https://m2.mtmt.hu/ hun 2026-08-24 20:29 JournalArticle 33550863 APPROVED true 0 false 2026-07-27T10:20:48.438+0000 2023-07-24T09:05:45.393+0000 2023-01-10T11:54:52.677+0000 true 10049317 Bartha Ildikó /api/admin/10049317 Admin Bartha Ildikó (MTADEKKCS admin 5) true 10049317 2024-01-15T15:06:27.865+0000 2024-01-15T15:06:27.865+0000 true false true 24 24 /api/publicationtype/24 PublicationType Folyóiratcikk 1 true 24 JournalArticle true 10000059 Article true 24 24 /api/publicationtype/24 PublicationType Folyóiratcikk 1 true 24 JournalArticle /api/subtype/10000059 Szakcikk SubType Szakcikk (Folyóiratcikk) 101 true 10000059 true 1 /api/category/1 Category Tudományos true 1 Stachowiak-Kudła, Monika true true /api/journal/10032992 REVIEWED HAGUE JOURNAL ON THE RULE OF LAW 1876-4045 1876-4053 true false 10032992 false 10032992 true 1876-4045 1876-4053 Journal FOREIGN 15 161 190 161 30 2023 Ensuring the proper implementation of academic freedom can be difficult both for policymakers and university authorities. Hence, great emphasis should be given to the defensive function of academic freedom. In this paper, we analyse the legal regulations and the jurisprudence of the constitutional courts of Germany, Hungary, Poland, Portugal, and Spain. We identify who is the holder of academic freedom, how the defensive function of academic freedom works and what academic activities are being protected. The study shows that individual countries emphasise slightly different aspects of the defensive function of academic freedom but remain unanimous on the essence of this function. As academic freedom is not defined unequivocally in most constitutions and legal frameworks, constitutional courts play a significant role in shaping its defensive function. Funding 2021948 /api/funding/2021948 OTKA(134499) Támogató: NKFI false true true 2023 true true true false true false NONE 2026-07-27 false 17 0 14 12 0 13 11 9 4 9 8 8 7 15 2 0 17 15 14 12 0 8 8 Folyóiratcikk Journal Article 24 12 Könyvrészlet Chapter in Book 25 1 Könyv Book 23 1 Egyéb konferenciaközlemény Conference paper 31 0 Egyéb konferenciakötet Conference proceedings 32 0 Oltalmi formák Protection forms 26 0 Disszertáció Thesis 28 1 Egyéb Miscellaneous 29 2 Alkotás Achievement 22 0 Kutatási adat Research data 33 0 Folyóiratcikk Journal Article 24 0 0 0 Könyvrészlet Chapter in Book 25 0 0 0 Könyv Book 23 0 0 0 Egyéb konferenciaközlemény Conference paper 31 0 0 0 Egyéb konferenciakötet Conference proceedings 32 0 0 0 Oltalmi formák Protection forms 26 0 0 0 Disszertáció Thesis 28 0 0 0 Egyéb Miscellaneous 29 0 0 0 Alkotás Achievement 22 0 0 0 Kutatási adat Research data 33 0 0 0 2023 0 4 3 4 3 2024 0 8 7 8 7 2025 0 3 3 3 3 2026 0 2 2 2 2 D1 A nemzetközi false 10033201 false false false 2023-04-10T10:55:10.029+0000 MTA-DE Közszolgáltatási Kutatócsoport (DE / ÁJK); Állam- és Jogtudományi Kar (DE) 1 4 2 4 0 true Language 10002 /api/language/10002 Angol Angol English true 2 true PersonAuthorship 106238353 /api/authorship/106238353 Stachowiak-Kudła, Monika ✉ 1 0.25 true false true Stachowiak-Kudła Monika true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PersonAuthorship 106238354 /api/authorship/106238354 Westa, Sina 2 0.25 false false false Westa Sina true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PersonAuthorship 106238355 /api/authorship/106238355 Santos Botelho, Catarina 3 0.25 false false false Santos Botelho Catarina true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PersonAuthorship 106238356 /api/authorship/106238356 Bartha, Ildikó [Bartha, Ildikó (Jogtudomány), szerző] Állam- és Jogtudományi Kar (DE); MTA-DE Közszolgáltatási Kutatócsoport (DE / ÁJK) 4 0.25 false true false Author 10033201 /api/author/10033201 Bartha Ildikó (Jogtudomány) Bartha Ildikó true 10033201 true Bartha Ildikó true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PublicationIdentifier 22813795 /api/publicationidentifier/22813795 DOI: 10.1007/s40803-022-00188-4 PlainSource 6 /api/publicationsource/6 DOI PublicationSourceType 10001 /api/publicationsourcetype/10001 DOI true true true DOI DOI https://doi.org/@@@ true true 6 true IDENTICAL 10.1007/s40803-022-00188-4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-022-00188-4 false true PublicationIdentifier 23210881 /api/publicationidentifier/23210881 WoS: 000911263500001 PlainSource 1 /api/publicationsource/1 WoS PublicationSourceType 10003 /api/publicationsourcetype/10003 Indexelő adatbázis false true true WoS WoS