Food-Sustainable Behaviors and Attitudes of Generation Z Consumers—Measurement and Analysis of Selected Behaviors

https://m2.mtmt.hu/ hun 2026-05-25 04:12 JournalArticle 37072071 VALIDATED true 0 false 2026-05-21T10:07:28.366+0000 2026-05-21T10:02:44.879+0000 2026-04-13T06:49:10.953+0000 true 10035832 Pergéné Szabó Enikő /api/admin/10035832 Admin Pergéné Szabó Enikő (admin) true 10035832 2026-05-21T10:02:43.770+0000 2026-05-21T10:02:43.962+0000 true 521 Szuper Admin /api/admin/521 Admin Szuper Admin (admin) true false false true 24 24 /api/publicationtype/24 PublicationType Folyóiratcikk 1 true 24 JournalArticle true 10000059 Article true 24 24 /api/publicationtype/24 PublicationType Folyóiratcikk 1 true 24 JournalArticle /api/subtype/10000059 Szakcikk SubType Szakcikk (Folyóiratcikk) 101 true 10000059 true 1 /api/category/1 Category Tudományos true 1 Balińska, Agata Food-Sustainable Behaviors and Attitudes of Generation Z Consumers—Measurement and Analysis of Selected Behaviors true true /api/journal/10046482 REVIEWED FOODS 2304-8158 true false 10046482 false 10046482 true 2304-8158 Journal FOREIGN 15 8 1310 1310 2026 Food waste in households means that there is a need to recognize the possibilities of balancing activities in the field of obtaining and managing food products. Activities in this area may concern giving away surplus food to others, purchasing local and organic products, limiting shopping activity. Generation Z, which was included in this research, uses new media, including mobile applications, to a greater extent than other generations. The main objective of the research is to recognize and present the food-sustainable behaviors and attitudes of Generation Z consumers. The study used the analysis of source data, which was the basis for formulating four hypotheses. They were verified in empirical studies conducted using the CAWI method. The collected material was analyzed using, among others, the proprietary index of environmentally and socially sustainable behaviors (ESRBI), the Mann-Whitney test. The studies showed that respondents assessed their food behaviors as irresponsible, with women’s assessment being higher than men’s. A positive correlation was demonstrated between the use of food saving applications and the value of the ESRBI index and individual sustainable behaviors. Respondents positively assessed the initiatives of local authorities and housing cooperatives in the area of creating places for sharing food and organizing community gardens. true false 2026 true true true false false false GOLD 2026-05-21 false http://www.mdpi.com/journal/foods 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 D1 480755 false false false false 2026-07-12T06:49:18.298+0000 3 26 0 3 0 true Language 10002 /api/language/10002 Angol Angol English true 2 true PersonAuthorship 137200608 /api/authorship/137200608 Balińska, Agata 1 0.33333334 true false false Balińska Agata true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PersonAuthorship 137200609 /api/authorship/137200609 Jaska, Ewa 2 0.33333334 false false false Jaska Ewa true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PersonAuthorship 137200610 /api/authorship/137200610 Werenowska, Agnieszka 3 0.33333334 false true false Werenowska Agnieszka true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PublicationIdentifier 31823882 /api/publicationidentifier/31823882 DOI: 10.3390/foods15081310 PlainSource 6 /api/publicationsource/6 DOI PublicationSourceType 10001 /api/publicationsourcetype/10001 DOI true true true DOI DOI https://doi.org/@@@ true true 6 true IDENTICAL 10.3390/foods15081310 https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15081310 false true PublicationIdentifier 32295561 /api/publicationidentifier/32295561 WoS: 001750322600001 PlainSource 1 /api/publicationsource/1 WoS PublicationSourceType 10003 /api/publicationsourcetype/10003 Indexelő adatbázis false true true WoS WoS https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/@@@ true true 1 true IDENTICAL 001750322600001 https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/001750322600001 false true PublicationIdentifier 31823883 /api/publicationidentifier/31823883 Egyéb URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/15/8/1310 PlainSource 40 /api/publicationsource/40 Egyéb URL PublicationSourceType 10006 /api/publicationsourcetype/10006 Link true true true Egyéb URL Other URL @@@ true true 40 true https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/15/8/1310 https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/15/8/1310 false true PredatorRating 11744011 /api/predatorrating/11744011 Norvég listás folyóirat:480755 FOODS 2304-8158 RatingType 