https://m2.mtmt.hu/ hun 2026-10-23 21:42 JournalArticle 35162885 ADMIN_APPROVED true Online kiadás 2024 0 false 2026-10-18T18:11:59.681+0000 2026-05-19T08:34:08.583+0000 2024-08-07T14:46:44.521+0000 true 10092026 Elek Judit /api/admin/10092026 Admin Elek Judit (TK admin4) true 2026-08-08T09:52:45.854+0000 2026-08-08T09:52:45.854+0000 2025-05-23T10:52:52.078+0000 true 10065569 Pécsi Éva /api/admin/10065569 Admin Pécsi Éva (MTMT Közp 2,3, admin) true Admin 10014568 /api/admin/10014568 Vándor Andrea (VA, admin) Vándor Andrea true 10014568 true 2025-02-06T11:26:05.931+0000 true false true 24 24 /api/publicationtype/24 PublicationType Folyóiratcikk 1 true 24 JournalArticle true 10000059 Article true 24 24 /api/publicationtype/24 PublicationType Folyóiratcikk 1 true 24 JournalArticle /api/subtype/10000059 Szakcikk SubType Szakcikk (Folyóiratcikk) 101 true 10000059 true 1 /api/category/1 Category Tudományos true 1 Benedek, István true true /api/journal/10015120 REVIEWED COMPARATIVE EUROPEAN POLITICS 1472-4790 1740-388X true false 10015120 false 10015120 true 1472-4790 1740-388X Journal FOREIGN 23 3 331 352 331 22 2025 Although the research subjects of populism and autocratization studies are interconnected, the full potential of combining their focuses—the dynamic elements of political systems and institutional dimensions—into a comprehensive and systematic conceptual framework remains underexploited. This study makes a stride in this direction by reviewing and connecting these areas through the concepts of populist autocratization and populist electoral autocracies. These concepts aim to deepen our understanding of the nature of contemporary autocratization and the stability of autocracies. While the study is primarily theoretical-conceptual in nature, it also engages with methodological and operationalization considerations, and outlines a brief research agenda to demonstrate the empirical applicability of the analytical framework and lays the foundation for future research. true 2024 true true true false true false GREEN 2026-10-18 true https://real.mtak.hu/207783 31 0 27 20 9 26 21 10 7 11 11 8 8 24 7 0 30 23 27 20 0 4 4 Folyóiratcikk Journal Article 24 25 Könyvrészlet Chapter in Book 25 1 Könyv Book 23 0 Egyéb konferenciaközlemény Conference paper 31 0 Egyéb konferenciakötet Conference proceedings 32 1 Oltalmi formák Protection forms 26 0 Disszertáció Thesis 28 1 Egyéb Miscellaneous 29 2 Alkotás Achievement 22 0 Kutatási adat Research data 33 0 Folyóiratcikk Journal Article 24 0 0 0 Könyvrészlet Chapter in Book 25 0 0 0 Könyv Book 23 0 0 0 Egyéb konferenciaközlemény Conference paper 31 0 0 0 Egyéb konferenciakötet Conference proceedings 32 0 0 0 Oltalmi formák Protection forms 26 0 0 0 Disszertáció Thesis 28 0 0 0 Egyéb Miscellaneous 29 0 0 0 Alkotás Achievement 22 0 0 0 Kutatási adat Research data 33 0 0 0 2024 0 3 0 3 0 2025 0 10 9 9 8 2026 0 18 15 18 15 Q1 A nemzetközi false 10061855 false false false 2024-11-05T15:46:56.617+0000 Politikatudományi Intézet (ELTE / AJK); Politikatudományi Intézet (HUN-REN TK) 1 10 2 1 0 true 10014568 Language 10002 /api/language/10002 Angol Angol English true 2 true PersonAuthorship 118515882 /api/authorship/118515882 Benedek, István [Benedek, István (politikai tudományok), szerző] Politikatudományi Intézet (HUN-REN TK); Politikatudományi Intézet (ELTE / AJK) 1 1.0 true false false Author 10061855 /api/author/10061855 Benedek István (politikai tudományok) Benedek István true 10061855 true Benedek István true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PublicationIdentifier 26911844 /api/publicationidentifier/26911844 DOI: 10.1057/s41295-024-00401-8 PlainSource 6 /api/publicationsource/6 DOI PublicationSourceType 10001 /api/publicationsourcetype/10001 DOI true true true DOI DOI https://doi.org/@@@ true true 6 true IDENTICAL 10.1057/s41295-024-00401-8 https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-024-00401-8 false true PublicationIdentifier 27461552 /api/publicationidentifier/27461552 WoS: 001285414100001 PlainSource 1 /api/publicationsource/1 WoS PublicationSourceType 10003 /api/publicationsourcetype/10003 Indexelő adatbázis false true true WoS WoS https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/@@@ true true 1 true IDENTICAL 001285414100001 https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/001285414100001 false true PublicationIdentifier 27675756 /api/publicationidentifier/27675756 REAL: 207783 SwordSource 36 /api/publicationsource/36 REAL PublicationSourceType 10007 /api/publicationsourcetype/10007 Repozitórium true true true REAL REAL https://real.mtak.hu/@@@ true true 36 true GREEN true 207783 https://real.mtak.hu/207783 false true PublicationIdentifier 27675751 /api/publicationidentifier/27675751 EDIT: 112307 SwordSource 92 /api/publicationsource/92 EDIT PublicationSourceType 10007 /api/publicationsourcetype/10007 Repozitórium true true true EDIT EDIT https://edit.elte.hu/handle/10831/@@@ true true 92 true GREEN true 112307 https://edit.elte.hu/handle/10831/112307 false true PublicationIdentifier 26911845 /api/publicationidentifier/26911845 Egyéb URL: https://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41295-024-00401-8 PlainSource 40 /api/publicationsource/40 Egyéb URL PublicationSourceType 10006 /api/publicationsourcetype/10006 Link true true true Egyéb URL Other URL @@@ true true 40 true https://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41295-024-00401-8 https://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41295-024-00401-8 false true Classification 12881 /api/classification/12881 Politikatudomány true true MtaRating 518087 /api/mtarating/518087 IX. Politikatudományi Bizottság:A nemzetközi COMPARATIVE EUROPEAN POLITICS 1472-4790 1740-388X RatingType 10015 /api/ratingtype/10015 IX. Politikatudományi Bizottság PTB Institute 14099 /api/institute/14099 Politikatudományi Bizottság IXGJO PTB [1901-] 0 false true false Politikatudományi Bizottság Committee on Political Science true 14099 true true true A nemzetközi true 18087 true MtaRating 509934 /api/mtarating/509934 IX. Nemzetközi és Fejlődéstanulmányok Doktori Bizottság:C nemzetközi COMPARATIVE EUROPEAN POLITICS 1472-4790 1740-388X RatingType 10013 /api/ratingtype/10013 IX. Nemzetközi és Fejlődéstanulmányok Doktori Bizottság NFDB Institute 19067 /api/institute/19067 Nemzetközi és Fejlődéstanulmányok Doktori Bizottság IXGJO NFDB [1901-] 0 false true false Nemzetközi és Fejlődéstanulmányok Doktori Bizottság Committee on World Economics and Development Studies true 19067 true true true C nemzetközi true 9934 true SjrRating 11615459 /api/sjrrating/11615459 sjr:Q1 (2025) Scopus - Political Science and International Relations COMPARATIVE EUROPEAN POLITICS 1472-4790 1740-388X 73 0.24 journal RatingType 10002 /api/ratingtype/10002 sjr sjr true true ClassificationExternal 3320 /api/classificationexternal/3320 Scopus - Political Science and International Relations true 3320 true Q1 DIRECT true true Reference 56351605 /api/reference/56351605 1. Abts, K., and S. Rummens. 2007. Populism versus democracy. Political Studies 55 (2): 405–424., DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00657.x 1 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00657.x false true Reference 56351606 /api/reference/56351606 2. Anckar, C., and C. Fredriksson. 2019. Classifying political regimes 1800–2016: A typology and a new dataset. European Political Science 18 (1): 84–96., DOI: 10.1057/s41304-018-0149-8 2 10.1057/s41304-018-0149-8 false true Reference 56351607 /api/reference/56351607 3. Balderacchi, C. 2018. Political leadership and the construction of competitive authoritarian regimes in Latin America: implications and prospects for Democracy. Democratization 25 (3): 504–523., DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2017.1388229 3 10.1080/13510347.2017.1388229 false true Reference 56351608 /api/reference/56351608 4. Bankov, P. 2020. The Fireman’s Ball in Bulgaria? A Comparison Between Sergey Stanishev and Boyko Borisov. In Party Leaders in Eastern Europe: Personality, Behavior and Consequences, edited by S. Gherghina, 43–66. Palgrave Studies in Political Psychology. Cham: Springer International Publishing., DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32025-6_3 4 10.1007/978-3-030-32025-6_3 false true Reference 56351609 /api/reference/56351609 5. Bene, M., and Z. Boda. 2023. A safety net against populism? An investigation of the interaction effect of political efficacy and democratic capacities on populist attitudes. Political Research Exchange 5 (1): 2220385., DOI: 10.1080/2474736X.2023.2220385 5 10.1080/2474736X.2023.2220385 false true Reference 56351610 /api/reference/56351610 6. Benedek, I. 2021. Riders on the Storm: The role of populism in the global crisis of democracy and in the functioning of electoral autocracies. Politics in Central Europe 17 (2): 197–225., DOI: 10.2478/pce-2021-0009 6 10.2478/pce-2021-0009 false true Reference 56351611 /api/reference/56351611 7. Benedek, I. 2024. Transforming the political public sphere: the media system of the Orbán regime in Hungary. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 17 (2) (forthcoming). 7 false true Reference 56351612 /api/reference/56351612 8. Boese, V. A., M. Lundstedt, K. Morrison, Y. Sato, and S. I. Lindberg. 2022. State of the World 2021: Autocratization changing its nature? Democratization 29 (6): 983–1013., DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2022.2069751 8 10.1080/13510347.2022.2069751 false true Reference 56351613 /api/reference/56351613 9. Bozóki, A., and I. Benedek. 2024. Politics in Hungary: Two Critical Junctures. In Civic and Uncivic Values in Hungary. Value Transformation, Politics, and Religion, edited by S. P. Ramet and L. Kürti. Abingdon-New York: Routledge (forthcoming)., DOI: 10.4324/9781003488842-3 9 10.4324/9781003488842-3 false true Reference 56351614 /api/reference/56351614 10. Brooker, P. 2000. Non-Democratic Regimes: Theory, Government and Politics. New York: St. Martin’s. 10 false true Reference 56351615 /api/reference/56351615 11. Bugarič, B. 2019. Central Europe’s descent into autocracy: A constitutional analysis of authoritarian populism. International Journal of Constitutional Law 17 (2): 597–616., DOI: 10.1093/icon/moz032 11 10.1093/icon/moz032 false true Reference 56351616 /api/reference/56351616 12. Bunce, V. J., and S. L. Wolchik. 2011. Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511977404 12 10.1017/CBO9780511977404 false true Reference 56351617 /api/reference/56351617 13. Busygina, I. 2019. Are post-soviet leaders doomed to be populist? A comparative analysis of Putin and Nazarbayev. European Politics and Society 20 (4): 502–518., DOI: 10.1080/23745118.2019.1569345 13 10.1080/23745118.2019.1569345 false true Reference 56351618 /api/reference/56351618 14. Canovan, M. 1999. Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies 47 (1): 2–16., DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.00184 14 10.1111/1467-9248.00184 false true Reference 56351619 /api/reference/56351619 15. Carothers, T. 2002. The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy 13 (1): 5–21., DOI: 10.1353/jod.2002.0003 15 10.1353/jod.2002.0003 false true Reference 56351620 /api/reference/56351620 16. Casal B. F., and J. Rama. 2021. Polarization: What do we know and what can we do about it? Frontiers in Political Science 30 (3): 687695., DOI: 10.3389/fpos.2021.687695 16 10.3389/fpos.2021.687695 false true Reference 56351621 /api/reference/56351621 17. Cassani, A. 2014. Hybrid what? Partial consensus and persistent divergences in the analysis of hybrid regimes - andrea cassani, 2014. International Political Science Review 35 (5): 542–558., DOI: 10.1177/0192512113495756 17 10.1177/0192512113495756 false true Reference 56351622 /api/reference/56351622 18. Cassani, A., and L. Tomini. 2019. Autocratization in Post-Cold War Political Regimes. Cham: Springer International Publishing., DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-03125-1 18 10.1007/978-3-030-03125-1 false true Reference 56351623 /api/reference/56351623 19. Castaldo, A. 2018. Populism and Competitive Authoritarianism in Turkey. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 18 (4): 467–487., DOI: 10.1080/14683857.2018.1550948 19 10.1080/14683857.2018.1550948 false true Reference 56351624 /api/reference/56351624 20. Castanho S. B., I. Andreadis, E. Anduiza, N. Blanuša, Y. Morlet Corti, G. Delfino, G. Rico, S. P. Ruth, B. Spruyt, M. Steenbergen, and L. Littvay. 2019. Public opinion surveys: A New Scale. In The Ideational Approach to Populism. Concept, Theory, and Analysis, edited by K. A. Hawkins, R. E. Carlin, L. Littvay, and C. R. Kaltwasser, 150–177. London-New York: Routledge., DOI: 10.4324/9781315196923-8 20 10.4324/9781315196923-8 false true Reference 56351625 /api/reference/56351625 21. Casullo, M. E. 2020. Populism and Myth. In The Populist Manifesto., edited by E. Eklundh and A. Knott, 25–38. London: Rowman & Littlefield International. 21 false true Reference 56351626 /api/reference/56351626 22. Collier, D., and S. Levitsky. 1997. Democracy with adjectives: conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics 49 (3): 430–451., DOI: 10.1353/wp.1997.0009 22 10.1353/wp.1997.0009 false true Reference 56351627 /api/reference/56351627 23. Collier, D., and J. E. Mahon. 