Monte-Carlo-Simulation biometrischer Effektgrößen und deren Einfluss auf das Übersetzungsverhältnis
des Hornhautastigmatismus in den Zylinder torischer Intraokularlinsen [Monte Carlo
simulation of biometric effect sizes and their influence on the translational ratio
of corneal astigmatism in the cylinders of toric intraocular lenses]
Background and objective Toric intraocular lenses (IOL) provide a reliable and predictable
option for permanent correction of corneal astigmatism. In order to determine the
lens strength necessary for achieving the desired correction, the operator can either
use the calculation mode implemented in the biometry device or the calculation service
offered by the lens manufacturer; however, in many cases a classical lens calculation
from biometric data is not carried out but only a simplified estimation, which translates
the corneal astigmatism into the torus of the toric IOL. This translational ratio,
which is mostly used as an average standard value, can however show a substantial
range of variation, so that in a worst case scenario an undercorrection of the refractive
cylinder of up to 12.5 & x202f;% or an overcorrection of up to 17 & x202f;% can result.
The purpose of this study was to elaborate the biometric effect sizes which determine
the relationship between the corneal astigmatism to be corrected and the torus necessary
for a full correction of an IOL. Methods A total of 16,744 datasets were extracted
from the IOLCon web platform and initially the axial position of the IOL implant was
derived independent of a formula, based on the preoperative biometric values and the
postoperative spherical equivalent. Subsequently, based on a ray propagation strategy
for spherocylindrical vergences, the corresponding refractive value of a full correcting
toric IOL was calculated. The translational relationship as a ratio between lens toricity
and corneal astigmatism was analyzed for potential biometric effect sizes with a Monte
Carlo simulation. Results The Monte Carlo simulation showed that the ratio of lens
toricity to corneal astigmatism cannot be assumed as being constant. The analyzed
data revealed an average translational ratio of 1.3938 & x202f;+/- 0.0595 (median
1.3921) with a range from 1.2131 to 1.5974. The axial position of the IOL was found
to have the greatest influence, whereby the more posterior the lens position the higher
the ratio. Due to the correlation of axial eye length and axial lens position, the
eye length can be assumed to be an indirect effect size. The corneal equivalent refractive
strength and the corneal astigmatism have no noteworthy effect on the translational
ratio. Conclusion Many calculation tools on the market simplify toric IOL power calculation
by assuming a constant ratio of lens toricity to corneal astigmatism; however, the
present simulation study showed that such a simplification can lead to clearly incorrect
results. Accordingly, an individual calculation of IOL toricity based on biometric
parameters (e.g. based on vergence propagation matrices or full aperture ray tracing)
is recommended.