https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/@@@ true true 1 true IDENTICAL 000911263500001 https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/000911263500001 false true PublicationIdentifier 23210882 /api/publicationidentifier/23210882 Scopus: 85145938302 PlainSource 3 /api/publicationsource/3 Scopus PublicationSourceType 10003 /api/publicationsourcetype/10003 Indexelő adatbázis false true true Scopus Scopus http://www.scopus.com/record/display.url?origin=inward&eid=2-s2.0-@@@ true true 3 true IDENTICAL 85145938302 http://www.scopus.com/record/display.url?origin=inward&eid=2-s2.0-85145938302 false true PublicationIdentifier 22813796 /api/publicationidentifier/22813796 Egyéb URL: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40803-022-00188-4 PlainSource 40 /api/publicationsource/40 Egyéb URL PublicationSourceType 10006 /api/publicationsourcetype/10006 Link true true true Egyéb URL Other URL @@@ true true 40 true https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40803-022-00188-4 https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40803-022-00188-4 false true Classification 12870 /api/classification/12870 Jogtudomány true true MtaRating 514567 /api/mtarating/514567 IX. Állam- és Jogtudományi Bizottság:A nemzetközi HAGUE JOURNAL ON THE RULE OF LAW 1876-4045 1876-4053 RatingType 10006 /api/ratingtype/10006 IX. Állam- és Jogtudományi Bizottság ÁJB Institute 14093 /api/institute/14093 Állam- és Jogtudományi Bizottság IXGJO ÁJB [1901-] 0 false true false Állam- és Jogtudományi Bizottság Állam- és Jogtudományi Bizottság true 14093 true true true A nemzetközi true 14567 true SjrRating 11389249 /api/sjrrating/11389249 sjr:D1 (2023) Scopus - Law HAGUE JOURNAL ON THE RULE OF LAW 1876-4045 1876-4053 42 0.1 journal RatingType 10002 /api/ratingtype/10002 sjr sjr true true ClassificationExternal 3308 /api/classificationexternal/3308 Scopus - Law true 3308 true D1 DIRECT true true Reference 37213031 /api/reference/37213031 1. Aberbach JD, Christensen T (2018) Academic autonomy and freedom under pressure: severely limited, or alive and kicking? Public Organization Review 18(4):487–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-017-0394-2, DOI: 10.1007/s11115-017-0394-2 1 10.1007/s11115-017-0394-2 false true Reference 37213032 /api/reference/37213032 2. Ackermann U (2020) Das Schweigen der Mitte. Intellektuelle in der Polasisierungsfalle. Darmstadt: wbg Theiss. 2 false true Reference 37213033 /api/reference/37213033 3. Alexy R (2000) On the structure of legal principles. Ratio Juris 13(3):294–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9337.00157, DOI: 10.1111/1467-9337.00157 3 10.1111/1467-9337.00157 false true Reference 37213034 /api/reference/37213034 4. Alexy R (2002) A theory of constitutional rights, trans. Oxford University Press, Julian Rivers 4 false true Reference 37213035 /api/reference/37213035 5. Alexy R (2015) On constitutional rights to protection. Legisprudence 3(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521467.2009.11424683, DOI: 10.1080/17521467.2009.11424683 5 10.1080/17521467.2009.11424683 false true Reference 37213036 /api/reference/37213036 6. Ali Nasir M (2018) Negative governmentality through fundamental rights: the far side of the European convention on human. Eur Law J 24(4–5):297–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12242, DOI: 10.1111/eulj.12242 6 10.1111/eulj.12242 false true Reference 37213037 /api/reference/37213037 7. Altbach PG (2001) Academic freedom: International realities and challenges. High Educ 41:205–219. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026791518365, DOI: 10.1023/A:1026791518365 7 10.1023/A:1026791518365 false true Reference 37213038 /api/reference/37213038 8. Andreescu L (2009) Individual academic freedom and aprofessional acts. Educ Theory 59(5):559–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2009.00338.x, DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2009.00338.x 8 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2009.00338.x false true Reference 37213039 /api/reference/37213039 9. Amaral A and Carvalho MT (2003) Autonomy and change in Portuguese higher education. In: Case studies—academic freedom and university institutional responsibility in Portugal. Bononia University Press, pp 35–46 9 false true Reference 37213040 /api/reference/37213040 10. Bánkuti M, Halmai G, Scheppele KL (2012) Disabling the constitution. J Democr 23(3):138–146, DOI: 10.1353/jod.2012.0054 10 10.1353/jod.2012.0054 false true Reference 37213041 /api/reference/37213041 11. Bárd P (2018) The rule of law and academic freedom or the lack of it in Hungary. Euro Political Sci 19(1):87–96. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-018-0171-x, DOI: 10.1057/s41304-018-0171-x 11 10.1057/s41304-018-0171-x false true Reference 37213042 /api/reference/37213042 12. Barnes P (2019) Academic independence, freedom and “enlightenment”: the case of accounting research. Account Hist 24(4):591–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1032373218785192, DOI: 10.1177/1032373218785192 12 10.1177/1032373218785192 false true Reference 37213043 /api/reference/37213043 13. Bazsa G (2014) Metszetek felsőoktatásunk közelmúltjából [Highlights from the Recent History of our Higher Education]. Debrecen: Debreceni Egyetemi Kiadó 13 false true Reference 37213044 /api/reference/37213044 14. Beiter KD, Karran T, Appiagyei-Atua K (2016) Academic freedom and its protection in the law of European states: measuring an International Human Right. Euro J Comparative Law Governance 3:254–345, DOI: 10.1163/22134514-00303001 14 10.1163/22134514-00303001 false true Reference 37213045 /api/reference/37213045 15. Beitz CR (2009) The idea of human rights. Oxford University PressBencze M (2022) “Law Is Not Politics”—the Role of the Liberal View on Law in the Rise of ‘New Populism’, In Manko R, Sulikowski R and Tacik P (eds), Law, Populism and the Political, Routledge (forthcomming) 15 false true Reference 37213046 /api/reference/37213046 16. Ben-David J (1971) The scientist’s role in society, a comparative study. Prentice Hall, New Jersey 16 false true Reference 37213047 /api/reference/37213047 17. Berggren N, Bjørnskov C (2022a) Academic freedom, institutions, and productivity. South Econ J 88(4):1313–1342, DOI: 10.1002/soej.12561 17 10.1002/soej.12561 false true Reference 37213048 /api/reference/37213048 18. Berggren N, Bjørnskov C (2022b) Political institutions and academic freedom: evidence from across the world. Public Choice 190:205–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-021-00931-9, DOI: 10.1007/s11127-021-00931-9 18 10.1007/s11127-021-00931-9 false true Reference 37213049 /api/reference/37213049 19. Berlin I (2004a) [1969]. Introduction. In Liberty. Incorporating four essays on liberty, ed. Henry Hardy, pp. 3–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press 19 false true Reference 37213050 /api/reference/37213050 20. Berlin I (2004b) [1969]. Two Concepts of Liberty. In Liberty. Incorporating four essays on liberty, ed. Henry Hardy, pp. 166–217. Oxford: Oxford University Press, DOI: 10.1093/019924989X.003.0004 20 10.1093/019924989X.003.0004 false true Reference 37213051 /api/reference/37213051 21. Bok D (2003) Universities in the marketplace. Princeton University Press 21 false true Reference 37213052 /api/reference/37213052 22. Boockmann H (1999) Wissen und Widerstand: Geschichte der deutschen Universität. Siedler Verlag 22 false true Reference 37213053 /api/reference/37213053 23. Botelho CS (2017) Aspirational constitutionalism, social rights prolixity and judicial activism: trilogy or trinity? Comparative Constitutional Law and Administrative Law Quarterly 3(4):62–87 23 false true Reference 37213054 /api/reference/37213054 24. Brand LA (2018) Committee on academic freedom: current concerns and initiatives. Rev Middle East Stud 52(2):353–355. https://doi.org/10.1017/rms.2018.95, DOI: 10.1017/rms.2018.95 24 10.1017/rms.2018.95 false true Reference 37213055 /api/reference/37213055 25. Byrne JP (1989) Academic freedom: a “special concern of the First Amendment.” Yale Law J 99(2):251–340, DOI: 10.2307/796588 25 10.2307/796588 false true Reference 37213056 /api/reference/37213056 26. Ceci SJ, Williams WM, Mueller-Johnson K (2006) Is tenure justified? An experimental study of faculty beliefs about tenure, promotion, and academic freedom. Behav Brain Sci 29(6):553–569, DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X06009125 26 10.1017/S0140525X06009125 false true Reference 37213057 /api/reference/37213057 27. Chronowski N, Varju M, Bárd P, Sulyok G (2019) Hungary: constitutional (r)evolution or regression? In: Albi A, Bardutzky S (eds) National constitutions in European and global governance: democracy, rights, the rule of law. Springer, Berlin, pp 1439–1488, DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6265-273-6_31 27 10.1007/978-94-6265-273-6_31 false true Reference 37213058 /api/reference/37213058 28. Cross B, Richardson-Self L (2020) ‘Offensiphobia’ is a red herring: on the problem of censorship and academic freedom. J Ethics 24:31–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-019-09308-z, DOI: 10.1007/s10892-019-09308-z 28 10.1007/s10892-019-09308-z false true Reference 37213059 /api/reference/37213059 29. DeGeorge RT (2003) Ethics, academic freedom and academic tenure. Journal of Academic Ethics 1:11–25. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025421706331, DOI: 10.1023/A:1025421706331 29 10.1023/A:1025421706331 false true Reference 37213060 /api/reference/37213060 30. DeGeorge RT, Block WE, Fuchs RF, McGee RW, Rorty R and Searle JR (1997) Academic Freedom and Tenure: Ethical Issues. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 30 false true Reference 37213061 /api/reference/37213061 31. Donnelly J (2007) The relative universality of human rights. Hum Rights Q 29(2):281–306, DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2007.0016 31 10.1353/hrq.2007.0016 false true Reference 37213062 /api/reference/37213062 32. Freeman M (2022) Human rights. WileyFerejohn J E (2002) Constitutional Review in the Global Context, New York University Journal of Legislation & Public Policy 6(1): 49–60 32 false true Reference 37213063 /api/reference/37213063 33. Fuchs R (1963) Academic freedom: its basic philosophy, function, and history. Law Contemp Probl 28(3):431–446, DOI: 10.2307/1190640 33 10.2307/1190640 false true Reference 37213064 /api/reference/37213064 34. Garlicki L (2001) Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. Komentarz [Commentary to the Constitution of the Republic of Poland], Warszawa 34 false true Reference 37213065 /api/reference/37213065 35. Gomes Canotilho JJ and Vital M (2007) Constituição da República Portuguesa Anotada. vol. I, Coimbra Editora, Coimbra, pp. 913–914 35 false true Reference 37213066 /api/reference/37213066 36. Grimm D (2015) The role of fundamental rights after sixty-five years of constitutional jurisprudence in Germany. Int J Constitutional Law 13(1):9–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mov005, DOI: 10.1093/icon/mov005 36 10.1093/icon/mov005 false true Reference 37213067 /api/reference/37213067 37. Gumport PJ (2000) Academic restructuring: organizational change and institutional imperatives. High Educ 39:67–91. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003859026301, DOI: 10.1023/A:1003859026301 37 10.1023/A:1003859026301 false true Reference 37213068 /api/reference/37213068 38. Guthrie C, Rachlinski JJ, Wistrich AJ (2007) Blinking on the bench: How judges decide cases. Cornell Law Revue 93:1–44 38 false true Reference 37213069 /api/reference/37213069 39. Hansson SO (2019) Academic and non-academic freedom of speech. Theoria 85:339–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12211, DOI: 10.1111/theo.12211 39 10.1111/theo.12211 false true Reference 37213070 /api/reference/37213070 40. Hasnas J (2019) Freedom of expression at the private university. In Downs DA and Surprenant CW (eds) The values and limits of academic speech, Routledge, Forthcoming, DOI: 10.4324/9781351064507-6 40 10.4324/9781351064507-6 false true Reference 37213071 /api/reference/37213071 41. Hayes D (2021) How the university lost its way: sixteen threats to academic freedom. Postdigital Sci Educ 3:7–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00079-2, DOI: 10.1007/s42438-019-00079-2 41 10.1007/s42438-019-00079-2 false true Reference 37213072 /api/reference/37213072 42. Hill D (2011) A Contentious triangle: grading and academic freedom in the academy. High Educ Q 65(1):3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2010.00465.x, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2010.00465.x 42 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2010.00465.x false true Reference 37213073 /api/reference/37213073 43. Hoxhaj A (2021) The CJEU in Commission v Hungary higher education defends academic freedom through WTO provisions. Modern Law Rev. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12686, DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12686 43 10.1111/1468-2230.12686 false true Reference 37213074 /api/reference/37213074 44. Ignatieff M, Roch S (eds) (2018) Academic freedom: the global challenge. Central European University Press, Budapest 44 false true Reference 37213075 /api/reference/37213075 45. Jackson VC (2015) Constitutional law in an age of proportionality. Yale Law Journal 124(8): 3094-3196 45 false true Reference 37213076 /api/reference/37213076 46. Karran T (2007) Academic freedom in Europe: a preliminary comparative analysis. Higher Education Policy 20: 289–313. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300159, DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300159 46 10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300159 false true Reference 37213077 /api/reference/37213077 47. Karran T (2009) Academic freedom in Europe: reviewing Unesco’s recommendation. Br J Educ Stud 57(2):191–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2009.00430.x, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2009.00430.x 47 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2009.00430.x false true Reference 37213078 /api/reference/37213078 48. Kayrooz and Preston (2002) Academic freedom: impressions of Australian social scientists. Minerva 40(1):341–358. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020925721453, DOI: 10.1023/A:1020925721453 48 10.1023/A:1020925721453 false true Reference 37213079 /api/reference/37213079 49. Klatt M, Meister M (2012) Proportionality—a benefit to human rights? Remarks on the I•CON Controversy. Int J Constitutional Law 10(3):687–708. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mos019, DOI: 10.1093/icon/mos019 49 10.1093/icon/mos019 false true Reference 37213080 /api/reference/37213080 50. Kors AC, Silverglate HA (1998) The shadow university: the betrayal of liberty on America’s campuses. Free Press, New York 50 false true Reference 37213081 /api/reference/37213081 51. Kováts G (2015) Recent developments in the autonomy and governance of higher education institutions in Hungary: the introduction of the “chancellor system.” In: Berács J, Iwinska J, Kováts G, Matei L (eds) Central European higher education cooperation conference proceedings. Corvinus University of Budapest Digital Press, Budapest, pp 26–39 51 false true Reference 37213082 /api/reference/37213082 52. Kováts G, Heidrich B, Chandler N (2021) The pendulum strikes back? An analysis of the evolution of Hungarian higher education governance and organisational structures since the 1980s. Euro Educ Res J 16(5):568–587, DOI: 10.1177/1474904117697716 52 10.1177/1474904117697716 false true Reference 37213083 /api/reference/37213083 53. Kováts G, Rónay Z (2021) Academic Freedom in Hungary. Central European University Press, Budapest 53 false true Reference 37213084 /api/reference/37213084 54. Kovács K, Tóth GA (2011) Hungary’s constitutional transformation. Euro Constitutional Law Rev 7(2):183–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019611200038, DOI: 10.1017/S1574019611200038 54 10.1017/S1574019611200038 false true Reference 37213085 /api/reference/37213085 55. Kreimer SF (1984) Allocational sanctions: the problem of negative rights in a positive state. Univ Pa Law Rev 132:1293–1397, DOI: 10.2307/3311891 55 10.2307/3311891 false true Reference 37213086 /api/reference/37213086 56. Kumm M (2004) Constitutional rights as principles: on the structure and domain of constitutional justice. Int J Constitutional Law 2(3):574–596, DOI: 10.1093/icon/2.3.574 56 10.1093/icon/2.3.574 false true Reference 37213087 /api/reference/37213087 57. Kumm M (2007) Political liberalism and the structures of rights: on the place and limits of the proportionality requirement. In Pavlakos G (ed) Law, rights, discourse. The legal philosophy of Robert Alexy, pp. 131–166 57 false true Reference 37213088 /api/reference/37213088 58. Ladányi A (1999) A Magyar felsőoktatás a XX. században [Hungarian Higher Education in the 20th Century]. Budapest: Akadémia Publishing 58 false true Reference 37213089 /api/reference/37213089 59. Landman T (2016) Rigorous morality: norms, values, and the comparative politics of human rights. Hum Rights Q 38(1):1–20, DOI: 10.1353/hrq.2016.0014 59 10.1353/hrq.2016.0014 false true Reference 37213090 /api/reference/37213090 60. Lozano B (1995) La libertad de catedra. Marcial Pons, Madrid 60 false true Reference 37213091 /api/reference/37213091 61. MacCallum GC (1967) Negative and positive freedom. Philosoph Rev 76(3):312–334 61 false true Reference 37213092 /api/reference/37213092 62. MacDonnel V (2013) The constitution as framework for governance. Univ Toronto Law J 63(4):624–654, DOI: 10.3138/utlj.0117 62 10.3138/utlj.0117 false true Reference 37213093 /api/reference/37213093 63. Marginson S (2014) Academic freedom: a global comparative approach. Front Educ China 9:24–41, DOI: 10.1007/BF03397000 63 