Rosiglitazone Does Not Show Major Hidden Cardiotoxicity in Models of Ischemia/Reperfusion
but Abolishes Ischemic Preconditioning-Induced Antiarrhythmic Effects in Rats In Vivo
(NVKP-16-1-2016-0017 National Heart Program) Támogató: NKFIH
(K139237)
(2020-4.1.1.-TKP2020)
Az orvos-, egészségtudományi- és gyógyszerészképzés tudományos műhelyeinek fejlesztése(EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00009)
Támogató: EFOP-VEKOP
(ÚNKP-21-4-I-60)
(Gedeon Richter Ph.D. Scholarship grant)
(RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00003)
(Doctoral Student Scholarship Program of the Co-Operative Doctoral Program of the
Ministry of Innovation and Technology financed by the National Research, Development
and Innovation Fund.)
Szakterületek:
Farmakológia és gyógyszerészet
Orvosi kémia
Clinical observations are highly inconsistent with the use of the antidiabetic rosiglitazone
regarding its associated increased risk of myocardial infarction. This may be due
to its hidden cardiotoxic properties that have only become evident during post-marketing
studies. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the hidden cardiotoxicity of rosiglitazone
in ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury models. Rats were treated orally with either
0.8 mg/kg/day rosiglitazone or vehicle for 28 days and subjected to I/R with or without
cardioprotective ischemic preconditioning (IPC). Rosiglitazone did not affect mortality,
arrhythmia score, or infarct size during I/R. However, rosiglitazone abolished the
antiarrhythmic effects of IPC. To investigate the direct effect of rosiglitazone on
cardiomyocytes, we utilized adult rat cardiomyocytes (ARCMs), AC16, and differentiated
AC16 (diffAC16) human cardiac cell lines. These were subjected to simulated I/R in
the presence of rosiglitazone. Rosiglitazone improved cell survival of ARCMs at 0.3
μM. At 0.1 and 0.3 μM, rosiglitazone improved cell survival of AC16s but not that
of diffAC16s. This is the first demonstration that chronic administration of rosiglitazone
does not result in major hidden cardiotoxic effects in myocardial I/R injury models.
However, the inhibition of the antiarrhythmic effects of IPC may have some clinical
relevance that needs to be further explored.