Történeti életvilágok – modernitás-értelmezési aspektusok

A., Gergely András [A. Gergely, András (Kisebbségszocioló...), szerző] Kulturális Antropológiai Tanszék (ELTE / TATK)

Magyar nyelvű Recenzió/kritika (Folyóiratcikk) Tudományos
  • Irodalomtudományi Bizottság: A
Firstly, Romania through the ages in a historical, cultural and political-ethnographical atlas – focused on evolutional and national studies, and other books of studies with a question the Hungarian ModernisationandNation-state-building in the Era of Dualism – like culture and civilization, imperialism and orientalism, or nations and nationalism, modernity and modernism are concepts that are the scholarly discussion in this essay a double-blind. In that volumes covering the cultures of the coveted, emerging, flourishing and humiliated nation-states of the region of Central and Southeast Europe from the historical models to the twentieth century, takes on the challenges of the difference between modernity, modernism and modernization. When and where was/is modernity, and when and where was/is modernism in the recent historical aspects? Is it modernity or modernities, nationalism or national constructivity? What is the comparative value of scrutinizing a particular region/state, interpretation of nation or nationalisation? What is the consciousness that epochs, periods, and successive generations have of themselves; it consists of images and projections of the self-identities, on the other hand, is the attempt at knowledge, the beginning of reflexions of nation-builders in the growth of centralizing and unifying state institutions with the accompanying development of specialized occupations tied the modernism is seen as the state of mind expressed in opposition to tradition, or as the culture of modernity.
Hivatkozás stílusok: IEEEACMAPAChicagoHarvardCSLMásolásNyomtatás
2024-02-25 19:01