https://m2.mtmt.hu/ hun 2026-04-05 03:27 JournalArticle 33547360 VALIDATED true 0 false 2026-02-05T09:22:50.889+0000 2023-04-27T07:47:29.385+0000 2023-01-09T07:25:29.712+0000 true 10028399 Bereczki Bálint /api/admin/10028399 Admin Bereczki Bálint (ÓE 5 admin) true 10028399 2024-07-09T13:32:07.641+0000 2024-07-09T13:32:07.641+0000 2023-03-31T07:02:40.247+0000 true 10080205 Szalóky-Siki Ágnes /api/admin/10080205 Admin Szalóky-Siki Ágnes (SE_KK_Admin5_SZSA, admin) true true false true 24 24 /api/publicationtype/24 PublicationType Folyóiratcikk 1 true 24 JournalArticle true 1134514 Survey paper true 24 24 /api/publicationtype/24 PublicationType Folyóiratcikk 1 true 24 JournalArticle /api/subtype/1134514 Összefoglaló cikk SubType Összefoglaló cikk (Folyóiratcikk) 102 true 1134514 true 1 /api/category/1 Category Tudományos true 1 Móga, Kristóf true true /api/journal/10062021 REVIEWED ROBOTICS 2218-6581 true false 10062021 false 10062021 true 2218-6581 Journal FOREIGN 12 1 1 1 15 2023 Background: This article provides a scoping review on the current status of Image-Guided Navigation with various forms of digital technologies, including Extended Reality, Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Displays (AR–HMDs) and Robot-Assisted Surgery (RAS) for Pedicle Screw Placement in orthopedics and spine surgery. Methods: A scoping literature review was performed in the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar and IEEE Xplore databases to collect clinical and user satisfaction data on AR–HMDs and compare those with RAS outcomes. In vivo patient, cadaver and phantom trial accuracy data reports were identified and grouped through the analysis. Over the past two years, 14 publications were retrieved and analyzed. Pedicle screw placement accuracy was described with Linear Tip Error (LTE), Angular Trajectory Error (ATE) and Gertzbein–Robbins Scale (GRS) outcomes. Results: The Pedicle Screw Placement accuracy was seen to increase in the in vivo, cadaver and phantom model groups using AR-HMD compared to the Free-Hand insertion technique. User experience and satisfaction data were limited; however, a clear advantage for the operative results was described when it was added. RAS screwing showed similar accuracy outcomes. The need for benchmarking and quantified situation awareness for AR–HMDs is recognizable. The authors present a method for standardized scoring and visualization of surgical navigation technologies, based on measurements of the surgeon (as the end-users) user satisfaction, clinical accuracy and operation time. Conclusions: computer-technology driven support for spine surgery is well-established and efficient for certain procedures. As a more affordable option next to RAS, AR–HMD navigation has reached technological readiness for surgical use. Ergonomics and usability improvements are needed to match the potential of RAS/XR in human surgeries. Funding 2024308 /api/funding/2024308 (2019-1.3.1-KK-2019-00007) Támogató: NKFIH false true Funding 2024309 /api/funding/2024309 (Horizon2020-2017-RISE-777911) false true Funding 2026259 /api/funding/2026259 Innovációs szolgáltató bázis létrehozása diagnosztikai, terápiás és kutatási célú kiberorvosi ren...(2019-1-3-1-KK-2019-00007) Támogató: NKFIH false true true 2023 true true true false false GOLD 2026-02-05 true https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics12010001 18 0 18 12 6 13 18 16 17 18 18 12 12 12 6 0 18 12 18 12 0 11 11 Folyóiratcikk Journal Article 24 15 Könyvrészlet Chapter in Book 25 3 Könyv Book 23 0 Egyéb konferenciaközlemény Conference paper 31 0 Egyéb konferenciakötet Conference proceedings 32 0 Oltalmi formák Protection forms 26 0 Disszertáció Thesis 28 0 Egyéb Miscellaneous 29 0 Alkotás Achievement 22 0 Kutatási adat Research data 33 0 Folyóiratcikk Journal Article 24 0 0 0 Könyvrészlet Chapter in Book 25 0 0 0 Könyv Book 23 0 0 0 Egyéb konferenciaközlemény Conference paper 31 0 0 0 Egyéb konferenciakötet Conference proceedings 32 0 0 0 Oltalmi formák Protection forms 26 0 0 0 Disszertáció Thesis 28 0 0 0 Egyéb Miscellaneous 29 0 0 0 Alkotás Achievement 22 0 0 0 Kutatási adat Research data 33 0 0 0 2023 0 6 4 6 4 2024 