{ "labelLang" : "hun", "responseDate" : "2024-03-29 01:06", "content" : { "otype" : "JournalArticle", "mtid" : 30917118, "status" : "VALIDATED", "published" : true, "unhandledTickets" : 0, "deleted" : false, "lastRefresh" : "2022-06-30T21:37:15.911+0000", "lastModified" : "2020-08-27T17:47:05.216+0000", "created" : "2019-11-14T11:23:51.842+0000", "creator" : { "otype" : "Admin", "mtid" : 10070381, "link" : "/api/admin/10070381", "label" : "Demecs Éva (BCE 4 admin)", "familyName" : "Demecs", "givenName" : "Éva", "published" : true, "snippet" : true }, "validated" : "2020-08-27T17:47:01.482+0000", "validator" : { "otype" : "Admin", "mtid" : 565, "link" : "/api/admin/565", "label" : "WoS import (admin)", "familyName" : "WoS", "givenName" : "import", "published" : true, "snippet" : true }, "core" : false, "citation" : true, "publicationPending" : false, "type" : { "otype" : "PublicationType", "mtid" : 24, "link" : "/api/publicationtype/24", "label" : "Folyóiratcikk", "code" : 24, "otypeName" : "JournalArticle", "listPosition" : 1, "published" : true, "oldId" : 24, "snippet" : true }, "subType" : { "otype" : "SubType", "mtid" : 10000059, "link" : "/api/subtype/10000059", "label" : "Szakcikk (Folyóiratcikk)", "name" : "Szakcikk", "nameEng" : "Article", "docType" : { "otype" : "PublicationType", "mtid" : 24, "link" : "/api/publicationtype/24", "label" : "Folyóiratcikk", "code" : 24, "otypeName" : "JournalArticle", "listPosition" : 1, "published" : true, "oldId" : 24, "snippet" : true }, "listPosition" : 101, "published" : true, "oldId" : 10000059, "snippet" : true }, "category" : { "otype" : "Category", "mtid" : 1, "link" : "/api/category/1", "label" : "Tudományos", "published" : true, "oldId" : 1, "snippet" : true }, "languages" : [ { "otype" : "Language", "mtid" : 10002, "link" : "/api/language/10002", "label" : "Angol", "name" : "Angol", "nameEng" : "English", "published" : true, "oldId" : 2, "snippet" : true } ], "firstAuthor" : "Pena, Julio", "authorships" : [ { "otype" : "PersonAuthorship", "mtid" : 88772373, "link" : "/api/authorship/88772373", "label" : "Pena, Julio", "listPosition" : 1, "share" : 0.0, "first" : true, "last" : false, "corresponding" : false, "familyName" : "Pena", "givenName" : "Julio", "authorTyped" : true, "editorTyped" : false, "otherTyped" : false, "type" : { "otype" : "AuthorshipType", "mtid" : 1, "link" : "/api/authorshiptype/1", "label" : "Szerző", "code" : 0, "published" : true, "oldId" : 0, "snippet" : true }, "published" : false, "snippet" : true }, { "otype" : "PersonAuthorship", "mtid" : 88772374, "link" : "/api/authorship/88772374", "label" : "Nápoles, Gonzalo", "listPosition" : 2, "share" : 0.0, "first" : false, "last" : false, "corresponding" : false, "familyName" : "Nápoles", "givenName" : "Gonzalo", "authorTyped" : true, "editorTyped" : false, "otherTyped" : false, "type" : { "otype" : "AuthorshipType", "mtid" : 1, "link" : "/api/authorshiptype/1", "label" : "Szerző", "code" : 0, "published" : true, "oldId" : 0, "snippet" : true }, "published" : false, "snippet" : true }, { "otype" : "PersonAuthorship", "mtid" : 88772375, "link" : "/api/authorship/88772375", "label" : "Salgueiro, Yamisleydi", "listPosition" : 3, "share" : 0.0, "first" : false, "last" : true, "corresponding" : false, "familyName" : "Salgueiro", "givenName" : "Yamisleydi", "authorTyped" : true, "editorTyped" : false, "otherTyped" : false, "type" : { "otype" : "AuthorshipType", "mtid" : 1, "link" : "/api/authorshiptype/1", "label" : "Szerző", "code" : 0, "published" : true, "oldId" : 0, "snippet" : true }, "published" : false, "snippet" : true } ], "title" : "Explicit methods for attribute weighting in multi-attribute decision-making: a review study", "identifiers" : [ { "otype" : "PublicationIdentifier", "mtid" : 16108070, "link" : "/api/publicationidentifier/16108070", "label" : "DOI: 10.1007/s10462-019-09757-w", "source" : { "otype" : "PlainSource", "mtid" : 6, "link" : "/api/publicationsource/6", "label" : "DOI", "type" : { "otype" : "PublicationSourceType", "mtid" : 10001, "link" : "/api/publicationsourcetype/10001", "label" : "DOI", "mayHaveOa" : true, "published" : true, "snippet" : true }, "name" : "DOI", "nameEng" : "DOI", "linkPattern" : "https://doi.org/@@@", "publiclyVisible" : true, "published" : true, "oldId" : 6, "snippet" : true }, "validState" : "IDENTICAL", "idValue" : "10.1007/s10462-019-09757-w", "realUrl" : "https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10462-019-09757-w", "published" : false, "snippet" : true }, { "otype" : "PublicationIdentifier", "mtid" : 17292342, "link" : "/api/publicationidentifier/17292342", "label" : "WoS: 000534130800001", "source" : { "otype" : "PlainSource", "mtid" : 1, "link" : "/api/publicationsource/1", "label" : "WoS", "type" : { "otype" : "PublicationSourceType", "mtid" : 10003, "link" : "/api/publicationsourcetype/10003", "label" : "Indexelő adatbázis", "mayHaveOa" : false, "published" : true, "snippet" : true }, "name" : "WoS", "nameEng" : "WoS", "linkPattern" : "http://gateway.isiknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?&GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=CustomerName&SrcApp=CustomerName&DestLinkType=FullRecord&KeyUT=@@@&DestApp=WOS", "publiclyVisible" : true, "published" : true, "oldId" : 1, "snippet" : true }, "validState" : "IDENTICAL", "idValue" : "000534130800001", "realUrl" : "http://gateway.isiknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?&GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=CustomerName&SrcApp=CustomerName&DestLinkType=FullRecord&KeyUT=000534130800001&DestApp=WOS", "published" : false, "snippet" : true }, { "otype" : "PublicationIdentifier", "mtid" : 16108071, "link" : "/api/publicationidentifier/16108071", "label" : "Egyéb URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10462-019-09757-w", "source" : { "otype" : "PlainSource", "mtid" : 40, "link" : "/api/publicationsource/40", "label" : "Egyéb URL", "type" : { "otype" : "PublicationSourceType", "mtid" : 10006, "link" : "/api/publicationsourcetype/10006", "label" : "Link", "mayHaveOa" : true, "published" : true, "snippet" : true }, "name" : "Egyéb URL", "nameEng" : "Egyéb URL", "linkPattern" : "@@@", "publiclyVisible" : true, "published" : true, "oldId" : 40, "snippet" : true }, "idValue" : "http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10462-019-09757-w", "realUrl" : "http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10462-019-09757-w", "published" : false, "snippet" : true } ], "journal" : { "otype" : "Journal", "mtid" : 543, "link" : "/api/journal/543", "label" : "ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW 0269-2821 1573-7462", "pIssn" : "0269-2821", "eIssn" : "1573-7462", "reviewType" : "REVIEWED", "noIF" : false, "sciIndexed" : true, "scopusIndexed" : true, "lang" : "FOREIGN", "hungarian" : false, "published" : true, "oldId" : 543, "snippet" : true }, "volume" : "2019", "internalId" : "online", "firstPageOrInternalIdForSort" : "online", "publishedYear" : 2019, "digital" : true, "printed" : true, "sourceYear" : 2019, "foreignEdition" : true, "foreignLanguage" : true, "fullPublication" : true, "conferencePublication" : false, "nationalOrigin" : false, "missingAuthor" : false, "oaType" : "NONE", "oaCheckDate" : "2022-06-30", "oaFree" : false, "citationCount" : 0, "citationCountUnpublished" : 0, "citationCountWoOther" : 0, "independentCitCountWoOther" : 0, "doiCitationCount" : 0, "wosCitationCount" : 0, "scopusCitationCount" : 0, "independentCitationCount" : 0, "unhandledCitationCount" : 0, "citingPubCount" : 0, "independentCitingPubCount" : 0, "unhandledCitingPubCount" : 0, "citedPubCount" : 1, "citedCount" : 1, "ratings" : [ { "otype" : "MtaRating", "mtid" : 510816, "link" : "/api/mtarating/510816", "label" : "I. Nyelvtudományi Bizottság:INT2 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW 0269-2821 1573-7462", "ratingType" : { "otype" : "RatingType", "mtid" : 10005, "link" : "/api/ratingtype/10005", "label" : "I. Nyelvtudományi Bizottság", "code" : "Nyelvtud Biz", "institute" : { "otype" : "Institute", "mtid" : 14076, "link" : "/api/institute/14076", "label" : "Nyelvtudományi Bizottság I.NYIO [1900-]", "childrenCount" : 0, "allowInstForum" : false, "allowOnlineRegistration" : true, "name" : "Nyelvtudományi Bizottság", "nameEng" : "Nyelvtudományi Bizottság", "published" : true, "oldId" : 14076, "snippet" : true }, "published" : true, "snippet" : true }, "val" : "INT2", "published" : true, "oldId" : 10816, "snippet" : true }, { "otype" : "SjrRating", "mtid" : 10826877, "link" : "/api/sjrrating/10826877", "label" : "sjr:D1 (2019) Scopus - Language and Linguistics ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW 0269-2821 1573-7462", "listPos" : 38, "rankValue" : 0.1, "type" : "journal", "ratingType" : { "otype" : "RatingType", "mtid" : 10002, "link" : "/api/ratingtype/10002", "label" : "sjr", "code" : "sjr", "published" : true, "snippet" : true }, "subject" : { "otype" : "ClassificationExternal", "mtid" : 