.1177/1745691619863798 139 10.1177/1745691619863798 false true Reference 75787182 /api/reference/75787182 140. Tahamata 2024: What does the implicit association test really measure? Insights from the theoretical debate., Psychologia, 66, p. 137, DOI: 10.2117/psysoc.2023-A247 140 10.2117/psysoc.2023-A247 false true Reference 75787183 /api/reference/75787183 141. Barrada 2024: Orthorexia nervosa: Research based on invalid measures is invalid., J. Glob. Health, 14, p. 03007, DOI: 10.7189/jogh.14.03007 141 10.7189/jogh.14.03007 false true Reference 75787184 /api/reference/75787184 142. Ng 2024: On orthorexia nervosa: A systematic review of reviews., Psychopathology, 57, p. 345, DOI: 10.1159/000536379 142 10.1159/000536379 false true Reference 75787185 /api/reference/75787185 143. Zuccala 2006: Modeling the invisible college., J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 5, p. 152, DOI: 10.1002/asi.20256 143 10.1002/asi.20256 false true Reference 75787186 /api/reference/75787186 144. Kiss 2024: Impact as equalizer: The demise of gender-related differences in anti-doping research., Scientometrics, 129, p. 4071, DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-05094-0 144 10.1007/s11192-024-05094-0 false true Reference 75787187 /api/reference/75787187 145. Loland, S., Skirstad, B., and Waddington, I. (2006). Sport and the systematic infliction of pain: A case study of state-sponsored mandatory doping in East Germany. Pain and Injury in Sport, Routledge., DOI: 10.4324/9780203002995 145 10.4324/9780203002995 false true Reference 75787188 /api/reference/75787188 146. Dimeo 2011: The individual and the state: A social historical analysis of the East German ‘doping system’., Sport Hist., 31, p. 218, DOI: 10.1080/17460263.2011.590026 146 10.1080/17460263.2011.590026 false true Reference 75787189 /api/reference/75787189 147. Ohl 2021: Fight against doping as a social performance: The case of the 2015–2016 Russian anti-doping crisis., Cult. Sociol., 15, p. 386, DOI: 10.1177/1749975520977345 147 10.1177/1749975520977345 false true Reference 75787190 /api/reference/75787190 148. Harris 2018: An analysis of governance failure and power dynamics in international sport: The Russian doping scandal., Int. J. Sport Policy Politics, 13, p. 359, DOI: 10.1080/19406940.2021.1898443 148 10.1080/19406940.2021.1898443 false true Reference 75787191 /api/reference/75787191 149. Fincoeur, B., Gleaves, J., and Ohl, F. (2018). Blowing the whistle on doping in cycling. Doping in Cycling, Routledge., DOI: 10.4324/9781351103879 149 10.4324/9781351103879 false true Reference 75787192 /api/reference/75787192 150. Moriconi 2020: To report, or not to report? From code of silence suppositions within sport to public secrecy realities., Crime Law Soc. Change, 74, p. 55, DOI: 10.1007/s10611-019-09875-0 150 10.1007/s10611-019-09875-0 false true Reference 75787193 /api/reference/75787193 151. Whitaker 2014: Reporting doping in sport: National level athletes’ perceptions of their role in doping prevention., Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports, 24, p. e515, DOI: 10.1111/sms.12222 151 10.1111/sms.12222 false true Reference 75787194 /api/reference/75787194 152. Bondarev, D., Barkoukis, V., Lazuras, L., Bochaver, K., Oudra, D., and Theodorou, N. (2022). Behaviours and beliefs related to whistleblowing against doping in sport: A cross-national study. Front. Psychol., 13., DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.835721 152 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.835721 false true Reference 75787195 /api/reference/75787195 153. Krumpal 2020: Sensitive questions and trust: Explaining respondents’ behavior in Randomized Response surveys., Sage Open, 10, p. 21582440209, DOI: 10.1177/2158244020936223 153 10.1177/2158244020936223 false true Reference 75787196 /api/reference/75787196 154. Ward 2023: Dealing with careless responding in survey data: Prevention, identification, and recommended best practices., Ann. Rev. Psychol., 74, p. 577, DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-040422-045007 154 10.1146/annurev-psych-040422-045007 false true Reference 75787197 /api/reference/75787197 155. Perri 2023: Assessing the effectiveness of indirect questioning techniques by detecting liars., Stat. Pap., 64, p. 1483, DOI: 10.1007/s00362-022-01352-6 155 10.1007/s00362-022-01352-6 false true Reference 75787198 /api/reference/75787198 156. Gupta 2024: Mitigating lack of trust in quantitative randomized response technique models., Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput., 53, p. 2624, DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2022.2082477 156 10.1080/03610918.2022.2082477 false true Reference 75787199 /api/reference/75787199 157. Ding 2020: Duplicate and salami publication: A prevalence study of journal policies., Int. J. Epidemiol., 49, p. 281, DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyz187 157 10.1093/ije/dyz187 false true Reference 75787200 /api/reference/75787200 158. Johnston 2014: Secondary data analysis: A method of which the time has come., Qual. Quant. Methods Libr., 3, p. 619 158 false true Reference 75787201 /api/reference/75787201 159. Jussim, L., Krosnick, J.A., and Stevens, S.T. (2022). Questionable research practices. Research Integrity: Best Practices for the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Oxford University Press., DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190938550.001.0001 159 10.1093/oso/9780190938550.001.0001 false true Reference 75787202 /api/reference/75787202 160. Tolsgaard 2019: Salami-slicing and plagiarism: How should we respond?., Adv. Health Sci. Educ., 24, p. 3, DOI: 10.1007/s10459-019-09876-7 160 10.1007/s10459-019-09876-7 false true Reference 75787203 /api/reference/75787203 161. Lishner 2021: HARKing: Conceptualizations, harms, and two fundamental remedies., J. Theor. Philos. Psychol., 41, p. 248, DOI: 10.1037/teo0000182 161 10.1037/teo0000182 false true Reference 75787204 /api/reference/75787204 162. Rubin 2017: When does HARKing hurt? Identifying when different types of undisclosed post hoc hypothesizing harm scientific progress., Rev. Gen. Psychol., 21, p. 308, DOI: 10.1037/gpr0000128 162 10.1037/gpr0000128 false true Reference 75787205 /api/reference/75787205 163. Baldwin 2022: Protecting against researcher bias in secondary data analysis: Challenges and potential solutions., Eur. J. Epidemiol., 37, p. 1, DOI: 10.1007/s10654-021-00839-0 163 10.1007/s10654-021-00839-0 false true Reference 75787206 /api/reference/75787206 164. Weston 2019: Recommendations for increasing the transparency of analysis of preexisting data sets., Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci., 2, p. 214 164 false true Reference 75787207 /api/reference/75787207 165. Khan 2023: Data sharing and reuse practices: Disciplinary differences and improvements needed., Online Inf. Rev., 47, p. 1036, DOI: 10.1108/OIR-08-2021-0423 165 10.1108/OIR-08-2021-0423 false true Reference 75787208 /api/reference/75787208 166. Dunn 2015: Secondary data analysis as an efficient and effective approach to nursing research., West. J. Nurs. Res., 37, p. 1295, DOI: 10.1177/0193945915570042 166 10.1177/0193945915570042 false true Reference 75787209 /api/reference/75787209 167. Harwell, L.C., Vivian, D.N., McLaughlin, M.D., and Hafner, S.F. (2019). Scientific data management in the age of big data: An approach supporting a resilience index development effort. Front. Environ. Sci., 7., DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00072 167 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00072 false true Reference 75787210 /api/reference/75787210 168. Nosek 2015: Promoting an open research culture., Science, 348, p. 1422, DOI: 10.1126/science.aab2374 168 10.1126/science.aab2374 false true Reference 75787211 /api/reference/75787211 169. Jacobsen 2020: FAIR principles: Interpretations and implementation considerations., Data Intel., 2, p. 10, DOI: 10.1162/dint_r_00024 169 10.1162/dint_r_00024 false true Reference 75787212 /api/reference/75787212 170. Gawronski 2020: Twenty-five years of research using implicit measures., Soc. Cogn., 38, p. s1, DOI: 10.1521/soco.2020.38.supp.s1 170 10.1521/soco.2020.38.supp.s1 false true /api/publication/37321248 Petróczi Andrea et al. Charting the Scientific Landscape of Indirect Estimation Models in Doping Prevalence Research: A Bibliometric Analysis with Narrative Appraisal. (2026) SPORTS 2075-4663 2075-4663 14 6<div class="JournalArticle Publication long-list"> <div class="authors"> <img title="Forrásközlemény" style="float: left" src="/frontend/resources/grid/publication-core-icon.png"> <div class="autype autype0"> <span class="author-name" mtid="10084575"><a href="/gui2/?type=authors&mode=browse&sel=10084575" target="_blank">Petróczi Andrea (<span class="authorship-author-name">Petróczi Andrea</span> <span class="authorAux-mtmt"> Sporttudomány</span>) </a> </span> <span class="author-affil"><span title="Széchenyi István