1993. Conceptual ‘stretching’ revisited: Adapting categories in comparative analysis. American Political Science Review 87 (4): 845–855., DOI: 10.2307/2938818 23 10.2307/2938818 false true Reference 56351628 /api/reference/56351628 24. Coppedge, M., J. Gerring, A. Glynn, C. H. Knutsen, S. I. Lindberg, D. Pemstein, B. Seim, Svend-Erik. Skaaning, and J. Teorell. 2020. Varieties of Democracy: Measuring Two Centuries of Political Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., DOI: 10.1017/9781108347860 24 10.1017/9781108347860 false true Reference 56351629 /api/reference/56351629 25. Coppedge, M. J. Gerring, C. H. Knutsen, S. I. Lindberg, J. Teorell, et al. 2024. V-Dem Codebook V14. V-Dem Institute. https://v-dem.net/documents/38/V-Dem_Codebook_v14.pdf, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4774440 25 10.2139/ssrn.4774440 false true Reference 56351630 /api/reference/56351630 26. Dahl, R. A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press. 26 false true Reference 56351631 /api/reference/56351631 27. Daly, T. G. 2020. Understanding multi-directional democratic decay: Lessons from the rise of Bolsonaro in Brazil. The Law and Ethics of Human Rights 14 (2): 199–226., DOI: 10.1515/lehr-2020-2014 27 10.1515/lehr-2020-2014 false true Reference 56351632 /api/reference/56351632 28. Deegan-Krause, K. 2013. Slovakia. In The Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe, 3rd ed., edited by S. Berglund, J. Ekman, and T. Knutsen, 255–289. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing. 28 false true Reference 56351633 /api/reference/56351633 29. Diamond, L. 2002. Elections without democracy: Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 21–35., DOI: 10.1353/jod.2002.0025 29 10.1353/jod.2002.0025 false true Reference 56351634 /api/reference/56351634 30. Erdle, S. 2020. Ben Ali’s New Tunisia (1987–2009): A Case Study of Authoritarian Modernization in the Arab World. Ben Ali’s New Tunisia (1987–2009). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter., DOI: 10.1515/9783112208618 30 10.1515/9783112208618 false true Reference 56351635 /api/reference/56351635 31. Esen, B., and S. Gumuscu. 2016. Rising competitive authoritarianism in Turkey. Third World Quarterly 37 (9): 1581–1606., DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1135732 31 10.1080/01436597.2015.1135732 false true Reference 56351636 /api/reference/56351636 32. Fabbrini, S. 2013. The rise and fall of Silvio Berlusconi: Personalization of politics and its limits. Comparative European Politics 11 (2): 153–171., DOI: 10.1057/cep.2012.18 32 10.1057/cep.2012.18 false true Reference 56351637 /api/reference/56351637 33. Geddes, B., J. Wright, and E. Frantz. 2014. Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions: A new data set. Perspectives on Politics 12 (2): 313–331., DOI: 10.1017/S1537592714000851 33 10.1017/S1537592714000851 false true Reference 56351638 /api/reference/56351638 34. Gerschewski, J. 2013. The three pillars of stability: Legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes. Democratization 20 (1): 13–38., DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2013.738860 34 10.1080/13510347.2013.738860 false true Reference 56351639 /api/reference/56351639 35. Graham, M. H., and M. W. Svolik. 2020. Democracy in America? Partisanship, polarization, and the robustness of support for democracy in the United States. American Political Science Review 114 (2): 392–409., DOI: 10.1017/S0003055420000052 35 10.1017/S0003055420000052 false true Reference 56351640 /api/reference/56351640 36. Guasti, P., and L. Buštíková. 2020. A marriage of convenience: Responsive populists and responsible experts. Politics and Governance 8 (4): 468–472., DOI: 10.17645/pag.v8i4.3876 36 10.17645/pag.v8i4.3876 false true Reference 56351641 /api/reference/56351641 37. Hadenius, A., and J. Teorell. 2007. Pathways from authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 18 (1): 143–157., DOI: 10.1353/jod.2007.0009 37 10.1353/jod.2007.0009 false true Reference 56351642 /api/reference/56351642 38. Hawkins, K. A. 2009. Is Chávez Populist?: Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies 42 (8): 1040–1067., DOI: 10.1177/0010414009331721 38 10.1177/0010414009331721 false true Reference 56351643 /api/reference/56351643 39. Hawkins, K. A., R. Aguilar, B. C. Silva, E. K. Jenne, B. Kocijan, and C. R. Kaltwasser. 2022. Global Populism Database. Harvard Dataverse. 39 false true Reference 56351644 /api/reference/56351644 40. Howard, M. M., and P. G. Roessler. 