Comparative Analysis of Nucleus Segmentation Techniques for Enhanced DNA Quantification in Propidium Iodide-Stained Samples

Jónás, V Z ✉ [Jónás, Viktor Zoltán (orvosi képfeldolg...), author] Applied Informatics and Applied Mathematics Doc... (ÓU); Centre of Bio-Tech (ÓU / EKIK); Paulik, R [Paulik, Róbert (Orvosi képfeldolg...), author]; Molnár, B [Molnár, Béla (belgyógyászat, ga...), author] Department of Internal Medicine and Oncology (SU / FM / C); Kozlovszky, M [Kozlovszky, Miklós (Informatika, tele...), author] Biomatika és Alkalmazott Mesterséges Intelligen... (ÓU / NJFCS); Centre of Bio-Tech (ÓU / EKIK); Laboratory of Parallel and Distributed Systems

English Article (Journal Article) Scientific
Published: APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2076-3417 14 (19) Paper: 8707 , 17 p. 2024
  • SJR Scopus - Engineering (miscellaneous): Q2
Identifiers
Fundings:
  • (al 2019-1-3-1-KK-2019-00007 Innovációs szolgáltató bázis létrehozása diagnosztikai, terápiás és kutatási célú kiberorvosi rendszerek fejlesztésére pályáz)
Subjects:
  • Health sciences
Digitization in pathology and cytology labs is now widespread, a significant shift from a decade ago when few doctors used image processing tools. Despite unchanged scanning times due to excitation in fluorescent imaging, advancements in computing power and software have enabled more complex algorithms, yielding better-quality results. This study evaluates three nucleus segmentation algorithms for ploidy analysis using propidium iodide-stained digital WSI slides. Our goal was to improve segmentation accuracy to more closely match DNA histograms obtained via flow cytometry, with the ultimate aim of enhancing the calibration method we proposed in a previous study, which seeks to align image cytometry results with those from flow cytometry. We assessed these algorithms based on raw segmentation performance and DNA histogram similarity, using confusion-matrix-based metrics. Results indicate that modern algorithms perform better, with F1 scores exceeding 0.845, compared to our earlier solution’s 0.807, and produce DNA histograms that more closely resemble those from the reference FCM method.
Citation styles: IEEEACMAPAChicagoHarvardCSLCopyPrint
2025-04-01 22:37