10033 /api/ratingtype/10033 Norvég listás folyóirat norveg true true 480755 true true SjrRating 11735122 /api/sjrrating/11735122 sjr:D1 (2026) Scopus - Health Professions (miscellaneous) FOODS 2304-8158 6 0.1 journal RatingType 10002 /api/ratingtype/10002 sjr sjr true true ClassificationExternal 3601 /api/classificationexternal/3601 Scopus - Health Professions (miscellaneous) true 3601 true D1 FROM_LAST_YEAR true true Reference 74428027 /api/reference/74428027 1. Vergura 2023: Investigating sustainable consumption behaviors: A bibliometric analysis., Br. Food J., 125, p. 253, DOI: 10.1108/BFJ-06-2022-0491 1 10.1108/BFJ-06-2022-0491 false true Reference 74428028 /api/reference/74428028 2. Canali, M., Amani, P., Aramyan, L., Gheoldus, M., Moates, G., Östergren, K., Silvennoinen, K., Waldron, K., and Vittuari, M. (2017). Food Waste Drivers in Europe, from Identification to Possible Interventions. Sustainability, 9., DOI: 10.3390/su9010037 2 10.3390/su9010037 false true Reference 74428029 /api/reference/74428029 3. (2026, January 10). Bankizywnosci. Available online: https://bankizywnosci.pl/. 3 false true Reference 74428030 /api/reference/74428030 4. Ruzgys 2024: Gen Z and sustainable diets: Application of The Transtheoretical Model and the theory of planned behaviour., J. Clean. Prod., 434, p. 140300, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140300 4 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140300 false true Reference 74428031 /api/reference/74428031 5. Qi, X., Li, M., Chen, J., Zhan, G., and Niu, L. (2025). What drives generation Z to avoid food waste in china? An empirical investigation. Foods, 14., DOI: 10.3390/foods14020323 5 10.3390/foods14020323 false true Reference 74428032 /api/reference/74428032 6. Jakubowska, D., Dąbrowska, A.Z., Pachołek, B., and Sady, S. (2024). Behavioral intention to purchase sustainable food: Generation Z’s perspective. Sustainability, 16., DOI: 10.3390/su16177284 6 10.3390/su16177284 false true Reference 74428033 /api/reference/74428033 7. Andruszkiewicz 2024: Comparative analysis of generation Z consumer behavior in poland and germany: Implications for the organic food market., Eur. Res. Stud., 27, p. 181 7 false true Reference 74428034 /api/reference/74428034 8. Kymäläinen, T., Seisto, A., and Malila, R. (2021). Generation Z Food Waste, Diet and Consumption Habits: A Finnish Social Design Study with Future Consumers. Sustainability, 13., DOI: 10.3390/su13042124 8 10.3390/su13042124 false true Reference 74428035 /api/reference/74428035 9. Chen 2024: Divergence and convergence: A cross-generational study on local food consumption., Sci. Rep., 14, p. 13463, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64284-1 9 10.1038/s41598-024-64284-1 false true Reference 74428036 /api/reference/74428036 10. Hanson 2021: Mobile applications to reduce food waste within Canada: A review., Can. Geogr., 66, p. 402, DOI: 10.1111/cag.12733 10 10.1111/cag.12733 false true Reference 74428037 /api/reference/74428037 11. Hong 2024: Mobile applications to reduce food waste in supply chains: A systematic literature review., Br. Food J., 126, p. 509, DOI: 10.1108/BFJ-09-2022-0742 11 10.1108/BFJ-09-2022-0742 false true Reference 74428038 /api/reference/74428038 12. Mohod, P.T., Otuka, R.I., Ajienka, N., Ihianle, I.K., and Nwajana, A.O. (2024). A Mobile Application to Facilitate Meal Box Sharing in Corporate Environments Using Cloud Infrastructure. Electronics, 13., DOI: 10.3390/electronics13234631 12 10.3390/electronics13234631 false true Reference 74428039 /api/reference/74428039 13. Xi-Yu, Z., Ching-Tzu, C., Yi-Tse, C., and Han-Shen, C. (2024). Study of the correlation between streaming video platform content on food production processes and the behavioral intentions of generation Z. Foods, 13., DOI: 10.3390/foods13101537 13 10.3390/foods13101537 false true Reference 74428040 /api/reference/74428040 14. Stanes 2015: Young adult households and household sustainability., Geoforum, 65, p. 46, DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.07.007 14 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.07.007 false true Reference 74428041 /api/reference/74428041 15. Fischer 2017: Measuring the sustainable consumption behaviour of young consumers: Development and validation of the YCSCB scale., Young Consum., 18, p. 312, DOI: 10.1108/YC-03-2017-00671 15 10.1108/YC-03-2017-00671 false true Reference 74428042 /api/reference/74428042 16. Smit 1992: Urban agriculture for sustainable cities: Using wastes and idle land and water bodies as resources., Environ. Urban., 4, p. 141, DOI: 10.1177/095624789200400214 16 10.1177/095624789200400214 false true Reference 74428043 /api/reference/74428043 