Patient-reported outcomes with first-line durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide versus
platinum-etoposide in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (CASPIAN): a randomized,
controlled, open-label, phase III study
Goldman, Jonathan W. ✉; Garassino, Marina Chiara; Chen, Yuanbin; Ozguroglu, Mustafa; Dvorkin, Mikhail; Trukhin, Dmytro; Statsenko, Galina; Hotta, Katsuyuki; Ji, Jun Ho; Hochmair, Maximilian J.; Voitko, Oleksandr; Havel, Libor; Poltoratskiy, Artem; Losonczy, Gyorgy [Losonczy, György (Pulmonológia, kli...), szerző] Pulmonológiai Klinika
(SE / AOK / K); Reinmuth, Niels; Patel, Nikunj; Laud, Peter J.; Shire, Norah; Jiang, Haiyi; Paz-Ares, Luis
Objectives: In the phase III CASPIAN study, first-line durvalumab plus etoposide in
combination with either cisplatin or carboplatin (EP) significantly improved overall
survival (primary endpoint) versus EP alone in patients with extensive-stage small-cell
lung cancer (ES-SCLC) at the interim analysis. Here we report patient-reported outcomes
(PROs). Materials and methods: Treatment-naive patients with ES-SCLC received 4 cycles
of durvalumab plus EP every 3 weeks followed by maintenance durvalumab every 4 weeks
until progression, or up to 6 cycles of EP every 3 weeks. PROs, assessed with the
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life
Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) version 3 and its lung cancer module, the Quality
of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer 13 (QLQ-LC13), were prespecified secondary endpoints.
Changes from baseline to disease progression or 12 months in prespecified key disease-related
symptoms (cough, dyspnea, chest pain, fatigue, appetite loss) were analyzed with a
mixed model for repeated measures. Time to deterioration (TTD) of symptoms, functioning,
and global health status/quality of life (QoL) from randomization was analyzed. Results:
In the durvalumab plus EP and EP arms, 261 and 260 patients were PRO-evaluable. Patients
in both arms experienced numerically reduced symptom burden over 12 months or until
progression for key symptoms. For the improvements from baseline in appetite loss,
the between-arm difference was statistically significant, favoring durvalumab plus
EP (difference, 4.5; 99% CI: 9.04, 0.04; nominal p = 0.009). Patients experienced
longer TTD with durvalumab plus EP versus EP for all symptoms (hazard ratio [95% CI]
for key symptoms: cough 0.78 [0.600-1.026]; dyspnea 0.79 [0.625-1.006]; chest pain
0.76 [0.575-0.996]; fatigue 0.82 [0.653-1.027]; appetite loss 0.70 [0.542-0.899]),
functioning, and global health status/QoL. Conclusion: Addition of durvalumab to first-line
EP maintained QoL and delayed worsening of patient-reported symptoms, functioning,
and global health status/QoL compared with EP.