In 19thcentury Europe, especially Central Europe, the mediaeval, first of all Gothic
style was thought to be most appropriate for sacral buildings. From the onset of the
century, this association brought to life a growing literature and its theoretical
background. The Gothic revival initiated in England in the late 18th–early 19th century
was a trend in taste. German speaking areas also witnessed a parallel spread of admiration
for the Gothic first by literary people too, and not by architects. Neogothic as an
architectural style grew into an evermore complex system on the continent. Karl Friedrich
Schinkel and the Berlin school, then Heinrich Hübsch from Karlsruhe became the most
often cited leaders of architectural theory before the appearance of the Viennese
Dombaumeister, Friedrich von Schmidt. He and his pupils are the paragons of NeoGothic:
they had a lion’s share of Hungarian sacral constructions and monument restoration
in the second half of the 19th century– suffice it to mention Frigyes Schulek and
Imre Steindl. The study reviews the theories in the architectural discourse about
the use of mediaeval architecture in historicism in the period of one hundred years
or so, from Béla Ney to István Medgyaszay, although it is not known exactly how extensive
an influence the 19th century foreign theoreticians exerted with their architectural
theories, aesthetics and philosophy on Hungarian architects