Monolithic zirconia as a valid alternative to metal-ceramic for implant-supported
single crowns in the posterior region: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized
controlled trials
(Center for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University)
Technical complication rates of standard metal-ceramic implant-supported posterior
restorations are relatively high. Whether monolithic zirconia crowns represent a more
successful alternative is unclear.The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis
was to compare the clinical outcomes of posterior monolithic zirconia and metal-ceramic
implant-supported single crowns.A search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase,
Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases for randomized controlled trials up to April
2023 with a follow-up time of at least 1 year. Restoration and implant survival and
failure rates, marginal bone loss (MBL), bleeding on probing (BOP), and technical
complications were analyzed by 2 reviewers. Statistical analyses were conducted using
the R-statistics software program. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane Risk
of Bias Tool 2 (RoB 2), and the certainty of evidence by the Grading of Recommendations,
Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.A total of 11 out of 2030
records were identified by title and abstract, and 4 records were included after full-text
analysis. The statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in MBL (MD -0.11,
95% CI: [-0.25; 0.03]), BOP (OR 0.66, 95% CI: [0.25; 1.77]), or implant failure (OR
1.30, 95% CI: [0.24; 7.08]). Monolithic zirconia presented significantly less chipping
over 1 year (OR 0.17, 95% CI: [0.03; 0.99]). The chipping rate was 0% for monolithic
zirconia and 7.61% for metal-ceramic. Based on a narrative review, the restoration
survival rate was 97.5% in the monolithic zirconia group and 99.1% in the metal-ceramic
group.Monolithic zirconia showed favorable short-term survival rates and had significantly
less chipping over 1 year. Regarding MBL, BOP, and failure rates, both restoration
types presented similar results at the 1-year follow-up.