https://m2.mtmt.hu/ eng 2026-07-27 00:51 JournalArticle 33661981 VALIDATED true 0 false 2026-05-22T18:53:19.422+0000 2023-04-03T09:00:02.398+0000 2023-02-24T16:30:24.652+0000 true 10021512 Pinke Zsolt László /api/author/10021512 Author Zsolt László Pinke (Környezettudomány, Bölcsészettudomány) true 10021512 2025-10-17T13:53:28.478+0000 2023-02-28T07:49:16.652+0000 true 10032014 Lőrinczi Erzsébet /api/admin/10032014 Admin Erzsébet Lőrinczi (BCE admin 5) true 10032014 true false true 24 24 /api/publicationtype/24 PublicationType Journal Article 1 true 24 JournalArticle true 10000059 Article true 24 24 /api/publicationtype/24 PublicationType Journal Article 1 true 24 JournalArticle /api/subtype/10000059 Szakcikk SubType Article (Journal Article) 101 true 10000059 true 1 /api/category/1 Category Scientific true 1 Széchy, Anna true true /api/journal/10015182 REVIEWED SUSTAINABILITY 2071-1050 true false 10015182 false 10015182 true 2071-1050 Journal FOREIGN 15 5 3924 3924 16 2023 The aim of this paper is to assess the economic value of recreation as an ecosystem service enjoyed by hikers in Hungary’s forests. The assessment is carried out in the framework of a national undertaking to map and assess the state of ecosystems and their services in Hungary under the EU’s biodiversity strategy. As is common in the policymaking context, the constraints of the project did not allow for a primary study. We therefore rely on previous studies and combine several approaches to arrive at a value estimate on two scales. First, we conduct a local case study, calculating travel costs for the Pilis Biosphere Reserve, a popular hiking area where visitor surveys are available. We then estimate the unit (value per visit) and total value of forest recreation for the whole country by a different approach, based on foreign studies via benefit transfer. We find that the results from the two approaches are consistent and that the monetary value of forest recreation (in the form of hiking/walking) is approximately 10 million EUR/year for the Pilis Biosphere Reserve and approximately 100 million EUR/year for the whole country. Funding 2024047 /api/funding/2024047 (KEHOP-4.3.0-VEKOP-15-2016-00001) false true true false 2023 true true true false true false GOLD 2026-05-22 true https://doi.org/10.3390/su15053924 6 0 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 0 0 6 6 5 5 0 4 4 Folyóiratcikk Journal Article 24 5 Könyvrészlet Chapter in Book 25 0 Könyv Book 23 0 Egyéb konferenciaközlemény Conference paper 31 0 Egyéb konferenciakötet Conference proceedings 32 0 Oltalmi formák Protection forms 26 0 Disszertáció Thesis 28 0 Egyéb Miscellaneous 29 1 Alkotás Achievement 22 0 Kutatási adat Research data 33 0 Folyóiratcikk Journal Article 24 0 0 0 Könyvrészlet Chapter in Book 25 0 0 0 Könyv Book 23 0 0 0 Egyéb konferenciaközlemény Conference paper 31 0 0 0 Egyéb konferenciakötet Conference proceedings 32 0 0 0 Oltalmi formák Protection forms 26 0 0 0 Disszertáció Thesis 28 0 0 0 Egyéb Miscellaneous 29 0 0 0 Alkotás Achievement 22 0 0 0 Kutatási adat Research data 33 0 0 0 2023 0 2 2 2 2 2024 0 2 2 2 2 2025 0 2 2 2 2 Q1 A false 10033435 false false false 2023-02-27T07:49:16.036+0000 Fenntarthatósági Menedzsment és Környezetgazdas... (BCE / FFI) 2 11 1 2 0 true Language 10002 /api/language/10002 English Angol English true 2 true PersonAuthorship 106841379 /api/authorship/106841379 Széchy, Anna [Széchy, Anna Zsófia (Környezetgazdaságtan), author] Department of Sustainability Management and Env... (CUB / ISD) 1 0.5 true false false Author 10033887 /api/author/10033887 Anna Zsófia Széchy (Környezetgazdaságtan) Széchy Anna Zsófia true 10033887 true Széchy Anna true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Author 0 true 0 true false true PersonAuthorship 106841380 /api/authorship/106841380 Szerényi, Zsuzsanna [Marjainé Szerényi, Zsuzsanna (A természeti erőf...), author] Department of Sustainability Management and Env... (CUB / ISD) 2 0.5 false true false Author 10033435 /api/author/10033435 Zsuzsanna Marjainé Szerényi (A természeti erőforrások pénzbeli értékelésére alkalmas eljárások elmélete és gyakorlata) Marjainé Szerényi Zsuzsanna true 10033435 true Szerényi Zsuzsanna true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Author 0 true 0 true false true PublicationIdentifier 23132052 /api/publicationidentifier/23132052 DOI: 10.3390/su15053924 PlainSource 6 /api/publicationsource/6 DOI PublicationSourceType 10001 /api/publicationsourcetype/10001 DOI true true true DOI DOI https://doi.org/@@@ true true 6 true GOLD true IDENTICAL 10.3390/su15053924 https://doi.org/10.3390/su15053924 false true PublicationIdentifier 23162515 /api/publicationidentifier/23162515 CorvinusKutatasok: 7959 SwordSource 94 /api/publicationsource/94 CorvinusKutatasok PublicationSourceType 10007 /api/publicationsourcetype/10007 Repozitórium true true true CorvinusKutatasok http://unipub.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/@@@ true true 94 true GREEN true IDENTICAL 7959 http://unipub.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/7959 false true PublicationIdentifier 23313227 /api/publicationidentifier/23313227 WoS: 000947364900001 PlainSource 1 /api/publicationsource/1 WoS PublicationSourceType 10003 /api/publicationsourcetype/10003 Indexelő adatbázis false true true WoS WoS https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/@@@ true true 1 true IDENTICAL 000947364900001 https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/000947364900001 true true PublicationIdentifier 23264610 /api/publicationidentifier/23264610 Scopus: 85149958171 PlainSource 3 /api/publicationsource/3 Scopus PublicationSourceType 10003 /api/publicationsourcetype/10003 Indexelő adatbázis false true true Scopus Scopus http://www.scopus.com/record/display.url?origin=inward&eid=2-s2.0-@@@ true true 3 true IDENTICAL 85149958171 http://www.scopus.com/record/display.url?origin=inward&eid=2-s2.0-85149958171 true true MtaRating 10485670 /api/mtarating/10485670 IV. Section of Agricultural Sciences:A SUSTAINABILITY 2071-1050 RatingType 10003 /api/ratingtype/10003 IV. Section of Agricultural Sciences IV. AO Institute 64 /api/institute/64 HAS Section of Agricultural Sciences (IV.) HASSASIV 0 false false false IV. Agrártudományok Osztálya HAS Section of Agricultural Sciences (IV.) true 64 true true true A true true MtaRating 11507815 /api/mtarating/11507815 IX. Committee on Sociology:C nemzetközi SUSTAINABILITY 2071-1050 RatingType 10007 /api/ratingtype/10007 IX. Committee on Sociology SZTB Institute 14102 /api/institute/14102 Committee on Sociology HASSELIX SZTB [1901-] 0 false true false Szociológiai Tudományos Bizottság Committee on Sociology true 14102 true true true C nemzetközi false true SjrRating 11381205 /api/sjrrating/11381205 sjr:Q1 (2023) Scopus - Geography, Planning and Development SUSTAINABILITY 2071-1050 191 0.24 journal RatingType 10002 /api/ratingtype/10002 sjr sjr true true ClassificationExternal 3305 /api/classificationexternal/3305 Scopus - Geography, Planning and Development true 3305 true Q1 DIRECT true true Reference 38727527 /api/reference/38727527 1. Costanza 1997: The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital., Nature, 387, p. 253, DOI: 10.1038/387253a0 1 10.1038/387253a0 false true Reference 38727528 /api/reference/38727528 2. National Research Council (2005). Valuing Ecosystems Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision-Making, National Research Council. 2 false true Reference 38727529 /api/reference/38727529 3. Hanley, N., Barbier, E.B., and Barbier, E. (2009). Pricing Nature: Cost-Benefit Analysis and Environmental Policy, Edward Elgar Publishing. 3 false true Reference 38727530 /api/reference/38727530 4. Brander 2012: Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units., Ecosyst. Serv., 1, p. 50, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005 4 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005 false true Reference 38727531 /api/reference/38727531 5. Gowdy 1994: Natural capital and the growth economy., Sustain. Dev., 2, p. 12, DOI: 10.1002/sd.3460020103 5 10.1002/sd.3460020103 false true Reference 38727532 /api/reference/38727532 6. Spangenberg 2010: Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services., Ecol. Complex., 7, p. 327, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.007 6 10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.007 false true Reference 38727533 /api/reference/38727533 7. OECD (2002). Handbook of Biodiversity Valuation: A Guide for Policy Makers, OECD Publishing. 7 false true Reference 38727534 /api/reference/38727534 8. Johnson, J.A., Ruta, G., Baldos, U., Cervigni, R., Chonabayashi, S., Corong, E., Gavryliuk, O., Gerber, J., Hertel, T., and Nootenboom, C. (2021). The Economic Case for Nature: A Global Earth-Economy Model to Assess Development Policy Pathways, World Bank., DOI: 10.1596/35882 8 10.1596/35882 false true Reference 38727535 /api/reference/38727535 9. Vysna, V., Maes, J., Petersen, J.E., La Notte, A., Vallecillo, S., Aizpurua, N., Ivits, E., and Teller, A. (2021). Final Report from Phase II of the INCA Project Aiming to Develop a Pilot for an Integrated System of Ecosystem Accounts for the EU, Publications Office of the European Union. Statistical report. 9 false true Reference 38727536 /api/reference/38727536 10. European Commission (2011). Our life insurance, our natural capital: An EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. COM, 244, 16. 10 false true Reference 38727537 /api/reference/38727537 11. Csákvári, E., Fabók, V., Babai, D., Dósa, H., Kisné Fodor, L., Jombach, S., Kelemen, E., Tormáné Kovács, E., Könczey, R., and Mártonné Máthé, K. (2021). A Közösségi Jelentőségű Természeti Értékek Hosszú Távú Megőrzését és Fejlesztését, Valamint az EU Biológiai Sokféleség Stratégia 2020 Célkitűzéseinek Hazai Szintű Megvalósítását Megalapozó Stratégiai Vizsgálatok Projekt, Ökoszisztéma-Szolgáltatások Projektelem, Agrárminisztérium. 11 false true Reference 38727538 /api/reference/38727538 12. Marjainé Szerényi, Z., Csutora, M., Harangozó, G., Krajnyik, Z., Kontár, R., and Nagypál, N. (2005). A Természetvédelemben Alkalmazható Közgazdasági Értékelési Módszerek, Környezetvédelmi és Vízügyi Minisztérium. 12 false true Reference 38727539 /api/reference/38727539 13. Vári, A., Tanács, E., Kovács, E.T., Kalóczkai, Á., Arany, I., Czúcz, B., Bereczki, K., Belényesi, M., Csákvári, E., and Kiss, M. (2022). National Ecosystem Services Assessment in Hungary: Framework, Process and Conceptual Questions. Sustainability, 14., DOI: 10.3390/su141912847 13 10.3390/su141912847 false true Reference 38727540 /api/reference/38727540 14. Elsasser 2018: Forest ecosystem services in rural areas of Germany: Insights from the national TEEB study., Ecosyst. Serv., 31, p. 77, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.014 14 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.014 false true Reference 38727541 /api/reference/38727541 15. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2002). Review of the Status and Trends of, and Major Threats to, the Forest Biological Diversity, SCBD. (CBD Technical Series no. 7). 15 false true Reference 38727542 /api/reference/38727542 16. Velasco-Muñoz, J.F., Aznar-Sánchez, J.A., Schoenemann, M., and López-Felices, B. (2022). An Analysis of the Worldwide Research on the Socio-Cultural Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services. Sustainability, 14., DOI: 10.3390/su14042089 16 10.3390/su14042089 false true Reference 38727543 /api/reference/38727543 17. Derks 2020: COVID-19-induced visitor boom reveals the importance of forests as critical infrastructure., For. Policy Econ., 118, p. 102253, DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102253 17 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102253 false true Reference 38727544 /api/reference/38727544 18. Pichlerová, M., Önkal, D., Bartlett, A., Výbošťok, J., and Pichler, V. (2021). Variability in Forest Visit Numbers in Different Regions and Population Segments before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18., DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18073469 18 10.3390/ijerph18073469 false true Reference 38727545 /api/reference/38727545 19. Bertram 2017: Going to the Woods Is Going Home: Recreational Benefits of a Larger Urban Forest Site —A Travel Cost Analysis for Berlin, Germany., Ecol. Econ., 132, p. 255, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.017 19 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.017 false true Reference 38727546 /api/reference/38727546 20. Matthew, N.K., Shuib, A., Gopal, N.G.R., and Zheng, G.I. (2022). Economic Value of Recreation as an Ecosystem Service in Ayer Keroh Recreational Forest, Malaysia. Sustainability, 14., DOI: 10.3390/su14094935 20 10.3390/su14094935 false true Reference 38727547 /api/reference/38727547 21. Nahuelhual 2006: Valuing ecosystem services of chilean temperate rainforests., Environ. Dev. Sustain., 9, p. 481, DOI: 10.1007/s10668-006-9033-8 21 10.1007/s10668-006-9033-8 false true Reference 38727548 /api/reference/38727548 22. Mayer 2018: Assessing and valuing the recreational ecosystem services of Germany’s national parks using travel cost models., Ecosyst. Serv., 31, p. 371, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.12.009 22 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.12.009 false true Reference 38727549 /api/reference/38727549 23. Zhao, X., He, Y., Yu, C., Xu, D., and Zou, W. (2019). Assessment of Ecosystem Services Value in a National Park Pilot. Sustainability, 11., DOI: 10.3390/su11236609 23 10.3390/su11236609 false true Reference 38727550 /api/reference/38727550 24. Borzykowski 2017: A travel cost assessment of the demand for recreation in Swiss forests., Rev. Agric. Food Environ. Stud., 98, p. 149, DOI: 10.1007/s41130-017-0047-4 24 10.1007/s41130-017-0047-4 false true Reference 38727551 /api/reference/38727551 25. Ezebilo 2016: Economic value of a non-market ecosystem service: An application of the travel cost method to nature recreation in Sweden., Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag., 12, p. 314 25 false true Reference 38727552 /api/reference/38727552 26. Lankia 2015: Valuing recreational ecosystem service flow in Finland., J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour., 10, p. 14, DOI: 10.1016/j.jort.2015.04.006 26 10.1016/j.jort.2015.04.006 false true Reference 38727553 /api/reference/38727553 27. Zandersen 2009: A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe., J. For. Econ., 15, p. 109 27 false true Reference 38727554 /api/reference/38727554 28. Bateman, I.J., Abson, D., Beaumont, N., Darnell, A., Fezzi, C., Hanley, N., Kontoleon, A., Maddison, D., Morling, P., and Morris, J. (2011). UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Technical Report, UNEP-WCMC. 28 false true Reference 38727555 /api/reference/38727555 29. Scarpa 2000: Importance of forest attributes in the willingness to pay for recreation: A contingent valuation study of Irish forests., For. Policy Econ., 1, p. 315, DOI: 10.1016/S1389-9341(00)00026-5 29 10.1016/S1389-9341(00)00026-5 false true Reference 38727556 /api/reference/38727556 30. Elsasser 2013: Aktuelle und potentielle Erholungsleistung der Wälder in Deutschland: Monetärer Nutzen der Erholung im Wald aus Sicht der Bevölkerung., Allg. Forst- Und Jagdztg., 184, p. 83 30 false true Reference 38727557 /api/reference/38727557 31. Liu, W.-Y., Lin, Y.-Y., Chen, H.-S., and Hsieh, C.