Repeated afternoon sleep recordings indicate first‐night‐effect‐like adaptation process in family dogs

Reicher, Vivien ✉ [Reicher, Vivien (Etológia), author]; Kis, Anna [Vargáné Kis, Anna (Etológia), author] Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology; Simor, Péter [Simor, Péter Dániel (Pszichológia), author] Department of Behavioral Sciences (SU / FM / I); Department of Affective Psychology (ELTE / Pszich_Int); Bódizs, Róbert [Bódizs, Róbert (Alváskutatás), author] Department of Behavioral Sciences (SU / FM / I); Gombos, Ferenc [Gombos, Ferenc (Pszichológia), author] Department of General Psychology (PPCU / DPszich); MTA-PPKE Adolescent Development Research Group (PPCU); Gácsi, Márta [Gácsi, Márta (Etológia), author] Department of Ethology (ELTE / ELU FoS / Bio_I); MTA-ELTE Comparative Ethology Research Group (ELTE / ELU FoS / Bio_I)

English Article (Journal Article) Scientific
Published: JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH 0962-1105 1365-2869 29 (6) Paper: e12998 , 10 p. 2020
  • SJR Scopus - Behavioral Neuroscience: Q1
Identifiers
Subjects:
  • Evolution of mind and cognitive functions, animal communication
  • Psychology
  • Psychology (including human - machine relations)
  • SOCIAL SCIENCES
  • Science
The importance of dogs (Canis familiaris) in sleep research is primarily based on their comparability with humans. In spite of numerous differences, dogs' comparable sleep pattern, as well as several phenotypic similarities on both the behavioural and neural levels, make this species a most feasible model in many respects. Our aim was to investigate whether the so‐called first‐night effect, which in humans manifests as a marked macrostructure difference between the first and second sleep occasions, can be observed in family dogs. We used a non‐invasive polysomnographic method to monitor and compare the characteristics of dogs' (N = 24) 3‐hr‐long afternoon naps on three occasions at the same location. We analysed how sleep macrostructure variables differed between the first, second and third occasions, considering also the effects of potential confounding variables such as the dogs' age and sleeping habits. Our findings indicate that first‐night effect is present in dogs' sleep architecture, although its specifics somewhat deviate from the pattern observed in humans. Sleep macrostructure differences were mostly found between occasions 1 and 3; dogs slept more, had less wake after the first drowsiness episode, and reached drowsiness sleep earlier on occasion 3. Dogs, which had been reported to sleep rarely not at home, had an earlier non‐rapid eye movement sleep, a shorter rapid eye movement sleep latency, and spent more time in rapid eye movement sleep on occasion 3, compared with occasion 1. Extending prior dog sleep data, these results help increase the validity of further sleep electroencephalography investigations in dogs.
Citation styles: IEEEACMAPAChicagoHarvardCSLCopyPrint
2025-04-02 03:04