mtmt
The Hungarian Scientific Bibliography
XML
JSON
Public search
Magyarul
Citations
/
Citings
Comparing the effectiveness of shade measurement by intraoral scanner, digital spectrophotometer, and visual shade assessment
Czigola, A. ✉ [Czigola, Alexandra (Fogpótlástan), author] Department of Prosthodontics (SU / FD)
;
Róth, I. [Róth, Ivett (Intraorális szken...), author] Department of Prosthodontics (SU / FD)
;
Vitai, V. [Vitai, Viktória (Fogpótlástan), author] Department of Prosthodontics (SU / FD)
;
Fehér, D. [Fehér, Dóra (Fogpótlástan), author] Department of Prosthodontics (SU / FD)
;
Hermann, P. [Hermann, Péter (Fogpótlástan), author] Department of Prosthodontics (SU / FD)
;
Borbély, J. [Borbély, Judit (Fogpótlástan), author] Department of Prosthodontics (SU / FD)
English Article (Journal Article) Scientific
Published:
JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY 1496-4155 1708-8240
33
(8)
pp. 1166-1174
2021
SJR Scopus - Dentistry (miscellaneous): Q1
Identifiers
MTMT: 32172660
DOI:
10.1111/jerd.12810
WoS:
000685919600001
Scopus:
85112441494
PubMed:
34397163
Subjects:
Clinical medicine
Medical biotechnology
Objective: Trios3 (3Shape, Denmark) intraoral scanner is complete with a tooth shade measurement function, but there is limited information about its efficacy. This in vivo study aimed to evaluate this function in relation to visual and spectrophotometric shade determination. Materials and Methods: Ten dental students from Semmelweis University determined tooth shade for 10 volunteers using Vita A1-D4 (VC) and Vita Linearguide 3D-Master (LG) guides, Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer (ES) and Trios 3 intraoral scanner (TR). First and last patient was always the same (Patient R). Intrapersonal repeatability was calculated. Four selected shades of each tooth were presented to student, supervisor, and patient to select best match. Selection percentages were calculated. The supervisor's best match was the reference (∆E00). Results: Median ∆E00 of Patient R: TR 1.09; VC 1.5; ES 2.35; LG 3.1. The percentages of best match: VC 16.7%.; TR 21.64%; ES 26.58%; LG 34.08%. Median ∆E00 of students' and supervisor's best match: LG 2.73; ES 4.29; TR 4.29; VC 16.35. TR was the most repeatable. The most “best-match shade tabs” were selected using LG. VC shade tabs was the least consistent with the examined teeth. Conclusions: TR can be used for shade selection with a 3D-Master tooth color system with visual verification. Clinical Significance: Correct tooth shade determination is one of the most important step in making esthetic restorations. New shade matching systems have been developed to surpass the visual method of shade determination. There are new intraoral scanners with built-in shade measurement functions. Digital shade determination methods are more independent from the environmental circumstances, and with intraoral scanners, it is easy to measure the tooth shade by taking a digital impression at the same time. These new devices may be a reliable alternative method for shade selection with visual verification. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Cited in (21)
Citing (2)
Citation styles:
IEEE
ACM
APA
Chicago
Harvard
CSL
Copy
Print
2025-04-11 02:48
×
Export list as bibliography
Citation styles:
IEEE
ACM
APA
Chicago
Harvard
Print
Copy