-M. (2019). Assessing the Amenity Value of Forest Ecosystem Services: Perspectives from the Use of Sustainable Green Spaces. Sustainability, 11., DOI: 10.3390/su11164500 31 10.3390/su11164500 false true Reference 38727558 /api/reference/38727558 32. Barrio 2010: A meta-analysis of contingent valuation forest studies., Ecol. Econ., 69, p. 1023, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.016 32 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.016 false true Reference 38727559 /api/reference/38727559 33. Sen 2014: Economic Assessment of the Recreational Value of Ecosystems: Methodological Development and National and Local Application., Environ. Resour. Econ., 57, p. 233, DOI: 10.1007/s10640-013-9666-7 33 10.1007/s10640-013-9666-7 false true Reference 38727560 /api/reference/38727560 34. Bartczak 2008: Valuing forest recreation on the national level in a transition economy: The case of Poland., For. Policy Econ., 10, p. 467, DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.04.002 34 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.04.002 false true Reference 38727561 /api/reference/38727561 35. Liebelt 2018: Hedonic pricing analysis of the influence of urban green spaces onto residential prices: The case of Leipzig, Germany., Eur. Plan. Stud., 26, p. 133, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1376314 35 10.1080/09654313.2017.1376314 false true Reference 38727562 /api/reference/38727562 36. Takács, D. (2016). Városi Szabadterek és Szabadtér-Fejlesztések Ingatlanérték-Befolyásoló Hatásának Elemzése Budapest Példáján. [Ph.D. Dissertation, Szent István Egyetem, Tájépítészeti és Tájökológiai Doktori Iskola]. 36 false true Reference 38727563 /api/reference/38727563 37. Bowler, D.E., Buyung-Ali, L.M., Knight, T.M., and Pullin, A.S. (2010). A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health, 10., DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-456 37 10.1186/1471-2458-10-456 false true Reference 38727564 /api/reference/38727564 38. 2019: Valóban aktív a magyar lakosság? Aktív és ökoturisztikai keresletet és motivációt felmérő kutatás., Tur. Bull., 19, p. 45 38 false true Reference 38727565 /api/reference/38727565 39. Jadhav, A., Anderson, S., Dyer, M.J.B., and Sutton, P.C. (2017). Revisiting Ecosystem Services: Assessment and Valuation as Starting Points for Environmental Politics. Sustainability, 9., DOI: 10.3390/su9101755 39 10.3390/su9101755 false true Reference 38727566 /api/reference/38727566 40. Pinke 2022: Value transfer in economic valuation of ecosystem services–Some methodological challenges., Ecosyst. Serv., 56, p. 101443, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101443 40 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101443 false true Reference 38727567 /api/reference/38727567 41. Boutwell 2013: Benefit transfer: A review of methodologies and challenges., Resources, 2, p. 517, DOI: 10.3390/resources2040517 41 10.3390/resources2040517 false true Reference 38727568 /api/reference/38727568 42. Richardson 2015: The role of benefit transfer in ecosystem service valuation., Ecol. Econ., 115, p. 51, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.018 42 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.018 false true Reference 38727569 /api/reference/38727569 43. Shrestha, R., Rosenberger, R., and Loomis, J. (2007). Environmental Value Transfer: Issues and Methods, Springer. 43 false true Reference 38727570 /api/reference/38727570 44. Rosenberger 2000: Using meta-analysis for benefit transfer: In-sample convergent validity tests of an outdoor recreation database., Water Resour. Res., 36, p. 1097, DOI: 10.1029/2000WR900006 44 10.1029/2000WR900006 false true Reference 38727571 /api/reference/38727571 45. Shrestha 2003: Meta-analytic benefit transfer of outdoor recreation economic values: Testing out-of-sample convergent validity., Environ. Resour. Econ., 25, p. 79, DOI: 10.1023/A:1023658501572 45 10.1023/A:1023658501572 false true Reference 38727572 /api/reference/38727572 46. Bergstrom 2006: Using meta-analysis for benefits transfer: Theory and practice., Ecol. Econ., 60, p. 351, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.015 46 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.015 false true Reference 