1203, "link" : "/api/classificationexternal/1203", "label" : "Scopus - Language and Linguistics", "published" : true, "oldId" : 1203, "snippet" : true }, "ranking" : "D1", "calculation" : "DIRECT", "published" : true, "snippet" : true } ], "ratingsForSort" : "D1", "mtaRatingsForSort" : "INT2", "referenceList" : "Allahi S, Mobin M, Vafadarnikjoo A, Salmon C (2015) An integrated AHP-GIS-MCLP method to locate bank branches. In: Proceedings of the (2015) industrial and systems engineering research conference Nashville. Tenn, USA; Aznar Bellver J, Martínez FG (2005) Nuevos métodos de valoración, 1-192. Editorial Universidad Politécnica de Valencia Madrid, Spain; Bana e Costa C, Vansnick JC, (1999) The MacBeth approach: basic ideas, software and an application. In: Meskens N, Roubens M (eds) Advances in decision analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Chicago, USA, pp 131–157DOI:10.1007/978-94-017-0647-6_9; Bao T, Xie X, Long P, Wei Z (2017) MADM method based on prospect theory and evidential reasoning approach with unknown attribute weights under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 88:305–317DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.07.012; Bottomley PA, Doyle JR (2001) A comparison of three weight elicitation methods: good, better, and best. Omega 29:553–560DOI:10.1016/S0305-0483(01)00044-5; Chen T (2014) Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy QUALIFLEX method with a likelihood-based comparison approach for multiple criteria decision analysis. Inf Sci 261:149–169DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2013.08.054; Chen T, Li C (2010) Determining objective weights with intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measures: a comparative analysis. Inf Sci 180:4207–4222DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2010.07.009; Chen T, Li C (2011) Objective weights with intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measures and computational experiment analysis. Appl Soft Comput J 11(8):5411–5423DOI:10.1016/j.asoc.2011.05.018; Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (1998) Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision-making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 97:33–48DOI:10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00339-9; Chin KS, Wang YM, Poon GK, Yang JB (2009) Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach. Comput Oper Res 36(6):1768–1779DOI:10.1016/j.cor.2008.05.002; Chin K, Fu C, Wang Y (2015) A method of determining attribute weights in evidential reasoning approach based on incompatibility among attributes. Comput Ind Eng 87:150–162DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2015.04.016; Churchman CW, Ackoff RL, Arnoff EL (1957) Introduction to operations research. Wiley, New York; Deng H, Yeh CH, Willis RJ (2000) Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Comput Oper Res 27:963–973DOI:10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00069-6; Deng M, Yang J, Xu W (2004) Evidential reasoning and mathematical. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 3(3):419–428DOI:10.1142/S0219622004001124; Diakoulaki D, Mavrotas G, Papayannakis L (1995) Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the critic method. Comput Oper Res 22:763–770DOI:10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H; Doyle JR, Green RH, Bottomley PA (1997) Judging relative importance: direct rating and point allocation are not equivalent. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 70(1):65–72DOI:10.1006/obhd.1997.2694; Edwards W (1977) How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet 7(5):325–340DOI:10.1109/TSMC.1977.4309720; Edwards W, Hutton BF (1994) SMARTS and SMARTER: improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurament. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 60:306–325DOI:10.1006/obhd.1994.1087; Efendi YG (2010) Efektivitas Iklan Televisi Indosat IM3 “Online-Saykoji” Berdasarkan Direct Rating Method (DRM). Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Tesis Sarjana dalam Ilmu Sosial. http://e-journal.uajy.ac.id/id/eprint/3226 . Accessed Jan 2019; Fan Z, Ma J, Zhang Q (2002) An approach to multiple attribute decision making based on fuzzy preference information on alternatives. Fuzzy Sets Syst 131:101–106DOI:10.1016/S0165-0114(01)00258-5; Farhadinia B, Xu Z (2017) Distance and aggregation-based methodologies for hesitant fuzzy decision making, cognitive computation. Cognit Comput 9(1):81–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-016-9436-2DOI:10.1007/s12559-016-9436-2; Farhadinia B, Xu Z (2018) Ordered weighted hesitant fuzzy information fusion-based approach to multiple attribute decision making with probabilistic linguistic term sets. Fundamenta Informaticae 159:361–383DOI:10.3233/FI-2018-1668; Figueira J, Roy B (2002) Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos. Eur J Oper Res 139:317–326DOI:10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00370-8; Fu C, Wang Y (2015) An interval difference based evidential reasoning approach with unknown attribute weights and utilities of assessment grades. Comput Ind Eng 81:109–117DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2014.12.031; Fu C, Yang SL (2010) The group consensus based evidential reasoning approach for multiple attributive group decision analysis. Eur J Oper Res 206(3):601–608DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2010.03.011; Fu C, Yang SL (2011) An attribute weight based feedback model for multiple attributive group decision analysis problems with group consensus requirements in evidential reasoning context. Eur J Oper Res 202(1):179–189DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2011.01.040; Fu C, Yang SL (2012) An evidential reasoning based consensus model for multiple attribute group decision analysis problems with interval-valued group consensus requirements. Eur J Oper Res 223:167–176DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.048; Fu C, Huhns M, Yang SL (2014) A consensus framework for multiple attribute group decision analysis in an evidential reasoning context. Inf Fusion 17:22–35DOI:10.1016/j.inffus.2011.12.002; Guo S (2017) Application of entropy weight method in the evaluation of the road capacity of open area. In: AIP conference proceedings (the American Institute of Physics)DOI:10.1063/1.4982485; Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F (2001) Multiperson decision making based on multiplicative preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 129(2):372–385DOI:10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00197-6; Horowitz I, Zappe C (1995) The linear programming alternative to policy capturing for eliciting criteria weights in the performance appraisal process. Omega 23(6):667–676DOI:10.1016/0305-0483(95)00039-9; Horsky D, Rao MR (1984) Estimation of attribute weights from preference comparisons. Manag Sci 30(7):801–822DOI:10.1287/mnsc.30.7.801; Jahan A, Mustapha F, Sapuan SM, Yusof Ismail Md, Bahraminasab M (2012) A framework for weighting of criteria in ranking stage of material selection process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58:411–420DOI:10.1007/s00170-011-3366-7; Jin F, Pei L, Chen H, Zhou L (2014) Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy continuous weighted entropy and its application to multi-criteria fuzzy group decision making. Knowl Based Syst 59:132–141DOI:10.1016/j.knosys.2014.01.014; Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value-tradeoffs. Wiley, New York; Khan MSA, Abdullah S, Ali A, Siddiqui N, Amin F (2017) Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy sets and their application to group decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 33:3971–3985. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-17811DOI:10.3233/JIFS-17811; Khan MSA, Ali A, Abdullah S, Amin F, Hussain F (2018) New extension of TOPSIS method based on pythagorean hesitant fuzzy sets with incomplete weight information. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 35:5435–5448. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-171190DOI:10.3233/JIFS-171190; Kim SH, Ahn BS (1999) Interactive group decision making procedure under incomplete information. Eur J Oper Res 116:498–507DOI:10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00040-X; Lai YJ, Liu TY, Hwang CL (1994) TOPSIS for MODM. Eur J Oper Res 76(3):486–500DOI:10.1016/0377-2217(94)90282-8; Lee JH, Han BJ, Lim HJ, Kim YD, Saxena N, Chung TM (2009) Optimizing access point allocation using genetic algorithmic approach for smart home environments. Comput J 52:938–949DOI:10.1093/comjnl/bxn053; Li DF (1999) Fuzzy multiattribute decision-making models and methods with incomplete preference information. Fuzzy Sets Syst 106:113–119DOI:10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00272-8; Li DF (2011) Closeness coefficient based nonlinear programming method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multiattribute decision making with incomplete preference information. Appl Soft Comput 11:3402–3418DOI:10.1016/j.asoc.2011.01.011; Li M, Wu C (2016) A distance model of intuitionistic fuzzy cross entropy to solve preference problem on alternatives. Math Probl Eng 08:1–9; Liang GS (1999) Fuzzy MCDM based on ideal and antiPts. Eur J Oper Res 112:682–691DOI:10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00410-4; Liang W, Zhang X, Liu M (2015) The maximizing deviation method based on interval-valued pythagorean fuzzy weighted aggregating operator for multiple criteria group decision analysis. Discrete Dyn Nat Soc. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/746572DOI:10.1155/2015/746572; Liu S, Chan FTS, Ran W (2016) Decision making for the selection of cloud vendor: an improved approach under group decision-making with integrated weights and objective/subjective attributes. Expert Syst Appl 55:37–47DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.01.059; Ma J, Fan ZP, Huang LH (1999a) A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights. Eur J Oper Res 112:397–404DOI:10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00141-6; Ma J, Zhang Q, Zhou D, Fan ZP (1999b) A subjective and objective integrated approach to multiple attribute decision making with preference information on alternatives, pp 1–19; Park DG, Kwun YC, Park JH, Park IY (2009) Correlation coefficient of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application to multiple attribute group decision making problems. Math Comput Model 50(9–10):1279–1293DOI:10.1016/j.mcm.2009.06.010; Park JH, Park IY, Kgun YC, Tan X (2011) Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision making problems under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Appl Math Model 35:2544–2556DOI:10.1016/j.apm.2010.11.025; Pecchia L, Crispino F, Morgan SP (2014) A software tool to support the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and the user need elicitation of medical devices via the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). In: Zhang YT (ed) The international conference on health informatics. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 42. Springer, Cham, pp 292–295DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-03005-0_74; Pei Z (2013) Rational decision making models with incomplete weight information for production line assessment. Inf Sci 222:696–716DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2012.07.060; Qi X, Liang C, Zhang J (2015) Generalized cross-entropy based group decision making with unknown expert and attribute weights under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Comput Ind Eng 79:52–64DOI:10.1016/j.cie.2014.10.017; Ram M (2018) Advanced fuzzy logic approaches in engineering science (advances in mechatronics and mechanical engineering). IGI Global, Philadelphia; Rao RV, Patel BK, Parnichkun M (2011) Industrial robot selection using a novel decision making method considering objective and subjective preferences. Robot Auton Syst 59(6):367–375DOI:10.1016/j.robot.2011.01.005; Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15:234–281DOI:10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5; Shirland LE, Jesse RR, Thompson RL, Iacovou CL (2003) Determining attribute weights using mathematical programming. Omega 31:423–437DOI:10.1016/S0305-0483(03)00081-1; Solymosi T, Dombi J (1986) A method for determining the weights of criteria: the centralized weights. Eur J Oper Res 26:35–41DOI:10.1016/0377-2217(86)90157-8; Sun Q, Jiewen O (2015) Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with entropy-weighted method. Manag Sci Eng 9(3):1–6; Valkenhoef G, Tervonen T (2016) Entropy-optimal weight constraint elicitation with additive multi-attribute utility models. Omega 64:1–12DOI:10.1016/j.omega.2015.10.014; Wan S, Dong J (2015) Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy mathematical programming method for hybrid multi-criteria group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy truth degrees. Inf Fusion 26:49–65DOI:10.1016/j.inffus.2015.01.006; Wan SP, Li DF (2013) Fuzzy LINMAP approach to heterogeneous MADM considering comparisons of alternatives with hesitation degrees. Omega 41:925–940DOI:10.1016/j.omega.2012.12.002; Wan S, Li D (2014) Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy programming method for heterogeneous multiattribute group decision making with Atanassov’s intuitionistic. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(2):300–312DOI:10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2253107; Wan S, Xu G, Wang F, Dong J (2015) A new method for Atanassov’s interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MAGDM with incomplete attribute weight information. Inf Sci 316(168):329–347DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2015.04.019; Wang Y (2005) On fuzzy multiattribute decision-making models and methods with incomplete preference information. Fuzzy Sets Syst 151:285–301DOI:10.1016/j.fss.2004.08.015; Wang YM, Fu GW (1993) Using multiobjective decision making method to make decision for multiattributes. Control Decis 8(1):25–29; Wang W, Liu X (2013) The multi-attribute decision making method based oninterval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Einstein hybrid weighted geometric operator. Comput Math Appl 66:1845–1856DOI:10.1016/j.camwa.2013.07.020; Wang Y, Luo Y (2010) Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making. Math Comput Model 51(1–2):1–12DOI:10.1016/j.mcm.2009.07.016; Wang Y, Parkan C (2006) A general multiple attribute decision-making approach for integrating subjective preferences and objective information. Fuzzy Sets Syst 157:1333–1345DOI:10.1016/j.fss.2005.11.017; Wang YM, Yang JB, Xu DL (2006) Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach. Eur J Oper Res 174(3):1885–1913DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.09.059; Xu Z, Zhang X (2013) Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowl Based Syst 52:53–64DOI:10.1016/j.knosys.2013.05.011; Yager RR (2013) Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. In: Proceedings of joint IFSA world congress and NAFIPS annual meeting, Edmonton, Canada, pp 57–61DOI:10.1109/IFSA-NAFIPS.2013.6608375; Yang JB (2001) Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainties. Eur J Oper Res 131:31–61DOI:10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00441-5; Yang JB, Wang YM, Xu DL, Chin KS (2006) The evidential reasoning approach for MADA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties. Eur J Oper Res 171:309–343DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.09.017; Ye J (2013) Multiple attribute group decision-making methods with completely unknown weights in intuitionistic fuzzy setting and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy setting. Group Decis Negot 22:173–188DOI:10.1007/s10726-011-9255-5; Zhang Y (2015) TOPSIS method based on entropy weight for supplier evaluation of power grid enterprise. In: 2nd international conference on education reform and modern management. https://download.atlantis-press.com/article/20912.pdf . Accessed Oct 2018DOI:10.2991/ermm-15.2015.88; Zhang X (2016) Multicriteria Pythagorean fuzzy decision analysis: a hierarchical QUALIFLEX approach with the closeness index-based ranking methods. Inf Sci 330:104–124DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2015.10.012; Zhang X, Xu Z (2014) Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 29(12):1061–1078DOI:10.1002/int.21676; Zhang Q, Chen JCH, Chong PP (2004) Decision consolidation: criteria weight determination using multiple preference formats. Decis Support Syst 38:247–258DOI:10.1016/S0167-9236(03)00094-0; Zhang Y, Wang Y, Wang J (2014) Objective attributes weights determining based on Shannon information entropy in hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Math Probl Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/463930DOI:10.1155/2014/463930; Zhou DN (2000) Fuzzy group decision support system approach to group decision making under multiple criteria. Ph.D. Dissertation, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. https://scholars.cityu.edu.hk/en/theses/theses(7e93bfc7-acd8-4b8d-bc06-c8082316bac0).html . Accessed Oct 2018; Zhou L, Tao Z, Chen H, Liu J (2014) Continuous interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to group decision making. Appl Math Model 38:2190–2205DOI:10.1016/j.apm.2013.10.036;", "hasCitationDuplums" : false, "directInstitutesForSort" : "", "ownerAuthorCount" : 2, "ownerInstituteCount" : 18, "directInstituteCount" : 0, "authorCount" : 3, "contributorCount" : 0, "hasQualityFactor" : true, "link" : "/api/publication/30917118", "label" : "Pena Julio et al. Explicit methods for attribute weighting in multi-attribute decision-making: a review study. (2019) ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW 0269-2821 1573-7462 2019", "template" : "