17. Hardman 2018: The trouble with temporary: Impacts and pitfalls of a meanwhile community garden in Wythenshawe, South Manchester., Renew. Agric. Food Syst., 33, p. 548, DOI: 10.1017/S1742170517000291 17 10.1017/S1742170517000291 false true Reference 74428044 /api/reference/74428044 18. Butterfield 2020: Neighborhood Composition and Community Garden Locations: The Effect of Ethnicity, Income, and Education., Sociol. Perspect., 63, p. 738, DOI: 10.1177/0731121420908902 18 10.1177/0731121420908902 false true Reference 74428045 /api/reference/74428045 19. (2026, January 12). Available online: www.ipcc.ch. 19 false true Reference 74428046 /api/reference/74428046 20. Dunlap 2017: ‘The town is surrounded:’ From climate concerns to life under wind turbines in La Ventosa, Mexico., Hum. Geogr., 10, p. 16, DOI: 10.1177/194277861701000202 20 10.1177/194277861701000202 false true Reference 74428047 /api/reference/74428047 21. Panopoulos, A., Poulis, A., Theodoridis, P., and Kalampakas, A. (2023). Influencing green purchase intention through eco labels and user-generated content. Sustainability, 15., DOI: 10.3390/su15010764 21 10.3390/su15010764 false true Reference 74428048 /api/reference/74428048 22. Saari 2021: Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention., Ecol. Econ., 189, p. 107155, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107155 22 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107155 false true Reference 74428049 /api/reference/74428049 23. Confetto 2023: Sustainability advocacy antecedents: How social media content influences sustainable behaviours among generation Z., J. Consum. Mark., 40, p. 758, DOI: 10.1108/JCM-11-2021-5038 23 10.1108/JCM-11-2021-5038 false true Reference 74428050 /api/reference/74428050 24. Gajdzik, B., Jaciow, M., Hoffmann-Burdzińska, K., Wolny, R., Wolniak, R., and Grebski, W. (2024). Impact of economic awareness on sustainable energy consumption: Results of research in a segment of polish households. Energies, 17., DOI: 10.3390/en17112483 24 10.3390/en17112483 false true Reference 74428051 /api/reference/74428051 25. Hong 2024: Sustainable consumption practices among chinese youth., Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., 11, p. 1058, DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-03582-5 25 10.1057/s41599-024-03582-5 false true Reference 74428052 /api/reference/74428052 26. Onel 2016: Consumer knowledge in pro-environmental behaviour., World J. Sci. Technol. Sustain. Dev., 13, p. 328, DOI: 10.1108/WJSTSD-01-2016-0004 26 10.1108/WJSTSD-01-2016-0004 false true Reference 74428053 /api/reference/74428053 27. Saulais 2024: Shapins sustainble consuption: Qubec consumer’s knowledge and beliefs about the environmental impacts of food., Appetite, 203, p. 107659, DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107659 27 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107659 false true Reference 74428054 /api/reference/74428054 28. Khan 2015: Gender differences and sustainable consumption behaviour., Br. J. Mark. Stud., 3, p. 29 28 false true Reference 74428055 /api/reference/74428055 29. Bulut 2017: Gender, generation and sustainable consumption: Exploring the behaviour of consumers from Izmir, Turkey., Int. J. Consum. Stud., 41, p. 597, DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12371 29 10.1111/ijcs.12371 false true Reference 74428056 /api/reference/74428056 30. Brough 2016: Is Eco-Friendly Unmanly? The Green-Feminine Stereotype and Its Effect on Sustainable Consumption., J. Consum. Res., 43, p. 567, DOI: 10.1093/jcr/ucw044 30 10.1093/jcr/ucw044 false true Reference 74428057 /api/reference/74428057 31. Zelezny 2000: New ways of thinking about environmentalism: Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism., J. Soc. Psychol. Study Soc. Issues, 56, p. 443, DOI: 10.1111/0022-4537.00177 31 10.1111/0022-4537.00177 false true Reference 74428058 /api/reference/74428058 32. Dahl 2013: Social Influence and Consumer Behavior., J. Consum. Res., 40, p. iii, DOI: 10.1086/670170 32 10.1086/670170 false true Reference 74428059 /api/reference/74428059 33. Bloodhart 2020: Sustainability and Consumption: What’s Gender Got to Do with It?., J. Soc. Issues, 76, p. 101, DOI: 10.1111/josi.12370 33 10.1111/josi.12370 false true Reference 74428060 /api/reference/74428060 34. Morone 2018: Does food sharing lead to food waste reduction? An experimental analysis to assess challenges and opportunities of a new consumption model., J. Clean. Prod., 185, p. 749, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.208 34 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.208 false true Reference 74428061 /api/reference/74428061 