https://m2.mtmt.hu/ hun 2026-10-23 23:01 JournalArticle 36857217 VALIDATED true 0 false 2026-05-21T14:55:57.971+0000 2026-05-21T14:54:43.743+0000 2026-01-11T14:13:49.072+0000 true 10013814 Szűcs-Zágoni Zoltán Gábor /api/author/10013814 Author Szűcs-Zágoni Zoltán Gábor (politikatudomány) true 10013814 2026-05-21T14:54:42.698+0000 2026-05-21T14:54:42.890+0000 true 521 Szuper Admin /api/admin/521 Admin Szuper Admin (admin) true false false true 24 24 /api/publicationtype/24 PublicationType Folyóiratcikk 1 true 24 JournalArticle true 10000059 Article true 24 24 /api/publicationtype/24 PublicationType Folyóiratcikk 1 true 24 JournalArticle /api/subtype/10000059 Szakcikk SubType Szakcikk (Folyóiratcikk) 101 true 10000059 true 1 /api/category/1 Category Tudományos true 1 Brinkmann, Matthias true true /api/journal/10001832 REVIEWED PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW 0031-8108 1558-1470 true false 10001832 false 10001832 true 0031-8108 1558-1470 Journal 135 1 1 36 1 36 2026 Consent theory claims that political legitimacy rests on the consent of the governed. The theory has been marginalized in political philosophy due to the success of Hume’s objections, which observe that consent theory entails anarchism, as almost nobody has consented to be governed. However, these standard objections leave the foundations of consent theory untouched; the consent theorist, confident in the appeal of these foundations, can endorse anarchism in response. This article offers an objection that focuses on what makes consent normatively appealing in the first place, the value of individual autonomy. On almost any plausible reading of that foundation, one should not be a consent theorist. true true 2026 true true true false false false NONE 2026-05-21 false 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 D1 false false false false 2026-04-11T13:13:56.967+0000 1 19 0 1 0 true Language 10002 /api/language/10002 Angol Angol English true 2 true PersonAuthorship 132661064 /api/authorship/132661064 Brinkmann, Matthias 1 1.0 true false false Brinkmann Matthias true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PublicationIdentifier 31156793 /api/publicationidentifier/31156793 DOI: 10.1215/00318108-12240672 PlainSource 6 /api/publicationsource/6 DOI PublicationSourceType 10001 /api/publicationsourcetype/10001 DOI true true true DOI DOI https://doi.org/@@@ true true 6 true IDENTICAL 10.1215/00318108-12240672 https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-12240672 false true PublicationIdentifier 32303225 /api/publicationidentifier/32303225 WoS: 001663778000001 PlainSource 1 /api/publicationsource/1 WoS PublicationSourceType 10003 /api/publicationsourcetype/10003 Indexelő adatbázis false true true WoS WoS https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/@@@ true true 1 true IDENTICAL 001663778000001 https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/001663778000001 false true PublicationIdentifier 31156794 /api/publicationidentifier/31156794 Egyéb URL: https://read.dukeupress.edu/the-philosophical-review/article/135/1/1/406431/Autonomy-and-Legitimacy-An-Internal-Refutation-of PlainSource 40 /api/publicationsource/40 Egyéb URL PublicationSourceType 10006 /api/publicationsourcetype/10006 Link true true true Egyéb URL Other URL @@@ true true 40 true https://read.dukeupress.edu/the-philosophical-review/article/135/1/1/406431/Autonomy-and-Legitimacy-An-Internal-Refutation-of https://read.dukeupress.edu/the-philosophical-review/article/135/1/1/406431/Autonomy-and-Legitimacy-An-Internal-Refutation-of false true SjrRating 11666223 /api/sjrrating/11666223 sjr:D1 (2026) Scopus - Philosophy PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW 0031-8108 1558-1470 3 0.0 journal RatingType 10002 /api/ratingtype/10002 sjr sjr true true ClassificationExternal 1211 /api/classificationexternal/1211 Scopus - Philosophy