https://m2.mtmt.hu/ hun 2026-04-30 21:05 JournalArticle 36437601 VALIDATED true 0 false 2026-01-01T14:01:39.563+0000 2026-01-01T14:00:27.491+0000 2025-11-16T13:00:48.202+0000 true 10093872 Bölcskei-Kászonyi Rita /api/admin/10093872 Admin Bölcskei-Kászonyi Rita (admin) false 2026-01-01T14:00:26.298+0000 2026-01-01T14:00:26.470+0000 true 521 Szuper Admin /api/admin/521 Admin Szuper Admin (admin) true false false true 24 24 /api/publicationtype/24 PublicationType Folyóiratcikk 1 true 24 JournalArticle true 10000059 Article true 24 24 /api/publicationtype/24 PublicationType Folyóiratcikk 1 true 24 JournalArticle /api/subtype/10000059 Szakcikk SubType Szakcikk (Folyóiratcikk) 101 true 10000059 true 1 /api/category/1 Category Tudományos true 1 Yeligeti, Madhura true true /api/journal/10007440 REVIEWED PLOS ONE 1932-6203 true false 10007440 false 10007440 true 1932-6203 Journal FOREIGN 20 11 e0335909 e0335909 2025 Designing systems and processes resilient to sudden shocks is an essential element of system analysis in many engineering fields. Quantitative resilience assessment employs various metrics to examine and monitor system resilience through experimentation. Existing resilience metrics typically portray the system’s response to a shock-like event as an inverse bell-shaped, triangular, or trapezoidal curve of performance over time. Then, for example, the downward and upward slopes are interpreted as the disruption and restoration phases of the system, respectively. However, these metrics fail or need simplification when a system response does not exhibit such an idealized shape. In this paper, we introduce a composite metric combining various elements of system performance curves, irrespective of shape features. Additionally, the metric integrates a user-defined critical threshold into its mathematical formulation. To verify the metric’s performance, we conducted a survey among researchers in energy system analysis using illustrative system response curves. Comparing the survey-derived ranking and the metric values verifies that the metric aligns with the judgment and expectations of potential users. Finally, we benchmark our metric against its contemporaries, highlighting its versatility with nontypical performance curves. Due to its modular mathematical formulation, this metric can be applied, enhanced, and extended for comparative performance assessment in various fields of analysis, especially in the absence of idealized system response curves. true 2025 true true true false false false GOLD 2026-01-01 false http://www.plosone.org/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Q1 A false false false false 2026-02-14T13:01:03.053+0000 3 15 0 3 0 true Language 10002 /api/language/10002 Angol Angol English true 2 true PersonAuthorship 128516102 /api/authorship/128516102 Yeligeti, Madhura ✉ 1 0.333 true false true Yeligeti Madhura true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PersonAuthorship 128516103 /api/authorship/128516103 Gils, Hans Christian 2 0.33333334 false false false Gils Hans Christian true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PersonAuthorship 128516104 /api/authorship/128516104 Nowak, Wolfgang 3 0.33333334 false true false Nowak Wolfgang true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PublicationIdentifier 30168016 /api/publicationidentifier/30168016 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335909 PlainSource 6 /api/publicationsource/6 DOI PublicationSourceType 10001 /api/publicationsourcetype/10001 DOI true true true DOI DOI https://doi.org/@@@ true true 6 true IDENTICAL 10.1371/journal.pone.0335909 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335909 false true PublicationIdentifier 31021480 /api/publicationidentifier/31021480 WoS: 001615500500025 PlainSource 1 /api/publicationsource/1 WoS PublicationSourceType 10003 /api/publicationsourcetype/10003 Indexelő adatbázis false true true WoS WoS https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/@@@ true true 1 true IDENTICAL 001615500500025 https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/001615500500025 false true PublicationIdentifier 30168017 /api/publicationidentifier/30168017 Egyéb URL: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335909 PlainSource 40 /api/publicationsource/40 Egyéb URL PublicationSourceType 10006 /api/publicationsourcetype/10006 Link true true true Egyéb URL Other URL @@@ true true 40 true IDENTICAL https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335909 https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335909 false true Classification 