2006. Liberalizing electoral outcomes in competitive authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 365–381., DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00189.x 40 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00189.x false true Reference 56351645 /api/reference/56351645 41. Kaltwasser, C. R., P. Taggart, P. O. Espejo, and P. Ostiguy. (eds.) 2017. The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford University Press, DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.34 41 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.34 false true Reference 56351646 /api/reference/56351646 42. Kestler, T., and M. Latouche. 2022. Venezuela: The Institutionalization of Authoritarian Populism. In The Palgrave Handbook of Populism, edited by M. Oswald, 511–526. Cham: Springer International Publishing., DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_32 42 10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_32 false true Reference 56351647 /api/reference/56351647 43. Laclau, E. 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso. 43 false true Reference 56351648 /api/reference/56351648 44. Lefort, C. 1988. Democracy and Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press. 44 false true Reference 56351649 /api/reference/56351649 45. Levitsky, S., and J. Loxton. 2013. Populism and competitive authoritarianism in the Andes. Democratization 20 (1): 107–136., DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2013.738864 45 10.1080/13510347.2013.738864 false true Reference 56351650 /api/reference/56351650 46. Levitsky, S., and L. A. Way. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press., DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511781353 46 10.1017/CBO9780511781353 false true Reference 56351651 /api/reference/56351651 47. Levitsky, S., and D. Ziblatt. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York: Crown Publishing Group. 47 false true Reference 56351652 /api/reference/56351652 48. Linz, J. 1978. Crisis, Breakdown & Reequilibration. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press. 48 false true Reference 56351653 /api/reference/56351653 49. Linz, J. 2000. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner., DOI: 10.1515/9781685850043 49 10.1515/9781685850043 false true Reference 56351654 /api/reference/56351654 50. Lührmann, A., and S. I. Lindberg. 2019. A third wave of autocratization is here: What is new about it? Democratization 26 (7): 1095–1113., DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029 50 10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029 false true Reference 56351655 /api/reference/56351655 51. Maerz, S. F, A. B. Edgell, M. C. Wilson, S. Hellmeier, and S. I. Lindberg. 2023. Episodes of regime transformation. Journal of Peace Research. (OnlineFirst)., DOI: 10.1177/00223433231168192 51 10.1177/00223433231168192 false true Reference 56351656 /api/reference/56351656 52. Mair, P. 2008. Concepts and Concept Formation. In Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, edited by D. D. Porta and M. Keating, 177–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511801938.011 52 10.1017/CBO9780511801938.011 false true Reference 56351657 /api/reference/56351657 53. Medzihorsky, Juraj, and Staffan I. Lindberg. 2024. Walking the talk: How to identify anti-pluralist parties. Party Politics 30 (3): 420–434., DOI: 10.1177/13540688231153092 53 10.1177/13540688231153092 false true Reference 56351658 /api/reference/56351658 54. Mény, Yves, and Yves Surel. 2002. The Constitutive Ambiguity of Populism. In Democracies and the Populist Challenge, edited by Yves Mény and Yves Surel, 1–21. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK., DOI: 10.1057/9781403920072 54 10.1057/9781403920072 false true Reference 56351659 /api/reference/56351659 55. Møller, J., and Svend-Erik. Skaaning. 2010. Beyond the radial delusion: Conceptualizing and measuring democracy and non-democracy. International Political Science Review 31 (3): 261–283., DOI: 10.1177/0192512110369522 55 10.1177/0192512110369522 false true Reference 56351660 /api/reference/56351660 56. Morgenbesser, L. 2017. The autocratic mandate: Elections, legitimacy and regime stability in Singapore. The Pacific Review 30 (2): 205–231., DOI: 10.1080/09512748.2016.1201134 56 10.1080/09512748.2016.1201134 false true Reference 56351661 /api/reference/56351661 57. Mouffe, C. 2013. Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London-New York.: Verso Books. 57 false true Reference 56351662 /api/reference/56351662 58. Mudde, C. 2004. The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition 39 (4): 541–563., DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x 58 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x false true Reference 56351663 /api/reference/56351663 59. Mudde, C., and C. R. Kaltwasser. 2013. Exclusionary versus inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition 48 (2): 147–174., DOI: 10.1017/gov.2012.11 59 10.1017/gov.2012.11 false true Reference 56351664 /api/reference/56351664 60. Müller, Jan-Werner. 2016. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press., DOI: 10.9783/9780812293784 60 10.9783/9780812293784 false true Reference 56351665 /api/reference/56351665 61. Mudde, C., and C. R. Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press., DOI: 10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001 61 10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001 false true Reference 56351666 /api/reference/56351666 62. Norris, P., and R. Inglehart. 2019. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. New York: Cambridge University Press., DOI: 10.1017/9781108595841 62 10.1017/9781108595841 false true Reference 56351667 /api/reference/56351667 63. O’Donnell, G. A. 1973. Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley, California. Polilitcs of Modernization Series, No. 9. University of California. 63 false true Reference 56351668 /api/reference/56351668 64. Pappas, T. S. 2019. Populism and Liberal Democracy: A Comparative and Theoretical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press., DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198837886.001.0001 64 10.1093/oso/9780198837886.001.0001 false true Reference 56351669 /api/reference/56351669 65. Pitkin, H. F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley-Los Angeles-London: University of California Press., DOI: 10.1525/9780520340503 65 10.1525/9780520340503 false true Reference 56351670 /api/reference/56351670 66. Rak, J., and R. Bäcker. 2022. Theorising Struggles etween Neo-Militant Democracies and Their Enemies. In Neo-Militant Democracies in Post-Communist Member States of the European Union, edited by Rak, J., and R. Bäcker, 3–21. New York and London: Routledge., DOI: 10.4324/9781003245162-1 66 10.4324/9781003245162-1 false true Reference 56351671 /api/reference/56351671 67. Robinson, N., and S. Milne. 2017. Populism and political development in hybrid regimes: Russia and the development of official populism. International Political Science Review 38 (4): 412–425., DOI: 10.1177/0192512117697705 67 10.1177/0192512117697705 false true Reference 56351672 /api/reference/56351672 68. Rooduijn, M. 2014. The nucleus of populism: In search of the lowest common denominator. Government and Opposition 49 (4): 573–599., DOI: 10.1017/gov.2013.30 68 10.1017/gov.2013.30 false true Reference 56351673 /api/reference/56351673 69. Rooduijn, M., A. L. Pirro, D. Halikiopoulou, C. Froio, S. Van Kessel, S. L. De Lange, C. Mudde, and P. Taggart. 2024. The PopuList: A database of populist, far-left, and far-right parties using expert-informed qualitative comparative classification (EiQCC). British Journal of Political Science. 54 (3): 969–978., DOI: 10.1017/S0007123423000431 69 10.1017/S0007123423000431 false true Reference 56351674 /api/reference/56351674 70. Sartori, G. 1970. Concept misformation in comparative politics. The American Political Science Review 64 (4): 1033–1053., DOI: 10.2307/1958356 70 10.2307/1958356 false true Reference 56351675 /api/reference/56351675 71. Sartori, G. 1987. The Theory of Democracy Revisited. New Jersey: Chatam House. 71 false true Reference 56351676 /api/reference/56351676 72. Sartori, G. 2008. Guidelines for Concept Analysis. In Concepts and Method in Social Science. The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori, edited by D. Collier and J. Gerring, 97–151. New York and London: Routledge. 72 false true Reference 56351677 /api/reference/56351677 73. Schedler, A. 2002. Elections without democracy: The menu of manipulation. Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 36–50., DOI: 10.1353/jod.2002.0031 73 10.1353/jod.2002.0031 false true Reference 56351678 /api/reference/56351678 74. Schedler, A. 2013. The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism. New York: Oxford University Press., DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199680320.001.0001 74 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199680320.001.0001 false true Reference 56351679 /api/reference/56351679 75. Schedler, A. 2023. Rethinking political polarization. Political Science Quarterly 138 (3): 335–359., DOI: 10.1093/psquar/qqad038 75 10.1093/psquar/qqad038 false true Reference 56351680 /api/reference/56351680 76. Somer, M., J. L. McCoy, and R. E. Luke. 2021. Pernicious polarization, autocratization and opposition strategies. Democratization 28 (5): 929–948., DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2020.1865316 76 10.1080/13510347.2020.1865316 false true Reference 56351681 /api/reference/56351681 77. Spasojević, D. 2020. Rising Expectations and Centralizing Power: Party Leaders in Serbia. In Party Leaders in Eastern Europe: Personality, Behavior and Consequences, edited by S. Gherghina, 219–40. Palgrave Studies in Political Psychology. Cham: Springer International Publishing., DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32025-6_10 77 10.1007/978-3-030-32025-6_10 false true Reference 56351682 /api/reference/56351682 78. Stanley, B., and M. Cześnik. 2019. Populism in Poland. In Populism Around the World: A Comparative Perspective, edited by D. Stockemer, 67–87. Cham: Springer International Publishing., DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-96758-5_5 78 10.1007/978-3-319-96758-5_5 false true Reference 56351683 /api/reference/56351683 79. Szabó, A., and M. Gerő. 2020. A magyar társadalom politikai integrációja [The Political Integration of Hungarian Society]. In Mobilitás és integráció a magyar társadalomban [Mobility and Integration in Hungarian Society], edited by I. Kovách, 89–126. Budapest: Argumentum Publishing House; Centre for Social Sciences. 79 false true Reference 56351684 /api/reference/56351684 80. Taggart, P. 2004. Populism and representative politics in contemporary Europe. Journal of Political Ideologies 9 (3): 269–288., DOI: 10.1080/1356931042000263528 80 10.1080/1356931042000263528 false true Reference 56351685 /api/reference/56351685 81. Tang, W. 2016. Populist Authoritarianism: Chinese Political Culture and Regime Sustainability. New York: Oxford University Press., DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190205782.001.0001 81 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190205782.001.0001 false true Reference 56351686 /api/reference/56351686 82. Urbinati, N. 1998. Democracy and populism. Constellations 5 (1): 110–124., DOI: 10.1111/1467-8675.00080 82 10.1111/1467-8675.00080 false true Reference 56351687 /api/reference/56351687 83. Urbinati, N. 2019. Me the People. How Populism Transforms Democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press., DOI: 10.4159/9780674243576 83 10.4159/9780674243576 false true Reference 56351688 /api/reference/56351688 84. Vittori, D. 2022. Threat or corrective? Assessing the impact of populist parties in government on the qualities of democracy: A 19-Country comparison. Government and Opposition 57 (4): 589–609., DOI: 10.1017/gov.2021.21 84 10.1017/gov.2021.21 false true Reference 56351689 /api/reference/56351689 85. Wahman, M., J. Teorell, and A. Hadenius. 2013. Authoritarian regime types revisited: Updated data in comparative perspective. Contemporary Politics 19 (1): 19–34., DOI: 10.1080/13569775.2013.773200 85 10.1080/13569775.2013.773200 false true Reference 56351690 /api/reference/56351690 86. Waldner, D., and E. Lust. 2018. Unwelcome change: Coming to terms with democratic backsliding. Annual Review of Political Science 21: 93–113., DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-114628 86 10.1146/annurev-polisci-050517-114628 false true /api/publication/35162885 Benedek István. Populist autocratization and populist electoral autocracies: towards a unified conceptual framework. (2025) COMPARATIVE EUROPEAN POLITICS 1472-4790 1740-388X 23 3 331-352<div class="JournalArticle Publication long-list"> <div class="authors"> <img title="Forrásközlemény" style="float: left" src="/frontend/resources/grid/publication-core-icon.png"> <img title="Idézőközlemény" style="float: left" src="/frontend/resources/grid/publication-citation-icon.png"> <div class="autype autype0"> <span class="author-name" mtid="10061855"><a href="/gui2/?type=authors&mode=browse&sel=10061855" target="_blank">Benedek István (<span class="authorship-author-name">Benedek István</span> <span