Clinical quantitative coronary artery stenosis and coronary atherosclerosis imaging
Mézquita, Aldo J Vázquez; Biavati, Federico*; Falk, Volkmar; Alkadhi, Hatem; Hajhosseiny, Reza; Maurovich-Horvat, Pál [Maurovich-Horvat, Pál (kardiológia), szerző] Radiológia Tanszék
(SE / AOK / K / OKK); Manka, Robert; Kozerke, Sebastian; Stuber, Matthias; Derlin, Thorsten; Channon, Keith M; Išgum, Ivana; Coenen, Adriaan; Foellmer, Bernhard; Dey, Damini; Volleberg, Rick H J A; Meinel, Felix G; Dweck, Marc R; Piek, Jan J; van de Hoef, Tim; Landmesser, Ulf; Guagliumi, Giulio; Giannopoulos, Andreas A; Botnar, René M; Khamis, Ramzi; Williams, Michelle C; Newby, David E**; Dewey, Marc ✉
Angol nyelvű Összefoglaló cikk (Folyóiratcikk) Tudományos
The detection and characterization of coronary artery stenosis and atherosclerosis
using imaging tools are key for clinical decision-making in patients with known or
suspected coronary artery disease. In this regard, imaging-based quantification can
be improved by choosing the most appropriate imaging modality for diagnosis, treatment
and procedural planning. In this Consensus Statement, we provide clinical consensus
recommendations on the optimal use of different imaging techniques in various patient
populations and describe the advances in imaging technology. Clinical consensus recommendations
on the appropriateness of each imaging technique for direct coronary artery visualization
were derived through a three-step, real-time Delphi process that took place before,
during and after the Second International Quantitative Cardiovascular Imaging Meeting
in September 2022. According to the Delphi survey answers, CT is the method of choice
to rule out obstructive stenosis in patients with an intermediate pre-test probability
of coronary artery disease and enables quantitative assessment of coronary plaque
with respect to dimensions, composition, location and related risk of future cardiovascular
events, whereas MRI facilitates the visualization of coronary plaque and can be used
in experienced centres as a radiation-free, second-line option for non-invasive coronary
angiography. PET has the greatest potential for quantifying inflammation in coronary
plaque but SPECT currently has a limited role in clinical coronary artery stenosis
and atherosclerosis imaging. Invasive coronary angiography is the reference standard
for stenosis assessment but cannot characterize coronary plaques. Finally, intravascular
ultrasonography and optical coherence tomography are the most important invasive imaging
modalities for the identification of plaques at high risk of rupture. The recommendations
made in this Consensus Statement will help clinicians to choose the most appropriate
imaging modality on the basis of the specific clinical scenario, individual patient
characteristics and the availability of each imaging modality.