Total cardiovascular or fatal events in people with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular
risk factors treated with dulaglutide in the REWIND trail: a post hoc analysis
Dagenais, Gilles R. ✉; Ryden, Lars; Leiter, Lawrence A.; Lakshmanan, Mark; Dyal, Leanne; Probstfield, Jeffrey L.; Atisso, Charles Messan; Shaw, Jonathan E.; Conget, Ignacio; Cushman, William C.; Lopez-Jaramillo, Patricio; Lanas, Fernando; Munoz, Ernesto German Cordona; Pirags, Valdis; Pogosova, Nana; Basile, Jan; Sheu, Wayne H. H.; Temelkova-Kurktschiev, Theodora; Raubenheimer, Peter J.; Keltai, Matyas [Keltai, Mátyás (Klinikai kardiológia), szerző] Gottsegen György Országos
Kardiológiai Intézet; Semmelweis Egyetem; Hall, Stephanie; Pais, Prem; Colhoun, Helen M.; Riddle, Matthew C.; Gerstein, Hertzel C.
Background: The Researching cardiovascular Events with a Weekly INcretin in Diabetes
(REWIND) double blind randomized trial demonstrated that weekly subcutaneous dulaglutide
1.5 mg, a glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonist, versus matched placebo reduced
the first outcome of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), cardiovascular death,
nonfatal myocardial infarction or nonfatal stroke (594 versus 663 events) in 9901
persons with type 2 diabetes and either chronic cardiovascular disease or risk factors,
and followed during 5.4 years. These findings were based on a time-to-first-event
analysis and preclude relevant information on the burden of total major events occurring
during the trial. This analysis reports on the total cardiovascular or fatal events
in the REWIND participantsMethods: We compared the total incidence of MACE or non-cardiovascular
deaths, and the total incidence of expanded MACE (MACE, unstable angina, heart failure
or revascularization) or non-cardiovascular deaths between participants randomized
to dulaglutide and those randomized to placebo. Incidences were expressed as number
per 1000 person-years. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using the conditional time
gap and proportional means models.Results: Participants had a mean age of 66.2 years,
46.3% were women and 31% had previous cardiovascular disease. During the trial there
were 1972 MACE or non-cardiovascular deaths and 3673 expanded MACE or non-cardiovascular
deaths. The incidence of total MACE or non-cardiovascular deaths in the dulaglutide
and placebo groups was 35.8 and 40.3 per 1000 person-years, respectively [absolute
reduction = 4.5 per 1000 person-years; conditional time gap HR 0.90 (95% CI, 0.82-0.98)
p = 0.020, and proportional means HR 0.89 (95% CI, 0.80-0.98) p = 0.022]. The incidence
of total expanded MACE or non-cardiovascular deaths in the dulaglutide and placebo
groups was 67.1 and 74.7 per 1000 person-years, respectively [absolute reduction =
7.6 per 1000 person-years; conditional time gap HR 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87-0.99) p = 0.023,
and proportional means HR 0.90 (95% CI, 0.82-0.99) p = 0.028].Conclusions: These findings
suggest that weekly subcutaneous dulaglutide reduced total cardiovascular or fatal
event burden in people with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk.