Primary refractory multiple myeloma: a real-world experience with 85 cases

Jurczyszyn, A. ✉; Waszczuk-Gajda, A.; Castillo, J.J.; Krawczyk, K.; Stork, M.; Pour, L.; Usnarska-Zubkiewicz, L.; Potoczek, S.; Hus, I.; Davila, Valls J.; Hari, P.; Chhabra, S.; Gentile, M.; Mikala, G. [Mikala, Gábor (Hematológia), author]; Varga, G. [Varga, Gergely (hematológia), author] III. Department of Internal Medicine (SU / FM / C); Chim, C.S.; Fiala, M.; Vij, R.; Schutz, N.; Rodzaj, M.; Porowska, A.; Vesole, D.H.; Druzd-Sitek, A.; Walewski, J.; Nooka, A.K.

English Article (Journal Article) Scientific
Published: LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA 1042-8194 1029-2403 61 (12) pp. 2868-2875 2020
  • SJR Scopus - Hematology: Q2
Identifiers
This study determined whether 85 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) double-refractory to primary induction therapy with triplet regimens had a homogenous prognosis. The overall response rate (ORR) after the second-line therapy was 51%. Patients who proceeded to immediate autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) had better ORR than those who received conventional therapies (62% vs. 31%). The ORR for patients who had ASCT directly after the frontline therapy was higher than for those treated with other regimens as the second line therapy (91% vs. 45%) and offered ASCT as the third-line therapy (91% vs. 55%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) after the second-line therapy and median overall survival were 21.6 months and 35.6 months, respectively. ASCT after the second line treatment (HR = 0.24) was an independent predictor of PFS. Eligible patients with primary refractory MM achieve the most benefit from ASCT, also performed immediately after first line induction therapy. © 2020, © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Citation styles: IEEEACMAPAChicagoHarvardCSLCopyPrint
2025-04-11 04:47