0 10 6 10 6 2025 0 2 2 2 2 Q1 false 10023855,10000698 false false false 2023-03-06T09:09:52.052+0000 Bejczy Antal iRobottechnikai Központ (ÓE / EKIK); Egyetemi Kutató és Innovációs Központ (ÓE); Kísérletes és Sebészeti Műtéttani Tanszék (SE / AOK / K) 3 26 3 3 0 true Language 10002 /api/language/10002 Angol Angol English true 2 true PersonAuthorship 106219600 /api/authorship/106219600 Móga, Kristóf ✉ [Móga, Kristóf János (sebészet, VR/AR/MR), szerző] Egyetemi Kutató és Innovációs Központ (ÓE) 1 0.333 true false true Author 10065486 /api/author/10065486 Móga Kristóf János (sebészet, VR/AR/MR) Móga Kristóf János true true Móga Kristóf true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PersonAuthorship 106219601 /api/authorship/106219601 Ferencz, Andrea [Ferencz, Andrea (Sebészet), szerző] Kísérletes és Sebészeti Műtéttani Tanszék (SE / AOK / K) 2 0.333 false false false Author 10000698 /api/author/10000698 Ferencz Andrea (Sebészet) Ferencz Andrea true 10000698 true Ferencz Andrea true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PersonAuthorship 106219602 /api/authorship/106219602 Haidegger, Tamás [Haidegger, Tamás (orvosi robotika é...), szerző] Bejczy Antal iRobottechnikai Központ (ÓE / EKIK) 3 0.333 false true false Author 10023855 /api/author/10023855 Haidegger Tamás (orvosi robotika és mesterséges intelligencia) Haidegger Tamás true 10023855 true Haidegger Tamás true false false AuthorshipType 1 /api/authorshiptype/1 Szerző 0 true 0 true false true PublicationIdentifier 22805060 /api/publicationidentifier/22805060 DOI: 10.3390/robotics12010001 PlainSource 6 /api/publicationsource/6 DOI PublicationSourceType 10001 /api/publicationsourcetype/10001 DOI true true true DOI DOI https://doi.org/@@@ true true 6 true GOLD true IDENTICAL 10.3390/robotics12010001 https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics12010001 false true PublicationIdentifier 23305129 /api/publicationidentifier/23305129 WoS: 000942257300001 PlainSource 1 /api/publicationsource/1 WoS PublicationSourceType 10003 /api/publicationsourcetype/10003 Indexelő adatbázis false true true WoS WoS https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/@@@ true true 1 true IDENTICAL 000942257300001 https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/000942257300001 true true PublicationIdentifier 23197872 /api/publicationidentifier/23197872 Scopus: 85148892899 PlainSource 3 /api/publicationsource/3 Scopus PublicationSourceType 10003 /api/publicationsourcetype/10003 Indexelő adatbázis false true true Scopus Scopus http://www.scopus.com/record/display.url?origin=inward&eid=2-s2.0-@@@ true true 3 true IDENTICAL 85148892899 http://www.scopus.com/record/display.url?origin=inward&eid=2-s2.0-85148892899 false true Classification 10930 /api/classification/10930 Sebészeti robotika true true SjrRating 11395750 /api/sjrrating/11395750 sjr:Q1 (2023) Scopus - Mechanical Engineering ROBOTICS 2218-6581 127 0.24 journal RatingType 10002 /api/ratingtype/10002 sjr sjr true true ClassificationExternal 2210 /api/classificationexternal/2210 Scopus - Mechanical Engineering true 2210 true Q1 DIRECT true true Reference 37156157 /api/reference/37156157 1. Taylor 2022: Surgical robotics and computer-integrated interventional medicine., Proc. IEEE, 110, p. 823, DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2022.3177693 1 10.1109/JPROC.2022.3177693 false true Reference 37156158 /api/reference/37156158 2. Georgiou 2021: 5G Use in Healthcare: The Future is Present., JSLS J. Soc. Laparosc. Robot. Surg., 25, p. e2021.00064 2 false true Reference 37156159 /api/reference/37156159 3. Fichtinger 2022: Image-guided interventional robotics: Lost in translation?., Proc. IEEE, 110, p. 932, DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2022.3166253 3 10.1109/JPROC.2022.3166253 false true Reference 37156160 /api/reference/37156160 4. Ravindra 2018: Degenerative lumbar spine disease: Estimating global incidence and worldwide volume., Glob. Spine J., 8, p. 784, DOI: 10.1177/2192568218770769 4 10.1177/2192568218770769 false true Reference 37156161 /api/reference/37156161 5. Deepak Awasthi, M., and Najeeb Thomas, M. (2022, November 02). Pedicle Screw