mtmt
The Hungarian Scientific Bibliography
XML
JSON
Public search
Magyarul
Citations
/
Citings
Efficacy and Safety of iGlarLixi, Fixed-Ratio Combination of Insulin Glargine and Lixisenatide, Compared with Basal-Bolus Regimen in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Propensity Score Matched Analysis
Tabák, Á.G. ✉ [Tabák, Ádám (belgyógyászat, di...), author] I. Department of Internal Medicine (SU / FM / C)
;
Anderson, J.
;
Aschner, P.
;
Liu, M.
;
Saremi, A.
;
Stella, P.
;
Tinahones, F.J.
;
Wysham, C.
;
Meier, J.J.
English Article (Journal Article) Scientific
Published:
DIABETES THERAPY 1869-6953 1869-6961
11
(1)
pp. 305-318
2020
SJR Scopus - Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism: Q2
Identifiers
MTMT: 31209067
DOI:
10.1007/s13300-019-00735-7
WoS:
000504136600001
Scopus:
85076588847
PubMed:
31848983
Subjects:
Clinical medicine
Introduction: Basal-bolus (BB) regimens are generally used to intensify basal insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) not meeting glycemic targets. However, drawbacks include multiple injection burden and risk of weight gain and hypoglycemia. A once-daily titratable fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL and lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) may provide a simple, well-tolerated, and efficacious alternative. We compared these treatments in a post hoc propensity score matched analysis using randomized trial data. Methods: From the LixiLan-L study, 195 patients who had been randomized to iGlarLixi were matched for age, sex, race, T2D duration, baseline body mass index, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose, insulin dose, and metformin use to 195 patients who had been randomized to a BB regimen in the GetGoal Duo-2 trial. Results: At study end, estimated treatment differences for reduction in HbA1c and weight change, and ratio of hypoglycemia events per patient-year (BB vs iGlarLixi) were − 0.28% (standard error 0.08, P = 0.0002), − 1.32 kg (standard error 0.30, P < 0.0001), and 2.85 (P < 0.0001), respectively, all favoring iGlarLixi over BB. Also, proportions of patients reaching individual and composite goals (HbA1c < 7% [< 53 mmol/mol], no weight gain, and no hypoglycemia) were higher in the iGlarLixi compared with the BB treatment group. Gastrointestinal side effects were more common with iGlarLixi. Conclusions: In patients with T2D inadequately controlled on basal insulin, iGlarLixi offers an effective alternative to BB regimen for reducing HbA1c, without increased risk of hypoglycemia and weight gain. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02058160 (LixiLan-L trial); NCT01768559 (GetGoal Duo-2 trial). Plain Language Summary: Plain language summary available for this article. © 2019, The Author(s).
Cited in (20)
Citation styles:
IEEE
ACM
APA
Chicago
Harvard
CSL
Copy
Print
2025-04-10 21:18
×
Export list as bibliography
Citation styles:
IEEE
ACM
APA
Chicago
Harvard
Print
Copy