10807 /api/classification/10807 Műszaki és technológiai tudományok true true Classification 10001 /api/classification/10001 Tudomány true true MtaRating 10486385 /api/mtarating/10486385 II. Pedagógiai Tudományos Bizottság:A PLOS ONE 1932-6203 RatingType 10023 /api/ratingtype/10023 II. Pedagógiai Tudományos Bizottság PedTB Institute 14107 /api/institute/14107 Pedagógiai Tudományos Bizottság II. FTO PedTB [1901-] 0 false true false Pedagógiai Tudományos Bizottság Pedagógiai Tudományos Bizottság true 14107 true true true A true true MtaRating 519076 /api/mtarating/519076 IX. Szociológiai Tudományos Bizottság:A nemzetközi PLOS ONE 1932-6203 RatingType 10007 /api/ratingtype/10007 IX. Szociológiai Tudományos Bizottság SZTB Institute 14102 /api/institute/14102 Szociológiai Tudományos Bizottság IXGJO SZTB [1901-] 0 false true false Szociológiai Tudományos Bizottság Committee on Sociology true 14102 true true true A nemzetközi true 19076 true MtaRating 11551131 /api/mtarating/11551131 IX. Regionális Tudományok Bizottsága:B nemzetközi PLOS ONE 1932-6203 RatingType 10010 /api/ratingtype/10010 IX. Regionális Tudományok Bizottsága RegTB Institute 14100 /api/institute/14100 Regionális Tudományok Bizottsága IXGJO RTB [1901-] 0 false true false Regionális Tudományok Bizottsága Committee on Regional Studies true 14100 true true true B nemzetközi false true SjrRating 11736318 /api/sjrrating/11736318 sjr:Q1 (2025) Scopus - Multidisciplinary PLOS ONE 1932-6203 24 0.24 journal RatingType 10002 /api/ratingtype/10002 sjr sjr true true ClassificationExternal 1000 /api/classificationexternal/1000 Scopus - Multidisciplinary true 1000 true Q1 FROM_LAST_YEAR true true Reference 69928024 /api/reference/69928024 1. CS Holling 1973: Resilience and stability of ecological systems., Annu Rev Ecol Syst., 4, p. 1, DOI: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245 1 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245 false true Reference 69928025 /api/reference/69928025 2. FS Brand 2007: Focusing the meaning(s) of resilience: resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object., E&S., 12, DOI: 10.5751/ES-02029-120123 2 10.5751/ES-02029-120123 false true Reference 69928026 /api/reference/69928026 3. TH Oliver 2015: Biodiversity and resilience of ecosystem functions., Trends Ecol Evol., 30, p. 673, DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.009 3 10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.009 false true Reference 69928027 /api/reference/69928027 4. C Folke 2016: Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science., E&S., 21, DOI: 10.5751/ES-08748-210341 4 10.5751/ES-08748-210341 false true Reference 69928028 /api/reference/69928028 5. AS Laino 2024: A logic-based resilience metric for water resource recovery facilities., Environ Sci (Camb)., 11, p. 377 5 false true Reference 69928029 /api/reference/69928029 6. AF Malek 2023: Power distribution system outage management using improved resilience metrics for smart grid applications., Energies., 16, p. 3953, DOI: 10.3390/en16093953 6 10.3390/en16093953 false true Reference 69928030 /api/reference/69928030 7. ST Waller 2023: Analyzing and modeling network travel patterns during the ukraine invasion using crowd-sourced pervasive traffic data., Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board., 2677, p. 491, DOI: 10.1177/03611981231161622 7 10.1177/03611981231161622 false true Reference 69928031 /api/reference/69928031 8. Y Yao 2023: Quantitative metrics for grid resilience evaluation and optimization., IEEE Trans Sustain Energy., 14, p. 1244, DOI: 10.1109/TSTE.2022.3230019 8 10.1109/TSTE.2022.3230019 false true Reference 69928032 /api/reference/69928032 9. JA Sanabria-Fernández 2024: Marine protection enhances the resilience of biological communities on temperate rocky reefs., Aquatic Conservation., 34, DOI: 10.1002/aqc.4101 9 10.1002/aqc.4101 false true Reference 69928033 /api/reference/69928033 10. S Perri 2023: Salinity-induced limits to mangrove canopy height., Global Ecol Biogeogr., 32, p. 1561, DOI: 10.1111/geb.13720 10 10.1111/geb.13720 false true Reference 69928034 /api/reference/69928034 11. JS Roth 2023: Macrophyte species richness improves resilience to grazing., Journal of Ecology., 111, p. 2146, DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.14153 11 10.1111/1365-2745.14153 false true Reference 69928035 /api/reference/69928035 12. KJE Clemente 2023: The vulnerability and resilience of seagrass ecosystems to marine heatwaves in New Zealand: a remote sensing analysis of seascape metrics usingPlanetScopeimagery., Remote