Placement. Available online: https://www.medschool.lsuhsc.edu/neurosurgery/nervecenter/tlscrew.html. 5 false true Reference 37156162 /api/reference/37156162 6. Dahdaleh 2014: Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar fractures., Neurosurg. Clin., 25, p. 337, DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2013.12.011 6 10.1016/j.nec.2013.12.011 false true Reference 37156163 /api/reference/37156163 7. Staartjes 2018: Pedicle screw revision in robot-guided, navigated, and freehand thoracolumbar instrumentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis., World Neurosurg., 116, p. 433, DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.159 7 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.159 false true Reference 37156164 /api/reference/37156164 8. Adogwa 2015: Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained of revision fusion for lumbar pseudoarthrosis: Defining the value of surgery., Clin. Spine Surg., 28, p. 101 8 false true Reference 37156165 /api/reference/37156165 9. Amato 2010: Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the lumbosacral spine using conventional technique: Computed tomography postoperative assessment in 102 consecutive patients., J. Neurosurg. Spine, 12, p. 306, DOI: 10.3171/2009.9.SPINE09261 9 10.3171/2009.9.SPINE09261 false true Reference 37156166 /api/reference/37156166 10. Du 2018: Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion among 3 image-guided navigation systems: Systematic review and meta-analysis., World Neurosurg., 109, p. 24, DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.154 10 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.154 false true Reference 37156167 /api/reference/37156167 11. Siller 2019: Indication and technical implementation of the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgeries—A transnational survey in the German-speaking countries., Acta Neurochir., 161, p. 1865, DOI: 10.1007/s00701-019-03974-6 11 10.1007/s00701-019-03974-6 false true Reference 37156168 /api/reference/37156168 12. Khamis 2021: Robotics and intelligent systems against a pandemic., Acta Polytech. Hung., 18, p. 13, DOI: 10.12700/APH.18.5.2021.5.3 12 10.12700/APH.18.5.2021.5.3 false true Reference 37156169 /api/reference/37156169 13. Smith 2020: Automated polyaxial screw placement using a commercial-robot-based, image-guided spine surgery system., IEEE Trans. Med. Robot. Bionics, 3, p. 74, DOI: 10.1109/TMRB.2020.3037339 13 10.1109/TMRB.2020.3037339 false true Reference 37156170 /api/reference/37156170 14. Overley 2017: Navigation and robotics in spinal surgery: Where are we now?., Neurosurgery, 80, p. S86, DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyw077 14 10.1093/neuros/nyw077 false true Reference 37156171 /api/reference/37156171 15. Haidegger 2019: Autonomy for surgical robots: Concepts and paradigms., IEEE Trans. Med. Robot. Bionics, 1, p. 65, DOI: 10.1109/TMRB.2019.2913282 15 10.1109/TMRB.2019.2913282 false true Reference 37156172 /api/reference/37156172 16. Haidegger 2019: Probabilistic Method to Improve the Accuracy of Computer-Integrated Surgical Systems., Acta Polytech. Hung., 16, p. 119, DOI: 10.12700/APH.16.10.2019.10.8 16 10.12700/APH.16.10.2019.10.8 false true Reference 37156173 /api/reference/37156173 17. Menger 2018: A cost-effectiveness analysis of the integration of robotic spine technology in spine surgery., Neurospine, 15, p. 216, DOI: 10.14245/ns.1836082.041 17 10.14245/ns.1836082.041 false true Reference 37156174 /api/reference/37156174 18. (2022, September 09). 3D Slicer Image Computing Platform. Available online: https://https://www.slicer.org/. 18 false true Reference 37156175 /api/reference/37156175 19. Móga, K., Boesl, D.B., and Haidegger, T. (2021, January 16–18). Augmented/Mixed Reality Technologies Supporting Digital Surgery. Proceedings of the IEEE 19th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics (SISY), Subotica, Serbia., DOI: 10.1109/SISY52375.2021.9582533 19 10.1109/SISY52375.2021.9582533 false true Reference 37156176 /api/reference/37156176 20. (2022, August 22). Microsoft HoloLens 2. Available online: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/hololens/industry-healthcare. 