35. Harvey 2020: Food sharing, redistribution, and waste reduction via mobile applications: A social network analysis., Ind. Mark. Manag., 88, p. 437, DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.02.019 35 10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.02.019 false true Reference 74428062 /api/reference/74428062 36. Mazzucchelli 2021: How to fight against food waste in the digital era: Key factors for a successful food sharing platform., J. Bus. Res., 124, p. 47, DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.055 36 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.055 false true Reference 74428063 /api/reference/74428063 37. Pala 2023: Mobile applications as a next generation solution to prevent food waste., Ege Acad. Rev., 23, p. 1 37 false true Reference 74428064 /api/reference/74428064 38. Ng 2023: Internal factors, external factors and behavioral intention toward food delivery apps (FDAs)., Br. Food J., 125, p. 2970, DOI: 10.1108/BFJ-07-2022-0586 38 10.1108/BFJ-07-2022-0586 false true Reference 74428065 /api/reference/74428065 39. Sestino, A., Rizzo, C., and Alam, G.M. (2023). Look how sustainable I am! Effects of communication focus, individuals’ differences on intention to use food waste fighting mobile applications. Eur. J. Innov. Manag., 1., DOI: 10.1108/EJIM-01-2023-0022 39 10.1108/EJIM-01-2023-0022 false true Reference 74428066 /api/reference/74428066 40. (2026, January 05). Toogoodtogo. Available online: https://www.toogoodtogo.com/pl/about-us. 40 false true Reference 74428067 /api/reference/74428067 41. (2026, January 10). Available online: https://foodsi.pl/. 41 false true Reference 74428068 /api/reference/74428068 42. Devonald 2025: Coping mechanisms and “homemaking” in the face of environmental challenges: Exploring the experiences of adolescent refugees in Jordan., Local Environ., 30, p. 151, DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2024.2419577 42 10.1080/13549839.2024.2419577 false true Reference 74428069 /api/reference/74428069 43. Lin 2024: Community gardens support high levels of food production, but benefit distribution is uneven across the gardener community., Sustain. Sci., 19, p. 2013, DOI: 10.1007/s11625-024-01558-7 43 10.1007/s11625-024-01558-7 false true Reference 74428070 /api/reference/74428070 44. Ornelas 2017: Yéego Gardening! A Community Garden Intervention to Promote Health on the Navajo Nation., Prog. Community Health Partnersh. Res. Educ. Action, 11, p. 417, DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2017.0049 44 10.1353/cpr.2017.0049 false true Reference 74428071 /api/reference/74428071 45. Pourias 2015: Is food a motivation for urban gardeners? Multifunctionality and the relative importance of the food function in urban collective gardens of Paris and Montreal., Agric. Hum., 33, p. 257, DOI: 10.1007/s10460-015-9606-y 45 10.1007/s10460-015-9606-y false true Reference 74428072 /api/reference/74428072 46. Lee, J.H., and Matarrita-Cascante, D. (2019). Gardeners’ Past Gardening Experience and Its Moderating Effect on Community Garden Participation. Sustainability, 11., DOI: 10.3390/su11123308 46 10.3390/su11123308 false true Reference 74428073 /api/reference/74428073 47. Schoen, V., Caputo, S., and Blythe, C. (2020). Valuing Physical and Social Output: A Rapid Assessment of a London Community Garden. Sustainability, 12., DOI: 10.3390/su12135452 47 10.3390/su12135452 false true Reference 74428074 /api/reference/74428074 48. Furness 2018: Food access, food security and community gardens in Rockford, IL., Local Environ., 23, p. 414, DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2018.1426561 48 10.1080/13549839.2018.1426561 false true Reference 74428075 /api/reference/74428075 49. Lee, S.M., Jang, H.J., Yun, H.K., Jung, Y.B., and Hong, I.K. (2022). Effect of Apartment Community Garden Program on Sense of Community and Stress. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19., DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19020708 49 10.3390/ijerph19020708 false true Reference 74428076 /api/reference/74428076 50. 