Sens Ecol Conserv., 9, p. 803, DOI: 10.1002/rse2.343 12 10.1002/rse2.343 false true Reference 69928036 /api/reference/69928036 13. Tolner F, Palovics R, Barta B, Eigner G. Long-term development perspectives of resilient companies. In: 2023 IEEE 21st World Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence and Informatics (SAMI). IEEE; 2023. p. 219–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/sami58000.2023.10044504, DOI: 10.1109/SAMI58000.2023.10044504 13 10.1109/SAMI58000.2023.10044504 false true Reference 69928037 /api/reference/69928037 14. M Liu 2021: Establishing forest resilience indicators in the hilly red soil region of southern China from vegetation greenness and landscape metrics using dense Landsat time series., Ecological Indicators., 121, p. 106985, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106985 14 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106985 false true Reference 69928038 /api/reference/69928038 15. A Sapkota 2025: Resilience investment against extreme weather events considering critical load points in an active microgrid., Applied Sciences., 15, p. 6973, DOI: 10.3390/app15136973 15 10.3390/app15136973 false true Reference 69928039 /api/reference/69928039 16. S Flores-Larsen 2023: New metrics for thermal resilience of passive buildings during heat events., Building and Environment., 230, p. 109990, DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.109990 16 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.109990 false true Reference 69928040 /api/reference/69928040 17. H Xie 2022: Resilience metrics for integrated power and natural gas systems., IEEE Trans Smart Grid., 13, p. 2483, DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2022.3145635 17 10.1109/TSG.2022.3145635 false true Reference 69928041 /api/reference/69928041 18. G Kandaperumal 2022: AWR: anticipate, withstand, and recover resilience metric for operational and planning decision support in electric distribution system., IEEE Trans Smart Grid., 13, p. 179, DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2021.3119508 18 10.1109/TSG.2021.3119508 false true Reference 69928042 /api/reference/69928042 19. B Yang 2021: Resilience metric of equipment system: theory, measurement and sensitivity analysis., Reliability Engineering & System Safety., 215, p. 107889, DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107889 19 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107889 false true Reference 69928043 /api/reference/69928043 20. A Assad 2019: A new metric for assessing resilience of water distribution networks., Water., 11, p. 1701, DOI: 10.3390/w11081701 20 10.3390/w11081701 false true Reference 69928044 /api/reference/69928044 21. P Jain 2018: Resilience metrics for improved process-risk decision making: survey, analysis and application., Safety Science., 108, p. 13, DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.012 21 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.012 false true Reference 69928045 /api/reference/69928045 22. BM Ayyub 2014: Systems resilience for multihazard environments: definition, metrics, and valuation for decision making., Risk Anal., 34, p. 340, DOI: 10.1111/risa.12093 22 10.1111/risa.12093 false true Reference 69928046 /api/reference/69928046 23. R Francis 2014: A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems., Reliability Engineering & System Safety., 121, p. 90, DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.004 23 10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.004 false true Reference 69928047 /api/reference/69928047 24. A Pagano 2022: A pipe ranking method for water distribution network resilience assessment based on graph-theory metrics aggregated through Bayesian belief networks., Water Resour Manage., 36, p. 5091, DOI: 10.1007/s11269-022-03293-z 24 10.1007/s11269-022-03293-z false true Reference 69928048 /api/reference/69928048 25. Caskey SA, Gunda T, Wingo J, Williams AD. Leveraging resilience metrics to support security system analysis. In: 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST). IEEE; 2021. p. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/hst53381.2021.9619837, DOI: 10.1109/HST53381.2021.9619837 25 10.1109/HST53381.2021.9619837 false true Reference 69928049 /api/reference/69928049 26. GA Abantao 2024: Reconceptualizing reliability indices as metrics to quantify power distribution system resilience., Energies., 17, p. 1909, DOI: 10.3390/en17081909 26 10.3390/en17081909 false true Reference 69928050 /api/reference/69928050 27. I Dobson 2024: How long is a resilience event in a transmission system?: metrics and models driven by utility data., IEEE Trans Power Syst., 39, p. 2814, DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2023.3292328 27 10.1109/TPWRS.2023.3292328 false true Reference 69928051 /api/reference/69928051 28. F Dehghani 2023: Age-dependent resilience assessment and quantification of distribution systems under extreme weather events., International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems., 150, p. 109089, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109089 28 10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109089 false true Reference 69928052 /api/reference/69928052 29. Hutchinson S, Bernal Heredia WG, Ghatpande OA. Resilience metrics for building-level electrical distribution systems with energy storage. In: 2022 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech). IEEE; 2022. p. 71–8., DOI: 10.1109/SusTech53338.2022.9794261 29 10.1109/SusTech53338.2022.9794261 false true Reference 69928053 /api/reference/69928053 30. J Gui 2023: Operational resilience metrics for power systems with penetration of renewable resources., IET Generation Trans & Dist., 17, p. 2344, DOI: 10.1049/gtd2.12811 30 10.1049/gtd2.12811 false true Reference 69928054 /api/reference/69928054 31. X Chen 2023: Evaluation of earthquake disaster recovery patterns and influencing factors: a case study of the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake., All Earth., 35, p. 132, DOI: 10.1080/27669645.2023.2207942 31 10.1080/27669645.2023.2207942 false true Reference 69928055 /api/reference/69928055 32. G Behzadi 2020: On metrics for supply chain resilience., European Journal of Operational Research., 287, p. 145, DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.040 32 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.040 false true Reference 69928056 /api/reference/69928056 33. T Roach 2018: Resilience-based performance metrics for water resources management under uncertainty., Advances in Water Resources., 116, p. 18, DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.03.016 33 10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.03.016 false true Reference 69928057 /api/reference/69928057 34. Novak M, Shirazi SN, Hudic A, Hecht T, Tauber M, Hutchison D, et al. Towards resilience metrics for future cloud applications. In: Cardoso J, editor. CLOSER 2016 . SciTePress (Science and Technology Publications); 2016. p. 295–301., DOI: 10.5220/0005910502950301 34 10.5220/0005910502950301 false true Reference 69928058 /api/reference/69928058 35. C Poulin 2021: Infrastructure resilience curves: performance measures and summary metrics., Reliability Engineering & System Safety., 216, p. 107926, DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107926 35 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107926 false true Reference 69928059 /api/reference/69928059 36. S Sajwan 2025: Multi-stage operational resilience metric-driven optimal service restoration in DER-rich power distribution systems., IEEE Access., 13, p. 95275, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3574480 36 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3574480 false true Reference 69928060 /api/reference/69928060 37. N Toumasis 2024: Emerging resilience metrics in an intensely managed ecological system., Ecological Engineering., 200, p. 107151, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2023.107151 37 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2023.107151 false true Reference 69928061 /api/reference/69928061 38. E Rosales-Asensio 2022: Resilience framework, methods, and metrics for the prioritization of critical electrical grid customers., Electronics., 11, p. 2246, DOI: 10.3390/electronics11142246 38 10.3390/electronics11142246 false true Reference 69928062 /api/reference/69928062 39. P Mathew 2021: Assessing the energy resilience of office buildings: development and testing of a simplified metric for real estate stakeholders., Buildings., 11, p. 96, DOI: 10.3390/buildings11030096 39 10.3390/buildings11030096 false true Reference 69928063 /api/reference/69928063 40. M Barbeau 2021: Resilience estimation of cyber-physical systems via quantitative metrics., IEEE Access., 9, p. 46462, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3066108 40 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3066108 false true Reference 69928064 /api/reference/69928064 41. M Fattahi 2020: Stochastic optimization of disruption-driven supply chain network design with a new resilience metric., International Journal of Production Economics., 230, p. 