20 false true Reference 37156177 /api/reference/37156177 21. (2022, September 22). Philips Showcases Unique Augmented Reality Concept for Image-Guided Minimally Invasive Therapies Developed with Microsoft. Available online: https://www.philips.com/a-w/about/news/archive/standard/news/press/2019/20190224-philips-showcases-unique-augmented-reality-concept-for-image-guided-minimally-invasive-therapies-developed-with-microsoft.html. 21 false true Reference 37156178 /api/reference/37156178 22. (2022, September 22). NDI Navigate New Possibilities. Available online: https://www.ndigital.com/. 22 false true Reference 37156179 /api/reference/37156179 23. Persson 2021: Augmented reality navigation in spine surgery: A systematic review., Acta Neurochir., 163, p. 843, DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-04708-3 23 10.1007/s00701-021-04708-3 false true Reference 37156180 /api/reference/37156180 24. PRISMA (2022, June 22). PRISMA Statement. Available online: http://www.prisma-statement.org/PRISMAStatement/. 24 false true Reference 37156181 /api/reference/37156181 25. Fgaier 2022: Populations, Interventions, and Outcomes in Digital Biomarker-Based Interventions’ Systematic Reviews: A Scoping Review., Value Health, 25, p. S534, DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.04.1293 25 10.1016/j.jval.2022.04.1293 false true Reference 37156182 /api/reference/37156182 26. Molina 2021: Clinical accuracy, technical precision, and workflow of the first in human use of an augmented-reality head-mounted display stereotactic navigation system for spine surgery., Oper. Neurosurg., 20, p. 300, DOI: 10.1093/ons/opaa398 26 10.1093/ons/opaa398 false true Reference 37156183 /api/reference/37156183 27. Li 2021: Treating lumbar fracture using the mixed reality technique., BioMed Res. Int., 2021, p. 6620746 27 false true Reference 37156184 /api/reference/37156184 28. Liu 2021: Clinical accuracy and initial experience with augmented reality–assisted pedicle screw placement: The first 205 screws., J. Neurosurg. Spine, 36, p. 351, DOI: 10.3171/2021.2.SPINE202097 28 10.3171/2021.2.SPINE202097 false true Reference 37156185 /api/reference/37156185 29. Dennler, C., Bauer, D.E., Scheibler, A.G., Spirig, J., Götschi, T., Fürnstahl, P., and Farshad, M. (2021). Augmented reality in the operating room: A clinical feasibility study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 22., DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04339-w 29 10.1186/s12891-021-04339-w false true Reference 37156186 /api/reference/37156186 30. Yahanda 2021: First in-human report of the clinical accuracy of thoracolumbar percutaneous pedicle screw placement using augmented reality guidance., Neurosurg. Focus, 51, p. E10, DOI: 10.3171/2021.5.FOCUS21217 30 10.3171/2021.5.FOCUS21217 false true Reference 37156187 /api/reference/37156187 31. Farshad 2021: First in man in situ augmented reality pedicle screw navigation., N. Am. Spine Soc. J. (NASSJ), 6, p. 100065, DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2021.100065 31 10.1016/j.xnsj.2021.100065 false true Reference 37156188 /api/reference/37156188 32. Bhatt, F.R., Orosz, L.D., Tewari, A., Boyd, D., Roy, R., Good, C.R., Schuler, T.C., Haines, C.M., and Jazini, E. (2022). Augmented Reality-Assisted Spine Surgery: An Early Experience Demonstrating Safety and Accuracy with 218 Screws. Glob. Spine J., 21925682211069321., DOI: 10.1177/21925682211069321 32 10.1177/21925682211069321 false true Reference 37156189 /api/reference/37156189 33. Felix 2022: Augmented Reality Spine Surgery Navigation: Increasing Pedicle Screw Insertion Accuracy for Both Open and Minimally Invasive Spine Surgeries., Spine, 47, p. 865, DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004338 33 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004338 false true Reference 37156190 /api/reference/37156190 34. Spirig 2021: Augmented reality-navigated pedicle screw placement: A cadaveric pilot study., Eur. Spine J., 30, p. 3731, DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06950-w 34 10.1007/s00586-021-06950-w false true Reference 37156191 /api/reference/37156191 35. Farshad 