Would depositors pay to show that they do not withdraw? Theory and experiment

Kinateder, M; Kiss, H J [Kiss, Hubert János (közgazdaságtan), author] Institute of Economics (MTA KRTK); Közgazdaságtan Intézet (CUB); Pintér, Á

English Article (Journal Article) Scientific
Published: EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS 1386-4157 1573-6938 23 pp. 873-894 2020
  • Gazdaságtudományi Doktori Minősítő Bizottság: A nemzetközi
  • SJR Scopus - Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous): D1
Identifiers
Fundings:
  • MTA KRTK
  • (NKFIH-1163-10/2019) Funder: NKFIH
  • NKFIH(K 119683)
  • (ECO2017-82449-P) Funder: Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness
In a Diamond–Dybvig type model of financial intermediation, we allow depositors to announce at a positive cost to subsequent depositors that they keep their funds deposited in the bank. Theoretically, the mere availability of public announcements (and not its use) ensures that no bank run is the unique equilibrium outcome. Multiple equilibria—including bank run—exist without such public announcements. We test the theoretical results in the lab and find a widespread use of announcements, which we interpret as an attempt to coordinate on the no bank run outcome. Withdrawal rates in general are lower in information sets that contain announcements.
Citation styles: IEEEACMAPAChicagoHarvardCSLCopyPrint
2025-04-02 02:06