Hospital reforms in 11 Central and Eastern European countries between 2008 and 2019: a comparative analysis

Dubas-Jakóbczyk, K. ✉; Albreht, T.; Behmane, D.; Bryndova, L.; Dimova, A.; Džakula, A.; Habicht, T.; Murauskiene, L.; Scîntee, S.G.; Smatana, M.; Velkey, Z. [Velkey, Zita (egészségügyi mene...), author] Egészségügyi Menedzserképző Központ (SU / DHS); Quentin, W.

English Survey paper (Journal Article) Scientific
Published: HEALTH POLICY 0168-8510 1872-6054 124 (4) pp. 368-379 2020
  • Gazdaságtudományi Doktori Minősítő Bizottság: B nemzetközi
  • SJR Scopus - Health Policy: Q1
This paper aims to: (1) provide a brief overview of hospital sector characteristics in 11 Central and Eastern European countries (Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia); (2) compare recent (2008 – 2019) hospital reforms in these countries; and (3) identify common trends, success factors and challenges for reforms. Methods applied involved five stages: (1) a theoretical framework of hospital sector reforms was developed; (2) basic quantitative data characterizing hospital sectors were compared; (3) a scoping review was performed to identify an initial list of reforms per country; (4) the list was sent to national researchers who described the top three reforms based on a standardized questionnaire; (5) received questionnaires were analysed and validated with available literature. Results indicate that the scope of conducted reforms is very broad. Yet, reforms related to hospital sector governance and changes in purchasing and payment systems are much more frequent than reforms concerning relations with other providers. Most governance reforms aimed at transforming hospital infrastructure, improving financial management and/or improving quality of care, while purchasing and payment reforms focused on limiting hospital activities and/or on incentivising a shift to ambulatory/day care. Three common challenges included the lack of a comprehensive approach; unclear outcomes; and political influence. Given similar reform areas across countries, there is considerable potential for shared learning. © 2020 Elsevier B.V.
Citation styles: IEEEACMAPAChicagoHarvardCSLCopyPrint
2023-12-06 12:15