2021: Operator independent reliability of direct augmented reality navigated pedicle screw placement and rod bending., N. Am. Spine Soc. J. (NASSJ), 8, p. 100084, DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2021.100084 35 10.1016/j.xnsj.2021.100084 false true Reference 37156192 /api/reference/37156192 36. Dennler 2021: Augmented Reality Navigated Sacral-Alar-Iliac Screw Insertion., Int. J. Spine Surg., 15, p. 161, DOI: 10.14444/8021 36 10.14444/8021 false true Reference 37156193 /api/reference/37156193 37. Frisk, H., Lindqvist, E., Persson, O., Weinzierl, J., Bruetzel, L.K., Cewe, P., Burström, G., Edström, E., and Elmi-Terander, A. (2022). Feasibility and accuracy of thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement using an augmented reality head mounted device. Sensors, 22., DOI: 10.3390/s22020522 37 10.3390/s22020522 false true Reference 37156194 /api/reference/37156194 38. Yanni 2021: Real-time navigation guidance with intraoperative CT imaging for pedicle screw placement using an augmented reality head-mounted display: A proof-of-concept study., Neurosurg. Focus, 51, p. E11, DOI: 10.3171/2021.5.FOCUS21209 38 10.3171/2021.5.FOCUS21209 false true Reference 37156195 /api/reference/37156195 39. Urakov 2020: Augmented reality-assisted pedicle instrumentation: Versatility across major instrumentation sets., Spine, 45, p. E1622, DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003669 39 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003669 false true Reference 37156196 /api/reference/37156196 40. Gertzbein 1990: Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo., Spine, 15, p. 11, DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199001000-00004 40 10.1097/00007632-199001000-00004 false true Reference 37156197 /api/reference/37156197 41. Zhang 2019: Risk factors for robot-assisted spinal pedicle screw malposition., Sci. Rep., 9, p. 3025, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40057-z 41 10.1038/s41598-019-40057-z false true Reference 37156198 /api/reference/37156198 42. Microsoft (2022, July 13). Hololens. Available online: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/hololens. 42 false true Reference 37156199 /api/reference/37156199 43. Augmedics (2022, July 13). xVision. Available online: https://augmedics.com/. 43 false true Reference 37156200 /api/reference/37156200 44. Fagerlund 2020: Augmented reality navigation with intraoperative 3D imaging vs fluoroscopy-assisted free-hand surgery for spine fixation surgery: A matched-control study comparing accuracy., Sci. Rep., 10, p. 707, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-57693-5 44 10.1038/s41598-020-57693-5 false true Reference 37156201 /api/reference/37156201 45. Hoeckelmann 2015: Current capabilities and development potential in surgical robotics., Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst., 12, p. 61, DOI: 10.5772/60133 45 10.5772/60133 false true Reference 37156202 /api/reference/37156202 46. Stramigioli 2015: Clinical pedicle screw accuracy and deviation from planning in robot-guided spine surgery: Robot-guided pedicle screw accuracy., Spine, 40, p. E986, DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000960 46 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000960 false true Reference 37156203 /api/reference/37156203 47. Khan 2019: Next-generation robotic spine surgery: First report on feasibility, safety, and learning curve., Oper. Neurosurg., 17, p. 61, DOI: 10.1093/ons/opy280 47 10.1093/ons/opy280 false true Reference 37156204 /api/reference/37156204 48. Jiang 2020: Three-dimensional assessment of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement accuracy and instrumentation reliability based on a preplanned trajectory., J. Neurosurg. Spine, 33, p. 519, DOI: 10.3171/2020.3.SPINE20208 48 10.3171/2020.3.SPINE20208 false true Reference 37156205 /api/reference/37156205 49. Lopez, I., Benzakour, A., Mavrogenis, A., Benzakour, T., Ahmad, A., and Lemée, J. (2022). Robotics in spine surgery: Systematic review of literature. Int. Orthop., 1–10., DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05508-9 49 10.1007/s00264-022-05508-9 false true