2024: Rola ogrodów społecznych w kształtowaniu relacji społecznych. [The role of community gardens in shaping social relations]., Tur. I Rozw. Reg., 22, p. 143 50 false true Reference 74428077 /api/reference/74428077 51. Grier 2015: Feasibility of an experiential community garden and nutrition programme for youth living in public housing., Public Health Nutr., 18, p. 2759, DOI: 10.1017/S1368980015000087 51 10.1017/S1368980015000087 false true Reference 74428078 /api/reference/74428078 52. Datta 2019: Sustainability: Through cross-cultural community garden activities., Local Environ., 24, p. 762, DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2019.1641073 52 10.1080/13549839.2019.1641073 false true Reference 74428079 /api/reference/74428079 53. Ding, X., Zhang, Y., Zheng, J., and Yue, X. (2020). Design and Social Factors Affecting the Formation of Social Capital in Chinese Community Garden. Sustainability, 12., DOI: 10.3390/su122410644 53 10.3390/su122410644 false true Reference 74428080 /api/reference/74428080 54. Haedicke 2018: The Aroma-Home Community Garden Project’s Democratic Narratives: Embodied Memory-Stories of Planting and Cooking., Public Art Dialogue, 8, p. 114, DOI: 10.1080/21502552.2018.1430290 54 10.1080/21502552.2018.1430290 false true Reference 74428081 /api/reference/74428081 55. Liamputtong 2017: Cultivating Community: Perceptions of Community Garden and Reasons for Participating in a Rural Victorian Town., Act. Adapt. Aging, 42, p. 124 55 false true Reference 74428082 /api/reference/74428082 56. Drake 2015: Best Practices in Community Garden Management to Address Participation, Water Access, and Outreach., J. Ext., 53, p. 7 56 false true Reference 74428083 /api/reference/74428083 57. Menconi 2020: Learning from the gardeners of the oldest community garden in Seattle: Resilience explained through ecosystem services analysis., Urban For. Urban Green., 56, p. 126878, DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126878 57 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126878 false true Reference 74428084 /api/reference/74428084 58. Davies 2019: Urban food sharing: Emerging geographies of production, consumption and exchange., Geoforum, 99, p. 154, DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.11.015 58 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.11.015 false true Reference 74428085 /api/reference/74428085 59. Tatebayashi 2019: Accounting shadow benefits of non-market food through food-sharing networks on Hachijo Island, Japan., Sustain. Sci., 14, p. 469, DOI: 10.1007/s11625-018-0580-3 59 10.1007/s11625-018-0580-3 false true Reference 74428086 /api/reference/74428086 60. Zhao 2023: Reducing food waste from social innovation perspective: A review of measures, research gaps and future directions., Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev., 26, p. 199, DOI: 10.22434/IFAMR2022.0006 60 10.22434/IFAMR2022.0006 false true Reference 74428087 /api/reference/74428087 61. (2026, January 16). Available online: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/pl/policies/food-waste/. 61 false true Reference 74428088 /api/reference/74428088 62. Jaska, E., Werenowska, A., and Balińska, A. (2022). Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Behaviors of Generation Z in Poland Stimulated by Mobile Applications. Energies, 15., DOI: 10.3390/en15217904 62 10.3390/en15217904 false true Reference 74428089 /api/reference/74428089 63. Sullivan 2013: Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales., J. Grad. Med. Educ., 5, p. 541, DOI: 10.4300/JGME-5-4-18 63 10.4300/JGME-5-4-18 false true Reference 74428090 /api/reference/74428090 64. Knapp 1990: Treating Ordinal Scales as Interval Scales: An Attempt to Resolve the Controversy., Nurs. Res., 39, p. 121, DOI: 10.1097/00006199-199003000-00019 64 10.1097/00006199-199003000-00019 false true Reference 74428091 /api/reference/74428091 65. Wolverton 2016: Practical Significance: Ordinal Scale Data and Effect Size in Zooarchaeology., Int. J. Osteoarchaeol., 26, p. 255, DOI: 10.1002/oa.2416 65 10.1002/oa.2416 false true Reference 74428092 /api/reference/74428092 66. Idika 2023: The application of the nominal scale of measurement in research data analysis., Prestig. J. Educ., 6, p. 190 66 false true Reference 74428093 /api/reference/74428093 67. Werenowska 2022: Korzystanie z mediów społecznościowych przez pokolenie Z w czasie pandemii COVID-19. (THE USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA BY GENERATION Z DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC)., Zarządzanie Mediami, 10, p. 23, DOI: 10.4467/23540214ZM.22.002.16924 67 10.4467/23540214ZM.22.002.16924 false true Reference 74428094 /api/reference/74428094 68. Markiewicz 2025: The Functions of Digital Media for Generation Z—Considerations Based on our own Research., Youth Cent. East. Eur., 12, p. 42 68 false true Reference 74428095 /api/reference/74428095 69. Siagian 2024: The role of social media in Generation Z communication., Interdiscip. J. Adv. Res. Innov., 2, p. 1 69 false true Reference 74428096 /api/reference/74428096 70. Peredy 2024: Analysing generation Z communication attitudes, values and norms., Acta Period., 30, p. 4 70 false true Reference 74428097 /api/reference/74428097 71. John 2024: Engaging the next generation in