class="authorAux-mtmt"> politikai tudományok</span>) </a> </span> <span class="author-affil"><span title="HUN-REN Társadalomtudományi Kutatóközpont">HUN-REN TK</span>/Politikatudományi Intézet; <span title="Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem">ELTE</span>/<span title="Állam- és Jogtudományi Kar">AJK</span>/Politikatudományi Intézet</span> </div> </div> <div class="title"><a href="/gui2/?mode=browse&params=publication;35162885" target="_blank">Populist autocratization and populist electoral autocracies: towards a unified conceptual framework</a></div> <div> <span class="journal-title">COMPARATIVE EUROPEAN POLITICS</span> <span class="journal-issn">(<a target="_blank" href="https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/1472-4790">1472-4790</a> <a target="_blank" href="https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/1740-388X">1740-388X</a>)</span>: <span class="journal-volume">23</span> <span class="journal-issue">3</span> <span class="page"> pp 331-352 </span> <span class="year">(2025)</span> </div> <div class="pub-footer"> <span class="language" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/html">Nyelv: Angol | </span> <span class="identifiers"> <span class="id identifier oa_none" title="none"> <a style="color:blue" title="10.1057/s41295-024-00401-8" target="_blank" href="https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-024-00401-8"> DOI </a> </span> <span class="id identifier oa_none" title="none"> <a style="color:blue" title="001285414100001" target="_blank" href="https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/001285414100001"> WoS </a> </span> <span class="id identifier oa_GREEN" title=" Green "> <a style="color:black" title="207783" target="_blank" href="https://real.mtak.hu/207783"> REAL </a> </span> <span class="id identifier oa_GREEN" title=" Green "> <a style="color:black" title="112307" target="_blank" href="https://edit.elte.hu/handle/10831/112307"> EDIT </a> </span> <span class="id identifier oa_none" title="none"> <a style="color:black" title="https://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41295-024-00401-8" target="_blank" href="https://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41295-024-00401-8"> Egyéb URL </a> </span> </span> <OnlyViewableByAuthor><div class="ratings"> <div class="journal-subject">Folyóirat szakterülete: Scopus - Political Science and International Relations&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;SJR indikátor:&nbsp;Q1</div> <div class="journal-subject">Politikatudományi Bizottság IXGJO PTB [1901-]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;A nemzetközi</div> <div class="journal-subject">Nemzetközi és Fejlődéstanulmányok Doktori Bizottság IXGJO NFDB [1901-]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;C nemzetközi</div> </div></OnlyViewableByAuthor> <div class="publication-citation" style="margin-left: 0.5cm;"> <span title="Nyilvános idézőközlemények összesen, említések nélkül" class="citingPub-count">Nyilvános idéző összesen: 30</span> | Független: 23 | Függő: 7 | Nem jelölt: 0 | WoS jelölt: 10 | Scopus jelölt:&nbsp;7 | WoS/Scopus jelölt:&nbsp;11 | DOI jelölt:&nbsp;21 </div> <div class="publication-citation" style="margin-left: 0.5cm; margin-top:0"> <span title="Nyilvános idézéskapcsolatok száma (egy közleményen belüli többszörös említésekkel együtt)" class="citingPub-count">Nyilvános idéző+említés összesen: 31</span> | Független: 24 | Függő: 7 | Nem jelölt: 0 </div> <div class="publication-citation"> <a target="_blank" href="/api/publication?cond=citations.related;eq;35162885&sort=publishedYear,desc&sort=title"> Idézett közlemények száma: 4 </a> </div> <div class="mtid"><span class="long-pub-mtid">Közlemény: 35162885</span> | <span class="status-data status-ADMIN_APPROVED"> Admin láttamozott </span> Forrás Idéző | <span class="type-subtype">Folyóiratcikk ( Szakcikk ) </span> | <span class="pub-category">Tudományos</span> | <span class="publication-sourceOfData">kézi felvitel</span> </div> <div class="notDuplums"><a target="_blank" href="/api/publication/35162885/notduplums">1 Nem duplumnak jelölés</a> </div> <div class="lastModified">Utolsó módosítás: 2026.05.19. 10:34 Tokai Tamás (Központi 2-3, admin) </div> <div class="lockedBy">Központi kezelésű 2025.02.06. 12:26 Vándor Andrea (VA, admin) </div> <pre class="comment" style="margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 0;"><u>Megjegyzés</u>: Online kiadás 2024</pre> </div></div>