107755, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107755 41 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107755 false true Reference 69928065 /api/reference/69928065 42. R Yarveisy 2020: A simple yet robust resilience assessment metrics., Reliability Engineering & System Safety., 197, p. 106810, DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.106810 42 10.1016/j.ress.2020.106810 false true Reference 69928066 /api/reference/69928066 43. C Cheng 2020: Improved integrated metric for quantitative assessment of resilience., Advances in Mechanical Engineering., 12, p. 168781402090606, DOI: 10.1177/1687814020906065 43 10.1177/1687814020906065 false true Reference 69928067 /api/reference/69928067 44. M Najarian 2019: Design and assessment methodology for system resilience metrics., Risk Anal., 39, p. 1885, DOI: 10.1111/risa.13274 44 10.1111/risa.13274 false true Reference 69928068 /api/reference/69928068 45. Dubaniowski MI, Heinimann HR. Supply-at-risk: resilience metric for infrastructure systems: framework for assessing and comparing resilience of infrastructure systems in urban areas. In: 2019 4th International Conference on System Reliability and Safety (ICSRS). 2019. p. 561–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/icsrs48664.2019.8987665, DOI: 10.1109/ICSRS48664.2019.8987665 45 10.1109/ICSRS48664.2019.8987665 false true Reference 69928069 /api/reference/69928069 46. B Cai 2018: Availability-based engineering resilience metric and its corresponding evaluation methodology., Reliability Engineering & System Safety., 172, p. 216, DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.12.021 46 10.1016/j.ress.2017.12.021 false true Reference 69928070 /api/reference/69928070 47. Hossain-McKenzie S, Lai C, Chavez A, Vugrin E. Performance-based cyber resilience metrics: an applied demonstration toward moving target defense. In: IECON 2018 - 44th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. 2018. p. 766–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/iecon.2018.8591764, DOI: 10.1109/IECON.2018.8591764 47 10.1109/IECON.2018.8591764 false true Reference 69928071 /api/reference/69928071 48. Song Z, Ren G, Mirabella L, Srivastava S. A resilience metric and its calculation for ship automation systems. In: 2016 Resilience Week (RWS), 2016. 194–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/rweek.2016.7573332, DOI: 10.1109/RWEEK.2016.7573332 48 10.1109/RWEEK.2016.7573332 false true Reference 69928072 /api/reference/69928072 49. DJ Rosenkrantz 2009: Resilience metrics for service-oriented networks: a service allocation approach., IEEE Trans Serv Comput., 2, p. 183, DOI: 10.1109/TSC.2009.18 49 10.1109/TSC.2009.18 false true Reference 69928073 /api/reference/69928073 50. T Hu 2025: Dynamic recovery and a resilience metric for UAV swarms under attack., Drones., 9, p. 589, DOI: 10.3390/drones9080589 50 10.3390/drones9080589 false true Reference 69928074 /api/reference/69928074 51. H Raoufi 2021: Power system resilience assessment considering critical infrastructure resilience approaches and government policymaker criteria., IET Generation Trans & Dist., 15, p. 2819, DOI: 10.1049/gtd2.12218 51 10.1049/gtd2.12218 false true Reference 69928075 /api/reference/69928075 52. Enjalbert S, Vanderhaegen F, Pichon M, Ouedraogo KA, Millot P. Assessment of transportation system resilience. Human Modelling in Assisted Transportation. Springer Milan. 2011. p. 335–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1821-1_36, DOI: 10.1007/978-88-470-1821-1_36 52 10.1007/978-88-470-1821-1_36 false true Reference 69928076 /api/reference/69928076 53. MH Nejati Amiri 2024: Towards a framework for measurements of power systems resiliency: comprehensive review and development of graph and vector-based resilience metrics., Sustainable Cities and Society., 109, p. 105517, DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105517 53 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105517 false true Reference 69928077 /api/reference/69928077 54. A Dehghani 2021: An overview of the assessment metrics of the concept of resilience in electrical grids., Int Trans Electr Energ Syst., 31, DOI: 10.1002/2050-7038.13159 54 10.1002/2050-7038.13159 false true Reference 69928078 /api/reference/69928078 55. PE Roege 2014: Metrics for energy resilience., Energy Policy., 72, p. 249, DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.012 55 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.012 false true Reference 69928079 /api/reference/69928079 56. JJ Plotnek 2021: Power systems resilience: definition