38727573 /api/reference/38727573 47. Hein 2011: Economic Benefits Generated by Protected Areas: The Case of the Hoge Veluwe Forest, The Netherlands., Ecol. Soc., 16, p. 19, DOI: 10.5751/ES-04119-160213 47 10.5751/ES-04119-160213 false true Reference 38727574 /api/reference/38727574 48. Lupp, G., Förster, B., Kantelberg, V., Markmann, T., Naumann, J., Honert, C., Koch, M., and Pauleit, S. (2016). Assessing the Recreation Value of Urban Woodland Using the Ecosystem Service Approach in Two Forests in the Munich Metropolitan Region. Sustainability, 8., DOI: 10.3390/su8111156 48 10.3390/su8111156 false true Reference 38727575 /api/reference/38727575 49. Lin, J.-C., Chiou, C.-R., Chan, W.-H., and Wu, M.-S. (2021). Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services in Taiwan. Forests, 12., DOI: 10.3390/f12121694 49 10.3390/f12121694 false true Reference 38727576 /api/reference/38727576 50. KSH (Hungarian Central Statistical Office) (2023, January 16). 15.1.1.5. Erdőgazdálkodási Célú Erdőterület Az Elsődleges Rendeltetés Szerint, Available online: https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/kor/hu/kor0003.html. 50 false true Reference 38727577 /api/reference/38727577 51. KSH (Hungarian Central Statistical Office) (2023, January 16). 15.1.2.14. Erdők Vármegye És Régió Szerint, 2017–2021, Available online: https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/kor/hu/kor0058.html. 51 false true Reference 38727578 /api/reference/38727578 52. KSH (2023, January 16). 15.1.1.6. A Faállománnyal Borított Erdőgazdálkodási Célú Erdőterület Megoszlása Fafajcsoportok és Korosztályok Szerint. Available online: https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/kor/hu/kor0004.html. 52 false true Reference 38727579 /api/reference/38727579 53. UNESCO-MAB (2023, January 16). Pilis Biosphere Reserve Follow-Up Progress Report. Available online: http://www.nbmr.hu/_user/browser/File/UNESCO/Elorehaladasi_jelentesek/Pilis%20biosphere%20reserve%20follow%20up%20report%202017.pdf. 53 false true Reference 38727580 /api/reference/38727580 54. (2023, January 16). Pilisi Parkerdő. A Biztonságos Erdőlátogatás Fontosságára Hívja Fel a Figyelmet az Agrárminisztérium. Available online: https://parkerdo.hu/parkerdo/biztonsagos-erdolatogatas-fontossagara-hivja-fel-figyelmet-az-agrarminiszterium/. 54 false true Reference 38727581 /api/reference/38727581 55. Fazekas, I., and Lázár, I. (2019). Tájak Működése és Arculata, MTA DTB Földtudományi Szakbizottság. 55 false true Reference 38727582 /api/reference/38727582 56. Willis 1990: The Individual Travel-Cost Method and the Value of Recreation: The Case of the Montgomery and Lancaster Canals., Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy, 8, p. 315, DOI: 10.1068/c080315 56 10.1068/c080315 false true Reference 38727583 /api/reference/38727583 57. Juutinen 2022: A comparative analysis of the value of recreation in six contrasting Nordic landscapes using the travel cost method., J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour., 39, p. 100528, DOI: 10.1016/j.jort.2022.100528 57 10.1016/j.jort.2022.100528 false true Reference 38727584 /api/reference/38727584 58. NAV (National Tax and Customs Administration) (2020, April 15). Korábbi Években Alkalmazott Üzemanyagárak, Available online: https://nav.gov.hu/nav/szolgaltatasok/uzemanyag/uzemanyagarak/Korabbi_evben_alkalma20150212.html. 58 false true Reference 38727585 /api/reference/38727585 59. KSH (Hungarian Central Statistical Office) (2020, April 15). A Teljes Munkaidőben Alkalmazásban Állók Kedvezmények Nélküli Nettó Átlagkeresete a Munkáltató Székhelyének Elhelyezkedése Szerint, Available online: https://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xstadat/xstadat_evkozi/e_qli030a.html. 59 false true Reference 38727586 /api/reference/38727586 60. Czajkowski 2019: The individual travel cost method with consumer-specific values of travel time Savings., Environ. Resour. Econ., 74, p. 