true 1211 true D1 FROM_LAST_YEAR true true Reference 71357498 /api/reference/71357498 1. Adams 2018: Institutional Legitimacy., Journal of Political Philosophy, 26, p. 84, DOI: 10.1111/jopp.12122 1 10.1111/jopp.12122 false true Reference 71357499 /api/reference/71357499 2. Applbaum 2019: Legitimacy: The Right to Govern in a Wanton World, DOI: 10.4159/9780674241923 2 10.4159/9780674241923 false true Reference 71357500 /api/reference/71357500 3. Bender 2022: Hume’s Deep Anti-Contractarianism., Hume Studies, 47, p. 103, DOI: 10.1353/hms.2022.0006 3 10.1353/hms.2022.0006 false true Reference 71357501 /api/reference/71357501 4. Beran 1977: In Defense of the Consent Theory of Political Obligation and Authority., Ethics, 87, p. 260, DOI: 10.1086/292040 4 10.1086/292040 false true Reference 71357502 /api/reference/71357502 5. Beran 1983: What Is the Basis of Political Authority?., Monist, 66, p. 487, DOI: 10.5840/monist198366434 5 10.5840/monist198366434 false true Reference 71357503 /api/reference/71357503 6. Bernstein 2018 6 false true Reference 71357504 /api/reference/71357504 7. Bird 2006: An Introduction to Political Philosophy, DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511801273 7 10.1017/CBO9780511801273 false true Reference 71357505 /api/reference/71357505 8. Brinkmann 2024: An Instrumentalist Theory of Political Legitimacy, DOI: 10.1093/9780198901174.001.0001 8 10.1093/9780198901174.001.0001 false true Reference 71357506 /api/reference/71357506 9. Buchanan 2002: Political Legitimacy and Democracy., Ethics, 112, p. 689, DOI: 10.1086/340313 9 10.1086/340313 false true Reference 71357507 /api/reference/71357507 10. Buckle 1991: Hume’s Critique of the Contract Theory., History of Political Thought, 12, p. 457 10 false true Reference 71357508 /api/reference/71357508 11. Christman 2018: Social and Political Philosophy: A Contemporary Introduction 11 false true Reference 71357509 /api/reference/71357509 12. Cibik 2024: Tacit Consent and Political Legitimacy., European Journal of Political Theory, 23, p. 340, DOI: 10.1177/14748851221143612 12 10.1177/14748851221143612 false true Reference 71357510 /api/reference/71357510 13. Coakley 2011: On the Value of Political Legitimacy., Politics, Philosophy, and Economics, 10, p. 345, DOI: 10.1177/1470594X10387272 13 10.1177/1470594X10387272 false true Reference 71357511 /api/reference/71357511 14. Cohen 2011: Reasons and Recognition: Essays on the Philosophy of T. M. Scanlon 14 false true Reference 71357512 /api/reference/71357512 15. Cruft 2010: Kamm and Miller on Rights’ Compatibility., Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 13, p. 393, DOI: 10.1007/s10677-009-9215-1 15 10.1007/s10677-009-9215-1 false true Reference 71357513 /api/reference/71357513 16. Delmas 2014: Samaritanism and Political Legitimacy., Analysis, 74, p. 254, DOI: 10.1093/analys/anu033 16 10.1093/analys/anu033 false true Reference 71357514 /api/reference/71357514 17. Dworkin 1986: Law’s Empire 17 false true Reference 71357515 /api/reference/71357515 18. Enoch 2017: Hypothetical Consent and the Value(s) of Autonomy., Ethics, 128, p. 6, DOI: 10.1086/692939 18 10.1086/692939 false true Reference 71357516 /api/reference/71357516 19. Enoch 2020: False Consciousness for Liberals, Part I: Consent, Autonomy, and Adaptive Preferences., Philosophical Review, 129, p. 159, DOI: 10.1215/00318108-8012836 19 10.1215/00318108-8012836 false true Reference 71357517 /api/reference/71357517 20. Enoch 2022: Autonomy as Non-Alienation, Autonomy as Sovereignty, and Politics., Journal of Political Philosophy, 30, p. 143, DOI: 10.1111/jopp.12264 20 10.1111/jopp.12264 false true Reference 71357518 /api/reference/71357518 21. Estlund 2020: Utopophobia: On the Limits (if Any) of Political Philosophy, DOI: 10.1515/9780691197500 21 10.1515/9780691197500 false true Reference 71357519 /api/reference/71357519 22. Gilbert 1999: Reconsidering the ‘Actual Contract’ Theory of Political Obligation., Ethics, 109, p. 236, DOI: 10.1086/233895 22 10.1086/233895 false true Reference 71357520 /api/reference/71357520 23. Gilbert 2006: A Theory of Political Obligation: Membership, Commitment, and the Bonds of Society, DOI: 10.1093/0199274959.001.0001 23 10.1093/0199274959.001.0001 false true Reference 71357521 /api/reference/71357521 24. Greene 2016: Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy, vol. 2 24 false true Reference 71357522 /api/reference/71357522 25. Greene Amanda R. 2019. “Is Political Legitimacy Worth Promoting?” In Political Legitimacy, edited by Jack Knight and Melissa Schwartzberg. Special issue, Nomos, no. 61: 65–101., DOI: 10.18574/nyu/9781479888696.003.0004 25 10.18574/nyu/9781479888696.003.0004 false true Reference 71357523 /api/reference/71357523 26. Healey 2022: Consent, Interaction, and the Value of Shared Understanding., Legal Theory, 28, p. 35, DOI: 10.1017/S1352325222000015 26 10.1017/S1352325222000015 false true Reference 71357524 /api/reference/71357524 27. Horton 2012: Political Legitimacy, Justice, and Consent., Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 15, p. 129, DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2012.651015 27 10.1080/13698230.2012.651015 false true Reference 71357525 /api/reference/71357525 28. Huemer 2012: The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey, DOI: 10.1057/9781137281661.0006 28 10.1057/9781137281661.0006 false true Reference 71357526 /api/reference/71357526 29. Hume 1994 29 false true Reference 71357527 /api/reference/71357527 30. Hurd 1996: The Moral Magic of Consent., Legal Theory, 2, p. 121, DOI: 10.1017/S1352325200000434 30 10.1017/S1352325200000434 false true Reference 71357528 /api/reference/71357528 31. Kamm 2007: Intricate Ethics, DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195189698.001.0001 31 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195189698.001.0001 false true Reference 71357529 /api/reference/71357529 32. Klosko 1991: Reformist Consent and Political Obligation., Political Studies, 39, p. 676, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1991.tb01395.x 32 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1991.tb01395.x false true Reference 71357530 /api/reference/71357530 33. Ladenson 1980: In Defense of a Hobbesian Conception of Law., Philosophy and Public Affairs, 9, p. 134 33 false true Reference 71357531 /api/reference/71357531 34. Larmore 2020: What Is Political Philosophy? 34 false true Reference 71357532 /api/reference/71357532 35. Lippert-Rasmussen 2009: Kamm on Inviolability and Agent-Relative Restrictions., Res Publica, 15, p. 165, DOI: 10.1007/s11158-009-9085-3 35 10.1007/s11158-009-9085-3 false true Reference 71357533 /api/reference/71357533 36. Locke 1988 36 false true Reference 71357534 /api/reference/71357534 37. Mack 2011: The Cambridge Companion to Nozick’s Anarchy, State, and Utopia 37 false true Reference 71357535 /api/reference/71357535 38. Mack 2015: Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy, vol. 1 38 false true Reference 71357536 /api/reference/71357536 39. Miller 2003: Political Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction, DOI: 10.1093/actrade/9780192803955.001.0001 39 10.1093/actrade/9780192803955.001.0001 false true Reference 71357537 /api/reference/71357537 40. Nagel 1991: Equality and Partiality 40 false true Reference 71357538 /api/reference/71357538 41. Nozick 1974: Anarchy, State, and Utopia 41 false true Reference 71357539 /api/reference/71357539 42. Oshana 2006: Personal Autonomy in Society 42 false true Reference 71357540 /api/reference/71357540 43. Otsuka 2003: Libertarianism Without Inequality, DOI: 10.1093/0199243956.001.0001 43 10.1093/0199243956.001.0001 false true Reference 71357541 /api/reference/71357541 44. Owens 2011: The Possibility of Consent., Ratio, 24, p. 402, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9329.2011.00509.x 44 10.1111/j.1467-9329.2011.00509.x false true Reference 71357542 /api/reference/71357542 45. Parfit 1984: Reasons and Persons 45 false true Reference 71357543 /api/reference/71357543 46. Pettit 2012: On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy, DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139017428 46 10.1017/CBO9781139017428 false true Reference 71357544 /api/reference/71357544 47. Pitkin 1965: Obligation and Consent.” Pt. 1., American Political Science Review, 59, p. 990, DOI: 10.2307/1953218 47 10.2307/1953218 false true Reference 71357545 /api/reference/71357545 48. Puryear 2021: Consent by Residence: A Defense., European Journal of Political Theory, 20, p. 529, DOI: 10.1177/1474885119833009 48 10.1177/1474885119833009 false true Reference 71357546 /api/reference/71357546 49. Raz 1986: The Morality of Freedom 49 false true Reference 71357547 /api/reference/71357547 50. Raz 1994: Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics 50 false true Reference 71357548 /api/reference/71357548 51. Renzo 2011: State Legitimacy and Self-Defence., Law and Philosophy, 30, p. 575, DOI: 10.1007/s10982-011-9105-2 51 10.1007/s10982-011-9105-2 false true Reference 71357549 /api/reference/71357549 52. Renzo 2022: Defective Normative Powers: The Case of Consent., Journal of Practical Ethics, DOI: 10.3998/jpe.2382 52 10.3998/jpe.2382 false true Reference 71357550 /api/reference/71357550 53. Shiffrin 2008: Promising, Intimate Relationships, and Conventionalism., Philosophical Review, 117, p. 481, DOI: 10.1215/00318108-2008-014 53 10.1215/00318108-2008-014 false true Reference 71357551 /api/reference/71357551 54. Simmons 1999: Justification and Legitimacy., Ethics, 109, p. 739, DOI: 10.1086/233944 54 10.1086/233944 false true Reference 71357552 /api/reference/71357552 55. Simmons 2005: Consent Theory for Libertarians., Social Philosophy and Policy, 22, p. 330, DOI: 10.1017/S0265052505041130 55 10.1017/S0265052505041130 false true Reference 71357553 /api/reference/71357553 56. Stark 2000: Hypothetical Consent and Justification., Journal of Philosophy, 97, p. 313, DOI: 10.2307/2678406 56 10.2307/2678406 false true Reference 71357554 /api/reference/71357554 57. Szűcs 2024: On the Edge of Anarchism: A Realist Critique of Philosophical Anarchism., Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 27, p. 1180, DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2022.2040201 57 10.1080/13698230.2022.2040201 false true Reference 71357555 /api/reference/71357555 58. Thrasher 2019: Self-Ownership as Personal Sovereignty., Social Philosophy and Policy, 36, p. 116, DOI: 10.1017/S0265052519000396 58 10.1017/S0265052519000396 false true Reference 71357556 /api/reference/71357556 59. Vallentyne 2000: “Left-Libertarianism: A Primer.” Introduction to Left-Libertarianism and Its Critics: The Contemporary Debate 59 false true Reference 71357557 /api/reference/71357557 60. van der Vossen 2021: Consent to Unjust Institutions., Legal Theory, 27, p. 236, DOI: 10.1017/S1352325221000148 60 10.1017/S1352325221000148 false true Reference 71357558 /api/reference/71357558 61. van der Vossen 2019: The Problem of Self-Ownership., Social Philosophy and Policy, 36, p. 1, DOI: 10.1017/S0265052519000372 61 10.1017/S0265052519000372 false true Reference 71357559 /api/reference/71357559 62. Waldron 1987: Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism., Philosophical Quarterly, p. 127, DOI: 10.2307/2220334 62 10.2307/2220334 false true Reference 71357560 /api/reference/71357560 63. Wellman 1996: Liberalism, Samaritanism, and Political Legitimacy., Philosophy and Public Affairs, 25, p. 211, DOI: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1996.tb00040.x 63 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1996.tb00040.x false true Reference 71357561 /api/reference/71357561 64. Wellman 2001: Toward a Liberal Theory of Political Obligation., Ethics, 111, p. 735, DOI: 10.1086/233571 64 10.1086/233571 false true Reference 71357562 /api/reference/71357562 65. Wendt 2016: On Realist Legitimacy., Social Philosophy and Policy, 32, p. 227, DOI: 10.1017/S0265052516000182 65 10.1017/S0265052516000182 false true Reference 71357563 /api/reference/71357563 66. Wendt 2020: Against Philosophical Anarchism., Law and Philosophy, 39, p. 527, DOI: 10.1007/s10982-020-09377-4 66 10.1007/s10982-020-09377-4 false true Reference 71357564 /api/reference/71357564 67. Wolf 2016: This Is Political Philosophy: An Introduction 67 false true Reference 71357565 /api/reference/71357565 68. Wolff 1993: Hume, Bentham, and the Social Contract., Utilitas, 5, p. 87, DOI: 10.1017/S0953820800005550 68 10.1017/S0953820800005550 false true Reference 71357566 /api/reference/71357566 69. Wolff 2006: An Introduction to Political Philosophy 69 false true Reference 71357567 /api/reference/71357567 70. Worsnip 2017: Cryptonormative Judgments., European Journal of Philosophy, 25, p. 3, DOI: 10.1111/ejop.12208 70 10.1111/ejop.12208 false true /api/publication/36857217 Brinkmann Matthias. Autonomy and Legitimacy: An Internal Refutation of Consent Theory. (2026) PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW 0031-8108 1558-1470 135 1 1-36<div class="JournalArticle Publication long-list"> <div class="authors"> <img title="Idézőközlemény" style="float: left" src="/frontend/resources/grid/publication-citation-icon.png"> <div class="autype autype0"> <span class="author-name" >Brinkmann Matthias </span> </div> </div> <div class="title"><a href="/gui2/?mode=browse&params=publication;36857217" target="_blank">Autonomy and Legitimacy: An Internal Refutation of Consent Theory</a></div> <div> <span class="journal-title">PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW</span> <span class="journal-issn">(<a target="_blank" href="https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/0031-8108">0031-8108</a> <a target="_blank" href="https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/1558-1470">1558-1470</a>)</span>: <span class="journal-volume">135</span> <span class="journal-issue">1</span> <span class="page"> pp 1-36 </span> <span class="year">(2026)</span> </div> <div class="pub-footer"> <span class="language" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/html">Nyelv: Angol | </span> <span class="identifiers"> <span class="id identifier oa_none" title="none"> <a style="color:blue" title="10.1215/00318108-12240672" target="_blank" href="https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-12240672"> DOI </a> </span> <span class="id identifier oa_none" title="none"> <a style="color:blue" title="001663778000001" target="_blank" href="https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/001663778000001"> WoS </a> </span> <span class="id identifier oa_none" title="none"> <a style="color:black" title="https://read.dukeupress.edu/the-philosophical-review/article/135/1/1/406431/Autonomy-and-Legitimacy-An-Internal-Refutation-of" target="_blank" href="https://read.dukeupress.edu/the-philosophical-review/article/135/1/1/406431/Autonomy-and-Legitimacy-An-Internal-Refutation-of"> Egyéb URL </a> </span> </span> <div class="publication-citation"> <a target="_blank" href="/api/publication?cond=citations.related;eq;36857217&sort=publishedYear,desc&sort=title"> Idézett közlemények száma: 1 </a> </div> <div class="mtid"><span class="long-pub-mtid">Közlemény: 36857217</span> | <span class="status-data status-VALIDATED"> Egyeztetett </span> Idéző | <span class="type-subtype">Folyóiratcikk ( Szakcikk ) </span> | <span class="pub-category">Tudományos</span> | <span class="publication-sourceOfData">WoS-XML</span> </div> <div class="lastModified">Utolsó módosítás: 2026.05.21. 16:54 Szuper Admin (admin) </div> </div></div>