communication to address information quality., J. Health Commun., 29, p. 400, DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2024.2361125 71 10.1080/10810730.2024.2361125 false true Reference 74428098 /api/reference/74428098 72. Erwin 2023: The influence of social media influencers on generation Z consumer behavior in Indonesia., West Sci. Interdiscip. Stud., 1, p. 1028, DOI: 10.58812/wsis.v1i10.317 72 10.58812/wsis.v1i10.317 false true Reference 74428099 /api/reference/74428099 73. Etikan 2016: Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling., Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat., 5, p. 1, DOI: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 73 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 false true Reference 74428100 /api/reference/74428100 74. Stratton 2021: Population Research: Convenience Sampling Strategies., Prehospital Disaster Med., 36, p. 373, DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X21000649 74 10.1017/S1049023X21000649 false true Reference 74428101 /api/reference/74428101 75. Raifman 2022: Respondent-Driven Sampling: A Sampling Method for Hard-to-Reach Populations and Beyond., Curr. Epidemiol. Rep., 9, p. 38, DOI: 10.1007/s40471-022-00287-8 75 10.1007/s40471-022-00287-8 false true Reference 74428102 /api/reference/74428102 76. Andrade 2021: The Inconvenient Truth About Convenience and Purposive Samples., Indian J. Psychol. Med., 43, p. 86, DOI: 10.1177/0253717620977000 76 10.1177/0253717620977000 false true Reference 74428103 /api/reference/74428103 77. Makwana 2023: Sampling methods in research: A review., Int. J. Trend Sci. Res. Dev., 7, p. 762 77 false true Reference 74428104 /api/reference/74428104 78. Sobieraj 2013: Dobór próby badawczej czynnikiem sukcesu w prowadzonych badaniach empirycznych [Research sample selection as a success factor in empirical research] Obronność—Zeszyty Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania i Dowodzenia Akademii., Obrony Nar., 2, p. 40 78 false true Reference 74428105 /api/reference/74428105 79. Biernacki 1981: Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling., Sociol. Methods Res., 10, p. 141, DOI: 10.1177/004912418101000205 79 10.1177/004912418101000205 false true Reference 74428106 /api/reference/74428106 80. Goodman 1961: Snowball Sampling., Ann. Math. Stat., 32, p. 148, DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177705148 80 10.1214/aoms/1177705148 false true Reference 74428107 /api/reference/74428107 81. Jaska 2024: Environmentally and socially responsible behaviour of Generation Z in the context of the economy of the common good., Argum. Oeconomica, 53, p. 90 81 false true Reference 74428108 /api/reference/74428108 82. Zimon 2016: Zastosowanie metody CSI do badania satysfakcji konsumentów na przykładzie wybranej sieci handlowej., Mod. Manag. Rev., 23, p. 219 82 false true Reference 74428109 /api/reference/74428109 83. Skowron 2010: Wykorzystanie modelu EPSI w badaniach lojalności klienta usług bankowych w wybranych krajach Unii Europejskiej., Pr. Nauk. Uniw. Ekon. We Wrocławiu, 97, p. 156 83 false true Reference 74428110 /api/reference/74428110 84. Przybytniowski 2019: Metoda CSI w badaniu satysfakcji klienta indywidualnego usług ubezpieczeń majątkowych., Probl. Jakości, 2, p. 8 84 false true Reference 74428111 /api/reference/74428111 85. Pukas 2015: Indeksy satysfakcji klienta—Kluczowe cechy i wykorzystanie w handlu detalicznym., Mark. I Rynek, 8, p. 548 85 false true Reference 74428112 /api/reference/74428112 86. German, J.D., and Cabacungan, A.D.H. (2021). Customer awareness and satisfaction analysis on the use of motorcycle taxi applications in the philippines. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 8th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA), IEEE., DOI: 10.1109/ICIEA52957.2021.9436717 86 10.1109/ICIEA52957.2021.9436717 false true Reference 74428113 /api/reference/74428113 87. Dudziak 2022: Application of the CSI method to test consumer satisfaction: A case study of petrol stations., Sci. J. Silesian Univ. Technol. Ser. Transp., 116, p. 113 87 false true Reference 74428114 /api/reference/74428114 88. Werenowska 2024: The Importance of Mobile Applications in Reducing Food Waste—The Example of the TooGoodToGo Application., J. Mod. Sci., 56, p. 190, DOI: 10.13166/jms/188723 88 10.13166/jms/188723 false true Reference 74428115 /api/reference/74428115 89. Balińska, A., Jaska, E., and Werenowska, A. (2024). The Importance of the Vinted Application in Popularizing Sustainable Behavior among Representatives of Generation Z. Sustainability, 16., DOI: 10.3390/su16146213 89 10.3390/su16146213 false true Reference 74428116 /api/reference/74428116 90. Yadav 2023: Customer satisfaction–dilemma of comparing multiple scale scores., Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell., 34, p. 32, DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2022.2028547 90 10.1080/14783363.2022.2028547 false true Reference 74428117 /api/reference/74428117 91. 