Reference 37156206 /api/reference/37156206 50. Zhang 2021: Comparison of robot-assisted and freehand pedicle screw placement for lumbar revision surgery., Int. Orthop., 45, p. 1531, DOI: 10.1007/s00264-020-04825-1 50 10.1007/s00264-020-04825-1 false true Reference 37156207 /api/reference/37156207 51. Yson 2013: Comparison of cranial facet joint violation rates between open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement using intraoperative 3-D CT (O-arm) computer navigation., Spine, 38, p. E251, DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827ecbf1 51 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827ecbf1 false true Reference 37156208 /api/reference/37156208 52. Tovar 2022: Robot-assisted and augmented reality–assisted spinal instrumentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of screw accuracy and outcomes over the last decade., J. Neurosurg. Spine, 37, p. 299, DOI: 10.3171/2022.1.SPINE211345 52 10.3171/2022.1.SPINE211345 false true Reference 37156209 /api/reference/37156209 53. Zhang, R.J., Zhou, L.P., Zhang, H.Q., Ge, P., Jia, C.Y., and Shen, C.L. (2022). Rates and risk factors of intrapedicular accuracy and cranial facet joint violation among robot-assisted, fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous, and freehand techniques in pedicle screw fixation of thoracolumbar fractures: A comparative cohort study. BMC Surg., 22., DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01502-5 53 10.1186/s12893-022-01502-5 false true Reference 37156210 /api/reference/37156210 54. Garcia 2022: Robotic-assisted vs. nonrobotic-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A cost-utility analysis., Neurosurgery, 90, p. 192, DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001779 54 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001779 false true Reference 37156211 /api/reference/37156211 55. Takács, B., and Haidegger, T. (2021, January 18–20). Fasttracking Technology Transfer in Medical Robotics. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 21st International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics (CINTI), Budapest, Hungary., DOI: 10.1109/CINTI53070.2021.9668590 55 10.1109/CINTI53070.2021.9668590 false true Reference 37156212 /api/reference/37156212 56. Malham 2022: Comparison of novel machine vision spinal image guidance system with existing 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation system: A randomized prospective study., Spine J., 22, p. 561, DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.002 56 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.002 false true Reference 37156213 /api/reference/37156213 57. Ahmad 2022: Intra-operative wearable visualization in spine surgery: Past, present, and future., J. Spine Surg., 8, p. 132, DOI: 10.21037/jss-21-95 57 10.21037/jss-21-95 false true Reference 37156214 /api/reference/37156214 58. Tu 2022: Ultrasound image guided and mixed reality-based surgical system with real-time soft tissue deformation computing for robotic cervical pedicle screw placement., IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 69, p. 2593, DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2022.3150952 58 10.1109/TBME.2022.3150952 false true Reference 37156215 /api/reference/37156215 59. Xu, D.-r., Luan, L.-r., Ma, X.-x., Cong, Z.-c., and Zhou, C.-l. (2022). Comparison of electromagnetic and optical navigation assisted Endo-TLIF in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 23., DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05443-1 59 10.1186/s12891-022-05443-1 false true Reference 37156216 /api/reference/37156216 60. Franz 2014: Electromagnetic tracking in medicine—A review of technology, validation, and applications., IEEE Trans. Med Imaging, 33, p. 1702, DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2321777 60 10.1109/TMI.2014.2321777 false true Reference 37156217 /api/reference/37156217 61. Sirokai, B., Kiss, M., Kovács, L., Benyó, B.I., Benyó, Z., and Haidegger, T. (2022, August 22). Best Practices in Electromagnetic Tracking System Assessment. Available online: https://repozitorium.omikk.bme.hu/bitstream/handle/10890/4783/137019.pdf?sequence=1. 