Durvalumab ± Tremelimumab plus Platinum-Etoposide in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (CASPIAN): Outcomes by PD-L1 Expression and Tissue Tumor Mutational Burden

Paz-Ares, Luis ✉; Garassino, Marina Chiara; Chen, Yuanbin; Reinmuth, Niels; Hotta, Katsuyuki; Poltoratskiy, Artem; Trukhin, Dmytro; Hochmair, Maximilian J.; Oezgueroglu, Mustafa; Ji, Jun Ho; Statsenko, Galina; Conev, Nikolay; Bondarenko, Igor; Havel, Libor; Losonczy, Gyoergy [Losonczy, György (Pulmonológia, kli...), szerző] Pulmonológiai Klinika (SE / AOK / K); Xie, Mingchao; Lai, Zhongwu; Godin-Heymann, Nadia; Mann, Helen; Jiang, Haiyi; Shrestha, Yashaswi ✉; Goldman, Jonathan W.

Angol nyelvű Szakcikk (Folyóiratcikk) Tudományos
Megjelent: CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH 1078-0432 1557-3265 30 (4) pp. 824-835 2024
  • SJR Scopus - Cancer Research: D1
Azonosítók
Purpose: In the CASPIAN trial, first-line durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide (EP) significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus EP alone in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). We report exploratory analyses of CASPIAN outcomes by programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression and tissue tumor mutational burden (tTMB). Experimental design: Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to durvalumab (1,500 mg) plus EP, durvalumab plus tremelimumab (75 mg) plus EP, or EP alone. Treatment effects in PD-L1 and tTMB subgroups were estimated using an unstratified Cox proportional hazards model. Results: The PD-L1 and tTMB biomarker-evaluable populations (BEP) comprised 54.4% (438/805) and 35.2% (283/805) of the intention-to-treat population, respectively. PD-L1 prevalence was low: 5.7%, 25.8%, and 28.3% had PD-L1 expression on >= 1% tumor cells (TC), >= 1% immune cells (IC), and >= 1% TCs or ICs, respectively. OS benefit with durvalumab plus EP versus EP was similar across PD-L1 subgroups, with HRs all falling within the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the PD-L1 BEP (0.47-0.79). OS benefit with durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus EP versus EP was greater in PD-L1 >= 1% versus <1% subgroups, although CIs overlapped. There was no evidence of an interaction between tTMB and treatment effect on OS (durvalumab plus EP vs. EP, P = 0.916; durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus EP vs. EP, P = 0.672). Conclusions: OS benefit with first-line durvalumab plus EP in patients with ES-SCLC was observed regardless of PD-L1 or tTMB status. PD-L1 expression may prove to be a useful biomarker for combined treatment with PD-(L)1 and CTLA-4 inhibition, although this requires confirmation with an independent dataset. See related commentary by Rolfo and Russo, p. 652.
Hivatkozás stílusok: IEEEACMAPAChicagoHarvardCSLMásolásNyomtatás
2025-04-03 10:44