2014: Selected instruments for measuring the quality of logistics services., Sci. J. Univ. Szczec., 803, p. 297 91 false true Reference 74428118 /api/reference/74428118 92. Werenowska 2024: Wybrane zachowania odpowiedzialne środowiskowo i społecznie generacji Z w kontekście gospodarki dobra wspólnego. [The selected environmentally and socially responsible behaviors of Generation Z in the context of the economics of the common good]., J. Tour. Reg. Dev., 21, p. 5 92 false true Reference 74428119 /api/reference/74428119 93. Mulder, J., and de Bruijne, M. (2019). Willingness of Online Respondents to Participate in Alternative Modes of Data Collection. Surv. Pract., 12., DOI: 10.29115/SP-2019-0001 93 10.29115/SP-2019-0001 false true Reference 74428120 /api/reference/74428120 94. Morgan, S.L. (2020). Response rates and representativeness: A benchmark comparison of the General Social Surveys to the American Community Surveys. SocArxiv, 2012–2018., DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/7q58d 94 10.31235/osf.io/7q58d false true Reference 74428121 /api/reference/74428121 95. Johnson 2016: Doing gender, doing surveys? Women’s gatekeeping and men’s non-participation in multi-actor reproductive surveys., Sociol. Inq., 86, p. 427, DOI: 10.1111/soin.12122 95 10.1111/soin.12122 false true Reference 74428122 /api/reference/74428122 96. Smith, W.G. (2026, March 20). Does Gender Influence Online Survey Participation? A Record-Linkage Analysis of University Faculty Online Survey Response Behavior, Available online: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED501717.pdf. 96 false true Reference 74428123 /api/reference/74428123 97. Keusch 2015: Why do people participate in Web surveys? Applying survey participation theory to Internet survey data collection., Manag. Rev. Q., 65, p. 183, DOI: 10.1007/s11301-014-0111-y 97 10.1007/s11301-014-0111-y false true Reference 74428124 /api/reference/74428124 98. (2026, February 01). “RAPORT 2023” Fundacja “Koalicja Sprawiedliwego Handlu”—Fairtrade Polska Kraków. Available online: https://www.fairtrade.org.pl/material/raport-fairtrade-polska-2023/. 98 false true Reference 74428125 /api/reference/74428125 99. (2026, February 01). Available online: https://warszawa19115.pl/-/jadlodzielnie. 99 false true Reference 74428126 /api/reference/74428126 100. (2026, February 10). Available online: https://zzw.waw.pl/2017/09/27/ogrody-spolecznosciowe-czyli-zrobmy-to-razem/. 100 false true Reference 74428127 /api/reference/74428127 101. 2022: Sustainable consumption—Examining the environmental and health awareness of students at the University of Debrecen., Cogent Bus. Manag., 9, p. 2105572, DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2022.2105572 101 10.1080/23311975.2022.2105572 false true Reference 74428128 /api/reference/74428128 102. Pavlovskaia 2022: An investigation of fair trade product knowledge, beliefs, experiences and buying intentions of generation Z in the US., J. Fair Trade, 3, p. 34, DOI: 10.13169/jfairtrade.3.2.0034 102 10.13169/jfairtrade.3.2.0034 false true Reference 74428129 /api/reference/74428129 103. Filip, A., Stancu, A., Onișor, L.F., Mogoș, O.C., Catană, Ș.A., and Goldbach, D. (2025). Drivers of purchase intentions of generation Z on eco-products. Sustainability, 17., DOI: 10.3390/su17020629 103 10.3390/su17020629 false true Reference 74428130 /api/reference/74428130 104. Robichaud 2022: Do young consumers care about ethical consumption? Modelling gen Z’s purchase intention towards fair trade coffee., Br. Food J., 124, p. 2740, DOI: 10.1108/BFJ-05-2021-0536 104 10.1108/BFJ-05-2021-0536 false true Reference 74428131 /api/reference/74428131 105. Alves, M., Seixas, C., Castro, A., and Leitão, A. (2024). Promoting the transition to a circular economy: A study about behaviour, attitudes, and knowledge by university students in Portugal. Sustainability, 16., DOI: 10.3390/su16010343 105 10.3390/su16010343 false true Reference 74428132 /api/reference/74428132 106. Olano 2025: School climate assemblies: An educational tool for empowering pupils and youth to take climate and sustainability action., Sustain. Sci., 20, p. 135, DOI: 10.1007/s11625-024-01583-6 106 10.1007/s11625-024-01583-6 false true Reference 74428133 /api/reference/74428133 107. Larionow 2022: W stronę psychologii i edukacji prośrodowiskowej: Osobowościowe i socjodemograficzne korelaty