The persistent tension between Hungary and its Western allies has become a defining
feature of European politics. Hungary has found itself in the crossfire of numerous
international criticisms in recent years. The accusations span a wide spectrum: from
the state of the rule of
law, through restricting the operating space of civil organizations, to fostering
relations with Russia and China. In the context of NATO, energy policy and ties with
Russia frequently
provoke sharp criticism.
On the contrary, the Hungarian government tries to justify its position by claiming
that there is nothing at the centre of its actions other than a merely pragmatic approach:
the preservation of Hungarian sovereignty, the preservation of foreign policy space,
the constructive reaction to the shifting power balance in the world and the exploitation
of
economic benefits.
The perception of Hungary's activities in the international arena remains extreme.
However, recent events have given rise to an interesting development. Hungary's approach
to
governance and international relations increasingly anticipates a shift in Western
political thinking. At least in an increasing number of cases.