10.1007/BF03397000 false true Reference 37213094 /api/reference/37213094 64. McKenna JB (1985) University reforms of Spain. Comp Educ Rev 29(4):460–470, DOI: 10.1086/446543 64 10.1086/446543 false true Reference 37213095 /api/reference/37213095 65. Möller K (2012) The global model of constitutional rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford, DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664603.001.0001 65 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664603.001.0001 false true Reference 37213096 /api/reference/37213096 66. Nando Rosales J and Sanz Ponce R (2019). La autonomía del profesorado no universitario: el derecho a la libertad de cátedra. Profesorado. Revista de currículum y formación del profesorado 23(3): 517–534, DOI: 10.30827/profesorado.v23i3.11241 66 10.30827/profesorado.v23i3.11241 false true Reference 37213097 /api/reference/37213097 67. Quinn R, Levine J (2014) Intellectual-HRDs and claims for academic freedom under human rights law. Int J Hum Rights 18(7/8):898–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2014.976203, DOI: 10.1080/13642987.2014.976203 67 10.1080/13642987.2014.976203 false true Reference 37213098 /api/reference/37213098 68. Palfreyman D (2007) Is academic freedom under threat in UK and US higher education? Educ Law 19(1):19–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09539960701231207, DOI: 10.1080/09539960701231207 68 10.1080/09539960701231207 false true Reference 37213099 /api/reference/37213099 69. Perry MJ (2000) The idea of human rights: Four inquiries. Oxford University PressPettit P (1997). Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press 69 false true Reference 37213100 /api/reference/37213100 70. Pogany I (1993) Constitutional reform in Central and Eastern Europe: Hungary’s transition to democracy. Int Comparative Law Q 42(2):332–355, DOI: 10.1093/iclqaj/42.2.332 70 10.1093/iclqaj/42.2.332 false true Reference 37213101 /api/reference/37213101 71. Post R (2012) Democracy, expertise, and academic freedom: a first amendment jurisprudence for the modern state. Yale University Press 71 false true Reference 37213102 /api/reference/37213102 72. Ramanujam N, Wijenayake V (2022) The bidirectional relationship between academic freedom and rule of law: Hungary, Poland and Russia. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-021-00165-3, DOI: 10.1007/s40803-021-00165-3 72 10.1007/s40803-021-00165-3 false true Reference 37213103 /api/reference/37213103 73. Ramshaw A (2019) The case for replicable structured full proportionality analysis in all cases concerning fundamental rights. Leg Stud 39(1):120–142, DOI: 10.1017/lst.2018.18 73 10.1017/lst.2018.18 false true Reference 37213104 /api/reference/37213104 74. Raz J (1986) The morality of freedom. Clarendon Press 74 false true Reference 37213105 /api/reference/37213105 75. Ryder A (2022) The challenge to academic freedom in hungary. a case study in authoritarianism, culture war and resistance, Berlin–Boston: de Gruyter, DOI: 10.1515/9783110749816 75 10.1515/9783110749816 false true Reference 37213106 /api/reference/37213106 76. Rittberger B, Richardson J (2019) What happens when we do not defend academic freedom. J Eur Publ Policy 26(3):324. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1316946, DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1316946 76 10.1080/13501763.2017.1316946 false true Reference 37213107 /api/reference/37213107 77. Rivers J (2014) The presumption of proportionality. Modern Law Revue 77(3):409–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12072, DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12072 77 10.1111/1468-2230.12072 false true Reference 37213108 /api/reference/37213108 78. Rüegg W (1993) Geschichte der Universität in Europe / 1: Mittelalter. Beck, München 78 false true Reference 37213109 /api/reference/37213109 79. Rüegg W (1996) Geschichte der Universität Europe / 2: Von der Reformation zur Französichen Revolution: (1500–1800). Beck, München 79 false true Reference 37213110 /api/reference/37213110 80. Rüegg W (2004). Geschichte der Universität Europa / 3: Vom 19. Jahrhundert zum Zweiten Weltkrieg: (1800 - 1945). München: Beck. 80 false true Reference 37213111 /api/reference/37213111 81. Rüegg W (2010). Geschichte der Universität Europa / 4: Vom Zweiten Weltkrieg bis zum Ende des 20. Jahrhunderts. München: Beck. 81 false true Reference 37213112 /api/reference/37213112 82. Safavi M, Håkanson L (2018) Advancing theory on knowledge