(Open access funding provided by Semmelweis University)
Szakterületek:
Metaanalízis
The early, appropriate management of acute onset dyspnea is important but often challenging.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound
(PoCUS) versus conventional management on clinical outcomes in patients with acute
onset dyspnea. The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and reference lists were searched
to identify eligible trials (inception to October 14, 2021). There were no language
restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and prospective and retrospective
cohort studies that compared PoCUS with conventional diagnostic modalities (controls)
in patients with acute onset dyspnea were included. Two independent reviewers extracted
data and assessed the risk of bias. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. The
primary study outcomes were time to diagnosis, time to treatment, and length of stay
(LOS). Secondary outcomes included rate of appropriate treatment, 30-day re-admission
rate, and mortality. We included eight RCTs and six observational studies with a total
of 5393 participants. Heterogeneity across studies was variable (from low to considerable),
with overall low or moderate study quality and low or moderate risk of bias (except
one article with serious risk of bias). Time to diagnosis (mean difference [MD], -
63 min; 95% CI, - 115 to - 11 min] and time to treatment (MD, - 27 min; 95% CI - 43
to - 11 min) were significantly shorter in the PoCUS group. In-hospital LOS showed
no differences between the two groups, but LOS in the Intensive Care Unit (MD, - 1.27
days; - 1.94 to - 0.61 days) was significantly shorter in the PoCUS group. Patients
in the PoCUS group showed significantly higher odds of receiving appropriate therapy
compared to controls (odds ratio [OR], 2.31; 95% CI, 1.61-3.32), but there was no
significant effect on 30-day re-admission rate and in-hospital or 30-day mortality.
Our results indicate that PoCUS use contributes to early diagnosis and better outcomes
compared to conventional methods in patients admitted with acute onset dyspnea.