Our point of departure is László Kálmán's system of radical anti-mainstream argumentations
about such central but dubious, or at least debated, constituents and concepts of
dynamic semantics as discourse representation, information state, compositionality
between semantics and syntax, bridging, deferred information, and ambiguity/vagueness.
We strive for pointing out that Kálmán's observations and stances concerning these
fundamental, ultimate problems of pragmasemantics are worth relying upon the formal
theory that is to realize the desirable purpose of creating a version of formal pragmasemantics
simultaneously capable of meeting the criteria and requirements appearing in different
non-logics-based/informal areas of the description of human communication and – what
is behind it – thinking.