Egyetem">SZE</span>/Egészség- és Sporttudományi Kar</span> ;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span class="author-name" >Sagoe Dominic </span> ;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span class="author-name" mtid="10050895"><a href="/gui2/?type=authors&mode=browse&sel=10050895" target="_blank">Kiss Anna (<span class="authorship-author-name">Kiss Anna</span> <span class="authorAux-mtmt"> dietetika, táplálkozástudomány</span>) </a> </span> <span class="author-affil">Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Könyvtár és Információs Központ</span> ;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span class="author-name" mtid="10048365"><a href="/gui2/?type=authors&mode=browse&sel=10048365" target="_blank">Soós Sándor (<span class="authorship-author-name">Soós Sándor</span> <span class="authorAux-mtmt"> Tudományelemzés</span>) </a> </span> <span class="author-affil">Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Könyvtár és Információs Központ; <span title="Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem">ELTE</span>/<span title="Pedagógiai és Pszichológiai Kar">PPK</span>/Felnőttképzés-kutatási és Tudásmenedzsment Intézet</span> ;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span class="author-name" >Chegeni Razieh </span> ;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span class="author-name" >Veltmaat Annalena </span> ;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span class="author-name" >Cruyff Maarten </span> ;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span class="author-name" >van der Heijden Peter </span> ;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span class="author-name" >de Hon Olivier </span> </div> </div> <div class="title"><a href="/gui2/?mode=browse&params=publication;37321248" target="_blank">Charting the Scientific Landscape of Indirect Estimation Models in Doping Prevalence Research: A Bibliometric Analysis with Narrative Appraisal</a></div> <div> <span class="journal-title">SPORTS</span> <span class="journal-issn">(<a target="_blank" href="https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/2075-4663">2075-4663</a> <a target="_blank" href="https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/2075-4663">2075-4663</a>)</span>: <span class="journal-volume">14</span> <span class="journal-issue">6</span> <span class="page"> Paper 229. 40 p. </span> <span class="year">(2026)</span> </div> <div class="pub-footer"> <span class="language" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/html">Nyelv: Angol | </span> <span class="identifiers"> <span class="id identifier oa_GOLD" title=" Gold "> <a style="color:blue" title="10.3390/sports14060229" target="_blank" href="https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14060229"> DOI </a> </span> <span class="id identifier oa_GREEN" title=" Green "> <a style="color:black" title="239867" target="_blank" href="https://real.mtak.hu/239867"> REAL </a> </span> <span class="id identifier oa_none" title="none"> <a style="color:blue" title="001803361200001" target="_blank" href="https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/001803361200001"> WoS </a> </span> <span class="id identifier oa_none" title="none"> <a style="color:blue" title="105043153982" target="_blank" href="http://www.scopus.com/record/display.url?origin=inward&eid=2-s2.0-105043153982"> Scopus </a> </span> <span class="id identifier oa_none" title="none"> <a style="color:black" title="https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/14/6/229" target="_blank" href="https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/14/6/229"> Egyéb URL </a> </span> </span> <OnlyViewableByAuthor><div class="ratings"> <div class="journal-subject">Folyóirat szakterülete: Scopus - Orthopedics and Sports Medicine&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;SJR indikátor:&nbsp;Q1</div> <div class="journal-subject">Folyóirat szakterülete: Scopus - Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;SJR indikátor:&nbsp;Q1</div> </div></OnlyViewableByAuthor> <div class="mtid"><span class="long-pub-mtid">Közlemény: 37321248</span> | <span class="status-data status-VALIDATED"> Egyeztetett </span> Forrás | <span class="type-subtype">Folyóiratcikk ( Összefoglaló cikk ) </span> | <span class="pub-category">Tudományos</span> | <span class="publication-sourceOfData"></span> </div> <div class="lastModified">Utolsó módosítás: 2026.07.14. 09:36 Zsömle Viktor (SZE 4 admin) </div> </div></div>