61 false true Reference 37156218 /api/reference/37156218 62. Vasan 2022: A tale of two robots: Operating times and learning curves in robot-assisted lumbar fusion., J. Clin. Neurosci., 97, p. 42, DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.12.027 62 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.12.027 false true Reference 37156219 /api/reference/37156219 63. 2022: Efficacy and safety of robotic spine surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis., J. Orthop. Traumatol., 23, p. 49, DOI: 10.1186/s10195-022-00669-0 63 10.1186/s10195-022-00669-0 false true Reference 37156220 /api/reference/37156220 64. Cofano 2021: Augmented reality in medical practice: From spine surgery to remote assistance., Front. Surg., 8, p. 657901, DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.657901 64 10.3389/fsurg.2021.657901 false true Reference 37156221 /api/reference/37156221 65. Bitkina 2020: Usability and user experience of medical devices: An overview of the current state, analysis methodologies, and future challenges., Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 76, p. 102932, DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2020.102932 65 10.1016/j.ergon.2020.102932 false true Reference 37156222 /api/reference/37156222 66. (2022, August 22). Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction (QUIS). Available online: https://www.umventures.org/technologies/quis%E2%84%A2-questionnaire-user-interaction-satisfaction-0. 66 false true Reference 37156223 /api/reference/37156223 67. Olsson, T. (2013). Human Factors in Augmented Reality Environments, Springer. 67 false true Reference 37156224 /api/reference/37156224 68. Haidegger, T., Kazanzides, P., Rudas, I., Benyó, B., and Benyó, Z. (2010, January 3). The importance of accuracy measurement standards for computer-integrated interventional systems. Proceedings of the EURON GEM Sig Workshop on the Role of Experiments in Robotics Research at IEEE ICRA, Anchorage, AK, USA. 68 false true Reference 37156225 /api/reference/37156225 69. Nagy, T.D., Ukhrenkov, N., Drexler, D.A., Takács, Á., and Haidegger, T. (2019, January 6–9). Enabling quantitative analysis of situation awareness: System architecture for autonomous vehicle handover studies. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC), Bari, Italy., DOI: 10.1109/SMC.2019.8914529 69 10.1109/SMC.2019.8914529 false true Reference 37156226 /api/reference/37156226 70. Woodward, J., and Ruiz, J. (2022). Analytic review of using augmented reality for situational awareness. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., Online ahead of print., DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2022.3141585 70 10.1109/TVCG.2022.3141585 false true Reference 37156227 /api/reference/37156227 71. 2020: Putting Humans Back in the Loop: A Study in Human–Machine Cooperative Learning., Acta Polytech. Hung., 17, p. 191, DOI: 10.12700/APH.17.2.2020.2.11 71 10.12700/APH.17.2.2020.2.11 false true Reference 37156228 /api/reference/37156228 72. Nagy, T.D., and Haidegger, T. (2022). Performance and Capability Assessment in Surgical Subtask Automation. Sensors, 22., DOI: 10.3390/s22072501 72 10.3390/s22072501 false true /api/publication/33547360 Móga Kristóf et al. What Is Next in Computer-Assisted Spine Surgery? Advances in Image-Guided Robotics and Extended Reality. (2023) ROBOTICS 2218-6581 12 1<div class="JournalArticle Publication long-list"> <div class="authors"> <img title="Forrásközlemény" style="float: left" src="/frontend/resources/grid/publication-core-icon.png"> <img title="Idézőközlemény" style="float: left" src="/frontend/resources/grid/publication-citation-icon.png"> <div class="autype autype0"> <span class="author-name" mtid="10065486"><a href="/gui2/?type=authors&mode=browse&sel=10065486" target="_blank">Móga Kristóf ✉ (<span class="authorship-author-name">Móga Kristóf János</span> <span class="authorAux-mtmt"> sebészet, VR/AR/MR</span>) </a> </span> <span class="author-affil"><span title="Óbudai Egyetem">ÓE</span>/Egyetemi Kutató és Innovációs Központ</span> ;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span class="author-name" mtid="10000698"><a