governance in universities: a case study of a higher education merger. Stud High Educ 43(3):500–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1180675, DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2016.1180675 82 10.1080/03075079.2016.1180675 false true Reference 37213113 /api/reference/37213113 83. Simhony A (1993) Beyond negative and positive freedom: T.H. Green’s view of freedom. Political Theory 10(1): 28–54, DOI: 10.1177/0090591793021001003 83 10.1177/0090591793021001003 false true Reference 37213114 /api/reference/37213114 84. Simpson RM (2020) The relation between academic freedom and free speech. Ethics 130(3):287–319. https://doi.org/10.1086/707211, DOI: 10.1086/707211 84 10.1086/707211 false true Reference 37213115 /api/reference/37213115 85. Skinner Q (1998) Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 85 false true Reference 37213116 /api/reference/37213116 86. Sklansky DA (2002) Quasi-affirmative rights in constitutional criminal procedure. Virginia Law Review 88(6):1229–1300. https://doi.org/10.2307/1073984, DOI: 10.2307/1073984 86 10.2307/1073984 false true Reference 37213117 /api/reference/37213117 87. Spector H (2010) Four conceptions of freedom. Political Theory 38(6):780–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591710378589, DOI: 10.1177/0090591710378589 87 10.1177/0090591710378589 false true Reference 37213118 /api/reference/37213118 88. Stachowiak-Kudła M (2020) Transnational judicial dialogue in case law related to academic freedom. In Kłos A, Misiuna J, Pachocka M and Szczerba-Zawada A, European Union and its values: Freedom, solidarity and democracy, vol. 1, Warsaw CEDEWU, pp. 17–29 88 false true Reference 37213119 /api/reference/37213119 89. Stachowiak-Kudła M (2021) Academic freedom as a source of rights’ violations: a European perspective. High Educ 82(5):1031–1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00718-3, DOI: 10.1007/s10734-021-00718-3 89 10.1007/s10734-021-00718-3 false true Reference 37213120 /api/reference/37213120 90. Stachowiak-Kudła M (2022) The scope of academic freedom right and the situation of scientists in Poland. Interchange 53:99–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-021-09450-4, DOI: 10.1007/s10780-021-09450-4 90 10.1007/s10780-021-09450-4 false true Reference 37213121 /api/reference/37213121 91. Stachowiak-Kudła M, Kudła J (2017) Financial regulations and the diversification of funding sources in higher education institutions: selected European experiences. Stud High Educ 42(9):1718–1735. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1119109, DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1119109 91 10.1080/03075079.2015.1119109 false true Reference 37213122 /api/reference/37213122 92. Starck C (2000) State duties of protection and fundamental rights. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 3(1):1–51 92 false true Reference 37213123 /api/reference/37213123 93. Suk Gersen J (2022) Academic freedom and discrimination in a polarizing time. Houston Law Review 59:781–801 93 false true Reference 37213124 /api/reference/37213124 94. Stone Sweet A (2013) Constitutional courts. In: Rosenfeld M (ed) Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 816–830 94 false true Reference 37213125 /api/reference/37213125 95. Szadkowski K, Krzeski J (2021) The common good and academic freedom in Poland. High Educ Q. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12349, DOI: 10.1111/hequ.12349 95 10.1111/hequ.12349 false true Reference 37213126 /api/reference/37213126 96. Taylor C (1979) What’s wrong with negative liberty. In: Ryan A (ed) The idea of freedom: Essays in honour of Isaiah Berlin. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 175–193 96 false true Reference 37213127 /api/reference/37213127 97. Tierney WG (2001) Academic freedom and organisational identity. Aust Univ Rev 44(1):7–14 97 false true Reference 37213128 /api/reference/37213128 98. Tóth GA (ed) (2012) Constitution for a disunited nation. On Hungary’s 2011 fundamental law. CEU Press, Budapest 98 false true Reference 37213129 /api/reference/37213129 99. Vrielinka J, Lemmensa P, Parmentiera S and the LERU Working Group on Human Rights (2011) Academic freedom as a fundamental right. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 13: 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.009, DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.009 99 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.009 false true /api/publication/33550863 Stachowiak-Kudła Monika et al. Academic Freedom as a Defensive Right. (2023) HAGUE JOURNAL ON THE RULE OF LAW 1876-4045 1876-4053 15 161-190<div class="JournalArticle Publication long-list"> <div class="authors"> <img title="Forrásközlemény" style="float: left" src="/frontend/resources/grid/publication-core-icon.png"> <img title="Idézőközlemény" style="float: left" src="/frontend/resources/grid/publication-citation-icon.png"> <div class="autype autype0"> <span class="author-name" >Stachowiak-Kudła Monika ✉ </span> ;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span class="author-name" >Westa Sina </span> ;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span class="author-name" >Santos Botelho Catarina </span> ;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span class="author-name" mtid="10033201"><a href="/gui2/?type=authors&mode=browse&sel=10033201" target="_blank">Bartha Ildikó (<span class="authorship-author-name">Bartha Ildikó</span> <span class="authorAux-mtmt"> Jogtudomány</span>) </a> </span> <span class="author-affil"><span title="Debreceni Egyetem">DE</span>/Állam- és Jogtudományi Kar; <span title="Debreceni Egyetem">DE</span>/<span title="Állam- és Jogtudományi Kar">ÁJK</span>/MTA-DE Közszolgáltatási Kutatócsoport</span> </div> </div> <div class="title"><a href="/gui2/?mode=browse&params=publication;33550863" target="_blank">Academic Freedom as a Defensive Right</a></div> <div> <span class="journal-title">HAGUE JOURNAL ON THE RULE OF LAW</span> <span class="journal-issn">(<a target="_blank" href="https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/1876-4045">1876-4045</a> <a target="_blank" href="https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/1876-4053">1876-4053</a>)</span>: <span class="journal-volume">15</span> <span class="page"> pp 161-190 </span> <span class="year">(2023)</span> </div> <div class="pub-footer"> <span class="language" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/html">Nyelv: Angol | </span> <span class="identifiers"> <span class="id identifier oa_none" title="none"> <a style="color:blue" title="10.1007/s40803-022-00188-4" target="_blank" href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-022-00188-4"> DOI </a> </span> <span class="id identifier oa_none" title="none"> <a style="color:blue" title="000911263500001" target="_blank" href="https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/000911263500001"> WoS </a> </span> <span class="id identifier oa_none" title="none"> <a style="color:blue" title="85145938302" target="_blank" href="http://www.scopus.com/record/display.url?origin=inward&eid=2-s2.0-85145938302"> Scopus </a> </span> <span class="id identifier oa_none" title="none"> <a style="color:black" title="https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40803-022-00188-4" target="_blank" href="https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40803-022-00188-4"> Egyéb URL </a> </span> </span> <OnlyViewableByAuthor><div class="ratings"> <div class="journal-subject">Folyóirat szakterülete: Scopus - Law&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;SJR indikátor:&nbsp;D1</div> <div class="journal-subject">Állam- és Jogtudományi Bizottság IXGJO ÁJB [1901-]&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;A nemzetközi</div> </div></OnlyViewableByAuthor> <div class="publication-citation" style="margin-left: 0.5cm;"> <span title="Nyilvános idézőközlemények összesen, említések nélkül" class="citingPub-count">Nyilvános idéző összesen: 17</span> | Független: 15 | Függő: 2 | Nem jelölt: 0 | WoS jelölt: 9 | Scopus jelölt:&nbsp;4 | WoS/Scopus jelölt:&nbsp;9 | DOI jelölt:&nbsp;11 </div> <div class="publication-citation"> <a target="_blank" href="/api/publication?cond=citations.related;eq;33550863&sort=publishedYear,desc&sort=title"> Idézett közlemények száma: 8 </a> </div> <div class="mtid"><span class="long-pub-mtid">Közlemény: 33550863</span> | <span class="status-data status-APPROVED"> Nyilvános </span> Forrás Idéző | <span class="type-subtype">Folyóiratcikk ( Szakcikk ) </span> | <span class="pub-category">Tudományos</span> | <span class="publication-sourceOfData">kézi felvitel</span> </div> <div class="funder"> OTKA(134499) Támogató: NKFI </div> <div class="notDuplums"><a target="_blank" href="/api/publication/33550863/notduplums">3 Nem duplumnak jelölés</a> </div> <div class="lastModified">Utolsó módosítás: 2023.07.24. 11:05 Trencsényi Katalin (DE 4 admin) </div> </div></div>