Can Autonomous Agents Without Phenomenal Consciousness Be Morally Responsible?

Bernáth, László [Bernáth, László (Filozófia), szerző] Filozófiai Intézet (HRN BTK); Logika Tanszék (ELTE / BTK / Fil_I)

Angol nyelvű Szakcikk (Folyóiratcikk) Tudományos
Megjelent: PHILOSOPHY AND TECHNOLOGY 2210-5433 2210-5441 34 pp. 1363-1382 2021
  • Filozófiai Tudományos Bizottság: A
  • SJR Scopus - History and Philosophy of Science: D1
Támogatások:
  • (BO/00432/18/2) Támogató: MTA Bolyai pályázat
  • OTKA(131998 PD) Támogató: ITM
  • OTKA(K132911)
  • Intencionalitás - antik, kora modern és kortárs analitikus(123839) Támogató: OTKA
It is an increasingly popular view among philosophers that moral responsibility can, in principle, be attributed to unconscious autonomous agents. This trend is already remarkable in itself, but it is even more interesting that most proponents of this view provide more or less the same argument to support their position. I argue that as it stands, the Extension Argument, as I call it, is not sufficient to establish the thesis that unconscious autonomous agents can be morally responsible. I attempt to show that the Extension Argument should overcome especially strong ethical considerations; moreover, its epistemological grounds are not too solid, partly because the justifications of its premises are in conflict.
Hivatkozás stílusok: IEEEACMAPAChicagoHarvardCSLMásolásNyomtatás
2026-10-17 01:33