tożsamości środowiskowej i dobrowolnej prostoty. [Towards a pro-environmental psychology and education: Personality and sociodemographic correlates of environmental identity and voluntary simplicity]., Lub. Rocz. Pedagog., 41, p. 53 107 false true Reference 74428134 /api/reference/74428134 108. Galbreath 2020: The effects of women in different roles on environmentally sustainable practices: Empirical evidence from the Australian wine industry., Australas. J. Environ. Manag., 27, p. 434, DOI: 10.1080/14486563.2020.1838351 108 10.1080/14486563.2020.1838351 false true Reference 74428135 /api/reference/74428135 109. Young 2009: Sustainable Consumption: Green Consumer Behaviour when Purchasing Products., Development, 18, p. 20 109 false true Reference 74428136 /api/reference/74428136 110. Haas, R., Aşan, H., Doğan, O., Michalek, C.R., Karaca Akkan, Ö., and Bulut, Z.A. (2022). Designing and Implementing the MySusCof App—A Mobile App to Support Food Waste Reduction. Foods, 11., DOI: 10.3390/foods11152222 110 10.3390/foods11152222 false true Reference 74428137 /api/reference/74428137 111. Zhao 2024: How do we reinforce climate action?., Sustain. Sci., 19, p. 1503, DOI: 10.1007/s11625-024-01486-6 111 10.1007/s11625-024-01486-6 false true Reference 74428138 /api/reference/74428138 112. Watabe 2023: Making sense of (un)sustainable food: Creation of sharable narratives in citizen-participating farming., Sustain. Sci., 18, p. 2121, DOI: 10.1007/s11625-023-01366-5 112 10.1007/s11625-023-01366-5 false true Reference 74428139 /api/reference/74428139 113. Spierings 2018: Ownership and Membership: Practices and Experiences of Neighbourhood Residents in the Wijsgeren Community Garden in Amsterdam., J. Econ. Hum. Geogr., 109, p. 677 113 false true Reference 74428140 /api/reference/74428140 114. Kamiyama 2023: Longitudinal analysis of home food production and food sharing behavior in Japan: Multiple benefits of local food systems and the recent impact of the COVID-19 pandemic., Sustain. Sci., 18, p. 2277, DOI: 10.1007/s11625-023-01363-8 114 10.1007/s11625-023-01363-8 false true /api/publication/37072071 Balińska Agata et al. Food-Sustainable Behaviors and Attitudes of Generation Z Consumers—Measurement and Analysis of Selected Behaviors. (2026) FOODS 2304-8158 15 8 p. 1310<div class="JournalArticle Publication long-list"> <div class="authors"> <img title="Idézőközlemény" style="float: left" src="/frontend/resources/grid/publication-citation-icon.png"> <div class="autype autype0"> <span class="author-name" >Balińska Agata </span> ;    <span class="author-name" >Jaska Ewa </span> ;    <span class="author-name" >Werenowska Agnieszka </span> </div> </div> <div class="title"><a href="/gui2/?mode=browse&params=publication;37072071" target="_blank">Food-Sustainable Behaviors and Attitudes of Generation Z Consumers—Measurement and Analysis of Selected Behaviors</a></div> <div> <span class="journal-title">FOODS</span> <span class="journal-issn">( <a target="_blank" href="https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/2304-8158">2304-8158</a>)</span>: <span class="journal-volume">15</span> <span class="journal-issue">8</span> <span class="page"> p. 1310. </span> <span class="year">(2026)</span> </div> <div class="pub-footer"> <span class="language" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/html">Nyelv: Angol | </span> <span class="identifiers"> <span class="id identifier oa_none" title="none"> <a style="color:blue" title="10.3390/foods15081310" target="_blank" href="https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15081310"> DOI </a> </span> <span class="id identifier oa_none" title="none"> <a style="color:blue" title="001750322600001" target="_blank" href="https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/001750322600001"> WoS </a> </span> <span class="id identifier oa_none" title="none"> <a style="color:black" title="https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/15/8/1310" target="_blank" href="https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/15/8/1310"> Egyéb URL </a> </span> </span> <div class="publication-citation"> <a target="_blank" href="/api/publication?cond=citations.related;eq;37072071&sort=publishedYear,desc&sort=title"> Idézett közlemények száma: 1 </a> </div> <div class="mtid"><span class="long-pub-mtid">Közlemény: 37072071</span> | <span class="status-data status-VALIDATED"> Egyeztetett </span> Idéző | <span class="type-subtype">Folyóiratcikk ( Szakcikk ) </span> | <span class="pub-category">Tudományos</span> | <span class="publication-sourceOfData">WoS-XML</span> </div> <div class="lastModified">Utolsó módosítás: 2026.05.21. 12:02 Szuper Admin (admin) </div> </div></div>