Novel Benchmark Values for Open Major Anatomic Liver Resection in Non-cirrhotic Patients: A Multicentric Study of 44 International Expert Centers

Sousa, Da Silva R.X.; Breuer, E.; Shankar, S.; Kawakatsu, S.; Hołówko, W.; Santos, Coelho J.; Jeddou, H.; Sugiura, T.; Ghallab, M.; Da, Silva D.; Watanabe, G.; Botea, F.; Sakai, N.; Addeo, P.; Tzedakis, S.; Bartsch, F.; Balcer, K.; Lim, C.; Werey, F.; Lopez-Lopez, V.; Peralta, Montero L.; Sanchez, Claria R.; Leiting, J.; Vachharajani, N.; Hopping, E.; Torres, O.J.M.; Hirano, S.; Andel, D.; Hagendoorn, J.; Psica, A.; Ravaioli, M.; Ahn, K.S.; Reese, T. [Reese, Tim (Medicine), szerző] Asklepios Campus Hamburg (SE / AOK); Montes, L.A.; Gunasekaran, G.; Alcázar, C.; Lim, J.H.; Haroon, M.; Lu, Q.; Castaldi, A.; Orimo, T.; Moeckli, B.; Abadía, T.; Ruffolo, L.; Dib, Hasan J.; Ratti, F.; Kauffmann, E.F.; De, Wilde R.F.; Polak, W.G.; Boggi, U.; Aldrighetti, L.; McCormack, L.; Hernandez-Alejandro, R.; Serrablo, A.; Toso, C.; Taketomi, A.; Gugenheim, J.; Dong, J.; Hanif, F.; Park, J.S.; Ramia, J.M.; Schwartz, M.; Ramisch, D.; De, Oliveira M.L.; Oldhafer, K.J. [Oldhafer, Karl (orvostudomány), szerző] Asklepios Campus Hamburg (SE / AOK); Kang, K.J.; Cescon, M.; Lodge, P.; Rinkes, I.H.M.B.; Noji, T.; Thomson, J.-E.; Goh, S.K.; Chapman, W.C.; Cleary, S.P.; Pekolj, J.; Regimbeau, J.-M.; Scatton, O.; Truant, S.; Lang, H.; Fuks, D.; Bachellier, P.; Ohtsuka, M.; Popescu, I.; Hasegawa, K.; Lesurtel, M.; Adam, R.; Cherqui, D.; Uesaka, K.; Boudjema, K.; Pinto-Marques, H.; Grąt, M.; Petrowsky, H.; Ebata, T.; Prachalias, A.; Robles-Campos, R. ✉; Clavien, P.-A.

Angol nyelvű Sokszerzős vagy csoportos szerzőségű szakcikk (Folyóiratcikk) Tudományos
Megjelent: ANNALS OF SURGERY 0003-4932 1528-1140 278 (5) pp. 748-755 2023
  • SJR Scopus - Surgery: D1
Azonosítók
Objective: This study aims at establishing benchmark values for best achievable outcomes following open major anatomic hepatectomy for liver tumors of all dignities. Background: Outcomes after open major hepatectomies vary widely lacking reference values for comparisons among centers, indications, types of resections, and minimally invasive procedures. Methods: A standard benchmark methodology was used covering consecutive patients, who underwent open major anatomic hepatectomy from 44 high-volume liver centers from 5 continents over a 5-year period (2016-2020). Benchmark cases were low-risk non-cirrhotic patients without significant comorbidities treated in high-volume centers (≥30 major liver resections/year). Benchmark values were set at the 75th percentile of median values of all centers. Minimum follow-up period was 1 year in each patient. Results: Of 8044 patients, 2908 (36%) qualified as benchmark (low-risk) cases. Benchmark cutoffs for all indications include R0 resection ≥78%; liver failure (grade B/C) ≤10%; bile leak (grade B/C) ≤18%; complications ≥grade 3 and CCI® ≤46% and ≤9 at 3 months, respectively. Benchmark values differed significantly between malignant and benign conditions so that reference values must be adjusted accordingly. Extended right hepatectomy (H1, 4-8 or H4-8) disclosed a higher cutoff for liver failure, while extended left (H1-5,8 or H2-5,8) were associated with higher cutoffs for bile leaks, but had superior oncologic outcomes, when compared to formal left hepatectomy (H1-4 or H2-4). The minimal follow-up for a conclusive outcome evaluation following open anatomic major resection must be 3 months. Conclusion: These new benchmark cutoffs for open major hepatectomy provide a powerful tool to convincingly evaluate other approaches including parenchymal-sparing procedures, laparoscopic/robotic approaches, and alternative treatments, such as ablation therapy, irradiation, or novel chemotherapy regimens. Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Hivatkozás stílusok: IEEEACMAPAChicagoHarvardCSLMásolásNyomtatás
2025-03-30 05:57