and taxonomy with a view towards metrics., International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection., 33, p. 100411, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcip.2021.100411 56 10.1016/j.ijcip.2021.100411 false true Reference 69928080 /api/reference/69928080 57. H Raoufi 2020: Power systems resilience metrics: a comprehensive review of challenges and outlook., Sustainability., 12, p. 9698, DOI: 10.3390/su12229698 57 10.3390/su12229698 false true Reference 69928081 /api/reference/69928081 58. S Charani Shandiz 2020: Resilience framework and metrics for energy master planning of communities., Energy., 203, p. 117856, DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117856 58 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117856 false true Reference 69928082 /api/reference/69928082 59. E Hossain 2021: Metrics and enhancement strategies for grid resilience and reliability during natural disasters., Applied Energy., 290, p. 116709, DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116709 59 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116709 false true Reference 69928083 /api/reference/69928083 60. AM Stanković 2023: Methods for analysis and quantification of power system resilience., IEEE Trans Power Syst., 38, p. 4774, DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3212688 60 10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3212688 false true Reference 69928084 /api/reference/69928084 61. M Bruckler 2024: Review of metrics to assess resilience capacities and actions for supply chain resilience., Computers & Industrial Engineering., 192, p. 110176, DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2024.110176 61 10.1016/j.cie.2024.110176 false true Reference 69928085 /api/reference/69928085 62. Y Han 2020: A systematic literature review of the capabilities and performance metrics of supply chain resilience., International Journal of Production Research., 58, p. 4541, DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1785034 62 10.1080/00207543.2020.1785034 false true Reference 69928086 /api/reference/69928086 63. A Almaleh 2023: Measuring resilience in smart infrastructures: a comprehensive review of metrics and methods., Applied Sciences., 13, p. 6452, DOI: 10.3390/app13116452 63 10.3390/app13116452 false true Reference 69928087 /api/reference/69928087 64. J Andersson 2020: A conceptual framework for resilience: fundamental definitions, strategies and metrics., Computing., 103, p. 559, DOI: 10.1007/s00607-020-00874-x 64 10.1007/s00607-020-00874-x false true Reference 69928088 /api/reference/69928088 65. Y Cheng 2021: Systems resilience assessments: a review, framework and metrics., International Journal of Production Research., 60, p. 595, DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2021.1971789 65 10.1080/00207543.2021.1971789 false true Reference 69928089 /api/reference/69928089 66. A Wachtel 2025: pyRoCS: a python package to evaluate the resilience of complex systems., SoftwareX., 29, p. 101977, DOI: 10.1016/j.softx.2024.101977 66 10.1016/j.softx.2024.101977 false true Reference 69928090 /api/reference/69928090 67. HT Tran 2017: A framework for the quantitative assessment of performance-based system resilience., Reliability Engineering & System Safety., 158, p. 73, DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.014 67 10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.014 false true Reference 69928091 /api/reference/69928091 68. C Nan 2017: A quantitative method for assessing resilience of interdependent infrastructures., Reliability Engineering & System Safety., 157, p. 35, DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.013 68 10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.013 false true Reference 69928092 /api/reference/69928092 69. P Silva 2024: Predictive resilience modeling using statistical regression methods., Mathematics., 12, p. 2380, DOI: 10.3390/math12152380 69 10.3390/math12152380 false true Reference 69928093 /api/reference/69928093 70. M Wetzel 2024: REMix: A GAMS-based framework for optimizing energy system models., JOSS., 9, p. 6330, DOI: 10.21105/joss.06330 70 10.21105/joss.06330 false true Reference 69928094 /api/reference/69928094 71. S Hilpert 2018: The Open Energy Modelling Framework (OEMOF) - a new approach to facilitate open science in energy system modelling., Energy Strategy Reviews., 22, p. 16, DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2018.07.001 71 10.1016/j.esr.2018.07.001 false true Reference 69928095 /api/reference/69928095 72. T Brown 2018: PyPSA: Python for Power