The fragility of an independent judiciary

Kovács, Kriszta [Kovács, Kriszta (Alkotmányjog), szerző] Emberi Jogi és Politikatudományi Tanszék (ELTE / TATK); Kim, Lane Scheppele

Angol nyelvű Szakcikk (Folyóiratcikk) Tudományos
  • Nemzetközi és Fejlődéstanulmányok Doktori Bizottság: B nemzetközi
  • Politikatudományi Bizottság: B nemzetközi
  • Regionális Tudományok Bizottsága: C nemzetközi
  • Szociológiai Tudományos Bizottság: C nemzetközi
  • SJR Scopus - Development: Q1
Azonosítók
Szakterületek:
  • Politikatudomány
When the European Union was founded, it was assumed that all Member States admitted as consolidated democracies would maintain their constitutional commitments. In recent years, Hungary and Poland have challenged this premise as elected autocratic governments in those countries have captured independent institutions and threatened longterm democracy. The judiciaries of these countries have been hard hit. In this paper, we trace what has happened to the judiciaries in Hungary and Poland, showing how first the constitutional courts and then the ordinary judiciary have been brought under the control of political forces so that there is no longer a separation of law and politics. We also explore why the European Union has so far not been able to stop this process. In the end, the European judiciary, particularly the Court of Justice, is attempting a rescue of national judiciaries, but the results are so far unclear. (C) 2018 The Regents of the University of California. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Hivatkozás stílusok: IEEEACMAPAChicagoHarvardCSLMásolásNyomtatás
2025-11-17 22:57