961, DOI: 10.1007/s10640-019-00355-6 60 10.1007/s10640-019-00355-6 false true Reference 38727587 /api/reference/38727587 61. KSH 2020b (Hungarian Central Statistical Office) (2020, April 15). A Személygépkocsi-Állomány Átlagos Kora Gyártmányok Szerint. Available online: https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/sza/hu/sza0026.html. 61 false true Reference 38727588 /api/reference/38727588 62. Pilisi Parkerdő (2019, October 15). Egyre Jobban Szeretünk a Főváros Környékén Kirándulni. Available online: https://www.turistamagazin.hu/hir/egyre-jobban-szeretunk-a-fovaros-kornyeken-kirandulni. 62 false true Reference 38727589 /api/reference/38727589 63. Müller, A., Knoke, T., and Olschewski, R. (2019). Can Existing Estimates for Ecosystem Service Values Inform Forest Management?. Forests, 10., DOI: 10.3390/f10020132 63 10.3390/f10020132 false true Reference 38727590 /api/reference/38727590 64. KSH (2023, January 16). 1.1.1.4. Egyes Termékek És Szolgáltatások Éves Fogyasztói Átlagára. Available online: https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/ara/hu/ara0004.html. 64 false true Reference 38727591 /api/reference/38727591 65. KSH (2023, January 16). 15.1.1.8. Fakitermelés az Erdőgazdálkodási Célú Erdőterületeken Fafajcsoportok Szerint. Available online: https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/kor/hu/kor0006.html. 65 false true Reference 38727592 /api/reference/38727592 66. Natural England (2023, January 16). Monitor of Engagement with the Natural Environment (MENE), Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/monitor-of-engagement-with-the-natural-environment-survey-purpose-and-results. 66 false true Reference 38727593 /api/reference/38727593 67. Sinclair 2020: Valuing nature-based recreation using a crowdsourced travel cost method: A comparison to onsite survey data and value transfer., Ecosyst. Serv., 45, p. 101165, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101165 67 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101165 false true Reference 38727594 /api/reference/38727594 68. Havinga 2020: Defining and spatially modelling cultural ecosystem services using crowdsourced data., Ecosyst. Serv., 43, p. 101091, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101091 68 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101091 false true /api/publication/33661981 Széchy Anna et al. Valuing the Recreational Services Provided by Hungary’s Forest Ecosystems. (2023) SUSTAINABILITY 2071-1050 15 5<div class="JournalArticle Publication long-list"> <div class="authors"> <img title="Forrásközlemény" style="float: left" src="/frontend/resources/grid/publication-core-icon.png"> <img title="Idézőközlemény" style="float: left" src="/frontend/resources/grid/publication-citation-icon.png"> <div class="autype autype0"> <span class="author-name" mtid="10033887"><a href="/gui2/?type=authors&mode=browse&sel=10033887" target="_blank">Széchy Anna (<span class="authorship-author-name">Széchy Anna Zsófia</span> <span class="authorAux-mtmt"> Környezetgazdaságtan</span>) </a> </span> <span class="author-affil"><span title="Corvinus University of Budapest">CUB</span>/<span title="Institute of Sustainable Development ">ISD</span>/Department of Sustainability Management and Environmental Economics</span> ;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span class="author-name" mtid="10033435"><a href="/gui2/?type=authors&mode=browse&sel=10033435" target="_blank">Szerényi Zsuzsanna (<span class="authorship-author-name">Marjainé Szerényi Zsuzsanna</span> <span class="authorAux-mtmt"> A természeti erőforrások pénzbeli értékelésére ...