System Analysis., JORS., 6, p. 4, DOI: 10.5334/jors.188 72 10.5334/jors.188 false true Reference 69928096 /api/reference/69928096 73. K McClymont 2020: Towards urban resilience through sustainable drainage systems: a multi-objective optimisation problem., J Environ Manage., 275, p. 111173, DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111173 73 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111173 false true Reference 69928097 /api/reference/69928097 74. Y Zhou 2019: Resilience of transportation systems: concepts and comprehensive review., IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst., 20, p. 4262, DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2018.2883766 74 10.1109/TITS.2018.2883766 false true Reference 69928098 /api/reference/69928098 75. M Bruneau 2003: A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities., Earthquake Spectra., 19, p. 733, DOI: 10.1193/1.1623497 75 10.1193/1.1623497 false true Reference 69928099 /api/reference/69928099 76. JM Colomer 2011: Ramon Llull: from ‘Ars electionis’ to social choice theory., Soc Choice Welf., 40, p. 317, DOI: 10.1007/s00355-011-0598-2 76 10.1007/s00355-011-0598-2 false true Reference 69928100 /api/reference/69928100 77. Szpiro G. Numbers Rule: The Vexing Mathematics of Democracy, from Plato to the Present. Princeton University Press. 2020. 77 false true Reference 69928101 /api/reference/69928101 78. DG Saari 1996: The Copeland method., Econ Theory., 8, p. 51, DOI: 10.1007/BF01212012 78 10.1007/BF01212012 false true Reference 69928102 /api/reference/69928102 79. B Efron 1985: Bootstrap confidence intervals for a class of parametric problems., Biometrika., 72, p. 45, DOI: 10.1093/biomet/72.1.45 79 10.1093/biomet/72.1.45 false true Reference 69928103 /api/reference/69928103 80. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall/CRC; 1994., DOI: 10.1201/9780429246593 80 10.1201/9780429246593 false true /api/publication/36437601 Yeligeti Madhura et al. A composite metric for evaluating system resilience with non-idealistic performance curves. (2025) PLOS ONE 1932-6203 20 11 p. e0335909<div class="JournalArticle Publication long-list"> <div class="authors"> <img title="Idézőközlemény" style="float: left" src="/frontend/resources/grid/publication-citation-icon.png"> <div class="autype autype0"> <span class="author-name" >Yeligeti Madhura ✉ </span> ;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span class="author-name" >Gils Hans Christian </span> ;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span class="author-name" >Nowak Wolfgang </span> </div> </div> <div class="title"><a href="/gui2/?mode=browse&params=publication;36437601" target="_blank">A composite metric for evaluating system resilience with non-idealistic performance curves</a></div> <div> <span class="journal-title">PLOS ONE</span> <span class="journal-issn">( <a target="_blank" href="https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/1932-6203">1932-6203</a>)</span>: <span class="journal-volume">20</span> <span class="journal-issue">11</span> <span class="page"> p. e0335909. </span> <span class="year">(2025)</span> </div> <div class="pub-footer"> <span class="language" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/html">Nyelv: Angol | </span> <span class="identifiers"> <span class="id identifier oa_none" title="none"> <a style="color:blue" title="10.1371/journal.pone.0335909" target="_blank" href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335909"> DOI </a> </span> <span class="id identifier oa_none" title="none"> <a style="color:blue" title="001615500500025" target="_blank" href="https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/001615500500025"> WoS </a> </span> <span class="id identifier oa_none" title="none"> <a style="color:blue" title="https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335909" target="_blank" href="https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335909"> Egyéb URL </a> </span> </span> <div class="publication-citation"> <a target="_blank" href="/api/publication?cond=citations.related;eq;36437601&sort=publishedYear,desc&sort=title"> Idézett közlemények száma: 1 </a> </div> <div class="mtid"><span class="long-pub-mtid">Közlemény: 36437601</span> | <span class="status-data status-VALIDATED"> Egyeztetett </span> Idéző | <span class="type-subtype">Folyóiratcikk ( Szakcikk ) </span> | <span class="pub-category">Tudományos</span> | <span class="publication-sourceOfData">WoS-XML</span> </div> <div class="lastModified">Utolsó módosítás: 2026.01.01. 15:00 Szuper Admin (admin) </div> </div></div>