(TKP2021-EGA-23) Támogató: Innovációs és Technológiai Minisztérium
(TKP2021-NVA-12) Támogató: Innovációs és Technológiai Minisztérium
Thematic Excellence Programme (2020-4.1.1.-TKP2020)(NKFIH-1277-2/2020) Támogató: Innovációs
és Technológiai Minisztérium
Nemzeti szívprogram(NVKP_16-1–2016-0017) Támogató: NKFIH
Data on the relevance of anemia in heart failure (HF) patients with an ejection fraction
(EF) > 40% by subgroup—preserved (HFpEF), mildly reduced (HFmrEF) and the newly defined
recovered EF (HFrecEF)—are scarce. Patients with HF symptoms, elevated NT-proBNP,
EF ≥ 40% and structural abnormalities were registered in the HFpEF-HFmrEF database.
We described the outcome of our HFpEF-HFmrEF cohort by the presence of anemia. Additionally,
HFrecEF patients were also selected from HFrEF patients who underwent resynchronization
and, as responders, reached 40% EF. Using propensity score matching (PSM), 75 pairs
from the HFpEF-HFmrEF and HFrecEF groups were matched by their clinical features.
After PMS, we compared the survival of the HFpEF-HFmrEF and HFrecEF groups. Log-rank,
uni-and multivariate regression analyses were performed. From 375 HFpEF-HFmrEF patients,
42 (11%) died during the median follow-up time of 1.4 years. Anemia (HR 2.77; 95%CI
1.47–5.23; p < 0.01) was one of the strongest mortality predictors, which was also
confirmed by the multivariate analysis (aHR 2.33; 95%CI 1.21–4.52; p = 0.01). Through
PSM, the outcomes for HFpEF-HFmrEF and HFrecEF patients with anemia were poor, exhibiting
no significant difference. In HFpEF-HFmrEF, anemia was an independent mortality predictor.
Its presence multiplied the mortality risk in those with EF ≥ 40%, regardless of HF
etiology.