Bromelain-based enzymatic debridement of chronic wounds: Results of a multicentre randomized controlled trial

Shoham, Yaron ✉; Shapira, Eyal; Haik, Josef; Harats, Moti; Egozi, Dana; Robinson, Dror; Kogan, Leonid; Elkhatib, Rania; Telek, Geza [Telek, Géza (orvostudomány), szerző] Fogorvostudományi Kar (SE); I. Sz. Sebészeti Klinika Sebészeti Tanszéki Cso... (SE / AOK / K / STGK); Shalom, Avshalom

Angol nyelvű Szakcikk (Folyóiratcikk) Tudományos
Megjelent: WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION 1067-1927 1524-475X 29 (6) pp. 899-907 2021
  • SJR Scopus - Dermatology: Q2
Azonosítók
Szakterületek:
  • Klinikai orvostan
  • Orvos- és egészségtudomány
Chronic wounds are estimated to affect over 6 million people annually in the United States with an estimated annual cost of $25 billion. Debridement represents a key step in their management and is considered a basic necessity to induce the functional process of tissue repair. However, there is an unmet need for an efficient rapid acting non-surgical debridement agent. Bromelain-based enzymatic debridement has been proven to provide an effective, selective and safe non-surgical debridement in deep burns. EscharEx (MediWound Ltd, Yavne, Israel), is a bromelain-based enzymatic debridement agent currently in development for chronic wounds. The aim of this study was to assess its safety and efficacy in chronic wounds. Seventy-three patients suffering from a lower extremity ulcer of diabetic/venous insufficiency/post-surgical/traumatic aetiology were enrolled in a multicentre, assessor blinded, randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized to topical treatment by either EscharEx or its gel vehicle for up to 10 daily 4 hour applications, and then continued follow-up for up to 6 months. The EscharEx arm achieved a significantly higher incidence of complete debridement compared to the gel vehicle arm; 55 versus 29% (p = .047), thus meeting the primary endpoint of this study. The EscharEx and gel vehicle arms achieved similar reductions in wound area, non-viable tissue area and wound healing scores during the debridement period. There were no significant differences between the arms in the incidence of complete wound closure (41% in the EsxcharEx arm vs. 53% in the gel vehicle arm) and in the mean time to complete wound closure (70.0 +/- 32.8 days in the EsxcharEx arm vs. 65.7 +/- 38.4 days in gel vehicle arm). There were no significant safety issues and EscharEx demonstrated a favourable benefit to risk profile.
Hivatkozás stílusok: IEEEACMAPAChicagoHarvardCSLMásolásNyomtatás
2025-04-02 07:51