href="/gui2/?type=authors&mode=browse&sel=10000698" target="_blank">Ferencz Andrea (<span class="authorship-author-name">Ferencz Andrea</span> <span class="authorAux-mtmt"> Sebészet</span>) </a> </span> <span class="author-affil"><span title="Semmelweis Egyetem">SE</span>/<span title="Általános Orvostudományi Kar">AOK</span>/<span title="Klinikum">K</span>/<span title="Városmajori Szív- és Érgyógyászati Klinika">VAROSMAJOR_SZÍVÉRGYÓGY</span>/Kísérletes és Sebészeti Műtéttani Tanszék</span> ;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <span class="author-name" mtid="10023855"><a href="/gui2/?type=authors&mode=browse&sel=10023855" target="_blank">Haidegger Tamás (<span class="authorship-author-name">Haidegger Tamás</span> <span class="authorAux-mtmt"> orvosi robotika és mesterséges intelligencia</span>) </a> </span> <span class="author-affil"><span title="Óbudai Egyetem">ÓE</span>/<span title="Egyetemi Kutató és Innovációs Központ">EKIK</span>/Bejczy Antal iRobottechnikai Központ</span> </div> </div> <div class="title"><a href="/gui2/?mode=browse&params=publication;33547360" target="_blank">What Is Next in Computer-Assisted Spine Surgery? Advances in Image-Guided Robotics and Extended Reality</a></div> <div> <span class="journal-title">ROBOTICS</span> <span class="journal-issn">( <a target="_blank" href="https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/2218-6581">2218-6581</a>)</span>: <span class="journal-volume">12</span> <span class="journal-issue">1</span> <span class="page"> Paper 1. 15 p. </span> <span class="year">(2023)</span> </div> <div class="pub-footer"> <span class="language" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/html">Nyelv: Angol | </span> <span class="identifiers"> <span class="id identifier oa_GOLD" title=" Gold "> <a style="color:blue" title="10.3390/robotics12010001" target="_blank" href="https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics12010001"> DOI </a> </span> <span class="id identifier oa_none" title="none"> <a style="color:blue" title="000942257300001" target="_blank" href="https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/000942257300001"> WoS </a> </span> <span class="id identifier oa_none" title="none"> <a style="color:blue" title="85148892899" target="_blank" href="http://www.scopus.com/record/display.url?origin=inward&eid=2-s2.0-85148892899"> Scopus </a> </span> </span> <OnlyViewableByAuthor><div class="ratings"> <div class="journal-subject">Folyóirat szakterülete: Scopus - Mechanical Engineering&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;SJR indikátor:&nbsp;Q1</div> <div class="journal-subject">Folyóirat szakterülete: Scopus - Artificial Intelligence&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;SJR indikátor:&nbsp;Q2</div> <div class="journal-subject">Folyóirat szakterülete: Scopus - Control and Optimization&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;SJR indikátor:&nbsp;Q2</div> </div></OnlyViewableByAuthor> <div class="publication-citation" style="margin-left: 0.5cm;"> <span title="Nyilvános idézőközlemények összesen, említések nélkül" class="citingPub-count">Nyilvános idéző összesen: 18</span> | Független: 12 | Függő: 6 | Nem jelölt: 0 | WoS jelölt: 16 | Scopus jelölt:&nbsp;17 | WoS/Scopus jelölt:&nbsp;18 | DOI jelölt:&nbsp;18 </div> <div class="publication-citation"> <a target="_blank" href="/api/publication?cond=citations.related;eq;33547360&sort=publishedYear,desc&sort=title"> Idézett közlemények száma: 11 </a> </div> <div class="mtid"><span class="long-pub-mtid">Közlemény: 33547360</span> | <span class="status-data status-VALIDATED"> Egyeztetett </span> Forrás Idéző | <span class="type-subtype">Folyóiratcikk ( Összefoglaló cikk ) </span> | <span class="pub-category">Tudományos</span> | <span class="publication-sourceOfData">kézi felvitel</span> </div> <div class="funder"> (2019-1.3.1-KK-2019-00007) Támogató: NKFIH, (Horizon2020-2017-RISE-777911), Innovációs szolgáltató bázis létrehozása diagnosztikai, terápiás és kutatási célú kiberorvosi ren...(2019-1-3-1-KK-2019-00007) Támogató: NKFIH </div> <div class="lastModified">Utolsó módosítás: 2023.04.27. 09:47 Bereczki Bálint (ÓE 5 admin) </div> </div></div>