</span>) </a> </span> <span class="author-affil"><span title="Corvinus University of Budapest">CUB</span>/<span title="Institute of Sustainable Development ">ISD</span>/Department of Sustainability Management and Environmental Economics</span> </div> </div> <div class="title"><a href="/gui2/?mode=browse&params=publication;33661981" target="_blank">Valuing the Recreational Services Provided by Hungary’s Forest Ecosystems</a></div> <div> <span class="journal-title">SUSTAINABILITY</span> <span class="journal-issn">( <a target="_blank" href="https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/2071-1050">2071-1050</a>)</span>: <span class="journal-volume">15</span> <span class="journal-issue">5</span> <span class="page"> Paper 3924. 16 p. </span> <span class="year">(2023)</span> </div> <div class="pub-footer"> <span class="language" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/html">Language: English | </span> <span class="identifiers"> <span class="id identifier oa_GOLD" title=" Gold "> <a style="color:blue" title="10.3390/su15053924" target="_blank" href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su15053924"> DOI </a> </span> <span class="id identifier oa_GREEN" title=" Green "> <a style="color:blue" title="7959" target="_blank" href="http://unipub.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/7959"> CorvinusKutatasok </a> </span> <span class="id identifier oa_none" title="none"> <a style="color:blue" title="000947364900001" target="_blank" href="https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/000947364900001"> WoS </a> </span> <span class="id identifier oa_none" title="none"> <a style="color:blue" title="85149958171" target="_blank" href="http://www.scopus.com/record/display.url?origin=inward&eid=2-s2.0-85149958171"> Scopus </a> </span> </span> <OnlyViewableByAuthor><div class="ratings"> <div class="journal-subject">Journal subject: Scopus - Geography, Planning and Development&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Rank:&nbsp;Q1</div> <div class="journal-subject">Journal subject: Scopus - Computer Networks and Communications&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Rank:&nbsp;Q2</div> <div class="journal-subject">Journal subject: Scopus - Energy Engineering and Power Technology&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Rank:&nbsp;Q2</div> <div class="journal-subject">Journal subject: Scopus - Environmental Science (miscellaneous)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Rank:&nbsp;Q2</div> <div class="journal-subject">Journal subject: Scopus - Hardware and Architecture&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Rank:&nbsp;Q2</div> <div class="journal-subject">Journal subject: Scopus - Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Rank:&nbsp;Q2</div> <div class="journal-subject">Journal subject: Scopus - Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Rank:&nbsp;Q2</div> <div class="journal-subject">HAS Section of Agricultural Sciences (IV.) HASSASIV&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;A</div> <div class="journal-subject">Committee on Sociology HASSELIX SZTB [1901-]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;C nemzetközi</div> </div></OnlyViewableByAuthor> <div class="publication-citation" style="margin-left: 0.5cm;"> <span title="" class="citingPub-count">Citing papers: 6</span> | Independent citation: 6 | Self citation: 0 | Unknown citation: 0 | Number of citations in WoS: 4 | Number of citations in Scopus:&nbsp;4 | WoS/Scopus assigned:&nbsp;5 | Number of citations with DOI:&nbsp;5 </div> <div class="publication-citation"> <a target="_blank" href="/api/publication?cond=citations.related;eq;33661981&sort=publishedYear,desc&sort=title"> Number of cited publications: 4 </a> </div> <div class="mtid"><span class="long-pub-mtid">Publication: 33661981</span> | <span class="status-data status-VALIDATED"> Validated </span> Core Citing | <span class="type-subtype">Journal Article ( Article ) </span> | <span class="pub-category">Scientific</span> | <span class="publication-sourceOfData">kézi felvitel</span> </div> <div class="funder"> (KEHOP-4.3.0-VEKOP-15-2016-00001) </div> <div class="lastModified">Last Modified: 2023.04.03. 11:00 Erzsébet Lőrinczi (BCE admin 5) </div> </div></div>