Modern orvostudományi diagnosztikus eljárások és terápiák fejlesztése transzlációs
megközelítésbe...(EFOP-3.6.2-16-2017-00006) Támogató: EFOP
Thematic Excellence Program (Semmelweis University)(2020-4.1.1.-TKP2020) Támogató:
Innovációs és Technológiai Minisztérium
Szakterületek:
Klinikai orvostan
Objective Although the osteogenic differentiation potential of mesenchymal stem cells
of dental origin is well established, the roles of different marker proteins in this
process remain to be clarified. Our aim was to compare the cellular and molecular
changes, focusing in particular on mesenchymal stem cell markers, during in vitro
osteogenesis in three dental stem cell types: dental follicle stem cells (DFSCs),
periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs) and dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs). Design
Human DFSCs, PDLSCs and DPSCs were isolated, cultured and their osteogenic differentiation
was induced for 3 weeks. Mineralization was assessed by von Kossa staining and calcium
concentration measurements. The expression of mesenchymal and osteogenic markers was
studied by immunocytochemistry and qPCR techniques. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity
and the frequency of STRO-1 positive cells were also quantified. Results The three
cultures all showed abundant mineralization, with high calcium content by day 21.
The expression of vimentin and nestin was sustained after osteogenic induction. The
osteogenic medium induced a considerable elevation of STRO-1 positive cells. By day
7, the ALP mRNA level had increased more than 100-fold in DFSCs, PDLSCs, and DPSCs.
Quantitative PCR results indicated dissimilarities of osteoblastic marker levels in
the three dental stem cell cultures. Conclusions DFSCs, PDLSCs and DPSCs have similar
functional osteogenic differentiation capacities although their expressional profiles
of key osteogenic markers show considerable variations. The STRO-1 positive cell fraction
expands during osteogenic differentiation while vimentin and nestin expression remain
high. For identification of stemness, functional studies rather than marker expressions
are needed.